Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
I got mine from Diablo.  No difference I'm sure.  Worked great.  Only odd thing is I can't shut off start/stop with dash switch when unit is hooked up and set to not disable it. I can disable it through the unit as designed though.    

 

Yeah because it’s not range or Diablo or edge, I think it’s straight powerteq.

 

Let them know!

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, Jav_eee said:

 

Yeah because it’s not range or Diablo or edge, I think it’s straight powerteq.

 

Let them know!

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

I've tried calling them to no avail.  

 

I think the parent company is Holley.  

Edited by SILVER SLED
Posted (edited)

My replacement unit came in and its installed.  So far it works perfectly.  Throttle sensitivity adjustments DO work on the fly and make a dramatic difference in pedal feel.  As long as everything keeps working as advertised this will be a great product.

 

And BTW... Range answers the phone every time I call and they are more than willing to help.

 

-Eli

Edited by Tjeli
  • Like 2
Posted

You guys talked me into it. Ordered can't wait to try it out. Thanks for all the great info!

Posted
8 minutes ago, RRonin said:

You guys talked me into it. Ordered can't wait to try it out. Thanks for all the great info!

You won't regret it.  ?

Posted
1 hour ago, SquireSCA said:

Why are these trucks so locked down?  Most other trucks can be easily tuned...  What's with GM locking ours down?

Getting ready for supercruise....

Posted (edited)

Just ordered mine! They have a holiday sale right now, got it for 405.00.

What throttle setting do you guys find works the best?

Edited by Firehawk T/A
Posted

Well.... these things seem to be buggy. Add another one to the list that has an issue. Mine causes the lane departure warning in my drivers side mirror to illuminate at random. If I drop the throttle setting back to 0, it'll turn off, but randomly turns itself back on. I tried disconnecting and plugging everything back in, but it still does it. I'll have to call Range the next day they're open.

Posted
Quote

Well.... these things seem to be buggy. Add another one to the list that has an issue. Mine causes the lane departure warning in my drivers side mirror to illuminate at random. If I drop the throttle setting back to 0, it'll turn off, but randomly turns itself back on. I tried disconnecting and plugging everything back in, but it still does it. I'll have to call Range the next day they're open.

Are you talking lane departure or blind spot monitoring? My truck only shows lane departure on the dash.

 

So far mine has been good, I drive from Minneapolis to Missouri on Monday. I am interested to see if my gas mileage changes much with using DFM disable.

Still playing around with the performance levels to see which one best suits me.

Tom

Posted
On 11/23/2020 at 6:24 PM, Firehawk T/A said:

Just ordered mine! They have a holiday sale right now, got it for 405.00.

What throttle setting do you guys find works the best?

I prefer the stock setting.  With the 6.2 and 10 speed its hard enough to take off smooth the way it is.

Posted (edited)

Got mine today and installed it. I also had some issues with the white tabs that needed to be filed down for the plug to go in. Other than that I really like it. I set the throttle sensitivity to the first setting which is the 20 mph mark and it feels perfect for me.  I played around with the settings while driving and made some adjustments on the fly, everything worked perfectly. It really makes a big difference in how the truck drives. I also disabled auto stop, the DFM and set the speed limit to 140. I'll keep ya posted if I have any issues.

Edited by Firehawk T/A
Posted

Installed mine today. I ran into one thing where option 6 (60 mph) was not the auto start disable but was throttle response adjustment. I can tell you when you set it to the highest setting acceleration is extremely abrupt. I'm waiting for my usb to odbii cable then I'll update it to see if the options change. So far very happy with this!!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Did the KYBs keep it the same height in the front? I was concerned that pre-assembled assembly would raise it up an inch to standard non-z60 height.. I guess which it would make the rake 1 inch instead of 2 inches.
    • Thank you for keeping the train on the tracks and for a thoughtful engagement. I enjoyed the reflection on a previous stance to refine and improve your position. I like that inquisitive flexibility about you Atlas.    No the process isn't sterile. Hundreds, perhaps thousands of miles of piping, vessels, pumps. Chevron, the people I worked for, were keenly aware that there is a market for what is known as their "ISOCLEAN" line of lubricants. These are lubricants that are the same as those sold bulk that are further processed by filtration to a level your particular application demands. They will filter and package and provide lab documentation as required. Do not kid yourself. Every gallon of oil that goes into a Chevron Turbine, reciprocating compressor, generator is prefiltered and tested before being charged. Lest wise it was when I was there in the plants I worked in.    There are requirements set by manufactures for the cleanliness of the oils used in their equipment. OTR such as CUMMINS has standards shared with customers on this. Commercial interest selling to Ma and Pa do, but don't share that information. Not even upon request but internally, they do exist.    The GM study sited, (Graph from Machinery Lubrication in previous post) only shows "relative" importance.  I find that fascinating. By constructing the graph like this they admit there are dozens of factors in engine life and via scientific method determined the effect of 'relative cleanliness' on engine life not in miles but in 'FACTORS'. This allows a certain amount of reverse engineering does it not?   They even provided some touchstones. Beta 75 as a reference point. Wonderful stuff!!   Smaller blenders CAN and some DO take the time and effort to do better than a refinery or large bulk blender, like Warren Oil, in improving the "in the can" cleanliness. No I don't have a list but testing could generate that information.    Again, but one of several levers we can pull to improve engine life. The simplest is keeping a clean work station while doing your own oil changes.     
    • Thank you. I'll give it a try 
    • I just spent the last 45K miles doing samples every oil change over more than a full year to get the data for seasons and break-in to broke in.    I found the same thing to be true. Something was always teetering on done or had stepped off the cliff long before the OLM was DOA. In fact, I found about a thousand mile difference between summer and winter. That is during the winter half the OLM was STILL too long. Even the severe schedule was to long in the winter.   Now having done the work I can say I was NOT DISAPOINTED. I saw nothing I didn't already know. Nothing my father hadn't already demonstrated in his 2K OCI's pushing dated iron on dated oils and weak filters to mileages well beyond 300K.   Building on his work through use of Lab testing it wasn't hard to find the correlation between 'sight/feel/odor, the things dad relied on, and test results. Use of current viscosity stable chemistries & filters has pushed that marker for my motors out to 3K summer, 4K winter.    So the early lies were 3K on conventional oil and the lie upon the lie was 7K+. turns out to be off by a factor of two.    So... it is true that modern chemistry has doubled the useful oil life. But the base milage that came from was off by double. It's how good lies work. Partly true, sometimes mostly true so that your meter isn't set off. It also means that non-shear-stable shelf oils are only now as good as the old oils were in their best case scenario.    So the question now is how do we improve on that? Thus the question into cleanliness among the other items listed in the post quoted below.    If this bores you, feel free not to participate.       
    • Is it though?  Like LTZ, not a high take rate.  Current Sierra has AT4, Denali and Elevation as its main bread winners.  Each trim accounting for 25-35% of sales for Sierra.  SLT makes up about 10-15% at best.        Like others have predicted here for GMC, it will be:   - Pro (equal to WT Chevy)   - Elevation (replaces SLE and SLT)   - AT4 (and X)   - Denali (and Ultimate).  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...