Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

We as of this morning new radio and HMI programming is a no go for fixing the radio reception on my truck. If anything it has made my stations reception even worse which makes me wonder if the dealership missed something when putting the truck back together.

 

Waiting on GM engineer to get back with me on the next step.

Posted

Sorry that they did not fix your truck, I have not heard from GM or the dealer since December, I guess if I want to listen to the radio its an F-150 or a Tundra. After ten trips to dealer truck is finally ok except for the radio. Very disappointed in the way GM has handled this concern.

Posted

Based on my dealing with the two engineers it is not from lack of trying, they are having a hard time replicating the issue and finding out what is causing the problem. I am going to continue to work with them on it in hopes of them finding a resolution of some sort.

Posted (edited)

I have been in contact with GM since Nov. 2013. GM dealer, GM engineering, GM factory tech tried an antenna booster on mine, and no fix available. My issues have been replicated and documented. No Fix.

Edited by steig
  • Like 1
Posted

Yeah I don't know what it is, I spoke with the Chief engineer over the truck line today. They are sending some techs from the radio division down to my area to drive some trucks and possibly mine. I plan on charting the locations where I am seeing issues in hopes of it helping them.

 

I personally think it has to be some sort of interference issue either with in the antenna system or the radio, but that is purely a hunch.

Posted (edited)

I maybe old and not up on current technology but we are talking about an FM radio here, they have be around for a long time. I can not understand why GM or its suppliers can not put a FM radio in a vehicle in 2014 that works properly. I drove a GM vehicle with a "colortouch" radio and it worked fine and I was told by GM that it was a lower trim level radio and would not work in my truck. Does anyone know of a aftermarket tuner that will correct the problem,

Edited by dmd277
Posted

I maybe old and not up on current technology but we are talking about an FM radio here, they have be around for a long time. I can not understand why GM or its suppliers can not put a FM radio in a vehicle in 2014 that works properly. I drove a GM vehicle with a "colortouch" radio and it worked fine and I was told by GM that it was a lower trim level radio and would not work in my truck. Does anyone know of a aftermarket tuner that will correct the problem,

Because they want siris subscribers..

 

Sent from my XT1060 using Tapatalk

Posted

Anyone have intermittent issues with satellite radio ? 2 days in a row now my XM has not worked , it works when I get in the car drive a for bit and then I leave it off for about an hour and when I get back in it is not working . Wait a half hour and go back and try and all is good . I also I have an issue with teh opener not working all the time .

Posted

Not sure where I saw it, but some have had issues with XM and have folllowed their reload procedure. Go to their web site and follow the procedure to dowload programming to your truck. It may help.

Posted

Spent a couple of hours with two GM engineers from the infotainment system today doing some drive analysis in my truck today. He confirmed that he was able to hear the issues I was having with the radio, took some recording and noted the areas and said they would go over the data and see what they could fine.

 

So now begins the wait to see what a possible resolution if any might be.

Posted

We should all do this . Buy a white shoe polish pen and on the back window write in huge letters, "DO NOT BUY GM PRODUCTS" . Then take it in for service. Refuse to remove it until they start taking us serious. Im making an appointment on monday morning. It would be different if this was the only problems Ive encountered. This is my second 2014 . Both complete TURDS! If I hear "OPERATING AS DESIGNED" one more time its not going to be pretty. OH Yeah, they better fix my non backlit radio knobs as well. Not to mention the broken seat, vibration under acceleration , snap crackle pop interior, and slipping transmission. And Im just getting started . This is getting ridiculous. Good luck to everyone.

Posted

Spent a couple of hours with two GM engineers from the infotainment system today doing some drive analysis in my truck today. He confirmed that he was able to hear the issues I was having with the radio, took some recording and noted the areas and said they would go over the data and see what they could fine.

 

So now begins the wait to see what a possible resolution if any might be.

As I drive around town more, I have been keeping better notes of how my radio is acting and it seems to be different now. When I first got the truck (Sep '13) the radio faded in and out very frequently (faded = clear, stereo reception changing to muffled, non-stereo) or HD station dropping. I have now determined several "spots" around town where this happens, but the rest of the time it appears to be strong. I went 30 miles East and stations were strong and again 30 miles north and they were strong. These "spots" seems to be within a mile or two from my home that I frequently go through, but then in other areas, the stations are strong. I tend to listen to two stations all of the time, so I was comparing reception of a limited number of stations. I noticed the same "spots" on a loaner LT with base radio a few weeks ago. One of these "spots" is in the car wash - radio completely drops in the middle of the car wash (I go to one where you sit in your vehicle and ride through). Never lost stations in my other vehicles in the car wash...

 

My wife reminded me that my 2011 Silverado had similar fading, although not as bad and it did not have HD.

 

Funny how her 2001 Trans Am stock radio doesn't drop these FM stations at all (and yes, that was before HD, so no HD comparison).

 

Either I am getting used to it or just understand the issue a little better.

Posted

I head back from one of the engineers today. From my drive they know the radio is going from Stereo to Mono. They had a hunch it is being caused by signal issues from the surrounding in the area as you drive thru them. Basically it is how the infotainment system handles losing a strong signal instead of playing static instead.

 

He said they are working with the radio vendor to see what can be done programming wise to correct it, so I am going to give them some time and see. Hopefully they can get a work around in place soon.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...