Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, GMCustomerService said:

This is certainly not what we like to hear, Tony.  Please know, customer satisfaction is extremely important to us. Our team would be more than happy to take a closer look into the concerns with your 2022 GMC Sierra 1500 Limited AT4. To do so, please send an email to [email protected] with ATTN: PacksAWallop/GM Trucks in the subject line.

Please include your contact information, VIN, a brief description of your concern, and the name of your preferred dealership. We look forward to hearing from you. To learn more about GM’s privacy policy, please visit https://www.gm.com/privacy-statement.html.
 
Privacy Statement | General Motors
Your privacy is important to General Motors. This Privacy Statement addresses the personal information GM collects and how GM handles that personal information.
www.gm.com
 

I actually already have a case opened up with GM.  First time it took her 3 or 4 days to get back to me.  Tried calling her again yesterday before lunch and had to leave a message.  Haven't heard back yet.  Would be nice if she could get back to me to try and get something figured out.  I've sent an email like you requested.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, ram1067 said:

…..going down the rabbit hole. Good luck!

LOL!  Appreciate it!  I will certainly keep everyone here updated with how GM does.

Posted
8 hours ago, PacksAWallop said:

LOL!  Appreciate it!  I will certainly keep everyone here updated with how GM does.


Yes, please keep us updated. I’m very interested in what happens down the road with this issue. Good luck. 

Posted
On 6/8/2022 at 10:09 PM, PacksAWallop said:

I understand that.  The point I was making is I'm nine to ten months past the supposed date range.  Pretty sure they wouldn't have an engine setting around for nine to ten mo ths waiting to go into a truck.  Could I be wrong?  Possibly, but that hasn't been the pattern so far.  Seems to be within a few months of the truck build date that the engine is built.  However I have not checked my engine build date.

The date range is hogwash, these engines have been having lifter issues and bent rod issues since 2014! They might be fixed when they move on from the 5.3 / 6.2 varrients, until these engine options are changed and no longer offered it is clear these issues will continue regardless of model years or some date range for engine builds.

  • Like 1
Posted
On 6/9/2022 at 10:11 AM, PacksAWallop said:

I actually already have a case opened up with GM.  First time it took her 3 or 4 days to get back to me.  Tried calling her again yesterday before lunch and had to leave a message.  Haven't heard back yet.  Would be nice if she could get back to me to try and get something figured out.  I've sent an email like you requested.

Yeah i would say about 10-15 years ago or so, they seem to have stripped away any ability for gm customer service people to give any kind of satisfaction for issues. I remember getting my warranty extended to 8 years and 80,000 miles and the extended warranty i had purchased at the time of buying my truck was credited to my loan, all of this from calling the 800 gm number. This was after 3 times having to get the dreaded steering shaft clunk fixed the gmt-800's had. I have also seen them give out gift cards to the gm accessory store when customers were inconvenienced like this.

 

Now i really don't understand what their function even is these days, i doubt you need help calling your dealer and telling them hey my engine sounds like a box of rocks and every service light is on the dash right now. Shame but to me it seems like GM stripped away their ability to do anything other than schedule an appointment at your local dealership today.

 

Go ahead GMCustomerService person, please by all means prove me wrong!

  • Like 1
Posted

It's called lip service. Lots of that today.

gdpit_com_182051206_947.gif

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
35 minutes ago, BIGDOGx said:

Yeah i would say about 10-15 years ago or so, they seem to have stripped away any ability for gm customer service people to give any kind of satisfaction for issues. I remember getting my warranty extended to 8 years and 80,000 miles and the extended warranty i had purchased at the time of buying my truck was credited to my loan, all of this from calling the 800 gm number. This was after 3 times having to get the dreaded steering shaft clunk fixed the gmt-800's had. I have also seen them give out gift cards to the gm accessory store when customers were inconvenienced like this.

 

Now i really don't understand what their function even is these days, i doubt you need help calling your dealer and telling them hey my engine sounds like a box of rocks and every service light is on the dash right now. Shame but to me it seems like GM stripped away their ability to do anything other than schedule an appointment at your local dealership today.

 

Go ahead GMCustomerService person, please by all means prove me wrong!

I’ve had 3 GM trucks with that clunk, including my Avalanche. It’s more of a rattle and not a safety issue. You can go online and see a fix that involves a hose clamp. I’m too old to contort myself under the dash. It’s part of the charm of having a 20 year old truck.

  • Like 1
Posted
51 minutes ago, BIGDOGx said:

Yeah i would say about 10-15 years ago or so, they seem to have stripped away any ability for gm customer service people to give any kind of satisfaction for issues. I remember getting my warranty extended to 8 years and 80,000 miles and the extended warranty i had purchased at the time of buying my truck was credited to my loan, all of this from calling the 800 gm number. This was after 3 times having to get the dreaded steering shaft clunk fixed the gmt-800's had. I have also seen them give out gift cards to the gm accessory store when customers were inconvenienced like this.

 

Now i really don't understand what their function even is these days, i doubt you need help calling your dealer and telling them hey my engine sounds like a box of rocks and every service light is on the dash right now. Shame but to me it seems like GM stripped away their ability to do anything other than schedule an appointment at your local dealership today.

 

Go ahead GMCustomerService person, please by all means prove me wrong!

Hit the nail on the head.  They can't do anything for me right now, basically told me it would have to fail two more times before any meaningful action can be taken.  Directed me to the dealership.  They don't even want me to drive it until it fails again, just take it there and let them have it to try and figure it out.  Won't be doing that since they don't have a loaner available.  The mechanic there mentioned that it could be an actuator issue with controlling the DFM lifters.  But they're so difficult to replace that GM doesn't allow them to work on them unless they're certain that is what's causing the problem.  

  • Sad 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, BIGDOGx said:

 

 

Now i really don't understand what their function even is these days, i doubt you need help calling your dealer and telling them hey my engine sounds like a box of rocks and every service light is on the dash right now. Shame but to me it seems like GM stripped away their ability to do anything other than schedule an appointment at your local dealership today.

 

Go ahead GMCustomerService person, please by all means prove me wrong!

 It's called GREED just like the big oil company's today.

 

Take your money and tell you  go away!!!

Edited by WeGone
  • Like 1
Posted
50 minutes ago, KARNUT said:

I’ve had 3 GM trucks with that clunk, including my Avalanche. It’s more of a rattle and not a safety issue. You can go online and see a fix that involves a hose clamp. I’m too old to contort myself under the dash. It’s part of the charm of having a 20 year old truck.

That truck is long gone right now👍, my point though was gm customer help being allowed to do something other than offer appointment booking. I got essentially a free gmpp plat 0 deduct warranty to 80k and about 1,500 was credited back to my loan account since i no longer needed the one i bought. This was after 3 consecutive unfixed clunk issues which is nothing compared to the top half of your engine being taken apart and replaced.

 

It got them another truck purchase from me in 2015 so yes it was well worth it for GM to keep me satisfied and throwing me a bone. Like i said GMCustomerService please prove me wrong!

  • Like 3
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

I am having this problem now with failed lifters on my 2021 Trailboss. I took it to the dealership last week and they said that their is a nationwide shortage on lifters and head gaskets so I will need to wait for probably months before it is fixed. The only option they are giving me is to trade it in. Problem is that they don't have any cars on the lot that are comparable to my Trailboss. They don't know when they will be getting any in. They are struggling to get me a rental due to the rental shortage! I was pretty much told I was screwed. Has anybody else dealt with this? I am just trying to figure out my options. I will add that I am in Alaska so there are not a lot of dealerships here. 

Edited by Trisha Offenbacker
Posted
On 6/10/2022 at 9:51 AM, BIGDOGx said:

The date range is hogwash, these engines have been having lifter issues and bent rod issues since 2014! They might be fixed when they move on from the 5.3 / 6.2 varrients, until these engine options are changed and no longer offered it is clear these issues will continue regardless of model years or some date range for engine builds.

Lol gm engines have had lifter and bent rods since they first came out, after afm came out things got worse, but always been garbage.

Posted

I can only give my advice and experience ....  GM only learns by a financial hit.

 

Lemon law these trucks. Krohn & Moss

 

Until GM feels the sting, they'll do nothing.  Their only goal is to get passed the warranty and then stick it to you.

 

Get a new truck, new warranty ... they have no problem telling YOU to pay up. Now tell GM.

 

My 2020 was handed back in October of 21.

Posted
23 hours ago, Trisha Offenbacker said:

I am having this problem now with failed lifters on my 2021 Trailboss. I took it to the dealership last week and they said that their is a nationwide shortage on lifters and head gaskets so I will need to wait for probably months before it is fixed. The only option they are giving me is to trade it in. Problem is that they don't have any cars on the lot that are comparable to my Trailboss. They don't know when they will be getting any in. They are struggling to get me a rental due to the rental shortage! I was pretty much told I was screwed. Has anybody else dealt with this? I am just trying to figure out my options. I will add that I am in Alaska so there are not a lot of dealerships here. 

 

Get a FULL refund, then go find something you want/need.  End of story!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Did have to make 1 modification because of the WeatherTech rear mud flaps and that was needing 3 longer screws than what came with the install package. 😄
    • Picked up the liners yesterday. Installed passenger side WITHOUT any modifications. All mounting holes lined up perfectly. Rain is interfering today with drivers side. Very Happy! Will add pics when finished
    • As a matter of amusement I’ll leave this conversation with this. Do you beat the government average fuel estimate? Statistics are a guide to me. Not a rule. Someone once said I have to have the last word. If true and possible may be. I’ll blame that on working in a family business.
    • That is a fair point, and I agree that trying to log “everything in the truck” would be the wrong direction.   There are a lot of modules and a lot of traffic. If the product became a full-truck datalogger, the amount of data would get huge very quickly, and most owners would never use it.   I think the first useful version would need to be narrow: - powertrain-side event evidence - selected high-value parameters - communication / voltage / reset events - pre/post event window - short report first, raw log only as backup   One distinction I should make is between active OBD/PID polling and passive bus capture. If you are polling PIDs through OBD, then yes: the more parameters you request, the lower the effective sample rate becomes, and you are adding diagnostic traffic to a vehicle that is already busy running itself. With passive CAN capture, the recorder is not asking all the modules for data. It is listening to traffic that is already on the bus. So it does not consume vehicle bus bandwidth in the same way that a scan tool polling hundreds of PIDs would. But your point still applies in a different way.   Even if passive capture does not add bus traffic, the recorder still has limits: - processing rate - storage rate - timestamp accuracy - decoder workload - event filtering - report size - user attention span   So the answer cannot be “log everything and let the user figure it out.” The product would need to store enough raw evidence to be useful, but only decode, graph, and present the important parts around the event.   A practical report should probably show: - what triggered the capture - how much pre/post data was preserved - which selected parameters changed - how those values compared to baseline - whether the same pattern happened before - whether any voltage, reset, bus-off, lost-message, or communication fault occurred - selected graphs around the event - raw data only as supporting evidence   So I agree with you. More data is not automatically better. The real product is the reduction from raw data into a useful event report.
    • That makes sense, and I agree with most of that.   I think the product would need both: 1. a default powertrain template, so it is useful out of the box; 2. user-selected priority parameters, so the owner or shop can choose what they want to see first.   Different users are going to care about different things. One owner may care about oil pressure and voltage. Another may care about misfire trend, AFM/DFM behavior, or U-codes. A shop may want communication events and repeatability first. Your baseline point is probably the most important one. Raw data is not very useful unless the report can show what normal looked like for that vehicle under similar conditions.   The way I would think about it is: - start with a basic known-good baseline - learn normal behavior for that specific vehicle over time - allow the event to be overlaid against baseline - show whether the event was a one-time spike or a repeatable pattern - provide a simple severity level, but with clear limits on what that severity means   For example, early severity could be something like: - Info: event captured, no obvious abnormal pattern - Watch: value moved outside baseline, but not repeated - Warning: repeatable abnormal pattern under similar conditions - Critical: communication loss, voltage drop, bus-off, reset, or severe repeated event   I would not want the first version to say “replace this part.” That would be overclaiming unless there is repair-confirmed data behind it. It would be more honest to say “this pattern deserves inspection.”   On the OBD port question, I think OBD absolutely has a role. OBD is probably the right place for: - DTCs - freeze frame - VIN - calibration information - normal scan-tool parameters - Mode 6 / enhanced diagnostic data if available The reason I am still looking at an ECM-side recorder is that the failure may happen before anyone connects a scan tool. If the owner plugs in a scanner after the event, the pre-event evidence may already be gone unless the ECU happened to save it. So I do not see this as “OBD versus ECM-side.” I see it more like: - ECM-side recorder: always armed, rolling buffer, event evidence - OBD/DLC companion: DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration, normal scan data - phone/cloud: status, notes, upload, report generation, notifications   I agree that phone connection and push notifications would be useful. I just would not want the phone or cloud connection to be required for capture. The recorder should save the event locally even if the phone is not connected. The phone should help with event marking, download, notes, upload, alerts, and report viewing.   For a default GM V8 event report, would this list make sense? - RPM - calculated load / MAP - throttle position - vehicle speed - gear / torque converter state if available - coolant temperature - oil pressure - oil temperature if available - battery voltage - commanded AFM/DFM state if available - actual AFM/DFM state if available - misfire counters / roughness by cylinder if available - fuel trims - relevant U-codes / communication events - bus-off / lost periodic message / module reset / voltage drop events Which of those would you remove, and what would you add?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...