Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

There are no words for just how stupid that statement is. I feel really sorry for you if you're so worried about voiding your warranty that you're afraid to torque a few nuts or bolts. Maybe you can't handle such a simple task. Either way, I for one am not worried one bit. Nor am I going to waste 2-3 hrs going to the dealer to have them do it, when it took me less than 5 minutes in my driveway.

That was a pretty messed up comment. I defended myself one time and got threatened by the moderator and yet I see BS like this on here all the time. And if you really stop and think, that warranty being voided theory is not far off. It seems to me like GM is doing everything in their power to avoid making good on these issues so maybe you're the one who is stupid and not the guy who is worried about voiding his warranty.

Posted

I am armed with a bunch of knowledge when I go into the dealership this week thanks to this thread but seems like I will be fighting a loosing battle.

  • Like 1
Posted

That was a pretty messed up comment. I defended myself one time and got threatened by the moderator and yet I see BS like this on here all the time. And if you really stop and think, that warranty being voided theory is not far off. It seems to me like GM is doing everything in their power to avoid making good on these issues so maybe you're the one who is stupid and not the guy who is worried about voiding his warranty.

I didn't threaten you, this is what my post said. I thought it was a joke and I chuckled a bit at what you said

Lol that's what it seems like

Posted

I didn't threaten you, this is what my post said. I thought it was a joke and I chuckled a bit at what you said

I think you have me confused with someone else. I haven't commented on here in a long time and the warning I got was a long time ago. It was something I was completely innocent in. I saw this other guy's post today about someone being stupid because they are worried about voiding their warranty and it annoyed me because I see useless posts like that on here all the time.

Posted

I think you have me confused with someone else. I haven't commented on here in a long time and the warning I got was a long time ago. It was something I was completely innocent in. I saw this other guy's post today about someone being stupid because they are worried about voiding their warranty and it annoyed me because I see useless posts like that on here all the time.

Ah you're right. It was another guy. Sorry about that
Posted

Well I'm starting to get annoyed...

Thought vibe at 70mph was tires.

Disappeared for a while(after balancing) but is now back....and balancing isn't fixing it.

F....k

I might have to get them checked again...

Posted

That was a pretty messed up comment. I defended myself one time and got threatened by the moderator and yet I see BS like this on here all the time. And if you really stop and think, that warranty being voided theory is not far off. It seems to me like GM is doing everything in their power to avoid making good on these issues so maybe you're the one who is stupid and not the guy who is worried about voiding his warranty.

 

First off, I never said that guy is stupid. I said his statement was, there's a difference that you obviously can't see.

 

Second, I firmly stand by what I said. Absolutely no way, one can have their warranty void for torquing a few nuts. Unless of course you're dumb enough to way over torque something like your head bolts and break them off, and them tell them you did so.

 

Maybe you'd do well to read up on the Moss Magnuson Warranty Act. Sure some people have had a dealer "void" their warranty without cause, or having burden of proof. Businesses get away with stuff all the time because people are uninformed. The worst is the insurance business. They only get away with it because people allow it.

Posted

 

Yeah, just the 8 nuts on the u-bolts. They all seemed to go along way before hitting 80.

So when I retourqued mine a month back I did the 59 plus 130 degrees.

 

Since I did not have an exact way to measure 130 degrees, I torqued the bolts to 59, then did a 90 degrees pass, and then another 45 degree pass.

 

That put me at 135 degrees give or take, but it was easier to measure in increments of 45 degrees.

 

So today I took the torque wrench to 80 ft.lbs. and checked each bolt.

 

All of them clicked immediately.

 

So apparently the 59 ft.lbs. Plus 130 degrees is over 80 ft.lbs.

Posted

Well I'm starting to get annoyed...

Thought vibe at 70mph was tires.

Disappeared for a while(after balancing) but is now back....and balancing isn't fixing it.

F....k

I might have to get them checked again...

 

If you have the opportunity, try adding some weight to the bed and see if that vibe changes. I noticed my high speed vibe was diminished when the bed was full of snow. Has me thinking pinion angle. I'm still waiting for a couple things I ordered to see if I'm correct.

 

The primary problem is the trucks are super sensitive. Most vehicles can mask vibrations or harmonics that normally occur. A number of these trucks obviously can't. I think the key to long term happiness is making them less sensitive. However, what works for one may not work for all. I think shocks, pinion angle, and a couple others things may help. Heck, it may take a redesigned driveshaft, if bed weight makes a big difference. I'm also kinda wondering if the air that passes under the truck is somehow inducing something that feels like vibration, but I have nothing to support that, I'm just thinking outside the box on that one.

Posted

So when I retourqued mine a month back I did the 59 plus 130 degrees.

 

Since I did not have an exact way to measure 130 degrees, I torqued the bolts to 59, then did a 90 degrees pass, and then another 45 degree pass.

 

That put me at 135 degrees give or take, but it was easier to measure in increments of 45 degrees.

 

So today I took the torque wrench to 80 ft.lbs. and checked each bolt.

 

All of them clicked immediately.

 

So apparently the 59 ft.lbs. Plus 130 degrees is over 80 ft.lbs.

 

That's very good to know.... It's quite possible that one could do the 59 plus 130 degrees, and then incrementally increase the torque wrench to find the approximate torque value. I'm a bit perplexed why they wouldn't have a set torque number. Seems like 59 plus 130 degrees would not yield a consistent result due to minor differences in each u-bolt.

  • Like 1
Posted

GM's Resolution Management Team wants to see proof my truck still vibrates after the 4th and final attempt so I have an appointment scheduled for this Monday (04/11/2016). I requested a buy back directly from GM so we will see if that happens or if we have to go all the way through the Lemon Law process (my truck qualifies under FL Lemon Law, it's been out of service for 30+ days AND 3 repair attempts with the official final repair attempt from GM). Hopefully I'll be able to update you all soon with a good outcome.

  • Like 1
Posted

First off, I never said that guy is stupid. I said his statement was, there's a difference that you obviously can't see.

 

Second, I firmly stand by what I said. Absolutely no way, one can have their warranty void for torquing a few nuts. Unless of course you're dumb enough to way over torque something like your head bolts and break them off, and them tell them you did so.

 

Maybe you'd do well to read up on the Moss Magnuson Warranty Act. Sure some people have had a dealer "void" their warranty without cause, or having burden of proof. Businesses get away with stuff all the time because people are uninformed. The worst is the insurance business. They only get away with it because people allow it.

You can quote that act all you want. But I am reading about people cranking down bolts without having any clue what the actual torque specifications are. And probably using Walmart or Auto Zone wrenches that aren't calibrated. All while working on vehicles with known problems manufactured by a company who seems to be doing everything they can to dodge the issue. I mean they are blaming rear end vibrations on rain gutters or bug deflectors. Or not driving the vehicles at speeds where the vibrations are occurring because they say that speeds above the limit are illegal and unsafe. So I'll stand by my original defense of the guy who is worried about voiding warranties. Why take a chance and give GM any ammunition at all?

Posted

You can quote that act all you want. But I am reading about people cranking down bolts without having any clue what the actual torque specifications are. And probably using Walmart or Auto Zone wrenches that aren't calibrated. All while working on vehicles with known problems manufactured by a company who seems to be doing everything they can to dodge the issue. I mean they are blaming rear end vibrations on rain gutters or bug deflectors. Or not driving the vehicles at speeds where the vibrations are occurring because they say that speeds above the limit are illegal and unsafe. So I'll stand by my original defense of the guy who is worried about voiding warranties. Why take a chance and give GM any ammunition at all?

 

The only ones blaming rain guards and bug deflectors are dealer service departments that are trying to blow someone off because they have no clue what the problem is. In that case you need a NEW service dept.

 

As for the legal posted speed limit, they have the right to deny operating above that. Simply offer to be the driver and let them operate their test equipment. Beyond that, contact GM. GM governs the trucks at 97-1** depending on configuration, which is what they deem to be the maximum safe speed. However the dealer isn't required to break the law.

Posted

 

If you have the opportunity, try adding some weight to the bed and see if that vibe changes. I noticed my high speed vibe was diminished when the bed was full of snow. Has me thinking pinion angle. I'm still waiting for a couple things I ordered to see if I'm correct.

 

The primary problem is the trucks are super sensitive. Most vehicles can mask vibrations or harmonics that normally occur. A number of these trucks obviously can't. I think the key to long term happiness is making them less sensitive. However, what works for one may not work for all. I think shocks, pinion angle, and a couple others things may help. Heck, it may take a redesigned driveshaft, if bed weight makes a big difference. I'm also kinda wondering if the air that passes under the truck is somehow inducing something that feels like vibration, but I have nothing to support that, I'm just thinking outside the box on that one.

 

No it makes no difference....just hauled bike 1000kms....still there.

Posted

 

No it makes no difference....just hauled bike 1000kms....still there.

 

 

How much weight?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • probably won't get a response from that user, as they haven't returned to the site since making that one post.  users don't (at least I don't, and I haven't seen any setting which would notify me via say, email) get any notification other than going to this site, and checking if they got a response on their thread...
    • Thanks - I wasn't quite caffeinated this morning. 2:1 makes sense, turning the crankshaft 360 degrees will turn the cam 180 degrees, and had I done that, the cam's dot would be at 6 and the crank's at 12 again.   I went ahead and took the sprocket off anyway, aligned everything dot-to-dot including the balance shaft just for s&g. I'm glad I did because I discovered no Loctite on the timing sprocket bolts. Maybe it's not required, but at only 20 ft-lb torque spec, those bolts aren't in there very tight. Cleaned and reassembled with some thread locker and torqued.   A general observation: Less is more with RTV. If a little doesn't stop a leak, a LOT probably won't, either. RTV is thinly veiled revenge, in a tube...      
    • The timing marks are ok, that is #1, you can turn it over until they line up and it won't change anything, the crankshaft turns twice for every camshaft revolution, I have always set up SB Chevs as your pic shows using a straight edge
    • Someone's been here before.... There is a receipt for a 3-piece timing set, purchased earlier this year.   Is this picture something, or, nothing?   I have the timing cover off and my crank is perfectly TDC and the keyed gear's locating mark is dead on 12 o'clock.   The cam gear locating mark is also at 12 o'clock. Now, I'm not an expert, but all the install guides say the two locating marks should meet and be perfectly aligned when installing a timing set. The mark on the crank should be dead on 12:00 and the cam gear's mark should be dead on 6:00, and both marks should be perfectly vertically aligned.   I believe the timing gear is keyed or has a dowel that ensures it can only be installed on the cam in one position, so I have to believe the cam is out of phase somehow. At the very least, with a triangular bolt pattern, it can only be installed in one of 3 different positions.   Before I pulled the front cover, the truck was running alright, no service engine soon lights except an occasional P0172 / rich condition. Timing -16 timing at idle (should be +16), and total -35% fuel trim, two conditions I haven't been able to figure out.   In related news, my injector tested pretty well, wasn't leaking, but I had it rebuilt anyway, and it's on it's way back to me.         Along with this discovery, the good and bad:   Good: The oil pan seal appears undamaged.   Bad: -The timing cover has been reused, and the positioning dowels have been broken. That could explain some of the leaking. -Some kind of white paste or grease was used to try to seal the oil pan seal and timing cover (since wiped off..). -Then, someone globbed silicone all over the front of the cover and also buried the ckp sensor in it. But, they didn't put any inside the cover or use RTV to try to seal the oil pan seal with the timing cover (good).
    • The guy that owns K&P filters last I checked in with him has over 300,000 miles on his Dodge base Hemi using his own 35 micron absolute stainless mesh filter from its first oil change.    The GM study I've posted a dozen times shows the relationship in engine life based in multiples of base units, not miles or years. That is the base unit is the number of miles the motor ran using the reference filter efficiency.    The above two paragraphs dismantle anecdotal arguments IF one changes oil often enough to prevent particle formation and the motor is in otherwise good shape. That is not full of silica (no air filter) or suffering a metallurgical issue that is not part of the lubrication discussion. Poor heat treat in example.   Data from UOA's I've reviewed from more than a few engines can show remarkably broad variations in oil cleanliness using the exact same filter over the course of an engines life.     Lastly there is the common sense of it. Wear debris WILL circulate the engine BEFORE it ever sees a filter in route to that filter and WILL harm the pump which NEVER sees filtered oil.    Alpha question then becomes, given the facts, how long do you believe is a reasonable service life from a vehicle you are certain you will not pass down? That is the junk yard will be it's resting place when you're done with it? (the moral issue most don't care about).    Omega question is then how diligent are you prepared to be in general mechanical, air & oil maintenance? Preventing particulates and keeping them sufficiently dilute; preventing the precursors from generation, amalgamation and precipitation.    If I get a good look at the engine bay of a vehicle I have a fair idea of the owners commitment to the inside of the power train. That 30 micron WIX is still more efficient than a sieve.                 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...