Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

This is my opinion only, but this is what GM should do: If they cannot fix your truck under waranty they should buy it back at full purchase price. Then they should take these trucks apart at one of their reaserch and development facilities, and find the root cause of the vibration problems and eliminate them. Then they would also have low mileage trucks, now repaired to sell at a good price to recoup their losses to some extent. This would be fair to everyone and would help GM to avoid similar pitfalls in the future.

Edited by pm26
  • Like 4
Posted

This is my opinion only, but this is what GM should do: If they cannot fix your truck under waranty they should buy it back at full purchase price. Then they should take these trucks apart at one of their reaserch and development facilities, and find the root cause of the vibration problems and eliminate them. Then they would also have low mileage trucks, now repaired to sell at a good price to recoup their losses to some extent. This would be fair to everyone and would help GM to avoid similar pitfalls in the future.

They'll buy it back and then put it on the used car lot for someone else to deal with.

Posted

They'll buy it back and then put it on the used car lot for someone else to deal with.

I meant buying them back voluntarily, not only when forced by the consumer protection laws.

And repairing them before selling them to another unsuspecting sucker. That's the only ethical thing to do.

  • Like 2
Posted

Just had 305/55/20 nittos, and xd wheels put on. Vibration gone, AGAIN, we'll see if it comes back, AGAIN

Posted

I meant buying them back voluntarily, not only when forced by the consumer protection laws.

And repairing them before selling them to another unsuspecting sucker. That's the only ethical thing to do.

 

I know what you meant.... and I agree with you that it makes logical sense to buy them back so they can figure out what is causing the vibration. The reality is that GM thinks it's acceptable for a truck to shake on the highway since they continue to tell me that it is "road input" or "a normal operating characteristic of the vehicle" or "performing as designed." But they won't give you a yes or no answer when you ask them if it is safe to drive. They will use the buzz words mentioned above and talk in circles until you end the call.

Posted (edited)

I don't know why everybody thinks it's ONE thing that is causing everybody's problems. It's likely that everybody is experiencing different problems - or several different problems. There is not one magic fix that will fix everybody's tuck. For some people it's tires. For some it'll be shocks, driveshaft, tranny, rear end, axles, etc. Each of you just need to be pushy and persistent to get the dealer and/or GM to resolve. If they can't/won't fix it, push for a buy back. There are several instances on this site of buy backs, so it does happen if you truly have a problem. But if you just sit around and wait and complain, your truck will never be fixed. I know dealing with the dealership and GM is a hastle, but it you want it fixed or a new truck, you have to do it. Otherwise, deal with it or trade your truck in on a different one.

 

And I'm sorry to those who think otherwise, a vibration is not a safety issue that will prompt the NHTSA to get involved.

Edited by Black03Yukon
  • Like 2
Posted

I don't know why everybody thinks it's ONE thing that is causing everybody's problems. It's likely that everybody is experiencing different problems - or several different problems. There is not one magic fix that will fix everybody's tuck. For some people it's tires. For some it'll be shocks, driveshaft, tranny, rear end, axles, etc. Each of you just need to be pushy and persistent to get the dealer and/or GM to resolve. If they can't/won't fix it, push for a buy back. There are several instances on this site of buy backs, so it does happen if you truly have a problem. But if you just sit around and wait and complain, your truck will never be fixed. I know dealing with the dealership and GM is a hastle, but it you want it fixed or a new truck, you have to do it. Otherwise, deal with it or trade your truck in on a different one.

 

And I'm sorry to those who think otherwise, a vibration is not a safety issue that will prompt the NHTSA to get involved.

You're right.

Posted (edited)

I don't know why everybody thinks it's ONE thing that is causing everybody's problems. It's likely that everybody is experiencing different problems - or several different problems. There is not one magic fix that will fix everybody's tuck. For some people it's tires. For some it'll be shocks, driveshaft, tranny, rear end, axles, etc. Each of you just need to be pushy and persistent to get the dealer and/or GM to resolve. If they can't/won't fix it, push for a buy back. There are several instances on this site of buy backs, so it does happen if you truly have a problem. But if you just sit around and wait and complain, your truck will never be fixed. I know dealing with the dealership and GM is a hastle, but it you want it fixed or a new truck, you have to do it. Otherwise, deal with it or trade your truck in on a different one.

 

And I'm sorry to those who think otherwise, a vibration is not a safety issue that will prompt the NHTSA to get involved.

 

Yes, I agree, but you shouldn't act like you haven't complained also.

 

Edit: let people complain, they are just venting their frustration like we all do from time to time. I didn't know this was a "do not complain forum" or have the rules changed/

Edited by 14LTZZ71
Posted

Yes, I agree, but you shouldn't act like you haven't complained also.

 

Edit: let people complain, they are just venting their frustration like we all do from time to time. I didn't know this was a "do not complain forum" or have the rules changed/

No, people are free to complain all they want. I never said they couldn't. Only that it won't fix anything.

Posted

Any idea if vibration on this could be related?

http://www.gm-trucks.com/forums/topic/163658-difference-in-rear-height/

I don't think so. The bed on mine sits 3/4" higer on the drivers side. All 3 pickup trucks that I've owned came from the factory with beds that sat higher on the drivers side. They don't do it because the fuel tank is on that side either because with a full tank of fuel it still sits 3/4" higher. I don't think its related to this issue.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Recent events

I was coming off the highway to off ramp, slight upward grade and traffic light was green slowed down and turned left to slight upward grade.

As I started to accelerate and turn left my truck begin to shudder and felt like the transmission slipped and the rear axle begin to bind up some what. My transmission fluid was reading 195f by the trucks readings.

I do not have any vibration at or above 70mph rides like glass.

 

I am working with GM right now to have my truck sorted out, unfortunately it has taken legal action to get them to do anything or take my complaints serious.

 

Tires have been replaced, balanced, driveshaft replaced, rear end is next to be replaced, radio replaced, seat assembly, rust issue on frame.

So yes I have been patient, and still no fix and vibration getting worse. Transmission shudders from 1-2 shift and worse when warm and up hill grade.

Edited by 2strokesmoke
Posted

Recent events

I was coming off the highway to off ramp, slight upward grade and traffic light was green slowed down and turned left to slight upward grade.

As I started to accelerate and turn left my truck begin to shudder and felt like the transmission slipped and the rear axle begin to bind up some what. My transmission fluid was reading 195f by the trucks readings.

I do not have any vibration at or above 70mph rides like glass.

 

I am working with GM right now to have my truck sorted out, unfortunately it has taken legal action to get them to do anything or take my complaints serious.

 

Tires have been replaced, balanced, driveshaft replaced, rear end is next to be replaced, radio replaced, seat assembly, rust issue on frame.

So yes I have been patient, and still no fix and vibration getting worse. Transmission shudders from 1-2 shift and worse when warm and up hill grade.

Either the GM engineers are just as confused as everyone else when it comes to this issue or GM has too much s_ _ t on their plate right now to worry about these issues. I hope they get you taken care of in a proper and ethical manner.

Posted (edited)

Either the GM engineers are just as confused as everyone else when it comes to this issue or GM has too much s_ _ t on their plate right now to worry about these issues. I hope they get you taken care of in a proper and ethical manner.

I'd put my money on the second option.

 

The shake is not the end of the world for me, but it's hard to stand by a product that comes with a built in massage/coffee mixing feature not advertised that I didn't want lol. I'll mention it when I go in for my oil change along with why they didn't put the screws in my rear handle which pulled off when a passenger climbed in. Besides I don't do 70mph very often for obvious reasons :P

 

It's more of a piss-off than anything. No one wants to have their friends in their new truck and have a shake like mine and then be told you should have bought a Ferd.

Edited by RageMonkey
Posted

I have a 2014 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 4x4 crew cab standard size bed with 20" Goodyear tires. I was starting to think I was the only one with this problem. I have been having the same experience with vibration at varied speeds around 75 to 85 mph. I took it back to the dealership about the 2nd week of ownership and they said there was a flat spot on one of the tires, so they replaced it with a new tire. Everything was fine until I took it in for the 1st oil change and tire rotation a few months later. I noticed right a way that it had a vibration again but even worse no matter what road I was on. I took it back a couple days later and they experimented by exchanging new tires from a new vehicle on their lot and said the ride was better. However, they said Chevrolet would not pay for 4 new tires for my truck so they removed them and put my original tires back on. When I picked it up, they told me it was solved by putting different amounts of air (nitrogen) in the tires(less in the back tires). I'm sorry, but that is not acceptable. Besides all that, sometime at the dealership, the plastic piece on the lower front of my truck got dented in!! They brought that to my attention when I picked the truck up! It wasn't there before!! I just figured claim it on my insurance! I have another appointment at a different dealership in town this Friday. I really hope to get this problem solved. I will post my results.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I have a 2000 Silverado 1500 LS, whenever I put it into reverse and also in drive it clunks, the truck also feels sluggish when driving. Any advice/ideas ?
    • Looks like it's riveted to me. What is wrong with that 1? Welcome to the Forum!
    • Missing pieces of the Assembly   Detergency vs Solvency   Not the same thing. Detergency is the mechanism that surrounds solid particulates preventing amalgamation. Usually accompanied by a Dispersant whose job it is to keep those encapsulated particles in Suspension. Solvency keeps things that can be dissolved in solution.    Salt is a solid that can be dissolved. Pepper is a solid that cannot be dissolved. A detergent/dispersant is effective on pepper but a solvent is more effective on salt. As long as the solids remain in either state, dissolved or dispersed then they can be be removed with the oil upon change.    How many wranglers does it take to herd cats? Depends on how many cats your herding. How much sponge does it take to soak up water? How much water is there to soak up? Point is most oil blends start with some herding ability and next to zero sponge and recently even fewer wranglers are being sent to do the same job.    So you start with a dozen cowboys and zero cows but at the drive progresses you pick up cows along the way, but not cowboys. At some point you have more cows that the wranglers can handle and some leave the herd. Deposits. And the API has an acceptable number of cows they are willing to let loose. In the ideal world zero is the right number for he rancher but to the butcher....a few lost is fine. This cow is beat to death. Let's move on....   Solvency isn't something oils on the Walmart shelf care about AT ALL. Problem is, you motor does. Fuels driven varnish sticks rings and only a solvent can keep them in check. The bet is that the solids driven portion that plug the expander rings and the oil drain backs and VVT screens and AFM screens will be an issue long before varnish is. Not that it wont be but if they market well enough the consumer can be kept ignorant enough to either believe it is "normal" (A quart in 1 or 2K is normal) OR is kept at bay longer than the first owner is likely to hang on to the unit. Solvency cost money.    Now the OEM's have John Q. Public buffaloed into the belief that the number cows accumulated along the trail is a known and predictable CONSTANT. It isn't. Nor is the rate at which they crossed paths with them. Only the number of wrangles is constant. Or was. Each new generation of oil sees fewer and fewer of them.    So what happens when the number of cowboys is lower (lower TBN) with each seasons trail but the trial is longer (OCI) and the number of cows along that trail continues increase? (Conditions that promote deposits).    For awhile the blenders were on to something. Better bases are harder to degrade (fewer cows) but that was overtaken by a longer trail (OCI) and improved breeding (More cows) while continuing to reduce the cowboy staffing levels (TBN/Aniline #).    Marketing has been successful. We've fired most of the staff, cows breed line bunnies, the trail is ten times longer and we've convinced the boss his ranch is in better shape that it ever was.    That kids is just the cleaning side. The side few pay attention to.     
    • Mann+Hummel since 1941 per their web site 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...