Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
11 hours ago, CamGTP said:

Needs more sidewall, gotta fill them wheels well lol.

Yea that's why I was trying to lower it. It's crazy how a 32.5" tire looks small on this generation truck. The same size tire would have rubbed on the old trucks.

Posted
U bolts wouldn’t be hard to get at any good parts store. 
 
Axle tubes...unsure of. I don’t know why they felt the need to change the 14SF into the 12SF but they obviously did. However a lot of the internal components are still the same. I wouldn’t hazard a guess until I put a tape measure to it. 
I wish I understood the decision as well. The 14,SF would have been a great choice but I assume weight and possibly gear size options were a factor. All about mpgs these days.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using Tapatalk

Posted

The axles are pretty much physically the same size. If there’s any weight difference it’s not much. 

  • 1 month later...
  • 1 month later...
Posted

I pulled the blocks on my 2017 and was able to reuse the factory u bolts no problem. I am about to buy a new trail boss and want to pull those blocks right away, the rear sits way too high. If someone has done this, post some pics.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
On 5/3/2019 at 7:02 PM, Dea1276 said:

Follow this. Post pics if you do it. I am back and forth on leveling my truck. I think this may be the way to do it. No undue strain on the cv joints or rough ride from lifting the front to high. 

Throw in 300# of sand in the box, you will get the level you want, cheaper, easier to install, more traction in the winter and it's easily reversible if you don't like the look!  .02$

  • Like 1
Posted

I took out the 2" and installed 1"

Looks right now

Posted
On 2019-07-07 at 12:39 PM, jon524 said:

I pulled the blocks on my 2017 and was able to reuse the factory u bolts no problem. I am about to buy a new trail boss and want to pull those blocks right away, the rear sits way too high. If someone has done this, post some pics.

No it doesn't. It sits as designed and engineered. Trucks are designed to carry loads, when front-only levelled trucks have a load on, they are sacked out with their lights pointing into the sky, subsequently pissing off every single driver you meet head on at night. But hey, we were all young once, so you just do you. 

Posted
18 hours ago, L86 All Terrain said:

No it doesn't. It sits as designed and engineered. Trucks are designed to carry loads, when front-only levelled trucks have a load on, they are sacked out with their lights pointing into the sky, subsequently pissing off every single driver you meet head on at night. But hey, we were all young once, so you just do you. 

Thank you for voicing your opinion I was very curious what you thought. If I was towing or hauling something that heavy I wouldn’t have bought a 1500 in the first place. Not to mention you can adjust your lights in about 10 seconds. Not sure why you felt the need to take a dig at me but hey, you just do you. 

  • Like 4
  • 6 months later...
  • 4 weeks later...
Posted
On 5/2/2019 at 7:01 PM, saber said:

I only haul a dirt bike in my truck and like a level look so loading is not an issue.

I'm not getting bigger tires and don't want to raise the front any higher.

Can I take out the spring blocks out and mill them down? Are they steel or aluminum? Can I get shorter U bolts?

Thanks in advance.

 

 

You have a 2” block in the rear. Take it out for level or replace with a 1” block. 

Posted
On 2/29/2020 at 10:02 PM, Luckyfd said:

You have a 2” block in the rear. Take it out for level or replace with a 1” block. 

Replaced with 1" blocks

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • The BORA 3/8" spacers arrived yesterday along with the extended lug nuts. I got the front wheels changed out today, but was overheated and covered in sweat so bad, I figured getting both front wheels done was a win, and took a cool shower. Hopefully, I'll go out tomorrow morning before it gets into the 80+ temps and do the backs. After getting the first wheel snugged up, I backed out one of the lug nuts then hand turned to count threads. I believe I stopped counting around 12-13, so I think I'm good there.    
    • My fullsize truck is averaging over 26mpg so I'm pretty happy with the increased fuel economy targets. When I had my gas Silverado (2020 5.3) it was averaging 21. Again, for a fullsize truck, that's very different from the 12-15 these things used to get 30 years ago.   Whine all you want, increased MPG is a good thing.
    • That is a fair point, and I think an OBD-first proof is probably the right next step. I agree that the value is not the hardware box by itself. The marketable part would be the software: always-on capture, baseline learning, event reduction, system-specific reports, and alerts. Also agreed that if an OBD device is always plugged in and has local storage, it should not miss the event in the same way that a scanner plugged in after the fact would. The only thing I would not want to assume yet is that an ELM327-class device gives all the late-GM data needed at the rate needed. Standard OBD live data, DTCs, freeze frame, Mode 6, VIN, and calibration information are definitely the right starting point. GDS2 also proves that a lot of useful ECM data can be viewed through the DLC without needing a DTC first. The question I need to test is whether the data needed for a useful GM V8 event report is actually available through the DLC, and at a useful sample rate: - misfire counts / roughness by cylinder - AFM/DFM state - oil pressure and oil temperature - fuel trims - voltage / reset context - U-codes and communication events - calibration / software information - whether these are standard PIDs, enhanced DIDs, Mode 6 data, GDS2-only data, or not available So I think the right benchmark is: 1. Build the OBD-only version first. 2. Keep it plugged in and logging locally. 3. Compare it against GDS2 / freeze frame / HP Tuners or another higher-end logger. 4. Measure which parameters are available and at what update rate. 5. Only justify ECM-side hardware if it captures useful evidence the OBD version cannot. So you may be right: the consumer product might simply be an always-plugged-in OBD event recorder with much better reporting. A question for you: when you say ELM327 devices can already deliver all the data needed, do you mean generic OBD Mode 01 data only, or GM enhanced data as well? For a useful GM V8 report, would generic OBD data be enough, or would you expect the tool to include enhanced items like misfire by cylinder, AFM/DFM state, oil pressure/oil temp, U-codes, and calibration information?
    • 87 down as low as $5.14 here... winning!
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...