Jump to content

Let's talk Superchargers


07Softail

Recommended Posts

Posted

what did you do to tune your trans? I also want to firm up my shifts and increase my speed limiter some. I have stock HEIGHT tires so my speedometer is still accurate and the trans is shifting like it was new... just sloppy as can be.

I have the AutoCal from BalckBear so when I logged data for them it logs both the engine and tranny. Then just email the files for both and tell them what requests you have i.e. firmer shifts, speed limiter, etc... and they will send a tune back. They had me load the new tune and log data again so they could make sure everything was good on my truck. The people at BBP are great to deal with.

I'm not joking when I say it's like driving a completely different truck.

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

  • Replies 49
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

post-142991-0-96690600-1450249706_thumb.jpgSo I have a question. I have researched the static compression ratio for the L83 EcoTec3 to be 11.0:1. the chart above is showing us what our effective compression ratio (boost PSI + static compression) will be after the fact. Lets say that I choose a Whipple, and it produces anywhere from 6-8 PSI of boost. That now puts us at a 15.5-17.0:1 effective compression ratio. From what I have read on the internet thus far is that a static + boost compression ratio over 12.0:1 will make you very liable to detonation. However, we have many people who have done this already without any issues(that we know of). obviously a tune would change the way the engines act to the supercharger, right? So my question! what is our maximum effective compression ratio before we start seeing problems ON A STOCK ENGINE? is it 12.0:1? or is there someone here who knows there stuff and explain it to me and maybe others in an understandable context? Let's talk Superchargers.

post-142991-0-96690600-1450249706_thumb.jpg

post-142991-0-96690600-1450249706_thumb.jpg

post-142991-0-96690600-1450249706_thumb.jpg

Posted

Static and Dynamic compression are two different animals. Dynamic is the cylinder pressure (PSI) at the time of the intake closing events of the camshaft. Also the cylinder head design plays a big part in the situation too especially the chamber shape to keep detonation at bay. Don't get to caught up on Static numbers. Also DI engines curb detonation a little better than other forms of fuel injection to. For instance I have a Harley Davidson with a 120" motor with 13.5:1 and it has 220 PSI cylinder in both cylinders and has two sets of compression releases to help turn the engine over during start up and runs fine on pump gas but it's all in the tune, I have a powervision tuner with 3 tunes i can switch to 1. for 87 octane 2. for 93 octane and 3. C116 race fuel.

 

RT

Posted

Direct injection is the key here with boost. Take the Ecobust Fords... the 3.5 is a 10:1 static engine that runs 15+ psi stock and rated for 87 octane fuel in the trucks. When the fuel isn't in the cylinder to detonate it makes it harder to do so.

 

Sent from my SM-G900W8 using Tapatalk

Posted

Look also at the Lysholm kits. Less $ and still the same Eaton TVS blower. I like Magnuson as the intercooler brick design seems to do a great job.

 

With any of these you will want to do the proper effective catchcan system like the Elite new E2-X system w/cleanside separator as 1994Vmax states, you do not want any combustible present during the compression stroke or detonation will rear it's ugly head even more severe than old port injection.

 

Also do not want that oil to bake onto the intercooler and insulate and obstruct the flow over time. This is after 14k miles:

 

intercooler%20clogged_zpsmj8gpf3s.jpg

 

Also would add the ecoboost Ford makes more power and gets better fuel economy on 93 octane as the KR is so much less and it can run more advance timing.

Posted

Throwing out a lot of phrases I'm not familiar with, so to the internet I go! Thanks for the explanation, however. There is just too much I don't understand right now.

  • 4 months later...
Posted

Has anyone had any issues after the supercharger? I have mine and am getting ready to install it in the next month or so. Does anyone know if you can use an aftermarket intake still? It looks like it won't work due to the way the stock intake is. I already have a catch can so I hope to get out most of the crap before it starts getting into the engine. Would like to talk to someone that did the install themselves. I want to make sure I have everything ready to go for the install.

Posted

Has anyone had any issues after the supercharger? I have mine and am getting ready to install it in the next month or so. Does anyone know if you can use an aftermarket intake still? It looks like it won't work due to the way the stock intake is. I already have a catch can so I hope to get out most of the crap before it starts getting into the engine. Would like to talk to someone that did the install themselves. I want to make sure I have everything ready to go for the install.

 

6.2L and a supercharger... If you you are even in Missouri let me know... I wanna go for a ride! Good luck with the install.

Posted

I just finished my eforce install. The hardest part was removing the wiring harness from the back of the stock intake manifold and the tightening the supercharger to head bolts on the back of the engine. Both would have almost beeen easier to remove the cab lol. Also in my install instructions I wanted me to temporarily remove the two heater hoses that go into the cab. I didn't want to deal with that and I was able to leave them in.

Posted

How is it driving? Who did the tune? I did not have that suggestion for my instructions. Mine States that I can remove the hoses to the reservoir but it's not needed. Did you have to regap your spark plugs?

Posted

How is it driving? Who did the tune? I did not have that suggestion for my instructions. Mine States that I can remove the hoses to the reservoir but it's not needed. Did you have to regap your spark plugs?

 

BlackBear performance is doing the tune. It drives ok now, but that's expected. Justin is having me log and send him data, then he changes the tune and I reflash it, and we repeat. After a couple iterations it should drive just fine. I did not touch the spark plugs on mine

Posted

Are you driving it without a tune or with the base tune from Justin? I have a base tune from him for when I install mine.

Posted

Are you driving it without a tune or with the base tune from Justin? I have a base tune from him for when I install mine.

 

The base tune, you can tell its not super smooth. but for daily driving it's fine. His advise is jsut no high throttle or high rpm. Right now he wants me to log boost under moderate throttle and under 5000 rpms.

Posted

Ok. I didn't get told no high rpms with my charger tune. I'm ready to get mine installed. How do you like it so far?

Posted

ummm i haven't really got on it, but i do notice much more power below 3000 rpms. When I get it tuned better I'm going to ask justin to make the throttle more touchy

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Its no wonder you've gravitated to the oil types and brands you have in later years after trying certain brands and one being a specialty oil or at least very hard to come by up here and the other would have been a commonly found oil of the era and the vastly different outcomes as a result to using the vehicles in question the same distance for an OCI . It shows what marketing hype can do without actually having the product to back up the claims and that is no different now with the insane claims that are written on the side of a bottle of oil from some of the off the shelf oils.    What has surprised me and I was already finding this out before I bought my truck with the GDI engine, that this newer fancy technology that seemingly would suggest better fuel economy/emissions with this high pressure spray of fuel is not in reality kind at all to the engine or at least the oils life. Yet they insist on claiming long OCI with this technology just like they did with the port or similar type fuel injection systems when in reality its a step back in oil life to have a GDI system.    I think the mistake your making Grumpy is that your not sending your samples to Blackstone and getting the feel good glowing report that you can run it another 1000 or more miles and then send another sample where they say run it yet another 1000 miles and on and on it goes until your sending in something that looks a lot like road tar and then they may suggest you change your oil within the next 1000 miles 😆
    • I am guessing that engines of that design back then had a better ability to be abused and survive longer than a new design engine with the long timing chain and the overhead cams and phasers etc. But I would never guess that an engine could go that far and not fail spectacularly or at least die a slow death. 
    • In the 80's 90's I'd run Honda's 7,500 miles between changes using Red Line HP 5W20 and do it for hundreds of thousands of miles with issues. Back in the day it was an SAE 20 with the HTHS of a SAE 30 and SN add load. It was also very polar. Oxidation VOA was over 120. Besides those motors were SPFI and lean burn tech. I could have likely run it longer but never did.    We had a Toyota bought new I ran on Pennzoil's latest and greatest synthetic of the day with "Penthane". A made up word for a very low dose of PAO. Tried 7,500 mile OCI's in that Group III/VI chemistry and the rings tapped out at 90K. Rocker box wasn't as bad as the one Punch put up but it wasn't good either. Also a SPFI motor.    I'm around 3,750 across the board on these GDI monsters and the oil it tapped out by then usually on TBN/TAN crossover and color. Red Line HP Euro.    The AMSOIL SS brochures tell you to follow the OEM values for the service class but that it can be run up to 25K if monitored. I can't imagine what motor could go that distance and not tap out. I've never owned one.    Yes, I know. Lot's of people do. I'm just not going to be one of them. 
    • I knew a guy in the early 80's that bought a new Monte Carlo and ran it a 100,000 miles without ever changing the filter or the oil. Just kept adding. It looked like that inside.     
    • Good evening. I was lucky enough to get passed down to me a 2007 GMC LBZ that was my great uncle's. While the underside and rockers are more or less gone I feel like with time I can restore it to working order since it only has 110,000 miles and he put nearly every option he could get without getting the new body style since he did not trust DEF. So far I have done everything I can think of but when I put the key into the ignition nothing happens. I put 2 brand new batteries in it. Cleaned the terminals. Check all the fuses and relays and they all pass with my multimeter. I know I'm missing something that I just cant think of. The only odd thing is the OBD2 port works which makes me think its not the mega fuse. Any advice would be greatly appreciated. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...