Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
10 minutes ago, Cpl_Punishment said:

If your 2015 Sierra was junk, why did you buy another one? With customers like you, what incentive does GM have to actually improve their products? 

If jumping brands is what you are referring to it won't help IMO. No need to be rude because he likes GM products. GM doesn't have to care due to rising sales for 10 years. 

Look here https://gmauthority.com/blog/gm/general-motors-sales-numbers/gm-truck-sales-numbers/

Combined GM Truck Sales Numbers

Sales Results - USA - Trax, Equinox, Traverse, Colorado, Silverado, Avalanche, Tahoe, Suburban, City Express, Express, LCV, Terrain, Acadia, Canyon, Sierra, Yukon, Yukon XL, Savana, Encore, Envision, Enclave, SRX, XT5, Escalade, Escalade ESV, Escalade EXT

Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total
2020 168,148 168,148 168,148 135,911 135,911 135,911             912,176
2019 178,230 178,230 178,230 205,102 205,102 205,102 205,327 205,327 205,327 203,175 203,175 203,175 2,375,500
2018 160,671 171,771 230,517 201,348 201,348 201,348 184,187 184,187 184,187 214,239 214,239 214,239 2,362,281
2017 142,460 180,147 183,237 174,862 169,872 189,664 180,465 204,180 209,002 196,536 184,579 246,238 2,261,242
2016 138,122 155,863 177,458 182,435 166,646 173,012 204,366 177,359 173,745 188,505 184,529 228,452 2,150,492
2015 137,381 160,040 166,631 181,197 194,308 176,080 194,726 195,714 182,323 181,715 165,565 215,831 2,151,511
2014 97,161 127,839 146,345 148,181 165,304 163,300 166,676 171,302 145,281 145,899 148,371 188,876 1,814,535
2013 114,063 136,989 144,723 139,428 153,635 150,915 143,188 161,408 110,156 140,648 127,942 148,446 1,671,541
2012 96,983 119,795 128,473 121,058 140,938 138,547 126,123 137,552 118,399 122,751 114,702 162,582 1,527,903
2011 104,621 117,624 117,303 117,706 115,968 119,023 134,523 136,284 138,092 124,297 120,118 161,755 1,507,314
2010 80,976 74,573 107,258 104,901 124,615 113,293 115,611 106,653 106,350 120,328 107,579 156,972 1,319,109

 

 

:)

Posted
1 hour ago, Cpl_Punishment said:

If your 2015 Sierra was junk, why did you buy another one? With customers like you, what incentive does GM have to actually improve their products? 

didn't say it was junk. I think GM has the best engineers in the business. Love the look. But little things like rubber window seals shouldn't be dry rotting after 2 years. Heated seats stopped working after 3. The quality of what they are putting into their vehicles are not as good as they should be.  Update: Got my AT4 back after 2 days in the shop. They couldn't find anything wrong with it. Reset the ECM. Seems to be working fine now. Time will tell.

Posted
5 hours ago, Cpl_Punishment said:

If your 2015 Sierra was junk, why did you buy another one? With customers like you, what incentive does GM have to actually improve their products? 

People just dont learn I've seen that working at dealerships across all brands ford is this way too, just ridiculous but that's what they do.

  • Like 1
Posted
On 7/17/2020 at 10:12 AM, Brandon Boles said:

didn't say it was junk. I think GM has the best engineers in the business. Love the look. But little things like rubber window seals shouldn't be dry rotting after 2 years. Heated seats stopped working after 3. The quality of what they are putting into their vehicles are not as good as they should be.  Update: Got my AT4 back after 2 days in the shop. They couldn't find anything wrong with it. Reset the ECM. Seems to be working fine now. Time will tell.

Best engineers in the business.  Compared to what.....Chrysler?  

  • Like 1
Posted
On 7/17/2020 at 9:12 AM, Brandon Boles said:

didn't say it was junk. I think GM has the best engineers in the business.

Actually I think they may have some very poor engineers right now.  They need to tap into some Honda and Crapota engineers and get the longevity and reliability aspects improved, and perhaps tap into Chrysler engineers to improve the looks, because the 2019+ Silverado looks like total ******. 

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted
On 7/14/2020 at 11:55 AM, NHM25 said:

Hey guys, reposting from another thread:

 

7/6/20: I may have everyone beat on my timeline to frustration. Just purchased new 2020 GMC AT4 from Van GMC Buick in Scottsdale 3 DAYS AGO! The assembly date is June 20, 2020! It ran great the first two days... day 3, won't start. Total of 170 miles on the truck. Same issues that everyone has noted. Came outside, tried to open her up with the key fob and the battery was completely dead. Had to open manually. Push start did not function, no power whatsoever... basically a $65k brick in my driveway.

 

Connected battery to wife's Explorer and got the dash to light up but it wouldn't start. Tons of error messages. Kept trying to start it and it finally lights up... but was running very rough with knocking. This morning, started it up and it ran great. Dropped it off at dealer and they tell me there are no codes, it's running fine, the alternator and the battery look good. So I send them the videos below and a link to this thread... No word yet but will keep you all posted. So incredibly frustrating. Love the truck but now have to worry about this... what happens if it doesn't start when my family and I are in the middle of the woods camping/hunting? Ridiculous. 2020 could not get any worse. 

7/8/20: UPDATE: Dealer thinks they found the problem: Loose UBEC Bolts. There was a recent bulletin posted on 6/26/20 about this that may be the cause for this issue as a whole. Ask for document ID 5628169 or the following title for the GM bulletin: #PIT5756: Various Electrical Concerns (Inspect UBEC Bolts for Being Loose) - (June 26, 2020). SEE ATTACHED

 

Condition: Some customers may comment on any number of electrical related symptoms. The following are some of the known reported ones:

  • no crank
  • no start
  • starter grinds or re-engages after engine starts
  • SES MIL
  • IPC guages sweep/fluctute and/or various IPC warning lights or messages
  • High or low system voltage
  • May have any of the following DTC's: B1325, B2750, B305D, B297B, C0049, P0562, P0700, U0100, U0101, U0102, U3006
  • some of these concerns may be noticed with powertrain movement, like when accelerating or braking. 

 

Cause: These concerns could be caused by the X50A underhood fuse box bolts being loose. The X50A has built in indicators which pop up as the X50A bolts are tightened down, to inidcate the X50A is fully installed. In some cases, even if these green indicators are popped up, the bolts may still be loose. 

 

Correction: Inspect the X50A Underhood Fuse Block bolts and verify they are properly torqued to 53 lb in (6Nm)

 

Dealer stated that my box was indeed loose (that's what she said). Has not been able to replicate issues. Really hoping this is the fix for my truck and all of yours. Will update forum either way. Best of luck. 

 

UPDATE: 7/14/20. I have had no issues with the truck so far. I start and drive it every day. I really hope this was the simple fix; hopefully you guys give it a try and it works. You can do this fix yourself. I've attached the bulletin for everyone here. Good luck. 

BUELLTIN (1).pdf 1.02 MB · 36 downloads

Thanks for the fix!  Tripped both P0700 and U0100 today and found this.  Those 4 bolts were only at about 15 inch-pounds, and the green indicators were up.  Talked to my service rep at the dealer to cover my arse and not void anything.  Tightened them to 53 and the CEL was off at the next start!!!

  • Like 2
Posted

Thanks for posting the bulletin about those bolts in the fuse block. I checked mine and all four were loose. It took each of them about 3/4 of a turn to get them to the spec of 53 inch/lbs. I’ve been having some intermittent electrical gremlins and CEL codes, so we’ll see if this helps.

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
On 8/11/2020 at 4:16 PM, Tomato said:

Thanks for the fix!  Tripped both P0700 and U0100 today and found this.  Those 4 bolts were only at about 15 inch-pounds, and the green indicators were up.  Talked to my service rep at the dealer to cover my arse and not void anything.  Tightened them to 53 and the CEL was off at the next start!!!

Good to hear. Hopefully this worked. I will say, I have not had a single issue with the truck since the dealer tightened the bolts. Went on a few big trips, camping, etc. It's running like a champ. 

Posted
1 hour ago, NHM25 said:

Good to hear. Hopefully this worked. I will say, I have not had a single issue with the truck since the dealer tightened the bolts. Went on a few big trips, camping, etc. It's running like a champ. 

Same here - no issues since.  I haven't towed since the fix, but I am hoping this cures the trailering app gremlins I was encountering.

Posted

My turn with this issue today.  Went to start this morning, completely dead.  No dome lights, no attempt to turn over.  Tried jumping off a small car and no dice.  Called roadside assist, they got it going after a few attempts.  Took to dealer, they did the slow charge test on the battery, says it is in amazing condition and had no idea what could have drained it.  Came to this thread, opened the hood and each bolt took several turns to tighten.  If you own this truck, check your fuse box bolts to preempt the issue.  Glad this did not happen to me camping.  8500 miles, BTW, and first issue.

  • Like 1
Posted
52 minutes ago, JohnTz said:

Guys is there a video or write up on this? Is this the big fuse block under the hood? 

No, No, and Yes. 

Posted

Just checked mine. About 1 turn each bolt to tighten. Never had any problems but wanted to be proactive on this. Thanks for the heads up. 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...