Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I had my first chance to try out the new Hydra-Matic 8L90 yesterday at GM's Milford Proving Grounds. Although it was in a Corvette Stingray, I feel that I can give you all a preview of what the new 8-speed might add to the Silverado, Sierra, and other K2 platform models.

Corvette_8Speed_16.jpg

If you want to hear about the 8L90 in the Stingray, head over to autoinsane.com and read my article: 8 new reasons to love the Corvette Stingray.

Corvette_8Speed_06.jpg

On the pickup side, the new 8L90 will add a considerable amount of polish and refinement. It's an all new design with second generation control systems.

It also fits in the same space and (at least in the Corvette application) weighs 8lbs less. The housing and input/output shafts will be different in the pickup application but the internals will be the same. Programming, shift algorithms and other fine tuning will vary by model and make.

I drove the 8-speed on GM's Milford Road Course at speeds over 100mph and with no restrictions. Summed up, it's the next best thing to a Porsche dual-clutch PDK. I was very impressed and have high hopes for its performance in the K2 platform.

I can see the quicker and firmer shift abilities of this transmission helping towing/hauling confidence. The wider ratio of gears will mean even quicker acceleration and better fuel economy. I think the most noticeable feature, however, is that you'll notice the transmission less. Partial throttle shifts are butter smooth and never hesitate.

Some quick notes:

  • No shift slop, as we've sometimes experienced with the current 6-speed
  • Very well tuned rev-matching on downshift
  • A wider range of shift feel than the 6-speed. Ranges from very smooth to harsh, depending on throttle
  • Built to handle up to 650 lb-ft of torque. Seems very mod-resistant.
  • Quicker CPU/processor and a handful of new sensors to measure almost every rotating shaft at any given time
  • 6.23msec between sensor measurements/adjustments
  • Added 1mpg to Corvette highway fuel economy

Want to see and hear how it shifts? Watch this video of me riding with a GM engineer.



I hope this is useful to someone. :cheers:

Corvette_8Speed_06.jpg

Corvette_8Speed_16.jpg

Corvette_8Speed_06.jpg

Corvette_8Speed_16.jpg

Corvette_8Speed_06.jpg

Corvette_8Speed_16.jpg

  • Replies 35
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

Wow thanks Zane. I know the 6 speed in my 09 silverado and 2014 are some sloppy shifters. I cant wait to see how this is in the trucks. Any idea on when the trucks will be available for testing?

Posted

Cool, good to hear!

 

 

Sent from my iPod touch using Tapatalk

Posted

I bet having a quicker CPU/Processor is what will mainly contribute to smoother operation. The transmissions now seem to not be able to figure out how to act sometimes which makes me think the computers are slow to process everything.

Posted

One of my biggest complaints in my 2014 LTZ is the 6 speed trans shifting. Also how it needs so much throttle to downshift. Shifting is terrible.

Posted

I bet having a quicker CPU/Processor is what will mainly contribute to smoother operation. The transmissions now seem to not be able to figure out how to act sometimes which makes me think the computers are slow to process everything.

I personally think it's not the speed of the processor rather the programming for maximum mpg's causing issues. You need to burn fuel to accelerate and the computer doesn't know what to do to use fuel to accelerate but not burn fuel to keep mpg's up. I think it's computer conflict personally. I drove a couple of the newer trucks (4spd & 6spd). I understand the 6 speed is a learning trans but my experience with it was not pleasent. I had to practicly floor it just to go from 15mph to 25mph.

Posted

I personally think it's not the speed of the processor rather the programming for maximum mpg's causing issues. You need to burn fuel to accelerate and the computer doesn't know what to do to use fuel to accelerate but not burn fuel to keep mpg's up. I think it's computer conflict personally. I drove a couple of the newer trucks (4spd & 6spd). I understand the 6 speed is a learning trans but my experience with it was not pleasent. I had to practicly floor it just to go from 15mph to 25mph.

That's a good point too. I wonder if it's a little of both the programming, and slow computers?

Posted

Was talking to my nephew last weekend about the 6-speeds. He works on developing the algorithms for transmissions at GM though mostly for new, yet to be released designs like the 8-speed and beyond. Apparently there are a herd of engineers working on the various algorithms each a small part of the whole system. One for gear ratios, one for shift points, one for AFM, one for fuel economy... Basically, lots of heads not always talking to each other. All these algorithms are developed by computer simulation and those raw numbers drive the final design, sloppy shifts, slow shifts, excessive downshifts be damned. It's all about the simulated results...real world not so much. He doesn't work on the trucks, but there are many similarities among the vehicle lines so I'm sure he knows what he's talking about. When I commented on the 1-2 shifts and how you often didn't know if it would be crisp or slushy he said "Yep, I know what that is." Obviously, GM knows about a lot of the issues spoken of here, but doesn't think they are real issues because the simulation says it's OK.

 

Hopefully, a lot of these problems in the older design 6-speed don't show up in the 8-speeds, but I wouldn't hold out a lot of hope until someone drives one in an actual truck. That and I don't want to be tempted to buy a '15 when I just got a '14.

Posted

I'm wondering if they finally managed to put a drain plug on the pan...

 

so long

j-ten-ner

Doubt it. If anything they probably made it harder for the people who change their own fluids.

Posted

Like I've said before, you have to drop the pan to change the filter anyhow, so who needs a plug? I guess in the "simulation" no one spilled transmission fluid all over. :lol:

Posted

Like I've said before, you have to drop the pan to change the filter anyhow, so who needs a plug? I guess in the "simulation" no one spilled transmission fluid all over. :lol:

 

I think it's safe to say that nobody working on the simulations, or most of the other parts, would ever think about changing the trans fluid themselves unless you could plug a keyboard in and do it that way. And it would add $0.75 to the BOM,

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I have A 2020 1500 5.3 8 speed. LTZ. Transmission problems since 60,000 miles. Started when I go to store in morning to get my morning coffee before work leave truck running get back in put it in drive/ rev no movement step on gas a little slams into gear. Put in neutral step on gas little shake then put in gear and gose.  Shut truck off start .. ok now at stop light stop truck after a few seconds feel a little kick if that doesn’t happen stuck in 3/4 gear shut truck off wait few seconds and start usually ok again. If you down shift manually ok as long as you get into 1st before stop. If not it kicks . I WANT A NEW TRANSMISSION. Now I want a new truck it just hit 80,000 IDK IF ILL BUY CHEVY CAUSE THEY STILL HAVE THE PROBLEM AND REFUSE TO RECALL . Oh I’ve changed the fluid and filter 3 times now. And yes used mobile 1 not ac/delco cause it’s not meeting the requirements that mobile is did use ac/delco filter 
    • Of course refrain from political debate but I myself have very dismal hope for what is all going on up here every where we turn so I nodded my head when I saw this joke.     
    • I'm looking at carpal tunnel surgery on my left hand and lumbar fusion. 
    • While waiting for parts I have been working on installing the AC compressor, new accumulator, and orifice tube. Also changed out the high side ball valve (original). The orifice tube that was in there wasn't too bad. Slightly dirty, a little bit of junk, but not blocked. Glad I changed it out.   The accumulator, which should have been a 5 minute job, may have just burned $50. Put some PAG in it, wrote the date and mileage on the side, fresh o-rings and gooey'd up the threads and rings with Nylog. Got everything connected and snugged and was going to vacuum down the system, and....   My manifold gauge won't fit on the port. It's not an R12 service port. It LOOKS like an R134 service port but the diameter is a hair too large. There's a sticker on the accumulator that says it's designed to be used with R12 and R134a systems only. So it's not R1234yf. Even if I reduced the diameter slightly with a file, the shoulder on the port is too large so the quick-connect valve won't lock on. I'm stumped. It's going back, and 50/50 on if they'll give me a refund.   Also, I did a fuel pressure test.... Key on, the gauge spikes to about 60psi and quickly bleeds off, like 2psi per second. The fuel isn't going into the plenum, no smell, starts fine, so I'm guessing there's a bad check valve in the pump and the fuel is just draining back into the tank. oh, hell. But, it shouldn't be a problem, pump primes just fine and the truck starts right up. It just means I can't really ever use fuel pressure to verify a leak at the injector or intake.
    • Got this yesterday out of nowhere. Truck is a 25',6.6 gasser with 8k miles.  Only semi anomaly is that the truck had been sitting, uncranked for 6 days. Elec Stability Control showed immediately upon cranking, not while driving. No drivability issues, just the message. Battery didn't seem to be weak when cranking over.  I drove it, killed it, let it sit a few hrs with no avail.  Truck is 100% stock. No damage. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...