Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Whether you believe/use or disbelieve/don't use nitrogen in your tires that is completely up to you. But don't sit there and tell people in your own scientific belief that it's a waste of money. There are purposes that nitrogen is used in tires. It's an upgrade just like an upgrade in anything else you might want to add to your truck.

 

By reducing the percentage of oxygen, water vapor and other gases in your tires from 22% to 7% or lower, your tires will maintain proper pressure longer than if you use plain old air. For example, with 95% nitrogen in your tires, they retain optimal pressure three to four times longer. (Scientific)

 

More Predictable Pressure Fluctuation. NASCAR teams use nitrogen so they can more accurately predict tire pressure fluctuation. Regular compressed air can fluctuate considerably when water vapor is present. TPMS Sensors have improved performance when nitrogen is used. The temp fluctuations are minimized.

 

The bottom line point I am trying to make is the fact that it has it's benefits and of course cost....and so does every other upgrade.

 

...and oh by the way....if you have "nitrogen" in your tires and they have a noticeable fluctuation from driving to the corner market and back....guess what...you don't have the correct amount of nitrogen in your tires.....the process of eliminating/replacing oxygen did not work correctly.......unless you drove there like driving at Bristol Motor Speedway, then by all means there should be a fluctuation.

 

I'm not saying that scientifically there's no advantage. But we're also not driving our trucks 200+ MPH in a giant circle 500 times. My point is the advantages of nitrogen are irrelevant and un-recognized at the consumer level. But feel free to keep buying into the propaganda and wasting your money. At the end of the day, we will be replacing our tires at the exact same time and you still need to check your pressure once a month until then and account for weather changes affecting pressure. In other words, you are wasting money on nitrogen....it's not giving you any advantage over the guy without nitrogen.

 

Here's some more reading material on why it's a waste of your money: http://www.wheels.ca/why-nitrogen-in-your-tires-is-a-waste-of-money/

Edited by Silverado-Hareek
Posted (edited)

 

I'm not saying that scientifically there's no advantage. But we're also not driving our trucks 200+ MPH in a giant circle 500 times. My point is the advantages of nitrogen are irrelevant and un-recognized at the consumer level. But feel free to keep buying into the propaganda and wasting your money. At the end of the day, we will be replacing our tires at the exact same time and you still need to check your pressure once a month until then and account for weather changes affecting pressure. In other words, you are wasting money on nitrogen....it's not giving you any advantage over the guy without nitrogen.

 

Here's some more reading material on why it's a waste of your money: http://www.wheels.ca/why-nitrogen-in-your-tires-is-a-waste-of-money/

 

Yep, we can play this game all day. You evidently reacted to my statement but I don't believe you read it. And yet again you are trying to tell people that no matter what proof there is out there, your opinion is the most important/correct.

 

Propaganda: defined as ideas, facts, or allegations spread deliberately to further one's cause or to damage an opposing cause;

 

I am not the one spreading propaganda sir! I merely made a statement that regardless of which side your on its just an upgrade.

 

"I'm not saying that scientifically there's no advantage. But we're also not driving our trucks 200+ MPH in a giant circle 500 times." Is that like a double negative. Meaning the science behind this only is relevant to trucks that do 200+ MPH in a giant circle 500 times? So they get the advantage and nobody else possibly could?.......That's like me saying the link to the article you added actually doesn't apply here in the United States because its from Canada. Only Canadians don't get an advantage....lol...

 

.....regardless that has nothing to do with any of this...the example was to bring your attention to the fact our trucks are extremely sensitive to many things, tire pressure fluctuating drastically can and will have an effect on your driving. As I stated...driving to the corner market it makes no difference, but commuting back and forth to work 50 miles a day will change the way the truck handles.....period! If you can't feel the difference in a 4psi change in tire pressure after 25 miles, your argument is null.

 

Let me make myself perfectly clear. I am middle of the road on this. I have two sets without and one set with (Don't ask me why, lets just say its scientific). There is a difference in how fast heat in the tires will change the pressure, and how fast your driving experience will change for the good or the bad depending on the start pressure and the mean pressure. My truck loves 34 psi....so staying as close to that on a general purpose trip of 25 to 35 miles (say within 2psi) I feel no change. Nitrogen does that for me. In using plain old dry air this same trip usually gives me a 4 psi change with a noticeable change in driveability. Like I stated, these trucks are sensitive and you can definitely feel changes.

 

Checking your air pressure monthly is a good practice, but I can also tell you I don't do it anymore in the nitrogen set. I have noticed in the last 6 months almost zero change in my nitrogen set, winter is where the real test of pressure takes hold.

 

Tire wear is irrelevant...to me. And if you want to go the wager route, I will definitely make the bet you will be replacing your OEM tires before me.....that sir is a guarantee!

Edited by Strykers_Inc
Posted

 

Yep, we can play this game all day. You evidently reacted to my statement but I don't believe you read it. And yet again you are trying to tell people that no matter what proof there is out there, your opinion is the most important/correct.

 

Propaganda: defined as ideas, facts, or allegations spread deliberately to further one's cause or to damage an opposing cause;

 

I am not the one spreading propaganda sir! I merely made a statement that regardless of which side your on its just an upgrade.

 

"I'm not saying that scientifically there's no advantage. But we're also not driving our trucks 200+ MPH in a giant circle 500 times." Is that like a double negative. Meaning the science behind this only is relevant to trucks that do 200+ MPH in a giant circle 500 times? So they get the advantage and nobody else possibly could?.......That's like me saying the link to the article you added actually doesn't apply here in the United States because its from Canada. Only Canadians don't get an advantage....lol...

 

.....regardless that has nothing to do with any of this...the example was to bring your attention to the fact our trucks are extremely sensitive to many things, tire pressure fluctuating drastically can and will have an effect on your driving. As I stated...driving to the corner market it makes no difference, but commuting back and forth to work 50 miles a day will change the way the truck handles.....period! If you can't feel the difference in a 4psi change in tire pressure after 25 miles, your argument is null.

 

Let me make myself perfectly clear. I am middle of the road on this. I have two sets without and one set with (Don't ask me why, lets just say its scientific). There is a difference in how fast heat in the tires will change the pressure, and how fast your driving experience will change for the good or the bad depending on the start pressure and the mean pressure. My truck loves 34 psi....so staying as close to that on a general purpose trip of 25 to 35 miles (say within 2psi) I feel no change. Nitrogen does that for me. In using plain old dry air this same trip usually gives me a 4 psi change with a noticeable change in driveability. Like I stated, these trucks are sensitive and you can definitely feel changes.

 

Checking your air pressure monthly is a good practice, but I can also tell you I don't do it anymore in the nitrogen set. I have noticed in the last 6 months almost zero change in my nitrogen set, winter is where the real test of pressure takes hold.

 

Tire wear is irrelevant...to me. And if you want to go the wager route, I will definitely make the bet you will be replacing your OEM tires before me.....that sir is a guarantee!

 

 

haha for someone who accuses one of acting like their opinion is the most important one/correct, you certainly go on to do the same thing and proclaim a lot of certainties based on YOUR opinions. But I digress. Agree to disagree on this one because we aren't going to change each other's minds. I have nitrogen in my tires and I notice no difference than when I had regular air. You obviously have a different perception or a more sensitive truck. My pressure starts at 35 psi and will get to 38-39 after prolonged driving on the interstate with nitrogen in the tires. With air, same exact readings. In both instances, the truck felt exactly the same.

 

 

Oh and 200+ mph in a circle 500 times = NASCAR. You missed the sarcasm referencing your NASCAR statement apparently.

Posted (edited)

I guess my original post wasn't very clear. My point on nitrogen is simply that it's not worth the upgrade. You are paying money for no realized benefit. I understand it's important to NASCAR and airplanes and people that check their tires once every presidential election. But for the people that monitor their tire pressure properly, filling up with nitrogen will be a waste of money and limit where you can fill up. I can go down the road and pump air into my tires for 50 cents. If I want nitrogen I need to schedule an appointment with the dealer. And even then, after having nitrogen, if the pressure fluctuates then what I need to make another appointment to get nitrogen again?

 

My argument is don't waste your money on nitrogen. Buy a decent tire gauge and check your tire pressure once a month like you should and save your money for something else.

Edited by Silverado-Hareek
Posted (edited)

Agreed and Concur and disagree all at the same time.....

Edited by Strykers_Inc
Posted (edited)

So has anyone who have received a buyback and got another 2014 Sierra/Silverado experienced the vibration on your new ride?

Edited by iLlama
Posted

I only have to put air in my tires once a year, in the winter I run my tires low for ride comfort in my cars and trucks. Once the outside air gets cold and the light comes on. In the summer I just let some out, about 2 lbs. Unless I run over a nail thats happen maybe twice. They may gain 2 lbs on the interstate when they warm up, that's in Texas at 75 MPH at 95 to 100 degrees.

Posted

HEy Folks, I've kept up with this topic for months so I know how previlent this issue seems to be so imagine my suprise when I was reading through the complians for the 2014 Sierra at http://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/ and only found one vibration compliant. Why aren't people logging this problem with the government?

Posted (edited)

HEy Folks, I've kept up with this topic for months so I know how previlent this issue seems to be so imagine my suprise when I was reading through the complians for the 2014 Sierra at http://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/ and only found one vibration compliant. Why aren't people logging this problem with the government?

because as long as they do a buy back it isn't recorded as a defect and they keep their ability to make claims of best truck.

 

a buy back customer is a happy satisfied customer on paper because the complaint was resolved to the customers satisfaction so that is how its done and kept on the down low

Edited by keakar
Posted

So has anyone who have received a buyback and got another 2014 Sierra/Silverado experienced the vibration on your new ride?

Yep
Posted

It is official, my truck 2014 Sierra crew 6'-6" box 5.3l All terrain 4x4 Z71 tow package 20" G/Y SRA tires, is being bought back!

After numerous attempts with tires, driveshafts, rear axle, and testing with engineer nothing corrected my vibrations at 40mph. My truck was tested in excess of 1000 miles with no fix. My engineer, off record thinks that this vibration is a stacking effect of machined internal parts out of tolerance. Now the harmonics, frequency, and energy can not be stoped or fixed.

My gut feeling says it was the transmission right from the begining. I started legal actions a while back and would have not been this far along on my own without help!

GM and their dealers treated me like I was a criminal, and they refused to help me with my new truck I bought from them saying nothing was wrong with your vehicle.

Guess what I am a tech! And this bull**it did not sit well with me. In conclusion I filed a report with NHSTA about all the issues I had with my new truck.

I have always supported GM by buying their trucks, even when they were on their face nearly out of business and bankrupt. But after how I was dealt with by this mob like company, they deserve to hear from us one at a time, and with the help of legal representation!

I am sorry if I upset those that have no issues with their trucks, but for us with real issues we have been stroked by the dealers and GM too long.

My buy back award is my way out of this mess!

Posted

It is official, my truck 2014 Sierra crew 6'-6" box 5.3l All terrain 4x4 Z71 tow package 20" G/Y SRA tires, is being bought back!

After numerous attempts with tires, driveshafts, rear axle, and testing with engineer nothing corrected my vibrations at 40mph. My truck was tested in excess of 1000 miles with no fix. My engineer, off record thinks that this vibration is a stacking effect of machined internal parts out of tolerance. Now the harmonics, frequency, and energy can not be stoped or fixed.

My gut feeling says it was the transmission right from the begining. I started legal actions a while back and would have not been this far along on my own without help!

GM and their dealers treated me like I was a criminal, and they refused to help me with my new truck I bought from them saying nothing was wrong with your vehicle.

Guess what I am a tech! And this bull**it did not sit well with me. In conclusion I filed a report with NHSTA about all the issues I had with my new truck.

I have always supported GM by buying their trucks, even when they were on their face nearly out of business and bankrupt. But after how I was dealt with by this mob like company, they deserve to hear from us one at a time, and with the help of legal representation!

I am sorry if I upset those that have no issues with their trucks, but for us with real issues we have been stroked by the dealers and GM too long.

My buy back award is my way out of this mess!

 

How are they buying it back? Are they giving you trade assist towards a new gmc/chevy or are you getting "cash" back?

Posted

I tried to convey in my first post that the only common denomiator in my truck vs the others with the same issue is the transmission. I have a different engine, different driveshaft, different rear axle, different tires & size, different wheels & a different tune. I towed my boat today which is when it seems worse. At 70 i shifted to neutral & watched tach go to idle. Shimmy didnt stop until truck slowed to 60. I tried this twice. It has to be something in the rotating assy of the transmission.

Posted (edited)

So has anyone who have received a buyback and got another 2014 Sierra/Silverado experienced the vibration on your new ride?

yep, several people have followed the advice of the deniers who believed because their truck was trouble free that all trucks are fine and we are just a bunch of cry babies over a handful of bad trucks, well its a lot of bad trucks out there and the vibrations even show up in trouble free trucks after 10,000 or 15,000 miles then they start developing the vibrations too.

 

I actually agree with them that not all trucks are bad and the good ones are great trucks, but I don't agree with their attitudes of sticking your head in the sand and trying to pretend GM doesn't have some serious issues going on with a lot of these trucks and they cant seam to fix it or figure out whats wrong with them.

 

the only person I would recommend to go buy one of these trucks now would be someone I really hated.

Edited by keakar
Posted

A few other notes i forgot to mention. With my tune i dont have V-4 anymore either. You woukd think the dealer of the first buy back would ship that truck to GM & the engineers would jump on finding the problem & getting us a fix. Guess not!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • The not as clean as one would assume theme with the new engine oil, that reminds me of comments over the years with mechanics not always being so on board with filling an oil filter, not from the center anyway due to that typically being the clean side of the filter, danger of some contaminant falling into the filter if not careful but the realization now that the oil may not be as pure as one had assumed it would surely be. Yes it would be possible to fill from the small holes but that means messing with something to prop open the anti drain back valve if the filter is so equipped and not damage that valve in the process. Me, I have hardly ever prefilled an engine oil filter however I have prefilled diesel fuel filters with a filter on a fuel bulk tank and for anyone that has messed with diesel engines with filters and units that have a limited or no way of priming them, putting on a dry filter is a bad day to say the least with those crappy systems. But anyway back to not so clean engine oil, indeed perhaps its not so bad after all that I have not made a practice of prefilling oil filters.    As Grumpy Bear commented on keeping things clean, that I really have to wonder what the typical practice is at a dealer or any other shop that changes engine oil, do they make sure to wipe or wash off the oil plug and certainly if it fell into some gunk or onto a dirty floor, or that they wiped the filter mounting flange and didn't go and use some dirty rag and end up adding dirt to the inside of the head of the filter mount. Or be careless in how they stored or handled the new filter and if they were bumping into items under the vehicle with the filter opening facing up and having dirt drop right into the filter and if so right into the threaded center that is on the clean side. The top side, did they clean away the built up gunk that may be around the filler before removing the cap or to be really careful at that point that something right close to the filler hole that was hidden under the caps flange won't fall into the engine. Or did they clean the funnel or was that just laying there covered in oil from the oil change before and dust kicked up from sweeping the floor stuck to the oil and now that will go running into the next persons engine due to just not cleaning the funnel as "they won't know anyway" attitude as that young guy is more worried about taking a break so he can go outside and smoke a joint. Just random points that came to mind when I think about what some hired personnel may do that the shop foreman has no idea of or perhaps the whole attitude of some shops may be "eh ... who cares, they will never know the difference anyway".  
    • $3.69 for 87 octane.   $4.24 for Diesel in town.
    • On the subject of OLM, Gm's OLM tool may be more "informed" than others brands. I recall OLM's in mid-2000's Chrysler products literally counting down a set number of miles. That's all the OLM appeared to be.    I would actually expect GM to be able to explain the parameters that their OLM takes into account from a high level. No, I would not expect them to disclose their software coding or data analysis around their parameters.   So we're talking about two different topics, so to continue the subject on the other one, I'd be curious to know how much "standard particulate matter" in fresh oil is able to be filtered at first start by a fresh oil filter. How much particulate matter is enough to "matter"?   I.e. how much of a "lever" do we think this equates to (variability in particulate content, in fresh oils, between different makes/brands, some which filter less, and some that filter more).   We can say that more particles = more wear = shorter engine life as a logical statement and use that data with a little marketing to scare people into selecting a more refined/filtered oil. Using a similie, is this like deciding to forego two alcoholic drinks in a lifetime because we're worried about the potential impact on lifespan? Are there numbers which translate the ISO test results into a quantifiable increase in wear for a given engine/use case?
    • I'm pretty sure it doesn't actually recalibrate the speedometer it just changes the wheel speed sensor inputs to the computer. The truck still thinks it has stock tires.
    • I apologize, I missed this post, at risk of going off CURRENT TOPIC.   I'm not saying it is BS, I'm questioning how much information is being held back. GM is NOT going to spell out exactly every parameter in the algorithm. Liability, intellectual property, etc.    I'm not naive enough to believe that it is as simple as revolutions, coolant temperature, miles, time; are you?    I don't do irrational either, and boiling the OLM down to four simple values that I could code in an afternoon (I'm not a coder) is irrational - unless it suits your agenda to ignore it. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...