Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I hit it with a wire brush attachment for drill and used hi grit paper on sander till I saw fresh shiny metal

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Hello,

have same problem. Running for few weeks from Chevy to GMC dealership. No one want to take my truck to repair this coating.
IS GM CUSTOMER SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE HERE? COULD YOU GUYS HELP ME TO LOCATE DEALER IN MY AREA?

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Was wondering if mine looks worse than most or on par? Spot treatment of mine is beyond a lost cause as 75% of my frame and all suspension is rusted.

 

When do we have to worry about integrity of the frame if ever? I remember Toyota had issues with them failing.

 

 

20170521_131718.jpg

 

20170521_131044.jpg

20170710_095331.jpg

Posted

That is definitely worse. Wow. Where do you live?

Posted

Wow that rust is nasty.You definitely won't see structural issues for at least a decade IF you don't address the problem. I've seen Toyotas with 5 or 6 year old frames that rotted away.

 

The issue with Toyota frames is that they're an open C frame that collects mud and road salt, the metal is thinner than the steel in competitor's frames, and the corrosion treatments Toyota specified were sub-par. Granted, even back in the 80's Toyotas were famous for terrible rust issues.

 

You can address your rust quite easily as long as you don't just try to cover up the rust by being lazy and re-applying the junk factory wax.

Posted

That is definitely worse. Wow. Where do you live?

 

Live in Madison wisconsin. Bought the car CPO from local dealer who got it back on lease. Had it 3 years now, 30k miles put on 57k miles total. Own a side business detailing cars and planes and definitely take care of my stuff. Shocked to see how fast this got bad.

 

Wow that rust is nasty.You definitely won't see structural issues for at least a decade IF you don't address the problem. I've seen Toyotas with 5 or 6 year old frames that rotted away.

The issue with Toyota frames is that they're an open C frame that collects mud and road salt, the metal is thinner than the steel in competitor's frames, and the corrosion treatments Toyota specified were sub-par. Granted, even back in the 80's Toyotas were famous for terrible rust issues.

You can address your rust quite easily as long as you don't just try to cover up the rust by being lazy and re-applying the junk factory wax.

Good point. Definitely wasn't just going to cover it, but feel a frame off is the only way to get all of it since it's so bad. Also it's rusting inside the frame too so no idea how to attempt those areas

Posted (edited)

Good point. Definitely wasn't just going to cover it, but feel a frame off is the only way to get all of it since it's so bad. Also it's rusting inside the frame too so no idea how to attempt those areas

Being a leased truck, I would bet that I was never washed all winter long. The frame wax is junk though and is the primary cause. Mine has little flakes of wax coming off the first year I bought it. Luckily I caught it early on.

 

You can either lift the bed off and attempt to strip off what wax is left and clean the rust up, then reapply a better frame coating such as POR-15 or Chassis Saver. The other option is to spray down the frame as it is with an oil based product. I use Fluid Film for its lower toxicity and its ability to creep into tight spaces that paint can't reach. Oil and Fluid Film will soften the factory wax, so you don't want to pressure wash the frame as it'll accelerate the peeling of the factory wax. I had a patch of wax come off, exposing clean steel. I hit it with rustoleum (mostly for looks as it was in the rear wheel well) and re-coated the area with oil. The oil works by soaking into the wax and rust, providing a moisture and oxygen barrier (just like oil on a gun barrel or cosmoline on new brake rotors), stopping the rust from spreading. Toyota guys swear by it (if it works for a Toyota, it'll protect anything).

 

 

As your frame proves, the factory wax is going to peel off no matter what you do. Reapplying the factory wax will actually cause the steel to rust even worse because now you're providing a place for salt and moisture to continue to eat the steel away. It'll look okay though, which is why some guys want to reapply the factory stuff-- out of sight out of mind. The same goes for rubberized undercoating. If you just spray it over the factory wax and rust, it'll continue to rot underneath but it'll look ok.

Edited by HondaHawkGT
Posted

EFLine, I have a 14 that was neglected by the previous owner and my frame seems to have more rust than most on here. That being said I don't have as much as you. I wonder if there is a way to report this to GM even with your truck being out of warranty. The more people who complain the more likely something more than just recoating the frame with junk wax will happen. No matter what conditions it's been in, except maybe being submerged in the ocean, that is unacceptable for a 3 year old truck in my opinion. I used to work as a mechanic and 10+ year old trucks didn't have as much rust as your frame or mine, and I'm in Ohio with all the nasty road salt and grime they put down in the winter. It really shows the lack of quality gm put into protecting the frames on these things.

Posted

As others have stated forget the frame wax as it is basically gone . Wire brush any scale and squirt the entire bottom with fluid film or Amsoil HD metal protector .

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

I used to own a 2011 GMC Sierra 2500 for 4 years and didn't see any rust on the frame.

 

-Did they have paint on the frame?

 

 

I just bought a 2017 GMC Sierra 2500 a couple weeks ago. The wax is very soft and sticky. I live in Florida, so no winter salt to deal with. Also not off-roading. Salty beach mist maybe once a month.

 

- Do you guys think the 2017 will have the same issues? Was 2016 better?

 

- Are the 2500 less affected?

 

- Did GM address and improve anything?

 

- Should I touch-up once a year with Nox-Rust X-121B, or Fluid Film, or LPS 3 or get the wax off and use something else?

Edited by crockett
Posted (edited)

That frame above is worst I've seen. I've gone fluid film route. I take a look now and then or anytime work on it and spray any area that is exposed or flaking. So far so good. Lil rust but not bad yet. Probably 15-20% of frame on my 14 and mostly back half and lift points.

Edited by jrob56
Posted

I used to own a 2011 GMC Sierra 2500 for 4 years and didn't see any rust on the frame.

 

-Did they have paint on the frame?

 

 

I just bought a 2017 GMC Sierra 2500 a couple weeks ago. The wax is very soft and sticky. I live in Florida, so no winter salt to deal with. Also not off-roading. Salty beach mist maybe once a month.

 

- Do you guys think the 2017 will have the same issues? Was 2016 better?

 

- Are the 2500 less affected?

 

- Did GM address and improve anything?

 

- Should I touch-up once a year with Nox-Rust X-121B, or Fluid Film, or LPS 3 or get the wax off and use something else?

If your frame wax is intact and it's still nice and soft, I would leave it alone. Just make sure to check on it once or twice a year. I would be willing to bet that if your truck was put on a lift, the bottom edge of the frame will have spots where the lift rubbed the wax off. I would check for rust there, clean off any rust you might find, then re-coat the area with the factory Nox-Rust wax. Also, check the area where the spare tire contacts the frame. The spare tends to rub against the frame and promote rust.

  • Like 1
Posted
HondaHawkGT, on 13 Jul 2017 - 04:27 AM, said:

If your frame wax is intact and it's still nice and soft, I would leave it alone. Just make sure to check on it once or twice a year. I would be willing to bet that if your truck was put on a lift, the bottom edge of the frame will have spots where the lift rubbed the wax off. I would check for rust there, clean off any rust you might find, then re-coat the area with the factory Nox-Rust wax. Also, check the area where the spare tire contacts the frame. The spare tends to rub against the frame and promote rust.

 

 

Makes sense. Thank you for the tips. Will order the wax and check / rework twice a year.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Bought my 14 GMC SLE DC at the end of May, was a lease in Ohio with plenty of car fax maintenance records. It had some frame rust showing under the rear fender liners and various other areas. After reading through this thread and the various results others got from the dealer, decided to do it myself. First pressure washed the frame on low pressure and let it dry for a day. Used a wire brush, the kind with the wooden handle, and hit the rust to remove the scale/slag, then blew off the frame with a leaf blower. Decided to use Chassis Saver and foam brushes, be sure to buy a lot of brushes. I painted the entire frame including right over the factory wax to get a uniform look. it's been a couple of months now and it still looks like I just did the job. I want to get a second coat on but that will happen in the fall.

 

Things I learned, read and heed the instructions.

One quart should provide one coat on entire frame.

It's wise to buy the S8 reducer

Don't use a red Solo cup, ate through the cup in 30 minutes, switched to thicker tupperware.

Foam brushes deteriorate after about 15 minutes, switched to horsehair and was fine.

Use a large piece of cardboard to catch slag and drips.

I drilled holes in the lid and sealed them with aluminum HVAC tape.

Work in well ventilated area, did mine in the garage and the house smelled for a few days.

The sooner you use S8 the easier it is to remove.

  • Like 1
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

I own a 2014 GMC Sierra with 10k miles on it that I bought a month ago. When I negotiated with the salesman I asked for the frame to be sprayed. They told me it would be. On the day I picked it up it wasn't done and they wanted to charge me if I wanted them to do it. I said I did wanted it done and the salesman said it would be taken care of. Looks like they sprayed the undercarriage with black Rustoelum. I should have expected nothing more than that. Complete mess, all over the wheel wells and suspension parts. I took a mild brush and was able to clean up most of it, but totally lost faith in the dealership and believing that they really want to help anyone anymore.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...