Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
16 hours ago, Pinnacle said:

LOl guys says it normal, its not. And they wont fix it its been discussed here to no end and there isnt a pinpoint solution. I think there was several guys here that had the engine shimmed, different drive shafts, rear end rebuilt and several sets of different tires and they still had some vibration.  Good luck with it, thats one of the few problems with them. Honestly, Id cancel the deal.  I had countless problems with my 2014

they changed every part but the one that's failing, the torque converter!!!!

  • Sad 1
Posted
4 hours ago, Bryan Glenn said:

Good news, dealership just agreed to unwind the deal and take the truck back. Shame, love the power and feel of the truck (aside from the vibration issues). Good luck to everyone. 

 

Anyone have any idea what truck out there is truly reliable. I feel like I can google transmission nightmares with everything but the Tundras.

 

Thanks

 

Cool beans!!  Good for you! 

 

My opinion...GM knows what the issue is, or issues are, that cause the shakes.  What ever the issue it's prolly an expensive fix so GM skirts the problem, and shoves it up the buyers ass.  Check out the '19 and '20 forums and see if there are members talking about shake.  If not it's obvious (to me) that GM knows the cause and has made corrections.

 

My '16 Silverado 4x4 Z71 has the shakes, but "it's within spec".  GM and the dealer both suck.  After 50 years of driving GMs I'll likely be looking at other brands when it's new truck time.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Willyone said:

 

Cool beans!!  Good for you! 

 

My opinion...GM knows what the issue is, or issues are, that cause the shakes.  What ever the issue it's prolly an expensive fix so GM skirts the problem, and shoves it up the buyers ass.  Check out the '19 and '20 forums and see if there are members talking about shake.  If not it's obvious (to me) that GM knows the cause and has made corrections.

 

My '16 Silverado 4x4 Z71 has the shakes, but "it's within spec".  GM and the dealer both suck.  After 50 years of driving GMs I'll likely be looking at other brands when it's new truck time.

I am trying to figure out what brand that is going to be. My research is landing me back to the same place over and over...Toyota Tundra. They are gas hogs, they aren't glamorous and lack technology and comfort but at least it will stay out of the shop. Damn shame

Posted
5 hours ago, flyingfool said:

they changed every part but the one that's failing, the torque converter!!!!

I have to say, having been in the same boat with my 2016 that I bought new and had NO idea about what the issue was until it was too late, it's good you got out.  I thought my issue (before I googled it and found this forum) was a bent rim.  In fact, I thought because I bought a set of 20" Foose rims used, that it was the issue and ordered a new Foose rim and the whole set was bad.  Discount tire told me at the time that was the issue.  I then bought a factory set of 22" Black rims and still had the issue.  It was then I found this forum and it had passed the time I could do anything about it and after $2k in tires and wheels traded in and got my new 2019.  I have NO issue of any kind on my 2019 and although I loved my 2016 (and still miss it), the 2019 has proven to be the right choice.  If you're still considering Chevy, the 2019 has kept me happy.  Although, I am a Chevy man, this whole thing has left a bad taste in my mouth that Chevy isn't stepping up.  Good luck, very happy that I at least found out it was my the Shake issue but sad about the cost incurred to get there.

Posted
46 minutes ago, Rmiles2314 said:

I have to say, having been in the same boat with my 2016 that I bought new and had NO idea about what the issue was until it was too late, it's good you got out.  I thought my issue (before I googled it and found this forum) was a bent rim.  In fact, I thought because I bought a set of 20" Foose rims used, that it was the issue and ordered a new Foose rim and the whole set was bad.  Discount tire told me at the time that was the issue.  I then bought a factory set of 22" Black rims and still had the issue.  It was then I found this forum and it had passed the time I could do anything about it and after $2k in tires and wheels traded in and got my new 2019.  I have NO issue of any kind on my 2019 and although I loved my 2016 (and still miss it), the 2019 has proven to be the right choice.  If you're still considering Chevy, the 2019 has kept me happy.  Although, I am a Chevy man, this whole thing has left a bad taste in my mouth that Chevy isn't stepping up.  Good luck, very happy that I at least found out it was my the Shake issue but sad about the cost incurred to get there.

i think a recall on the entire rear wheel drive line up or cars and trucks would cripple an already weak company. GM ignores it and and stalls the lawyers in court for as long as possible, and hope it last past warrantee , eventually get you into the next model. 

Posted
15 hours ago, Bryan Glenn said:

I am trying to figure out what brand that is going to be. My research is landing me back to the same place over and over...Toyota Tundra. They are gas hogs, they aren't glamorous and lack technology and comfort but at least it will stay out of the shop. Damn shame

Appears you have your chops set on a Tundra.  So, suggest you go ahead and buy one.

concerning the dreaded Chevy Shake;  I’ve been on this forum since the early days and I’ve observed some very heated debates about the cause.  To date, I’m not aware of anyone nailing a specific root cause.  I have my own theory but not going into it now.  However, I agree with the posted who stated GM knows.  I’ve been lurking on the 2020 forum some and have not seen any posts about the Chevy Shake.  So, appears GM May have corrected it and eliminated the problem.  We shall see.

 

about engines;  agree with the positive comments about the Tundra engine.  However, the GM 5.3 and 6.2 are sound tried and true engines as well.  These pushrod/cam-in-block engine trace their heritage back to the original Chevy 1955 265 ci engine and the design has evolved over the years to its current state.  Not getting into the pros and cons of pushrods vs ohc engines.  A topic for another day.  Calf rope.

 

Posted (edited)

i would stick to pushrod motors...GM , or DOdge trucks... the whole global economy is getting locked down, you might have issues in the future with parts from other countries.... keep it domestic for reliability.  

 

I did have a dodge ram promaster city van , the radio had issue , but since the truck and radio was built in Turkey i cant get warrantee support for the components. but this is not the same parts supplier for the Doge ram truck line up. so they should be safe.

Edited by flyingfool
Posted
On 5/26/2020 at 3:30 PM, Bryan Glenn said:

I am trying to figure out what brand that is going to be. My research is landing me back to the same place over and over...Toyota Tundra. They are gas hogs, they aren't glamorous and lack technology and comfort but at least it will stay out of the shop. Damn shame

 

I haven't looked into the Tundra or haunted a Toyota forum. But I notice on Craigslist the Tundra seems to hold its value better than other truck brands, or at least the asking prices are up there.  The smaller Tacoma seems to be a pretty popular choice around my area.  And judging from some of the news videos, apparently the Taliban think it's a pretty good machine gun platform LOL.

Posted
17 hours ago, Willyone said:

 

I haven't looked into the Tundra or haunted a Toyota forum. But I notice on Craigslist the Tundra seems to hold its value better than other truck brands, or at least the asking prices are up there.  The smaller Tacoma seems to be a pretty popular choice around my area.  And judging from some of the news videos, apparently the Taliban think it's a pretty good machine gun platform LOL.

Lol, yeh, those Tacoma’s appear the platform of choice across the Middle East.  Back here in the USA there’s a large almost cult following for the Tacoma.  Good clean used one’s often sell for almost as much as new ones.  However, I’m staying with my full size Silverado just in case the Zombie Apocalypse breaks out.  Might need a platform larger than a Tacoma, lol ?!! 

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Snoringbear said:

Lol, yeh, those Tacoma’s appear the platform of choice across the Middle East.  Back here in the USA there’s a large almost cult following for the Tacoma.  Good clean used one’s often sell for almost as much as new ones.  However, I’m staying with my full size Silverado just in case the Zombie Apocalypse breaks out.  Might need a platform larger than a Tacoma, lol ?!! 

 

Silverado.... throw them zombies in the box and shake their brains out LOL.  I actually like the stance of the Tacoma.  Never really looked at them up close and personal, but they seem to come OEM with good size tires and good ground clearance.  Don't know if I could live with an Asian truck in my driveway though. But I guess they're made/assembled here in America, so....

 

I don't really need a full size truck any more.  Hell, my '16 hasn't ever done an honest days work other than towing a UHaul after buying a couple of motorcycles from out of state.  I could prolly get by with a Tacoma or one of the other mid size brands.  But most of the mid size trucks cost about the same as a full size, comparably equiped. At least that was what I saw in August of 2016 when I bought my viber.  And gas mileage isn't much better with the smaller gas trucks either.  Being mostly retired now, I don't really give ****** about MPG.  If I was willing to spend the coin I'd opt for a 6.2 next time around, if I were to go for another GM. But as we all know, sadly, GM isn't inclined to do the right thing.

Edited by Willyone
Posted
19 hours ago, Willyone said:

 

Silverado.... throw them zombies in the box and shake their brains out LOL.  I actually like the stance of the Tacoma.  Never really looked at them up close and personal, but they seem to come OEM with good size tires and good ground clearance.  Don't know if I could live with an Asian truck in my driveway though. But I guess they're made/assembled here in America, so....

 

I don't really need a full size truck any more.  Hell, my '16 hasn't ever done an honest days work other than towing a UHaul after buying a couple of motorcycles from out of state.  I could prolly get by with a Tacoma or one of the other mid size brands.  But most of the mid size trucks cost about the same as a full size, comparably equiped. At least that was what I saw in August of 2016 when I bought my viber.  And gas mileage isn't much better with the smaller gas trucks either.  Being mostly retired now, I don't really give ****** about MPG.  If I was willing to spend the coin I'd opt for a 6.2 next time around, if I were to go for another GM. But as we all know, sadly, GM isn't inclined to do the right thing.

Lol, well, “knock on wood”.  I don’t have a shaker.  My big aggravation is the low speed hard shift between 1st and 2nd.  The recommended TSB helped but didn’t totally eliminate the problem.  But, back on topic;  while a  mid-size would take care of my needs same as you, I’m a big guy and thereby prefer a full-size truck.  And, as you pointed out there’s little if any economic advantage in driving the smaller truck.  Btw, I have the 6.2 and it tows my 6,000 lb TT great.  And, mileage is good too.  

Posted
2 hours ago, Snoringbear said:

Lol, well, “knock on wood”.  I don’t have a shaker.  My big aggravation is the low speed hard shift between 1st and 2nd.  The recommended TSB helped but didn’t totally eliminate the problem.  But, back on topic;  while a  mid-size would take care of my needs same as you, I’m a big guy and thereby prefer a full-size truck.  And, as you pointed out there’s little if any economic advantage in driving the smaller truck.  Btw, I have the 6.2 and it tows my 6,000 lb TT great.  And, mileage is good too.  

 

I've driven full size trucks 99% of the time since my early to mid 20s, for about 45 years ... dam I'm getting old LOL.  After that many years ya kind'a get used to driving a truck.  Only reason I would want a 6.2, or equivalent power in a brand X, is for the fun factor.  You have the 6.2, and I'm jealous!!   My bright red Chebby now has just over 30K for mileage so I'll be keeping it for a while.  But when the China virus fear factor blows over I might go kick a tire or two.

Posted
2 hours ago, Willyone said:

 

I've driven full size trucks 99% of the time since my early to mid 20s, for about 45 years ... dam I'm getting old LOL.  After that many years ya kind'a get used to driving a truck.  Only reason I would want a 6.2, or equivalent power in a brand X, is for the fun factor.  You have the 6.2, and I'm jealous!!   My bright red Chebby now has just over 30K for mileage so I'll be keeping it for a while.  But when the China virus fear factor blows over I might go kick a tire or two.

You and I have traveled similar paths when it comes to cars;  I’ve been driving a truck since 1975.  Bought a brand new standard cab long bed with in-line 6 engine.  Had am radio and dealer installed AC.  Everything else was standard, 3 on the tree, no power anything.  During the oil embargo hung a twenty gal saddle tank on the right side. Drove the piss out of that truck.  

Posted

Long time member but no posts for year and a half with this dreaded shake and vibration problem issue jumping in here.  A little ownership history here.

2012 LTZ crew 4X4 6.2 with 3.73 tow package gears.  Real hot rod with zero shake issues and no other problems.

2015 High Country crew 4X4 6.2 8-speed with 3.23 gears.  Shake, shake, shake in the 70-83 mph range. Follow on details below.  K2XX platform.

2018 High Country crew 4X4 6.2 8-speed with 3.23 gears.  Shakes not as bad at different speeds 68-78 mph range.  K2XX platform.

 

Shake issues taken to 3 different Chevy and 1 GMC dealers all under the bumper to bumper warranty with under 20k miles with the 2015. Loss of use time

in the 90 day range (GM furnished rental or loaner truck) and many parts and wheels/tires replaced to no avail.  GM engineer brought in twice and no help.

Standard factory answer..."within specs".  So before doing anything that may put me in jail I got BBB involved.  They were great to work with and totally

unbiased as they should be.  At this stage I was open to GM's buy back program.  With several back and forth negotiations by BBB with GM it went nowhere.  GM's offer was totally unacceptable using different formulas only a idiot would consider.  I have stacks of paperwork at that point but no solution.  Having personally known the  General Manager of the nearby  Chevy dealership he bent over backwards to rectify the situation and made me an offer I liked by trading in for a identically equipped new 2018.  So far can live with its mild come and go shakes and only 9k miles and 1 tire replaced

with the RFB out of tolerance.  As they say, "like the truck, hate the ride".

 

Had many, many great  and problem free Chevy half ton pickups last 50 years with these last 2 the worst.  Also had 2 new Dodge and 7 new Ford 1-ton dually diesels for towing OTR purposes that worked great.  I am old school and Chevy has been my 1st choice all along but open to ideas with Ford and Ram in the future.  Would be interesting to see if the Mexican built trucks have more or all of these problems versus the I believe (Fort Wayne) Indiana

plant.  I want "Built in the USA" on any future vehicle I may look at.  The Asian trucks may be good and some assembled here but all the profits go back to Tokyo and Seoul.  

 

Stay safe and healthy!

 

 

Posted

Tell you a funny story about my 6.2.  Not long after I bought it I decided to take it out on the interstate and see what it would do.  So, chose a stretch of road that was nice and straight with no traffic and put the petal to the metal. Well, my bad ass 6.2 took of like a striped ape.clicked through the numbers on the speedo at a rapid rate.  So, as it approached 100 mph I’m thinking Wow, I’m thinking this this thing might do 120 mph or more.  Then... the speedo hit 98 mph and the truck speed flattened out and would do no more.  So, I’m wondering what the heck just happen.  Big disappointment; big bad @$$ engine won’t even do 100?  Well, you know the rest of the story.  Come to find out the truck has a speed limiter set at 98 mph ?.  I since found out that youngsters often buy a tuner and remove the speed limiter setting.  But, being old and such never bothered ?...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • He is not saying that an SAE *W20 will have more viscosity than a *W40 due to MORE VII polymers. He is saying that although multiple *W40 may post in the PDS the same or similar 100 C and 150 C viscosities that the blenders choice of modifier TYPE and AMOUNT to get his chosen base to grade will not give identical real world viscosities in shear and at temperature. All will pass the SII test but not all will pass the 100 C HTHS (unpublished value) testing the blender does and relies on to get the required by law "percentage improvement' referenced to his last great work.    Tis the problem with the lie. Once told others are required to support it. 
    • I have a `25, 1500 that auto sets on incline. Never knew that at first. I have the electronic shifter. Just think if it didn`t do that? Unlike a mechanical shift that you can muscle out of park, how would you get this thing out? That would be a problem.   What I found out later is, I don`t have to push the button to release. Just put it in gear.   Setting parameters? Don`t know if it`s possible.
    • 2023 GMC 3500 HD, SLE, 6.6L Gas, 4x4, 6 Spd Options:  SLE Convenience Package; Driver Alert Package 1; Spray on Bedliner; X31 Off Road Package; TRAILERING MIRRORS, HEATED POWER -ADJUSTABLE, AUTO DIMMING, WITH TURN INDICATORS WHEELHOUSE LINERS, REAR INC. REAR AXLE - 3.73 RATIO INC. GVWR, 11,350 LBS. (5148 KG) INC. FRONT AND REAR PARK ASSIST, INC. ULTRASONIC     I have been launching my new boat and noticed some things related to the parking brake.. I usually set the parking brake (habit) when on flat ground for typical driving.    When backed down on the launch ramp to launch the boat and I place gear selector into Park, the parking brake activates automatically. My second nature is to set parking brake manually and noticed I was turing the parking brake off.  The parking brake appears to be setting itself automatically.   I looked all over my owner's manual and only found references to being on an incline and manually setting parking brake, or at times parking brake will be auto engaged, but nothing specific to my situation.    When is the parking brake automatically engaged?  Under what specific circumstances?  Can the auto set parameters be changed?     I like the auto set feature.  It would be nice if always engaged when shifted into Park and released when shifted out of Park (like my wifes 2025 RAV4).   Thanks!    
    • www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...