Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

It's not the dealerships fault....

I agree with this to a point, but it is there responsibility to fix the issue. If a dealer touches a customer's truck to rectify an issue, they are acknowledging a problem. They can't then come back and say the truck is operating as designed after they can't solve the issue? At that point the manufacturer has to acknowledge he built a lemon. So not the dealers fault, but still hold them accountable to fix it. I treat my dealer nice, but he's also the one that sold you that lemon.

  • Like 1
Posted

They are not denying there is an issue. Makes the whole situation even more pathetic at a corporate level.

Posted (edited)

Makes the whole situation even more pathetic at a corporate level.

Just like the GM customer service on this site, the issue is not being addressed by anyone with any horsepower. Issues don't rise to the senior executive level, or else junior executives will be out of a job. Junior, inexperienced executives don't yet have the big picture to work out issues or they don't have the 'nads to bring them up. A lot of times senior executives are out of the know, they just look at $ signs.

Edited by The Zip
  • Like 3
Posted

Why have these "reps" suddenly come back? Do they know something none of us do? Their presence really pisses me off more than anything since they are so useless to getting any resolution for our issues

 

My guess is the article, growing word on the street of the issues, and trying to do some damage control on this 600 page thread. Until I see some action towards solving issues, this is all just lip service to me.

  • Like 1
Posted

 

My guess is the article, growing word on the street of the issues, and trying to do some damage control on this 600 page thread. Until I see some action towards solving issues, this is all just lip service to me.

Sure does seem like the issue has been searched enough.

 

59efc35e31517d71c7a52315503e31dc.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

PM'd the CS rep with a question and so far I've gotten nowhere. My questions don't need a VIN, just an honest answer.

Edited by severado
  • Like 2
Posted

I found a website that collects the aggregate data of complaints and it says that Vibration/ Shaking is the #1 complaint about the 2015 Silverado. lol shocker right

Posted

Sure does seem like the issue has been searched enough.

 

59efc35e31517d71c7a52315503e31dc.jpg

I just did that search, and had to print it to bring to arbitration lol

  • Like 1
Posted

I found a website that collects the aggregate data of complaints and it says that Vibration/ Shaking is the #1 complaint about the 2015 Silverado. lol shocker right

What is the site?

Posted

So I took a closer look at the site, and found that its only based on complaints submitted to them. Vibration is still the #1 complaint though.

here is the link

 

according to the site, there is also 12 active recalls and 90 TSB's out for the Shakerado

 

What is the site?

Posted

Got my truck back yesterday after a week at the dealer. They swapped out my stock 18s with a set of 17s and 20s from the lot with different brand tires. Ass. Service manager drove it each time and confirmed vibration didn't improve with either set. Transmission/driveline guy swears it's in the tires... Sooo GM is sending me 4 brand new tires from a different brand, not SRAs, and the ASM says well take it from there. Says we'll get it worked out, he's just going through the GM routine. Can't say anything bad about the dealer. They're doing their job and just dealing with the GM circus while keeping me updated. I'm just glad they haven't fed me the "it's normal" game the first dealer I went to tried to play.

  • Like 1
Posted

I've got a very interesting story to share. Fellow I've worked with for 23 years was telling me about his wife's Escalade. Don't know the exact year but its previous generation to the current platform. He chaged one of the front axles - it's a 4x4. He had to disconnect the sway bar from the suspension arm and the bolt was so rusted it broke. He got the axle replacement done and didn't had the replacement bolt for the sway bar so took it for a test drive with the sway bar disconnected on that side. The result was shocking.... At about 60 mph, he said the steering wheel shake and shimming was so severe he thought the steering wheel was going to come off! He thought for sure there was a vibration being caused by the new axle. So he verified everything about the new axle and his install (should note he was a mechanic at a GM garage for a decade before moving into our industry, so he is fully qualified to do this kind of work).

 

After finding nothing wrong with the axle or its install, he replaced the broken bolt in the sway bar, re-attached it, and took it for a drive. Remarkably, the shake/shimmy/vibration was all but completely gone! He was stunned. Since when does the sway bar control wheel hop/suspension vibration, or whatever was going on?? Never heard of this.

 

Now, I said "all but gone" because he did say there was a tiny amount of vibration left that was about the same as before from "likely some tire unbalance" as he put it. So, it's almost like the normal amount of slight tire unbalance or road force irregularity is well absorbed/damped/controlled on that generation of GM - until the sway bar was disconnected. Then all hell broke loose! Makes me wonder if there is a similar phenomenon going on with the new trucks, but the base design is not getting the phenomenon under control. Hmmmmm.

 

And hear is the irony....his company truck is a new 2014 GMC Sierra double cab, short box 4x4 and according to him, the truck is perfectly smooth down the highway. And he is very fussy, so I can't see him missing the problems everyone else is experiencing. So for whatever reason, his 2014 is under control.

Posted

I've got a very interesting story to share. Fellow I've worked with for 23 years was telling me about his wife's Escalade. Don't know the exact year but its previous generation to the current platform. He chaged one of the front axles - it's a 4x4. He had to disconnect the sway bar from the suspension arm and the bolt was so rusted it broke. He got the axle replacement done and didn't had the replacement bolt for the sway bar so took it for a test drive with the sway bar disconnected on that side. The result was shocking.... At about 60 mph, he said the steering wheel shake and shimming was so severe he thought the steering wheel was going to come off! He thought for sure there was a vibration being caused by the new axle. So he verified everything about the new axle and his install (should note he was a mechanic at a GM garage for a decade before moving into our industry, so he is fully qualified to do this kind of work).

 

After finding nothing wrong with the axle or its install, he replaced the broken bolt in the sway bar, re-attached it, and took it for a drive. Remarkably, the shake/shimmy/vibration was all but completely gone! He was stunned. Since when does the sway bar control wheel hop/suspension vibration, or whatever was going on?? Never heard of this.

 

Now, I said "all but gone" because he did say there was a tiny amount of vibration left that was about the same as before from "likely some tire unbalance" as he put it. So, it's almost like the normal amount of slight tire unbalance or road force irregularity is well absorbed/damped/controlled on that generation of GM - until the sway bar was disconnected. Then all hell broke loose! Makes me wonder if there is a similar phenomenon going on with the new trucks, but the base design is not getting the phenomenon under control. Hmmmmm.

 

And hear is the irony....his company truck is a new 2014 GMC Sierra double cab, short box 4x4 and according to him, the truck is perfectly smooth down the highway. And he is very fussy, so I can't see him missing the problems everyone else is experiencing. So for whatever reason, his 2014 is under control.

hmmmm

Posted

So my vibrations come and go with temperature changes and bends in the road when traveling at 70 and above. I've noticed that the upper control arm bushings are pretty cracked. Had a 94 corvette that had same type of vibrations and bad bushings. Gonna bring this up next time I go in for another recall. Curious if any of you guys are seeing this? Oh yeah only 20000 miles on the clock.

post-129871-146446723343_thumb.jpg

 

Sent from my VS990 using Tapatalk

post-129871-146446723343_thumb.jpg

post-129871-146446723343_thumb.jpg

post-129871-146446723343_thumb.jpg

Posted

So my vibrations come and go with temperature changes and bends in the road when traveling at 70 and above. I've noticed that the upper control arm bushings are pretty cracked. Had a 94 corvette that had same type of vibrations and bad bushings. Gonna bring this up next time I go in for another recall. Curious if any of you guys are seeing this? Oh yeah only 20000 miles on the clock.

attachicon.gif0528161511a.jpg

 

Sent from my VS990 using Tapatalk

do you mean corroded? I'm not seeing cracks, or am I just missing it?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • The timing marks are ok, that is #1, you can turn it over until they line up and it won't change anything, the crankshaft turns twice for every camshaft revolution, I have always set up SB Chevs as your pic shows using a straight edge
    • Someone's been here before.... There is a receipt for a 3-piece timing set, purchased earlier this year.   Is this picture something, or, nothing?   I have the timing cover off and my crank is perfectly TDC and the keyed gear's locating mark is dead on 12 o'clock.   The cam gear locating mark is also at 12 o'clock. Now, I'm not an expert, but all the install guides say the two locating marks should meet and be perfectly aligned when installing a timing set. The mark on the crank should be dead on 12:00 and the cam gear's mark should be dead on 6:00, and both marks should be perfectly vertically aligned.   I believe the timing gear is keyed or has a dowel that ensures it can only be installed on the cam in one position, so I have to believe the cam is out of phase somehow. At the very least, with a triangular bolt pattern, it can only be installed in one of 3 different positions.   Before I pulled the front cover, the truck was running alright, no service engine soon lights except an occasional P0172 / rich condition. Timing -16 timing at idle (should be +16), and total -35% fuel trim, two conditions I haven't been able to figure out.   In related news, my injector tested pretty well, wasn't leaking, but I had it rebuilt anyway, and it's on it's way back to me.         Along with this discovery, the good and bad:   Good: The oil pan seal appears undamaged.   Bad: -The timing cover has been reused, and the positioning dowels have been broken. That could explain some of the leaking. -Some kind of white paste or grease was used to try to seal the oil pan seal and timing cover (since wiped off..). -Then, someone globbed silicone all over the front of the cover and also buried the ckp sensor in it. But, they didn't put any inside the cover or use RTV to try to seal the oil pan seal with the timing cover (good).
    • The guy that owns K&P filters last I checked in with him has over 300,000 miles on his Dodge base Hemi using his own 35 micron absolute stainless mesh filter from its first oil change.    The GM study I've posted a dozen times shows the relationship in engine life based in multiples of base units, not miles or years. That is the base unit is the number of miles the motor ran using the reference filter efficiency.    The above two paragraphs dismantle anecdotal arguments IF one changes oil often enough to prevent particle formation and the motor is in otherwise good shape. That is not full of silica (no air filter) or suffering a metallurgical issue that is not part of the lubrication discussion. Poor heat treat in example.   Data from UOA's I've reviewed from more than a few engines can show remarkably broad variations in oil cleanliness using the exact same filter over the course of an engines life.     Lastly there is the common sense of it. Wear debris WILL circulate the engine BEFORE it ever sees a filter in route to that filter and WILL harm the pump which NEVER sees filtered oil.    Alpha question then becomes, given the facts, how long do you believe is a reasonable service life from a vehicle you are certain you will not pass down? That is the junk yard will be it's resting place when you're done with it? (the moral issue most don't care about).    Omega question is then how diligent are you prepared to be in general mechanical, air & oil maintenance? Preventing particulates and keeping them sufficiently dilute; preventing the precursors from generation, amalgamation and precipitation.    If I get a good look at the engine bay of a vehicle I have a fair idea of the owners commitment to the inside of the power train. That 30 micron WIX is still more efficient than a sieve.                 
    • It also depends on what criteria someone is using for “best” when talking filters.  Are we going off best efficiency?   Best quality/QC?  Etc. because the two may not mutually exclusive.  
    • They’re not the same wiz as 10-15 years ago.  QC has fallen pretty hard.  The XP line was never good though in the first place.    https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/wix-filter-rusted-through.386492/post-6991372   https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/i-ve-used-my-last-wix-filter.27299/   https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/looking-for-a-better-replacement-for-wix-51258.403977/   https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/convince-me-in-using-the-purolator-boss.401537/post-7420147   the forums are littered with posts and examples of not great wix filters the last couple years 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...