Jump to content

Are you ready to buy an electric truck?  

1,054 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

Posted

Those people don’t care about that. All they see is their car produces zero emissions and they are better than everyone else.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Posted
Those people don’t care about that. All they see is their car produces zero emissions and they are better than everyone else.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


No one is better than anyone else, some have more but that doesn’t make them better.

da8287cbb3d611ccc388e104e718855a.jpg


Sent from Above
Posted (edited)

All you have done is shifted from one kind of pollution to another and then taken a victory lap. Bravo.

Edited by oak 1971
Spelling
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 3
Posted
I have planted more trees and saved more spotted owls than you have- so there.


Lol


Sent from Above
Posted


No one is better than anyone else, some have more but that doesn’t make them better.

da8287cbb3d611ccc388e104e718855a.jpg


Sent from Above



You are correct. Let me clarify. They “think” they are better. Especially where I live.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Some place I see electric cars being useful is suburban travel. I live 15 miles from the nearest town and would find this transport effective for these short hauls. Take the majority of wear and tear out of the Silverado/Buick.  

 

But a working truck...yea....don't think so. Long haul vehicle. Nope. What has kept me from buying something like the Chevy Bolt is the fact that this ugly little coffin box cost more than my Buick LaCrosse. I can buy two Honda Civics for that price and drive them longer than I will live. Hoop jumps for tax credits and rebates. 

 

Someone riddle me this. Why are the practical electrics such UGLY cars. Is it cheaper to make an UGLY car/truck? 

 

 

Edited by Grumpy Bear
Spelling
  • Like 4
Posted



You are correct. Let me clarify. They “think” they are better. Especially where I live.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


That’s just because they’re insecure and need a pat on the back for buying something that not accepted within society. Believe me, I’m around it all the time. I Knowingly offend tree huggers all the time and believe me, they need us much more than we need them. So, with that said, I’d wave at them and make sure they hear me well when I say “yeah, good luck with that”!


Sent from Above
  • Like 1
Posted
Some place I see electric cars being useful is suburban travel. I life 15 miles from the nearest town and would find this transport effective for these short hauls. Take the majority of wear and tear out of the Silverado/Buick.  

 

But a working truck...yea....don't think so. Long haul vehicle. Nope. What has kept me from buying something like the Chevy Bolt is the fact that this ugly little coffin box cost more than my Buick LaCrosse. I can buy two Honda Civics for that price and drive them longer than I will live. Hoop jumps for tax credits and rebates. 

 

Someone riddle me this. Why are the practical electrics such UGLY cars. Is it cheaper to make an UGLY car/truck? 

 

I’d “ONLY” buy one if it looked like this or similar:

 

e72f92e7b3b253cedc73cf6db49749fa.plist

 

with everything my truck offers and more.

 

 

Sent from Above

 

  • Haha 1
Posted
22 minutes ago, TXGREEK said:

 

I’d “ONLY” buy one if it looked like this or similar:

 

e72f92e7b3b253cedc73cf6db49749fa.plist

 

with everything my truck offers and more.

 

 

Sent from Above

 

So that's a no. :crackup:

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Grumpy Bear said:

Some place I see electric cars being useful is suburban travel. I live 15 miles from the nearest town and would find this transport effective for these short hauls. Take the majority of wear and tear out of the Silverado/Buick.  

 

But a working truck...yea....don't think so. Long haul vehicle. Nope. What has kept me from buying something like the Chevy Bolt is the fact that this ugly little coffin box cost more than my Buick LaCrosse. I can buy two Honda Civics for that price and drive them longer than I will live. Hoop jumps for tax credits and rebates. 

 

Someone riddle me this. Why are the practical electrics such UGLY cars. Is it cheaper to make an UGLY car/truck? 

 

 

Yep I couldn't handle the lack of range when I want to get away from suburbia.  In all honesty an electric would be perfect for all of my uses except when I go on road trips.  Your ugly little coffin box is pretty much any car and small SUV for me so they HAVE to come out with a pickup before I could even consider driving one.  Even then I would still have to stick with a 2500/3500 because anything less is a little coffin box and I can't compensate with them.

 

They are ugly because we are used to seeing grills and they are also built to be as aerodynamic as possible.  That's my theory anyway.

Edited by Chevyguy85
Posted

The only problem I have with an electric vehicle is that there is nothing right now comparable to my Tahoe. If GM made the Tahoe, Yukon or Escalade electric with 400 mile range I would consider it. But we all know it’s not going to happen in the near future. And the price tag would be astronomical. I only commute 8 miles each way and my office has free electric charging so it would make sense to get an electric vehicle but I travel with the family a lot in the summer and over breaks. This summer I drove 7k miles just for vacations and had to haul all this stuff. Don’t think it would fit in an electric vehicle. Maybe a model 3. I don’t know. But what I do know is I like to be high driving down the road. Traveling up and down I95 trucks are everywhere. Just my .02

1590b9d1b3e74446e028c547b192cdc9.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Posted
The only problem I have with an electric vehicle is that there is nothing right now comparable to my Tahoe. If GM made the Tahoe, Yukon or Escalade electric with 400 mile range I would consider it. But we all know it’s not going to happen in the near future. And the price tag would be astronomical. I only commute 8 miles each way and my office has free electric charging so it would make sense to get an electric vehicle but I travel with the family a lot in the summer and over breaks. This summer I drove 7k miles just for vacations and had to haul all this stuff. Don’t think it would fit in an electric vehicle. Maybe a model 3. I don’t know. But what I do know is I like to be high driving down the road. Traveling up and down I95 trucks are everywhere. Just my .02

1590b9d1b3e74446e028c547b192cdc9.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Absolutely agree, hopefully automobile companies start to think big. The US Government should get involved, cutting costs as a means to kickstart this program like they give incentives for solar etc


Sent from Above
Posted
So that's a no. :crackup:


Maybe in about 100 years when we’re long gone sadly [emoji20]


Sent from Above
  • Like 1
Posted
22 hours ago, TXGREEK said:

 


Not fake news, I didn’t ever think about it either. I’m involved and work with the TCEQ (Texas commission environmental quality) and HGAC (Houston Galveston area Council) along with others, seen all the reports, from dangerous bacteria and wash off from storm water. We’ve physically tested water quality and we’re shocked to find the amount of hydrocarbons found in a cup of water that’s floating into watersheds and coastal waters. Think of it this way, where do you think everything on the street washes off to? Storm Water channels and eventually into watersheds.


https://www.harvestingrainwater.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/HCP-IQ-Test_with_credits_SHORT.pdf



Sent from Above

 

It also bubbles up right out of the sea floor, in fact more of it enters the environment naturally than by man.  So what?  It's natural, not a pollutant.

 

Growing up in Fort Lauderdale, the beaches used to have patches a tar (oil) that would get our feet all dirty while walking the beach but this did not affect sea life offshore.  However, it was near the mouths of the inlets where I routinely saw fish with lesions and growths and was told at the time that this was caused by lawn fertilizers.  They've lied so much I don't believe anything they say anymore without investigating it for myself.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Because that is IDIOTIC, much like this question. They've already been forced to do it by past administrations - why would you roll that back when it's a GOOD thing?  WHO IS ARGUING FOR LOWER MILEAGE???? 😂  NOBODY IS!!   I'm certainly not! What I want is RELIABLE vehicles again that are worth the price paid!    I don't get your logic here ...   In 2003 I paid $2,200 for our '86 Grand Marquis. It's STILL running and I've never been inside the engine, aside for the timing cover since it was leaking, so I threw a new timing set in since that makes sense. Transmission is ORIGINAL. Electric pump in the gas tank is ORIGINAL. Rear end is ORIGINAL. I'd have to hit my head REAL hard to want to pay $60k or more for a car that still can't come close to the comfort, seating and storage space, or reliability of this one. Nothing is even in the ball park! Hundreds of thousands of brands and models have been built and sent to the crusher while this one keeps on going!   https://postimg.cc/Z9XRrCSg   I've got a whole fleet of cars, motorcycles, and a truck close to this age for summer and winter. No one could pay me enough to buy anything built this century. I have zero use for any it.
    • Since I'm the one who has to fix them when they break, I'll take vehicles over 30 years old all day, EVERY day, over ANY modern crap. Have you attempted any repairs on anything built after 2006? It's a friggin nightmare, and gets worse the newer the model year.    If I had the will or desire, I can make any car of any age outside of a Model T (I don't have THAT much will ...) just as powerful, comfortable, and have all the tech the new stuff does, and get pretty close in mileage, too. I prefer SIMPLICITY. The less the vehicle has, the less to fix WHEN it breaks, not IF.   I'm glad you snot-nosed punks don't like them. More for us, plus that keeps the prices from climbing more than they already have.👍
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...