Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Your driveshaft continues to turn even in neutral, so if the vibration is in the shaft it will continue to vibrate in neutral. They make money off tire sales and usually with no return policy. I have Nittos and they are no more smooth than any other tire I've tried. Want smooth, go Michelin. Better yet, go with a new driveshaft.

Posted

This may not be applicable for those who's trucks been in and out of shops getting tire balanced.

 

I purchased a used 2014 silverado 1500 z71 with a shake above 70mph. Faintly starts at 60 but pretty negligible until 70 then violent up to 80. Never took it above that. Dealer put new tires on, iron man or something I've never heard, and claimed balance. I had them look over it before purchase and they blamed the leaf spring pack as it was a heavier one with one more leaf for the 5th wheel it pulled. I replaced the shocks as well as checked balance on a driveshaft. None of it helped.

 

I was going to try road force balance before replacing leaf spring back. Before the road force balance, I wanted to spend the lower cost on a regular balance. $30 for the rear 2 wheels and now it is smooth until 85mph. I know most people with the problem probably tried balance multiple times, even at multiple locations, but mine was definitely an unbalanced tire.

 

Posted
2 hours ago, Bart’s Silverado said:

Your driveshaft continues to turn even in neutral, so if the vibration is in the shaft it will continue to vibrate in neutral. They make money off tire sales and usually with no return policy. I have Nittos and they are no more smooth than any other tire I've tried. Want smooth, go Michelin. Better yet, go with a new driveshaft.

What??  Your driveshaft turns when your in neutral?  Better get that looked into.

Posted
9 hours ago, Gofas said:

Well I thought if you put truck in neutral and shake stops it’s driveshaft?

my truck still shakes even in neutral. Haha or maybe drive shaft keeps spinning cause it’s connected to the rear axle, duh!

 

I even let dealer service guy pick tire.

they picked Nitto grappler stock size. 

He says they had least problems with shake using these...

I’ve heard of vibration issues at a stop are the RPMs being too low. I think it’s set to about 500 rpm which is a little low. From what I’m reading the rpm can be changed with tuning (like diablew)

Posted (edited)
9 hours ago, calvic said:

What??  Your driveshaft turns when your in neutral?  Better get that looked into.

If the wheels are spinning and the axle is connected to the drive shaft, you bet the drive shaft will be spinning, even when the transmission is in neutral. You would have to disconnect the drive shaft from the rear axle. (or driving axle)

 

All you are doing when putting your transmission into neutral is removing the driving force of the transmission to the drive shaft but the shaft will still be spinning so long as the other end is spinning (the axle/wheels) Think about it. 

Edited by Colossus
Posted
On 8/7/2018 at 11:19 AM, Bart’s Silverado said:

You are just throwing your money away. Please see my other posts. Your problem is driveshaft related. Get rid of that long fat aluminum driveshaft. Go to a two piece shaft if yours is 2wd or a steel replacement shaft if yours is 4wd. I recommend you look up Performance Drivelines in California. 

 

Hello Bart,

 

How familiar is this company with this particular issue on the 14-18 trucks? I would like to give them a try but as others said, it's a lot of money to dump into a truck that is under warranty. 

Posted
4 hours ago, Shawn5800 said:

 

Hello Bart,

 

How familiar is this company with this particular issue on the 14-18 trucks? I would like to give them a try but as others said, it's a lot of money to dump into a truck that is under warranty. 

They make custom driveshaft setups for raised and lowered trucks where driveshaft critical speeds or clearance issues can easily become a problem. Adapting their technology to standard ride height trucks was an easy issue for them. I've had great results. I'm the one that actually figured out that the driveshaft were the issue, they just supplied me with my desired solution. 

Posted

My drive shaft comment was a brain fart.

well anyway I’m at46k and already ordered new tires.

if dealerwill not investigate further I’ll try driveshaft..

Well I thought if you put truck in neutral and shake stops it’s driveshaft?

my truck still shakes even in neutral.

 

I even let dealer service guy pick tire.

they picked Nitto grappler stock size. 

He says they had least problems with shake using these...

Posted

Just bought a used 2016 Crew cab LT 2wd 5.3 3.08. 58k miles. Didn’t notice the shake when test driving,  but didn’t go up to 70+mph. Truck shakes so bad between 70-75 mph it will almost shake a water bottle out of the cup holder. Truck has a set of Fuel Maverick 20x9 wheels with BFG All Terrain K02 275/55-20 that are brand new.

Truck has been back at the dealer where I bought it. They have balanced the tires, performed alignment, swapped wheels and tires from a known smooth truck. Still shakes. I suggested that they look into the driveshaft. Has anyone had any luck getting this fixed? 800 pages, it’s obviously common.

  • Like 1
Posted
On 8/9/2018 at 10:22 AM, Bart’s Silverado said:

They make custom driveshaft setups for raised and lowered trucks where driveshaft critical speeds or clearance issues can easily become a problem. Adapting their technology to standard ride height trucks was an easy issue for them. I've had great results. I'm the one that actually figured out that the driveshaft were the issue, they just supplied me with my desired solution. 

Thanks @Bart’s Silverado .  Spoke with Morgan at Performance Driveline, who provided me more information about this issue than three dealers.  Basically, the two piece drive shaft, as Bart's Silverado explained, eliminates the critical speed issues most of you are having with the one piece aluminum drive shafts.  They're also stronger so they'll take more HPs.  My issue, with the studder at 1200-1800 rpms they believe is due to a batch of mis-machined axles from the manufacturer that GM installed in these trucks anyway.  They have a truck in the shop with the chevy shake and the studder my truck suffers from and they've tried everything from tires to drive shaft, which fixed the critical speed issue, but not the studder.  They've ordered some custom axles in hopes this will be the final fix.  The estimated cost will be $550-600 for the custom axles.  She said they'll have the axles in at the end of the month and should be able to report on the results then.  Morgan isn't the owner, but she was extremely helpful and knew the issues inside and out.  When and if you decide to upgrade your driveline, give these guys your business.  Class act operation.

  • Like 1
Posted

I used a programmer to reprogram how the converter locks up. When I say reprogram I mean I selected the economy programming for the converter. I also disabled the cylinder deactivation. I think those two actions eliminated the shudder on my truck. It may have just been the elimination of cylinder deactivation. BTW I saw no decrease in fuel economy by eliminating the cylinder deactivation and returning to a true V8 engine. I am enjoying more power under my right foot though!

Posted

I have reached out to my local Toyota dealer after driving a few Tundras. I just can't succumb to driving a rattle box everyday for the money we pay. I should have bought the Tundra like I said I would have after my 07 Sierra was eating 2 quarts of oil every 5k. 

 

I don't have the time or the drive anymore to haggle with dealers who almost 100% of the time don't genuinely care about your issues and don't have the backing from GM to follow through with a real fix. Chances are GM knows where these issues are coming from but know the money pit they will be in by opening a full blown recall for it. 

 

Call it frame stiffening, bad tires, bad driveshafts, torque converter, pinion angle, rear ends. At the end of the day some guys have these generation trucks with zero vibration. The ones who do should be taken care of properly. 

 

FYI, if you haven't driven a 5.7 Tundra, do yourself a favor and do it and enjoy the basics of a truck and real torque,  no shuddering or bullshit hesitation.

 

/end rant

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
8 hours ago, Bart’s Silverado said:

I used a programmer to reprogram how the converter locks up. When I say reprogram I mean I selected the economy programming for the converter. I also disabled the cylinder deactivation. I think those two actions eliminated the shudder on my truck. It may have just been the elimination of cylinder deactivation. BTW I saw no decrease in fuel economy by eliminating the cylinder deactivation and returning to a true V8 engine. I am enjoying more power under my right foot though!

Which programmer did you end up using?

Posted (edited)
13 hours ago, Shawn5800 said:

FYI, if you haven't driven a 5.7 Tundra, do yourself a favor and do it and enjoy the basics of a truck and real torque,  no shuddering or bullshit hesitation.

 

 

 

 

 

I get it. I wouldn't put up with the shaking either.

 

When I bought my truck, I drove a Tundra. They are exquisite, no doubt about it. The problem I had was with the price point. They are notably more expensive than the 1500 or f150 for comparable models. I just can't justify paying that much for a half ton.

 

I've owned my 2017 1500 sierra for a little over a year. I'm at 9000km of mostly city driving. I've had problems with the rear suspension, fuel pump, air conditioner, and transmission. In a single year. Thank god I haven't had the shake yet, but from what I've read, it starts in at around 30,000km (on average).

 

GM has been horrible to deal with; thank god my dealer sympathizes and the mechanic they have is pretty good. He said to me out of frustration that this model of 1500 from 2014 up (K2X?) is the most problematic vehicle he has seen since working for GM. Of course that is anecdotal, but even the dealers aren't happy with having to deal with this turd.

 

I'm currently trying to get my finances in order to trade in for an F150. I may go second hand. I think I'm done with new vehicles. I've only ever owned two, and was under the mistaken impression that new vehicles are less problematic and have warranty. I've come to learn warranties aren't worth the hassle they put you through, especially GM.

 

 

Edited by Baytrucker
Posted
20 hours ago, Chevelleguy3 said:

Just bought a used 2016 Crew cab LT 2wd 5.3 3.08. 58k miles. Didn’t notice the shake when test driving,  but didn’t go up to 70+mph. Truck shakes so bad between 70-75 mph it will almost shake a water bottle out of the cup holder. Truck has a set of Fuel Maverick 20x9 wheels with BFG All Terrain K02 275/55-20 that are brand new.

Truck has been back at the dealer where I bought it. They have balanced the tires, performed alignment, swapped wheels and tires from a known smooth truck. Still shakes. I suggested that they look into the driveshaft. Has anyone had any luck getting this fixed? 800 pages, it’s obviously common.

Go through the thread again carefully and look at the user names.  I've been tracking this thread, and one thing I noticed is that the only people who have said they have gotten rid the shake and then proceeded to never post again, were the people who "fixed it" by trading it in for another vehicle.

 

There are other users who applied fixes, but ended up coming back later saying the shake reappeared.

 

I've been lucky so far in regard to the shake. Every other component on my truck seems to be taking turns in line to break, but the shaking hasn't appeared yet. It makes me uncomfortable that it has such a high probability of developing a shake later on.

 

You may want to look at swapping and getting out, rather than sinking thousands of dollars into a fix. Its pretty telling that GM has had 5 years to fix this issue, and still can't even figure out definitively what causes it, so you may end up playing a very expensive game of whack-a-mole. I'm not sure what moved you to buy a GM product in the first place (a lot of people here seem to have epic brand loyalty), but GM simply isn't the company it used to be. Cut your losses and run.

 

 

 

  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...