Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I am about to change the rear differential fluid on my 2016 Silverado. I went to the dealer to get the fluid (75W-85 special new fluid, supposedly "High Efficiency"). The dealer was unable to give me the volume spec for the fluid to fill it back up. I have seen both 2 liters and 2.6 liters required. Seeing as to how the fluid costs $22 a liter from the dealer, I don't want to buy 3 liters if I only need 2.

 

Can anyone help clear this up/set me straight???

Posted

I have no Idea, but I would like to know too. I would bet it's filled up on the light side. I can only imagine how much crap is in there! I should have taken a picture of my first Crankcase oil @ 1000 miles looked like I had a gone silver mining some even about the size of finger nail clippings? Oh, well I am over it.................

Posted (edited)

I am about to change the rear differential fluid on my 2016 Silverado. I went to the dealer to get the fluid (75W-85 special new fluid, supposedly "High Efficiency"). The dealer was unable to give me the volume spec for the fluid to fill it back up. I have seen both 2 liters and 2.6 liters required. Seeing as to how the fluid costs $22 a liter from the dealer, I don't want to buy 3 liters if I only need 2.

 

Can anyone help clear this up/set me straight???

 

For the rear axle, if you have the 5.3 or 6.2 V8s, its 2.75 quarts/2.6 liters.

 

If you have the 4.3 V6, its 2.15 quarts/2.03 liters.

 

Rear axle uses the 75w85 part # 19300457.

 

The front axle is 1.51 quarts/1.43 liters.

 

Front axle uses 75w90, part # 88900401.

 

Your dealer's parts guys are either lazy or stupid as it took me all of 30 seconds to get the capacities for front and rear axles, and the fluid chart.

Edited by 15HDriver
  • Like 8
Posted

 

For the rear axle, if you have the 5.3 or 6.2 V8s, its 2.75 quarts/2.6 liters.

 

If you have the 4.3 V6, its 2.15 quarts/2.03 liters.

 

Rear axle uses the 75w85 part # 19300457.

 

The front axle is 1.51 quarts/1.43 liters.

 

Front axle uses 75w90, part # 88900401.

 

Your dealer's parts guys are either lazy or stupid as it took me all of 30 seconds to get the capacities for front and rear axles, and the fluid chart.

Thanks so much! I have the 5.3L so it looks like I will be heading back out to the dealer. I will take before and after pictures of the fluid to show the metallic flakes. Truck only has 7000 miles on it, but I know that the break-in period creates a lot of flaking.

Posted

Thanks so much! I have the 5.3L so it looks like I will be heading back out to the dealer. I will take before and after pictures of the fluid to show the metallic flakes. Truck only has 7000 miles on it, but I know that the break-in period creates a lot of flaking.

 

 

Sounds about normal for new truck axle fluids. I drained my front, rear and transfer case at 10k.

Posted

I bought some Mobil 1 75w-90 full synthetic when I did mine and I haven't had an issue, changed it about 50k miles ago. I'm about due for another change, as well as trans and tcase

Posted

Does anyone know if the GM Rear axle fluid 75w85 part # 19300457 is a true full synthetic oil? It says high efficiency, but I can't find any descriptions that says full synthetic. I'm sure there's a lot of opinions on this; but is there a better full synthetic option in the GM recommend weight of 75w85?

 

Also, with out getting under the truck right now, to anyone who has already changed their diff fluid on these new trucks, is there any kind of drain plug or do you have to remove the cover to drain? If so, is there a GM gasket to replace or do you just use rtv gasket maker?

 

Thanks

Posted

I replaced the diff fluids on my 2015 Denali 1500 at 15,000 km (7300 miles). It took 2.6 litres for the rear.i used amsoil 75/90 severe gear, as I have had good results in the past with the severe gear.

The 75/85 is a fuel economy formulation, and is a little lighter than the 75/90. I have found that the intermittent downshift clunk has almost disappeared completely with the amsoil 75/90. I'll be sticking with this fluid rather than the GM 75/85.

I also noticed that the factory diff fluid was extremely whitish brown, almost like water contamination. There was a lot of particulate in the fluid. Definitely glad that I did an early fluid replacement.

On a side note; the factory cover gasket is very beefy, and there should be no issues reusing the gasket a number of times (as long as it doesn't get over torqued on reinstallation).

  • Like 2
Posted

I replaced the diff fluids on my 2015 Denali 1500 at 15,000 km (7300 miles). It took 2.6 litres for the rear.i used amsoil 75/90 severe gear, as I have had good results in the past with the severe gear.

The 75/85 is a fuel economy formulation, and is a little lighter than the 75/90. I have found that the intermittent downshift clunk has almost disappeared completely with the amsoil 75/90. I'll be sticking with this fluid rather than the GM 75/85.

I also noticed that the factory diff fluid was extremely whitish brown, almost like water contamination. There was a lot of particulate in the fluid. Definitely glad that I did an early fluid replacement.

On a side note; the factory cover gasket is very beefy, and there should be no issues reusing the gasket a number of times (as long as it doesn't get over torqued on reinstallation).

While this is a Dodge explanation for the milky fluid, it might also explain the GM. Dodge had a batch of AAM differentials that had milky fluid in them from new, a batch of guys complained, and it turned out that the marking compound used to set the gear lash harmlessly contaminated the fluid giving it the milky appearance. Just one possibility.

 

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

The rear diff cover gasket is reusable. It is a rubber coated steel gasket. There is no drain on the rear. No RTV needed on these trucks.

The front diff has a drain plug. I found what looked like white assembly grease inside the fill plug on the front diff and the oil had a white tint to it. Looked like water contamination, but I am certain it was the grease.

The transfer case has a simple drain and fill plug. Very easy.

Like a few others, I refilled front and rear with Amsoil Severe Gear and the transfer case with Dex VI.

A lot of people never change these fluids and don't have any problems, but it gives me piece of mind considering the cost of the investment.

  • Like 1
Posted

I have always changed the drive line fluids in all my trucks every 30k miles (both diffs, transfer, and trans) in my last 3 trucks that I kept for 12+ years and 150k miles each. Mainly for peace of mind. On the flip side my company trucks get traded in every few years with over 150k miles on them and they never get any fluids changed but the oil and they never have any problems.

  • Like 1
Posted

The earliest recommended change in my manual appears to be 45,000 miles for the front differential and I assume the rear should be done at the same time. By reading this post it sounds like this may be too long of an interval and I should consider an earlier change!

Posted

While this is a Dodge explanation for the milky fluid, it might also explain the GM. Dodge had a batch of AAM differentials that had milky fluid in them from new, a batch of guys complained, and it turned out that the marking compound used to set the gear lash harmlessly contaminated the fluid giving it the milky appearance. Just one possibility.

 

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk

 

Yeppers. #PI0020D: White, Milky or Cloudy Appearance of Front Differential Fluid. On GM it affected the front diffs 2012-2015.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Length/amount of data capture will be important to consider, sifting through 5 minutes of a data log can be enormous when it is stored in milliseconds. Being able to find the 'event' let alone decipher it.   Presumably the driver would notice something and hit a button to capture the 'window' of data. That window has to be large enough for the operator to recognize the event and react accordingly.    The data has to be able to be retrieved easily.   The data has to be able to be understood. Which is the biggest challenge, dealer techs won't even know what most of it is and would likely not even look at it if an owner brought it to them. Meaning the owner, the least educated/qualified, trying to understand it.    How will the data be presented? Could specific PIDs be selected and a timelapse graph be watched? How will a specific value be noted as abnormal? Additionally, a good data logger would be able to 'learn' normal values for a specific vehicle and flag abnormalities automatically. It could in theory watch parameters degrade over time and suggest maintenance as needed. (If the MAF reading begins tapering off for a given set of other readings - MAP, throttle position, Ambient, etc.. a flag to check air filter.) With the amount of data available, a device (really the vehicle rather than an additional accessory) should be able to do more than issue a DTC. It should be able to run the full diagnostic suite automatically and present a solution rather than a code. (It's not the 90's anymore). The technology is available for the vehicle to not just say "P0087", it should know low fuel pressure, check other PIDs to narrow down the problem itself, and determine if it is a lift pump, high pressure pump, regulator, leak in the fuel line, clogged filter, etc. Even if it can't narrow it down, it should be able to guide the user to the likely problems.   This would be a major problem for dealer service departments, which are the manufacturers customers it is in their collective best interest to NOT have this available to the consumer.   Further, if the owner is going to be the primary consumer of the data, it's got to be at a consumer price point vs. dealer only specialty tool price.   This group is more 'involved' in their vehicle than general public/consumer and will have knowledge, experience, needs and desires that are quite different from the market at large.   
    • I put the prof up. If you read what I posted. You can see that housing, cars and income are in line with the era we were talking about. It’s harder in some places easier in others. Let’s agree to disagree and put this back on track, OK? We both are pretty stubborn and hard headed. But I bring receipts. If you wish I will not respond to you in the future. 
    • Lets see if I can sum up two pages of nothing useful.    You want to refute your own governments data of the "Purchasing Power" Index FOR THE ENTIRE USA and its territories replacing it with the experience of a single family and its business and label that reality?  Then pound on that for a week hoping it will find traction?    Stan, I've told you several times. I don't do irrational. There are more people in the USA than your family.    I'm pretty sure this tread is so blown up. I'll give you a few days or months if need be to post yourself silent then I'll see if I can find enough parts of the train to reassemble it. 
    • Facebook groups hate VSE, poor customer service; their responses to criticisms are pretty poor for a reputable company. I'm not a customer, haven't bought anything from them, but how they handle themselves on social media is a definite "No" for me. 
    • $10,000 for a transmission?   Pretty sure I could buy all the parts, tools, and education to rebuild it myself for a quarter of that amount.   or swap it out with a new one...
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...