Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

My truck is at dealer again today for FM radio reception issues / HD radio issues. Dealer is dealing directly with GM tech services this time.

Posted

Please let me know if they make any improvement so that I can tell my dealer. Thanks

  • Like 1
Posted

Please let me know if they make any improvement so that I can tell my dealer. Thanks

Ok

Posted

Just putting this out there, confirm for yourselves. About a year ago I had 2 blown speakers in my Camaro I took it to a high end, very reputable stereo shop. The installer told me the speakers will be destroyed if there is static in the receiver. He told me that is the biggest cause along with a CD that skips etc. GM needs to come up with a fix, this is going on since July that I am aware of.

Posted

My truck is still at dealer for radio reception problems (will be there tommorrow also). Dealer found found a radio code that needs to have tech support involved. They also compared with another 2014 Silverado and found FM reception to be close to mine, but my radio dropped the HD much more than other Silverado.

DMD277, I will let you know what they say.

Posted

Factory Technician is coming to check out radio issues. Probably be at least a week, so I won't know anything for a least a week.

Posted

Tell the tech guy while he has his head up his butt,I mean in your radio to call Ibquity . They are the radio people. The number is 1-908-580- 7000 between the two of them maybe we can do fm again

Posted

Keep us up to date, I am waiting until my first oil change to have mine checked out.


Keep us up to date, I am waiting until my first oil change to have mine checked out.

Posted

Keep us up to date, I am waiting until my first oil change to have mine checked out.

 

Keep us up to date, I am waiting until my first oil change to have mine checked out.

I would let them know now instead of waiting. I spoke with multiple people from GM and they claim there are no complaints about FM reception issues. If they cannot fix my radio, I am pursusing a buy back from GM. The only problem is that I added $$$ accesories.

Posted

I have already opened a case with GM, told me there was no resolution at this point.

 

Here is how GM's email address work.

 

[email protected]

 

Here is a list of the executive officers of GM. Last time I ran into a block I emailed everyone over these people, several got the email and with in 25 hours I had a high up person contact my friend and with in 2 days his buy back was in process on his car.

 

http://www.gm.com/company/corporate-officers

Posted

My truck is at dealer again today for FM radio reception issues / HD radio issues. Dealer is dealing directly with GM tech services this time.

 

It sounds like you got tired of waiting on them to fix it. I was crossing my fingers that you were onto something with them. The radio reception still bugs me daily. Dealer said works as it should.

 

Feb 20, 2014 NO FIX for FM.

Posted

 

It sounds like you got tired of waiting on them to fix it. I was crossing my fingers that you were onto something with them. The radio reception still bugs me daily. Dealer said works as it should.

 

Feb 20, 2014 NO FIX for FM.

Its very frustrating !

Posted

Sooo , it is just as I suspected. 21 pages of complaints and GM has no knowledge of the problem. What in the H have Jennifer and her little band of do nothings been doing. If they did the things they claim to do, the father land would have knowledge of this and every other problem talked about on these forums. Yes I know that we are a small number, I have talked to at least 4 new owners in parking lots and gas stations who hate the radio,but were unaware of this forum. So the number represented here is far less than actual problems or no problems overall. Even the company that does the radio says this problem is in over 50% of the trucks, and GM is aware of it, but admitting it would greatly effect the _____

Posted (edited)

My service manager told me the same thing. GM has not had complaints about FM radio reception. I know that several owners on this site have contacted their dealers and GM. It makes me wonder.

Edited by dmd277

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...