Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

 

Thank you. Is this actually a "legit" (for lack of a better word) GM-Chevy TSB that I can take to the dealer?

Well, the website is not a GM website and it's not a scanned image on an actual GM TSB, so can't say for sure if it is legit or not. The number of it (PI1354A) looks like a GM number but I haven't been able to find that TSB on any other site with GM TSBs. Not sure what to make of it.

 

Print it out, take it to your dealer, and if he says it's bogus, ask to see the actual "PI1354A" document. If he claims there is no "PI1354A", ask to see the index of TSBs. If they won;t show you, then draw your own conclusion.

 

FYI, I suspect it is legit, because the Shop Foreman at my delaership mentioned (on his own) that there is a bulletin to Roadforce to 15 lb. This is likely it.

 

Good luck.

Posted

Only way to fix the vibration issues is to trade your truck .

YUP! I dumped that vibrating 2014 Silverado and couldn't be happier. That truck was evil and was ruining my life with all it's problems. I hope everyoe is able to find satisfaction in the end.

  • Like 1
Posted

YUP! I dumped that vibrating 2014 Silverado and couldn't be happier. That truck was evil and was ruining my life with all it's problems. I hope everyoe is able to find satisfaction in the end.

I dont mean to be rude or anything, but unless you're trying to legit help someone don't comment like this. We know u taded your truck in and are happy now like 30 pages ago.
Posted

I dont mean to be rude or anything, but unless you're trying to legit help someone don't comment like this. We know u taded your truck in and are happy now like 30 pages ago.

Agreeing with another forum member and also wishing everyone satisfaction in the end rubbed you the wrong way? I just popped in hoping to see people posting a viable fix for GM's vibration issue but ..nope. They're still selling 6000 lb vibrators with not a care on the world.

Posted

Agreeing with another forum member and also wishing everyone satisfaction in the end rubbed you the wrong way? I just popped in hoping to see people posting a viable fix for GM's vibration issue but ..nope. They're still selling 6000 lb vibrators with not a care on the world.

And $7/pound is a pretty hefty price to pay for one.

Posted

Mine vibrated today on the interstate, passengers seat was shaking. 1st time its done it since I put the Lt tires on, about 20,000 miles ago. I'm gonna go trade it for a ford.... NOT!!

Posted

Agreeing with another forum member and also wishing everyone satisfaction in the end rubbed you the wrong way? I just popped in hoping to see people posting a viable fix for GM's vibration issue but ..nope. They're still selling 6000 lb vibrators with not a care on the world.

You have a Ford my friend, I believe you're on the wrong site... Time to give it up...
Posted

For any Ford advocates,

 

I drive a 14' Ford XTR Extended cab as a work truck, and there's about 10 of them used as field trucks where I work in in Alberta. I can tell you first hand the problems Fords face even being the last year of the previous gen where there should be next to no bugs. Thing is, being pounded through the mud and dirt roads does it in on the suspensions and shocks, tire balancing, bearings,etc, but when you are having head problems (replaced), "VVT Phaser" issues, idler wheel bearing problems (20k km on a non field based truck), and the odd rough shifting of the transmission, off spec front diff resulting in complete replacement of the front end, and mysterious injector related issues resulting in the truck not being able to start, a transmission switch exposed to the debris of the road that can become jammed up with mud/dirt/snow/ice and you can't shift into gear. I enjoy driving my work truck, but it has it's quirks at 22k km (tranny switch problem)

 

Bear in mind these are work trucks that do take abuse (not so much on the engine/electrical side), there's a few items listed that shouldn't occur to trucks with less than 50k miles. I gander at both Ram and Ford forums as well, and even though I like Fords, the aluminum and the amount of electronic "everything" they piled into the truck just worries me too much for longevity. Ram by the looks of it has some serious electrical horror stories on brand new trucks with the BCMs requiring entire replacement, and the ecodiesel seems to be teething badly as well (http://www.dieselramforum.com/forum/new-member-introductions/5345-beware-new-eco-diesel.html few threads like this)

 

My personal 08 Sierra has been a tank that has taken abuse and put on a lot of miles in short time without many issues popping up. It vibrates going down the highway as well, even shaking water bottles, but it really doesn't bother me all too much (mind you the age of the truck).

 

I hope when I get my truck in roughly a month it doesn't vibrate or have transmission problems. All the ones I test drove including a friends seemed to be trouble free in all these "high problematic" areas except for the (now fixed) Sierra headlights. I am being cautious being a new vehicle because across most brands it does seem like quality control/assurance has gone by the wayside in favour of cost cutting.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

 

I hope when I get my truck in roughly a month it doesn't vibrate or have transmission problems. All the ones I test drove including a friends seemed to be trouble free in all these "high problematic" areas except for the (now fixed) Sierra headlights. I am being cautious being a new vehicle because across most brands it does seem like quality control/assurance has gone by the wayside in favour of cost cutting.

How does ordering a new truck despite all the identified issues and "hoping that it does not vibrate or have transmission problems" qualify in any way as being cautious? To me it sounds like gambling.

 

If you want to be cautious, wait until GM proves that they have addressed and eliminated the known issues on these vehicles.

 

Years ago I too ignored complaints about problems with Volkswagen cars. I bought a new one hoping that it too would be perfect. It turned out to be the biggest lemon I have ever owned for a vehicle. So much for "hoping that mine will be trouble free".

Edited by pm26
Posted

How does ordering a new truck despite all the identified issues and "hoping that it does not vibrate or have transmission problems" qualify in any way as being cautious? To me it sounds like gambling.

 

If you want to be cautious, wait until GM proves that they have addressed and eliminated the known issues on these vehicles.

 

Years ago I too ignored complaints about problems with Volkswagen cars. I bought a new one hoping that it too would be perfect. It turned out to be the biggest lemon I have ever owned for a vehicle. So much for "hoping that mine will be trouble free".

Fair points. I guess I didn't mention I have been looking at gms for about a year now and waited for the 2nd MY to see what quirks and problems there might be. The other point I was trying to make with my stories about other brands of trucks was that purchasing any of them could be a gamble, which with 2014 fords should be the best bet being the last year of that Gen yet they still have issues.

 

I am excited for my truck to be delivered despite the issues, like I said I have been shopping for about a year now and I feel like I would equally be gambling if I looked at fords and rams. "Cautious" I suppose isn't a great statement for it, more like "playing the field".

Posted

Well, if they are putting new tires on it, insist that they do a proper Roadforce balance. Insist they Forcematch all 4 wheels and tires, and measure rim runouts first with the tires removed. Everything should be done using the stud adapter (not the centring cone). And, insist they do the "Centering" check that the Hunter machine can do first. And, insist they Roadforce balance to a maximum of 15 lb per the latest GM bulletin.

If they don't know what all that is, they they are not competent to do Roadforce balance. If they say it's not necessary, then they are not competent to do Roadforce balancing. If they don't give you the printouts after, to show they did it all, then they are not competent to do Roadforce balancing or are hiding something.

I'm not saying this will solve the vibration problem, but unless they do all that when they install new tires in an attempt to solve a vibration problem, they are wasting their time and yours. And, by the way, this is all pretty much covered in a GM bulletin some where. Doesn't mean every dealer follows it properly, but that is how it should be done.

Well, if they are putting new tires on it, insist that they do a proper Roadforce balance. Insist they Forcematch all 4 wheels and tires, and measure rim runouts first with the tires removed. Everything should be done using the stud adapter (not the centring cone). And, insist they do the "Centering" check that the Hunter machine can do first. And, insist they Roadforce balance to a maximum of 15 lb per the latest GM bulletin.

If they don't know what all that is, they they are not competent to do Roadforce balance. If they say it's not necessary, then they are not competent to do Roadforce balancing. If they don't give you the printouts after, to show they did it all, then they are not competent to do Roadforce balancing or are hiding something.

I'm not saying this will solve the vibration problem, but unless they do all that when they install new tires in an attempt to solve a vibration problem, they are wasting their time and yours. And, by the way, this is all pretty much covered in a GM bulletin some where. Doesn't mean every dealer follows it properly, but that is how it should be done.

Well, if they are putting new tires on it, insist that they do a proper Roadforce balance. Insist they Forcematch all 4 wheels and tires, and measure rim runouts first with the tires removed. Everything should be done using the stud adapter (not the centring cone). And, insist they do the "Centering" check that the Hunter machine can do first. And, insist they Roadforce balance to a maximum of 15 lb per the latest GM bulletin.

If they don't know what all that is, they they are not competent to do Roadforce balance. If they say it's not necessary, then they are not competent to do Roadforce balancing. If they don't give you the printouts after, to show they did it all, then they are not competent to do Roadforce balancing or are hiding something.

I'm not saying this will solve the vibration problem, but unless they do all that when they install new tires in an attempt to solve a vibration problem, they are wasting their time and yours. And, by the way, this is all pretty much covered in a GM bulletin some where. Doesn't mean every dealer follows it properly, but that is how it should be done.

Posted

Here's an update: I wasn't waiting for dealer to jerk me around anymore so I called GM myself and opened a claim. They tried co tacting the dealer several times, but dealer was avoiding them. Finally dealer made arrangements with GM to bring my truck back in Monday to look at suspension and rear differential. I've bern telling dealer things to look at based on this forum, but they keep saying "it's not that". GM keeps calling me asking me what I want and I tell them to fix it or buy it back so I can get a 2015. I keep stressing to them this is the 3rd time they're trying to fix...I'm trying to give the subtle hint of leMon law.

 

Any ideas on how to get GM to buy this back? They keep wanting to dump money into a sinking ship... i don't get it.

Posted

Here's an update: I wasn't waiting for dealer to jerk me around anymore so I called GM myself and opened a claim. They tried co tacting the dealer several times, but dealer was avoiding them. Finally dealer made arrangements with GM to bring my truck back in Monday to look at suspension and rear differential. I've bern telling dealer things to look at based on this forum, but they keep saying "it's not that". GM keeps calling me asking me what I want and I tell them to fix it or buy it back so I can get a 2015. I keep stressing to them this is the 3rd time they're trying to fix...I'm trying to give the subtle hint of leMon law.

 

Any ideas on how to get GM to buy this back? They keep wanting to dump money into a sinking ship... i don't get it.

 

The best way is to research your states lemon law through the BBB site;

http://www.bbb.org/council/programs-services/dispute-handling-and-resolution/bbb-auto-line

 

GM will only have a certain amount of time once you've filed.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Sad thing is that this doesn't have to be the case. LSPI can be solved without a reduction in TBN. Swap Ca for Mg.  Cats are not a issue if the OEM can get a ring and valve guide seal even at SN levels of SAPS. Dizzy is purring like a kitten with a bowl of warm milk. 200K of Full SAPS oil and zero detonation issues and nice a clean inside and out. This shouldn't be an issue. It isn't 1920.    Tell ya what AMSOIL SS is excellent at, internal cleanliness. The new formula is even a step up from their already outstanding cleanliness levels. Can't say the OEM offering is quite that clean. There marketing suggest the SS is cleaner.     That is the only defense with at shelf oil. Nothing wrong with them if you ignore the marketing and OEM 'recommended' OCI and use a thimble full of common sense. 😉 You go sir. 
    • I started with a folding cover by BAK PAC on my 2500. It went bad after close to 5 years. Bent and vinyl coming loose. Contacted BAK and they gave me a very good discount on a Revolver. Had it a number of years. Mostly outdoor storage. Some garage storage. Vinyl started to come loose. Still under warranty so they replaced to cover. Sold the 2500, bought the 1500 and got another revolver for it. Had it a couple years now and no issues. I store it indoors. Got a bit of discount when buying it as well. If you are seeing problems, contact BAK or real truck and let them know. Customer service was pretty good. But I think they changed their warranty.
    • I agree, there is no one answer fits all as every rig is different, one may be pulling some little aluminum fishing boat while another is towing a monstrosity that weighs a lot and hopefully the owner if the rig has some prior experience to know what drive mode they should choose.    It also struck me and this is from watching a few of those boat ramp escapades videos in the past, Ford being one of the vehicles that has the auto front axle hubs and sure enough its found out that one hub has crapped out and won't engage and may not have manual hubs to even select on both sides so they are on the boat ramp stuck with no four wheel drive and spinning .... they flat out need a tow to get up the ramp and deal with the vehicles new found issues. That can happen to all brands of pickup, finding out either four wheel drive or 4 low isn't working right at the time its needed it to work as some electronic crap has failed. 
    • Its possible you never had the joy of the crappy boat launches we tend to have around here or really some of them are just grades down to the river if its a river scenario and the conditions change all the time with the river levels and silt deposits. Some of the lakes we went to years ago, there was no such thing as a cement pad that went down into the water that the trailer stayed on, it was gravel maybe up to the water line and then duck crap much beyond that so sinking the boat tires into mud. Of course some of the more established lakes had a cement bar type boat ramp but sometimes it was covered in green slime closer and certainly within the water and a two wheel drive had all sorts of fun if one had to touch that slime with the rear tires.    A neighbor of mine had made a comment years back with his chev truck that was probably about the same year as yours but a half ton extended cab 4x4 and he a a fiberglass boat with an inboard so it wasn't a feather weight and he had gone out to one of the large popular lakes in the area and don't ask me how this happened but he was in two wheel drive as he figured he didn't require four wheel drive for that boat ramp and somehow upon pulling the boat out he twisted one of his drive axles. I suspect it must have spun and then grabbed on the cement ramp and shocked it to the degree of twisting it. He would have had the standard 8.5 or whatever it was axle housing as the 9.5 ring gear like my truck has also has larger drive axles as far as I know. Anyway he was feeling a vibration driving home and had it checked out and a shop found that the tire/hub was wobbling because of the axle had twisted so in went a new drive axle. After that bad experience he said he made sure to put it into four wheel drive to lower the stress on the rear axle. Of course that is where an HD truck can handle a lot more stress and no doubt these newer half tons with their larger ring gears probably have larger drive axles as well to match vs back in the day. 
    • Desirable - as in does someone WANT one, aspire to have one. Could reasonably buy any car they want and CHOOSE these instead.    I didn't watch the video, why did they win?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...