Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

 

They took apart my front diff and replaced the ring gear (4x4 vibration that I honestly didn't even notice but the shop foreman did) and put new Michelin LTX MS2 on it (for the high speed vibration), road forced, and voila, it's fixed!! :):).

Did your front diff make any noticeable noise when in Auto or 4wd? I can almost always hear mine when in either. I never heard anything with my 2005.

Posted

This type of treatment will hurt them in the long run . People are becoming more aware of this problem but more importantly is how they screw you around around.. Not right

Posted (edited)

4 appointments service manager forgot what he told me, second one he set up and wasn't even there. 3 hour round trip for nothing thanks Ray Service manager at Somerset Kenny Ross

 

They say not suppose to use auto . Keep in 2 wd then why did you make auto ?

Still shakes In 2 wd

I suppose you should not use your auto transmission either. Make sure you change all the gears manually from now on. :rolleyes:

Edited by pm26
Posted (edited)

That's funny about manual! This is a bad joke. Talking Ray at Somerset Service manger has an anawer for everything to the point he forgets what he Is saying!

The funny but sad thing is I could put a hitch on a car and have better luck!!

Try towing in 2 wd with trailer and heavy stuff! Watch the back tires spin !! Auto is an option only in the snow and rain. Is what they told me! But on question is ???? Why do is the whole truc shake Ray????

Edited by tlevine99
Posted

Who knows if this would cause any sort of vibration but I found this a little odd. Maybe it's normal or within spec who knows but I thought I'd share. It finally warmed up enough over the weekend so I could put my mud flaps on when I noticed on the rears I had a harder time fitting my fingers and hand in behind the wheel on the passenger side trying to put the screws back in the wheel well. So I took a measurement and found the passenger side rear wheel 1cm closer to the back of the wheel opening than the drivers side. I verified the 1cm difference measuring towards the front of the wheel openings too. Anyone else ever notice this or care to take a quick measurement on yours? What do you guys think of this?

post-138443-0-25815600-1425946358_thumb.jpg

post-138443-0-94156500-1425946380_thumb.jpg

post-138443-0-25815600-1425946358_thumb.jpg

post-138443-0-94156500-1425946380_thumb.jpg

post-138443-0-25815600-1425946358_thumb.jpg

post-138443-0-94156500-1425946380_thumb.jpg

post-138443-0-25815600-1425946358_thumb.jpg

post-138443-0-94156500-1425946380_thumb.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted

That has to be the craziest thing I've seen :nonod:

 

I don't see how that could be in spec's, but then again the wizard ( GM engineer )

thought that if they loosened all the body mounts and re torque them that would

make the vibration between 62 & 75 disappear :nopity:

Posted

They want to do vibration test

How do I know they are even doing it correctly

Ask them for a copy of the procedure.

Posted

2014 GMC all-terrain package unresolved vibration issues started bringing this truck back to the dealership after 17 days of ownership. Rf tires no change, had really bad vibration in rear end at 80 mph , dealership replace complete rear end , pick up truck from dealership test drove it had a really bad vibration in the steering wheel made my hands numb after driving,kept complaining about this issue until a vibration specialist is a test on truck and determine ring in pinon was bad, new ring and pinion made vibration a little less in steering wheel ,but still a problem dealership says they cannot do any more for this truck they said to cal lGM corporate , So I did and had a customer service agent tell me there was nothing wrong with my truck so therefore they could not do anything for me,found out only 50% of lemon law cases are won due to vibration issues also dealership says they will not even give me book value for this new truck,I stood behind the GMC name for over 30 years unfortunately GM does not stand behind their customers or their products .

Posted

Two new vibration analysis tools from GM:

Part 1 -

http://sandyblogs.com/techlink/?p=4396

 

Part 2 -

http://sandyblogs.com/techlink/?p=4394

 

Thanks for those links, they provide a lot of insight into what is needed to fix the vibration problems.

 

Just to get all the info centralized, I've gathered the following TSB, worksheet etc. info to show the service departments in case they're unable to find their ass with both hands on this issue:

 

GM TSB PI1354B

 

Vibration Analysis Worksheet – Bulletin 03-00-91-001G

 

CH-51450 Oscilloscope Diagnostic Kit with NVH

 

I found a link to the actual worksheet PDF if you click it.

Posted

2014 GMC all-terrain package unresolved vibration issues started bringing this truck back to the dealership after 17 days of ownership. Rf tires no change, had really bad vibration in rear end at 80 mph , dealership replace complete rear end , pick up truck from dealership test drove it had a really bad vibration in the steering wheel made my hands numb after driving,kept complaining about this issue until a vibration specialist is a test on truck and determine ring in pinon was bad, new ring and pinion made vibration a little less in steering wheel ,but still a problem dealership says they cannot do any more for this truck they said to cal lGM corporate , So I did and had a customer service agent tell me there was nothing wrong with my truck so therefore they could not do anything for me,found out only 50% of lemon law cases are won due to vibration issues also dealership says they will not even give me book value for this new truck,I stood behind the GMC name for over 30 years unfortunately GM does not stand behind their customers or their products .

 

I'd strongly suggest a BBB complaint ;

http://www.bbb.org/council/programs-services/dispute-handling-and-resolution/bbb-auto-line

 

GM customer service will give you nothing but the run around, I never was given the opportunity to talk to the District

Rep. who made the final call, so I had to deal with the C/S person who could not even comment on exact and directed

questions and it was day's before I'd get an answer back in the three way cluster ! and don't even get me started about the engineer ordeal ! GM is running so fast to cover up something that they have been fully aware of since 08/2013 and I'm

sure well before that, they are the post child of disorganization they even sent me the final paper work to a Cadillac buy

back in Florida instead of mine !

 

And to add more insult, I just read on this very site that there are now transmission issues on the 8spd, I had the 6sp in mine and that it rose 200 to 300 rpms on the up shift and was deemed as " Normal Operation" :banghead:

 

Save all your paperwork, Take names and numbers of EVERYONE you talk to from GM & dealerships and note the dates & times as well !

2014 GMC all-terrain package unresolved vibration issues started bringing this truck back to the dealership after 17 days of ownership. Rf tires no change, had really bad vibration in rear end at 80 mph , dealership replace complete rear end , pick up truck from dealership test drove it had a really bad vibration in the steering wheel made my hands numb after driving,kept complaining about this issue until a vibration specialist is a test on truck and determine ring in pinon was bad, new ring and pinion made vibration a little less in steering wheel ,but still a problem dealership says they cannot do any more for this truck they said to cal lGM corporate , So I did and had a customer service agent tell me there was nothing wrong with my truck so therefore they could not do anything for me,found out only 50% of lemon law cases are won due to vibration issues also dealership says they will not even give me book value for this new truck,I stood behind the GMC name for over 30 years unfortunately GM does not stand behind their customers or their products .

 

I'd strongly suggest a BBB complaint ;

http://www.bbb.org/council/programs-services/dispute-handling-and-resolution/bbb-auto-line

 

GM customer service will give you nothing but the run around, I never was given the opportunity to talk to the District

Rep. who made the final call, so I had to deal with the C/S person who could not even comment on exact and directed

questions and it was day's before I'd get an answer back in the three way cluster ! and don't even get me started about the engineer ordeal ! GM is running so fast to cover up something that they have been fully aware of since 08/2013 and I'm

sure well before that, they are the post child of disorganization they even sent me the final paper work to a Cadillac buy

back in Florida instead of mine !

 

And to add more insult, I just read on this very site that there are now transmission issues on the 8spd, I had the 6sp in mine and that it rose 200 to 300 rpms on the up shift and was deemed as " Normal Operation" :banghead:

 

Save all your paperwork, Take names and numbers of EVERYONE you talk to from GM & dealerships and note the dates & times as well !

2014 GMC all-terrain package unresolved vibration issues started bringing this truck back to the dealership after 17 days of ownership. Rf tires no change, had really bad vibration in rear end at 80 mph , dealership replace complete rear end , pick up truck from dealership test drove it had a really bad vibration in the steering wheel made my hands numb after driving,kept complaining about this issue until a vibration specialist is a test on truck and determine ring in pinon was bad, new ring and pinion made vibration a little less in steering wheel ,but still a problem dealership says they cannot do any more for this truck they said to cal lGM corporate , So I did and had a customer service agent tell me there was nothing wrong with my truck so therefore they could not do anything for me,found out only 50% of lemon law cases are won due to vibration issues also dealership says they will not even give me book value for this new truck,I stood behind the GMC name for over 30 years unfortunately GM does not stand behind their customers or their products .

 

I'd strongly suggest a BBB complaint ;

http://www.bbb.org/council/programs-services/dispute-handling-and-resolution/bbb-auto-line

 

GM customer service will give you nothing but the run around, I never was given the opportunity to talk to the District

Rep. who made the final call, so I had to deal with the C/S person who could not even comment on exact and directed

questions and it was day's before I'd get an answer back in the three way cluster ! and don't even get me started about the engineer ordeal ! GM is running so fast to cover up something that they have been fully aware of since 08/2013 and I'm

sure well before that, they are the post child of disorganization they even sent me the final paper work to a Cadillac buy

back in Florida instead of mine !

 

And to add more insult, I just read on this very site that there are now transmission issues on the 8spd, I had the 6sp in mine and that it rose 200 to 300 rpms on the up shift and was deemed as " Normal Operation" :banghead:

 

Save all your paperwork, Take names and numbers of EVERYONE you talk to from GM & dealerships and note the dates & times as well !

Posted (edited)

Who knows if this would cause any sort of vibration but I found this a little odd. Maybe it's normal or within spec who knows but I thought I'd share. It finally warmed up enough over the weekend so I could put my mud flaps on when I noticed on the rears I had a harder time fitting my fingers and hand in behind the wheel on the passenger side trying to put the screws back in the wheel well. So I took a measurement and found the passenger side rear wheel 1cm closer to the back of the wheel opening than the drivers side. I verified the 1cm difference measuring towards the front of the wheel openings too. Anyone else ever notice this or care to take a quick measurement on yours? What do you guys think of this?

I would take the truck in for alignment and make sure that the rear axle is properly mounted on the spring seats. It is a rigid axle and if it not mounted straight, then you will have issues. 1 cm (3/8") difference is a bit much.

Edited by pm26
Posted

There are quite a few places to get a 3/8 difference between bed mounts and maybe even the sheet metal. You should measure from a place on the chassis to the wheel to get a true measurement.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Did have to make 1 modification because of the WeatherTech rear mud flaps and that was needing 3 longer screws than what came with the install package. 😄
    • Picked up the liners yesterday. Installed passenger side WITHOUT any modifications. All mounting holes lined up perfectly. Rain is interfering today with drivers side. Very Happy! Will add pics when finished
    • As a matter of amusement I’ll leave this conversation with this. Do you beat the government average fuel estimate? Statistics are a guide to me. Not a rule. Someone once said I have to have the last word. If true and possible may be. I’ll blame that on working in a family business.
    • That is a fair point, and I agree that trying to log “everything in the truck” would be the wrong direction.   There are a lot of modules and a lot of traffic. If the product became a full-truck datalogger, the amount of data would get huge very quickly, and most owners would never use it.   I think the first useful version would need to be narrow: - powertrain-side event evidence - selected high-value parameters - communication / voltage / reset events - pre/post event window - short report first, raw log only as backup   One distinction I should make is between active OBD/PID polling and passive bus capture. If you are polling PIDs through OBD, then yes: the more parameters you request, the lower the effective sample rate becomes, and you are adding diagnostic traffic to a vehicle that is already busy running itself. With passive CAN capture, the recorder is not asking all the modules for data. It is listening to traffic that is already on the bus. So it does not consume vehicle bus bandwidth in the same way that a scan tool polling hundreds of PIDs would. But your point still applies in a different way.   Even if passive capture does not add bus traffic, the recorder still has limits: - processing rate - storage rate - timestamp accuracy - decoder workload - event filtering - report size - user attention span   So the answer cannot be “log everything and let the user figure it out.” The product would need to store enough raw evidence to be useful, but only decode, graph, and present the important parts around the event.   A practical report should probably show: - what triggered the capture - how much pre/post data was preserved - which selected parameters changed - how those values compared to baseline - whether the same pattern happened before - whether any voltage, reset, bus-off, lost-message, or communication fault occurred - selected graphs around the event - raw data only as supporting evidence   So I agree with you. More data is not automatically better. The real product is the reduction from raw data into a useful event report.
    • That makes sense, and I agree with most of that.   I think the product would need both: 1. a default powertrain template, so it is useful out of the box; 2. user-selected priority parameters, so the owner or shop can choose what they want to see first.   Different users are going to care about different things. One owner may care about oil pressure and voltage. Another may care about misfire trend, AFM/DFM behavior, or U-codes. A shop may want communication events and repeatability first. Your baseline point is probably the most important one. Raw data is not very useful unless the report can show what normal looked like for that vehicle under similar conditions.   The way I would think about it is: - start with a basic known-good baseline - learn normal behavior for that specific vehicle over time - allow the event to be overlaid against baseline - show whether the event was a one-time spike or a repeatable pattern - provide a simple severity level, but with clear limits on what that severity means   For example, early severity could be something like: - Info: event captured, no obvious abnormal pattern - Watch: value moved outside baseline, but not repeated - Warning: repeatable abnormal pattern under similar conditions - Critical: communication loss, voltage drop, bus-off, reset, or severe repeated event   I would not want the first version to say “replace this part.” That would be overclaiming unless there is repair-confirmed data behind it. It would be more honest to say “this pattern deserves inspection.”   On the OBD port question, I think OBD absolutely has a role. OBD is probably the right place for: - DTCs - freeze frame - VIN - calibration information - normal scan-tool parameters - Mode 6 / enhanced diagnostic data if available The reason I am still looking at an ECM-side recorder is that the failure may happen before anyone connects a scan tool. If the owner plugs in a scanner after the event, the pre-event evidence may already be gone unless the ECU happened to save it. So I do not see this as “OBD versus ECM-side.” I see it more like: - ECM-side recorder: always armed, rolling buffer, event evidence - OBD/DLC companion: DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration, normal scan data - phone/cloud: status, notes, upload, report generation, notifications   I agree that phone connection and push notifications would be useful. I just would not want the phone or cloud connection to be required for capture. The recorder should save the event locally even if the phone is not connected. The phone should help with event marking, download, notes, upload, alerts, and report viewing.   For a default GM V8 event report, would this list make sense? - RPM - calculated load / MAP - throttle position - vehicle speed - gear / torque converter state if available - coolant temperature - oil pressure - oil temperature if available - battery voltage - commanded AFM/DFM state if available - actual AFM/DFM state if available - misfire counters / roughness by cylinder if available - fuel trims - relevant U-codes / communication events - bus-off / lost periodic message / module reset / voltage drop events Which of those would you remove, and what would you add?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...