Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

su4unega.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

I expected a larger bump

 

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Most ppl post up dynajet results and there more forgiving here's the other one-

ytyzy9u6.jpg

 

Baseline with Corsa. It added 8 hp bone stock run was 285 I don't have that sheet sorry

y8any3y7.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Edited by Dj0nes
Posted

Mine was on a Dynocom.

 

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

 

 

Posted

Yeah I'm sure they're all a lil different. Numbers are numbers in my opinion. The over all drivability is completely different. I also didn't have them tune it all out and advance timing to much. Only advanced it 3 degrees. I'm sure more could have been gained but I'm staying safe. The shift point and tq lock up changes improved everything. This is only the first round I'll be taking it back for tweaks eventually once I get a feel for what can improve still.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

I was expecting more because the stock numbers for the new 5.3 and my LQ9 are near identical. Mine put 325 To the wheels. The tune was awful as well and I had it redone for divability

 

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

 

 

Posted

I didn't make near 325 to the wheels stock. I haven't seen any make near that lol. Must have gotten a good motor or the dyno was a lil overzealous with the results. Most Ive see are around 290-295 to the wheels. STPT numbers are true to the wheel numbers.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

I didnt do that to the wheels stock. It was the 6.0 with a 5.3 K&N intake and 5.3 MBRP exhaust then a tune. This thing is 345 at the crank stock

 

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

 

 

Posted

Ohhh I understand now. My bad.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

Why don't they show anything below 2500 rpm? I want to see what they look like in the "normal" driving region.

Posted

That's how all dynos work. 3rd gear pulls from 15-20 mph. In the "power band". You wouldn't see much of a difference down low on paper but real time driving it's day and night. The truck holds gears much better and never downshifts when going up hills. I put it to some tests yesterday and was very impressed with the gains and trans shift points.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

On paper all of the gains were at the top of the rev range which isn't that encouraging. The consolation is that you did feel the difference in normal driving situations where it matters and.

 

Personally I would love to see low and mid range torque and power improve along with the gear change alterations.

Posted

Im a big fan of the BB tune and a buddy of mine just got his new 14 done and loves it

Did your buddy get his 14 tuned with the ecm or both ecm and tcm?? Ive been waitin for the tcm to come out

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Google converting 98 4.3 spider injection to carburetor if all else fails. 
    • My centre console USB ports haven’t been working and the one in the glovebox is starting to act up. When I plug my phone into the cord the radio will go black and stop playing, and the CarPlay is inconsistent.   I checked the fuses and they were fine. I changed the USB port out and still nothing. Hoping for some advice on what I should be looking at.  
    • The truck is a 1995 Chevrolet S10 Blazer, 4.3 VIN "W" engine. :cracks knuckles:   On a whim - because I needed a headache - this truck was for sale so I stopped to take a look. Doesn't run. Well, it does, but barely. Long crank, choppy idle, bad misfire(s), it REEKS of fuel. I can DO this..I'm thinking. Diamond in the rough. One owner until last year. A young guy is selling it, he bought it 6 months ago. It stranded him more than once, he's got a newborn. It was in the shop 10 days ago and he "thinks" they said it needs a new fuel injection system. He can't put any more money into it, needs it gone. I was thinking of upgrading my Macbook, which is a total want, not a need. For less than the price of a new laptop I can have fun for months tinkering on this truck and enjoying it. I'm taking this truck home. The guy was beyond thrilled, his wife was there, she thanked me profusely, I could tell they were hurting. They seemed like good people in a bind.   Some parts, a wash, maybe a set of tires, and I can have a few months of fun and then turn it for beer money (or the next project).   Sure enough, there's a work order from a shop last week in the INCHES of paperwork on this truck dating back to when the first owner bought it. They put a new distributor in it, fuel injection work describes basically opening the plenum and putting it back together. He said he couldn't afford any more work so he had them button it up and that's when he put it up for sale.   I'm not well versed in 4.3. I did discover 1995 uses the 1992-1995 SCPI "Spider" injector which is riddled with issues from splitting lines, clogged or cracked poppet valves and plastic spider legs that crumble over time. Cool. I'll just order me a ne---. Oh, the auto parts store doesn't have it? Rock Auto doesn't have it. eBay? $$$$$$ for used. These are UNAVAILABLE period end of story unless you know "a guy" who's still got one in a box somewhere.   Can't upgrade to the '96-'04 injector, it's a different plenum, wiring/pinout and sensor config.   There are a few kinda "know a guy" -guy rebuild services for these injectors out there for about $350. Okay, Okay... I'd like to know if anyone has used them? Anyone got a lead on these crappy 92-95 spiders?   I also don't want to send MY spider to Narnia and back without knowing if that's truly the problem. I guess I'll need to pull apart the plenum and do some digging.   I was also thrown for a loop. This 1995 model year truck has an OBD-II connector. The interface is decidedly not OBD-II. I can read and reset trouble codes and view live data, but there's not a lot of data. Like misfire count and on what cylinder, that's not there. It's OBD-1.5.   Nothing is ever easy. Now it makes sense why this guy wanted to disappear this thing for cheap. I'm guessing the shop told him the injector is toast, the part is unobtainable and they're not going to sort sending the thing to a rando offering rebuild service on craigslist, and the kid likely can't be without a working car for 3 weeks even if they'd facilitate that.   Experience with these early SCPI's? Stories? Things to check? Sympathy? (..Nah...)   This can sit until I sort it. But I haven't had a problem with a vehicle I couldn't easily solve in a long time.    
    • I have four that read by the dash 8 to 10% better than miles/pump calculations and I have one that is spot on. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...