Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

That is crap! If I took my driveshaft to a balancing shop, do you think I would get it back with clamps on it?

If their driveshafts are out of balance from factory have it replaced again with one that is not out!

What happens when the clamps break or move. Will you still have warranty, will you still be covered.

if they will not compromise I would get in writing that this fix is proper and legal to do. If that clamp comes off and hurts someone big trouble......!

I would ask a balancing shop that works on driveshafts, what is the standard industry practice method they use.

We deserve better, new vehicle no cutting corners fix it 100% right or replace part for known good one!

Posted

So we've had rear ends replaced, drive shafts, and tires, with little to no luck at all. (tires have helped some)

 

I'd be curious to see what a good set of rear shocks would do for this issue and see if they would dampen the vibration. Between that and good tires, we might be onto something! If not that, maybe the torque converter.

 

Not wishing this on anyone, but hoping the torque converter route will be experimented with soon so we can rule that out and/or find a fix.

Posted (edited)

Just called a driveshaft rebalancing shop, and I asked them how they would balance my driveshaft, would they use c clamps ever...answer absolutely no!

We would weld weights on, and if the aluminum was too thin then we would epoxy the weight on to the driveshaft.

But first we will check the run out before we balance, as sometimes a driveshaft needs to be cut turned and re welded.

Average cost is around $100 turn around 1 day average.

Edited by 2strokesmoke
Posted

Follow Up; PIPE CLAMPS FOR DRIVE SHAFT BALANCE

 

I was just told by the GM rep after he discussed the pipe clamp concern with the Engineer that the recommended way GM balances drive shafts is to use pipe clamps.

 

They no longer use welded weights and the reason is the light weight thin aluminum shell of the shaft would be difficult to weld on.

 

This is GM's permanent fix.

Believe we just found the vibration - could it be the thin drive shaft oscillating?

Posted

Follow Up; PIPE CLAMPS FOR DRIVE SHAFT BALANCE

 

I was just told by the GM rep after he discussed the pipe clamp concern with the Engineer that the recommended way GM balances drive shafts is to use pipe clamps.

 

They no longer use welded weights and the reason is the light weight thin aluminum shell of the shaft would be difficult to weld on.

 

This is GM's permanent fix.

I think they recently transitioned to using a wad of well chewed bubble gum stuck in the required spot. Besides being inexpensive, it is also environmentally friendly.

Posted

Maybe we are on to something, the driveshaft walls are so thin they are oscillating at low rpm when gear upshifts?

GM has a new part number for the propeller shaft anyone know the part number and issue date.

Part change means design change or supplier change!

I hope GM makes good on sorting this monster out and fixing their loyal customers trucks.

I hope they don't take us to be fools! Many of us are very knowledgeable and have many tools available to us.

The social media and video can damage businesses swiftly and costly.

Posted (edited)

A driveshaft must be designed to handle all the torque with an adequate safety margin to prevent permanent deformation and vibration. This means that adequate wall thickness and diameter is required to meet this goal. When you reduce the wall thickness, you must increase the tube diameter to prevent twisting of the tube when under torsional load. There is a practical balance between the two parameters.

 

A lot of engineering goes into driveshaft design. In my opinion, most of the problems encountered with these trucks are most likely workmanship related.

 

 

 

http://www2.dana.com/pdf/DSAG-0200.pdf

Edited by pm26
Posted (edited)

Cool video. Very informative. No email it to GM, maybe they can learn a little something.

 

 

 

Tapatalk via Moto X

Edited by anthony2558
Posted

Well we may have just accidentally stumbled upon the radio reception problem:

"If you have a vibration in step 1

and
step 2, the problem could
be the flywheel, pressure plate or
disc. If the vibration is so
severe it could shake the radio out of the dash, STOP THE

ENGINE."

:crackup:

Posted

My driveshaft has weights welded on from the factory so it can certainly be done (at least on this one). Does everybody with the problem have the same type of driveshaft or has anybody kept track? That might be interesting data.

 

I have no vibration issues and my driveshaft is the 5.5" diam aluminum hydroformed (I'm guessing) shaft, 6.2 CC Standard bed.

Posted

All of us should at least have weights welded to the shaft, the whole hose clamp setup that GM claims as a sufficient fix is complete BS. driveline shops weld or epoxy weights to them all of the time.

 

I would be curious as to where this driveshaft idea leads as far as if we all have the same one or differences in them.

 

With this many people with this issue, we are bound to find a fix soon (I hope and pray at least!)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Question @diyer2 on this line if you please. Are you saying the shudder is the system turning on and off at the frequency of the shudder? Guess I'm asking if you are saying you have seen it do this with the bi-direction scan tool in graph mode? If so have you been able to discern the 'trigger'. Something is telling to cycle rapidly.    My truck just started doing this recently. 197K on the clock. My response has been M5 anything under 55 mph. I treat it like a lugging stick shift. Gear down and let it spin a bit. Engauge M5, then tow mode and then M6 lets the trans stay in 5th but the AFM is active. Smooth like Skippy.    My thought was that as a machine ages the friction gets lower and as the system is load based, the lower friction would allow it to turn on at ever lower rpm until it reaches the lugging point. And yes I am ignorant of any minimum rpm requirement for the system. If you know that would be useful information.    As you know I run a Scan-Gauge II which allows me to watch the On/Off of the signal to the VLOM. While in the shudder mode I'm not seeing is cycle at that frequency or at all for that matter outside the triggers @newdude posted a few years back. Now is it possible that the refresh rate isn't fast enough to catch it? Maybe. It is why I asked my first question about graphing and trigging parameter.     As we have observed from members here the failure point is all over the map miles wise as you note yourself in your opening post. That by itself begs a few questions like fellows that comment on these lifters failing even after the system has been disabled. Long after. 😬   https://www.enginelabs.com/news/tech-tips-replacing-ls-active-fuel-management-lifters-with-melling/   The Gen5 lifters operate the same as the LS versions. In fact they are the same lifter.    https://www.enginelabs.com/tech-stories/sorting-out-gen-v-lt-lifter-failure-with-a-simple-valvetrain-fix/        
    • UPDATE 2: Steering wheel control backlights and control of the cluster can supposedly be achieved by adding a wire to pin 20 of the cluster and tapping it to pin 2 of the main clock spring harness. I'm going to give it a shot - will update  
    • GM Global A pickups 2019-2022 can do OTA programming for the radio.  GM VIP (GM Global B) can do OTAs for almost every module on board.  So a 2022.5 and newer pickup can do OTAs for recalls like the 2.7 fuel flow recall.  EVs get OTAs that improve one pedal driving, radio issues, HVAC issues, updated battery management software, etc.     So age of the vehicle/what GM electrical platform its on will alter what amount of updates can be pushed on OTAs.  
    • Thank You.   So far my new ride is making me look like a genius for going with the 3.0L, as my first fuel refill occurred over three weeks from when I took delivery.  This engine combination is very amazing.  So far no issues and had not done a regen yet.
    • I am curious as to how much fluid you put back in the transmission ( assuming you had replaced the filter to compare to my findings ) and then went through the process of warming up the trans before pulling the check plug to drain out the excess and if you measured how much came back out.    I just found it surprising that some claimed a certain amount less fluid being put in and then draining some back out. The attitude of the truck as per if the surface is level and how the trucks stance is would make quite a difference since the check plug is right at the front of the transmission. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...