Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Finished my install.  All is working except the glove box USB.
I didn’t have any open USB’s on my HMI. 
2018 parts, so my iPhone 8 and wife’s X are wireless charging. 
Have my upgraded HMI on the way to get Apple car play and other later model features.  
Thanks for your help Phil!
758F4437-40CC-49A5-B74A-C0B1F4F9B577.thumb.jpeg.171d0656cf99987044ed45abe99cc220.jpeg

Nice!

So you’re upper Glove USB (single) USB Port uses the Green Port on the HMI. Are you using this port to drive the front hub?

Is your front HUB a Double USB?

If so, you can try to return the Glove Box USB into the green port.

Then use a Black to Grey. Grey going into the Front hub. Then a Black to Brown to feed the inside storage compartment Hub?

If you want to try an get all the USB ports working :)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, pgamboa said:


Nice!

So you’re upper Glove USB (single) USB Port uses the Green Port on the HMI. Are you using this port to drive the front hub?

Is your front HUB a Double USB?

If so, you can try to return the Glove Box USB into the green port.

Then use a Black to Grey. Grey going into the Front hub. Then a Black to Brown to feed the inside storage compartment Hub?

If you want to try an get all the USB ports working :)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The black port on the HMI already had a wire hooked to it.  What does it feed?  Does it feed the USB that was under the jump seat not being used?

 So you’re saying disconnect the existing black and go with the new black to grey on the input of the front hub?

Edited by Baldhills
  • Like 1
Posted
The black port on the HMI already had a wire hooked to it.  What does it feed?  Does it feed the USB that was under the jump seat not being used?
 So you’re saying disconnect the existing black and go with the new black to grey on the input of the front hub?

Yep. The black port is the cable under the passenger seat. You when you unplugged the jump seat, that USB cable is what feeds the inside compartment.

So....

You can unplug that cable with the black end. Use a black to grey. Grey to front USB Hub. Then use a Black to Brown from the front hub to feed the inside storage compartment hub.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
11 minutes ago, pgamboa said:


Yep. The black port is the cable under the passenger seat. You when you unplugged the jump seat, that USB cable is what feeds the inside compartment.

So....

You can unplug that cable with the black end. Use a black to grey. Grey to front USB Hub. Then use a Black to Brown from the front hub to feed the inside storage compartment hub.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Phil,

sounds good. I didn’t know what the black port fed. It all makes more sense now.

thanks!

  • Like 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, Baldhills said:

Phil,

sounds good. I didn’t know what the black port fed. It all makes more sense now.

thanks!

Yup.

 

With a Double USB Port Hub up front, this allows you to daisy chain (loop) in and out of this hub to feed the inside compartment one, using the (1) Black USB Port off the HMI.  Then you can use the Green port to retain the glove box port :)  That is how I have it setup on mine.  

 

For some thought, that output from the Front Hub is not passing that USB Data Logic...So they have to use the Green port.  If they have a Glove Box USB, they'll have to abandon that.

Posted
On 9/3/2018 at 1:55 PM, pgamboa said:


Nice!

So you’re upper Glove USB (single) USB Port uses the Green Port on the HMI. Are you using this port to drive the front hub?

Is your front HUB a Double USB?

If so, you can try to return the Glove Box USB into the green port.

Then use a Black to Grey. Grey going into the Front hub. Then a Black to Brown to feed the inside storage compartment Hub?

If you want to try an get all the USB ports working :)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

what website are y’all using ??! everyone i go to to order from has them discontinued ??

Posted
3 hours ago, suru said:

 

The part number listed is wrong for the green to grey.  

84022315 is the correct part number for the (green to grey) cable.

  • Like 1
Posted
The part number listed is wrong for the green to grey.  
84022315 is the correct part number for the (green to grey) cable.

The cable part #s are correct. Some sites have updated their databases and show the superseded part #. If the part #s don’t show up on some sites, they may show up on others.

I order all my stuff through GMPartsGiant.com since they ship out of Dallas.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

Hey guys,

 

I have a 2017 LT Crew cab with the jump seat

is there a complete list of every PN you will need to do the swap to a center console?

 

I've tried searching but my search skills must suck LOL

any help or direction would be greatly appreciated!

 

thank you

Posted (edited)
10 hours ago, pgamboa said:


The cable part #s are correct. Some sites have updated their databases and show the superseded part #. If the part #s don’t show up on some sites, they may show up on others.

I order all my stuff through GMPartsGiant.com since they ship out of Dallas.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Phil,

I'm sorry I checked the number that you said worked on GMPartsGiant.com and it doesn’t work either.

Who ever typed that number fat fingered it.

I figured it out by checking the number on the black to brown: 8402232 and noticed how similar it was.  I decided to switch the 2 and 3 that we’re fat fingered for the black/green and it worked. 

84022315 works on both GMPartsnow.com and GMPartsGiant.com. 84023215 works on neither. 

 

Edited by Baldhills
  • Like 1
Posted
Phil,
I'm sorry I checked the number that you said worked on GMPartsGiant.com and it doesn’t work either.
Who ever typed that number fat fingered it.
I figured it out by checking the number on the black to brown: 8402232 and noticed how similar it was.  I decided to switch the 2 and 3 that we’re fat fingered for the black/green and it worked. 
84022315 works on both GMPartsnow.com and GMPartsGiant.com. 84023215 works on neither. 
 

You’re absolutely right! Lol. I fat fingered that one! I corrected my notes.

On my thread, the original part # 19303284 was superseded by 84022315.

You are correct.

Some sites don’t ever update their superseded part #s and will say “discontinued” while the same part # turns up a superseded part # on another site.

Thanks for the heads up!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
    • It has happened to me a few times. I carry a jumpstart-tire inflator with me.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...