Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I did.... shifted like garbage. Not enough adjustability for that stuff yet to do anything like that. That's 8 speed though... 6 should be no problem to do whatever.

 

Sent from my SM-G900W8 using Tapatalk

Edited by 1994Vmax
Posted

Yeah mine shifted awful to and Justin has tuned on mine for a while now and turned it off and I was amazed at what a difference it makes. I was wondering how many has done so when tuning the transmission.

 

RT

Posted

I have done some minor tuning on my 20116's transmission. I reduced the upshift times by 30% and the downshift times by 35%. I turned off the upshift and downshift torque management and the truck shifts almost perfect. It will have to do until HP Tuners releases the pressure tables. As of now it is firm on every shift and gets after it on the shift time side. To be honest I could probably reduce the up and down shifts by 40% and it will be perfect.

 

I wish GM would take some cues from the Germans. My wifes Audi has a 8spd auto in it, under normal drive mode it shifts quick with no delay at all and just some slight firmness. Put into sport mode and the shift times are reduced in half and in snaps the shifts in place each time.

Posted (edited)

I have done some minor tuning on my 20116's transmission. I reduced the upshift times by 30% and the downshift times by 35%. I turned off the upshift and downshift torque management and the truck shifts almost perfect. It will have to do until HP Tuners releases the pressure tables. As of now it is firm on every shift and gets after it on the shift time side. To be honest I could probably reduce the up and down shifts by 40% and it will be perfect.

 

I wish GM would take some cues from the Germans. My wifes Audi has a 8spd auto in it, under normal drive mode it shifts quick with no delay at all and just some slight firmness. Put into sport mode and the shift times are reduced in half and in snaps the shifts in place each time.

LOL on the European Builders.... Hell my wife's Honda Pilot and my Daughters Civic shift better than the truck did until this last change and they are both Merican made!

 

RT

Edited by 07Softail
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Instead of digging through 57 pages, I'm hoping someone can answer my question. I'm thinking about picking up a 2016 w/ the 8-speed. I have HPT with an available license. Are there any components that I won't be able to edit with the tune? Is the 8-speed fully supported with the newest version of HPT?

Posted (edited)

I have HPT and upon recommendation of how much of a buggy pos it is I haven't upgraded to the latest.. they were supposed to increase 8 speed support though which I want too. But in 2 weeks time they have revised the 3.2 release 25 times and it's still causing guys issues... so I will wait a bit longer. The current 8 speed stuff isn't hardly worth playing with.

 

Sent from my SM-G900W8 using Tapatalk

Edited by 1994Vmax
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

My 2014 5.3 silverado has a supercharger kooks headers kooks exhaust and a cai and pcm dyno tuned my truck made 540 and 560 at the crank truck. Long story short my stick piston rods broke and came thru the block. My mechanic said the truck was running way to rich and pistons lost the lubrication due to it running to rich

Edited by Jb716
Posted

My 2014 5.3 silverado has a supercharger kooks headers kooks exhaust and a cai and pcm dyno tuned my truck made 540 and 560 at the crank truck. Long story short my stick piston rods broke and came thru the block. My mechanic said the truck was running way to rich and pistons lost the lubrication due to it running to rich

My 2014 5.3 silverado has a supercharger kooks headers kooks exhaust and a cai and pcm dyno tuned my truck made 540 and 560 at the crank truck. Long story short my stick piston rods broke and came thru the block. My mechanic said the truck was running way to rich and pistons lost the lubrication due to it running to rich

That's sucks man. Hate to hear about the bad luck

 

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

 

That's sucks man. Hate to hear about the bad luck

 

Been a the shop now putting another 5.3 in it and adding supercharger and headers to it until I have money to built a a vette ls3

  • Like 1
Posted

My 2014 5.3 silverado has a supercharger kooks headers kooks exhaust and a cai and pcm dyno tuned my truck made 540 and 560 at the crank truck. Long story short my stick piston rods broke and came thru the block. My mechanic said the truck was running way to rich and pistons lost the lubrication due to it running to rich

Posted

Yeah, making nearly 600 hp is one thing. Getting the beast to live a long time is another. Don't ask me how I know haha. Sorry for the bad luck man. Oh and btw old broken internals make for some good furniture and accessories for a man cave.

  • Like 2
Posted

 

 

Yeah, making nearly 600 hp is one thing. Getting the beast to live a long time is another. Don't ask me how I know haha. Sorry for the bad luck man. Oh and btw old broken internals make for some good furniture and accessories for a man cave.

crank is going to be a coffee table

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...