Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Finished the fluid change last night. Found quite a bit of metallic flake in the magnetic catches. Nothing to be concerned about, but the fluid was pretty dirty. Didn't really notice the flakes in the oil, but possible that as it was draining (and subsequently passing over the magnet) the flakes were caught. See pictures. Painted it for rust prevention.

post-162447-0-44593000-1477419721_thumb.jpg

post-162447-0-60081500-1477419722_thumb.jpg

post-162447-0-83079300-1477419723_thumb.jpg

post-162447-0-08678700-1477419725_thumb.jpg

post-162447-0-68551600-1477419725_thumb.jpg

post-162447-0-30529300-1477419726_thumb.jpg

post-162447-0-85648400-1477419726_thumb.jpg

post-162447-0-44593000-1477419721_thumb.jpg

post-162447-0-60081500-1477419722_thumb.jpg

post-162447-0-83079300-1477419723_thumb.jpg

post-162447-0-08678700-1477419725_thumb.jpg

post-162447-0-68551600-1477419725_thumb.jpg

post-162447-0-30529300-1477419726_thumb.jpg

post-162447-0-85648400-1477419726_thumb.jpg

post-162447-0-44593000-1477419721_thumb.jpg

post-162447-0-60081500-1477419722_thumb.jpg

post-162447-0-83079300-1477419723_thumb.jpg

post-162447-0-08678700-1477419725_thumb.jpg

post-162447-0-68551600-1477419725_thumb.jpg

post-162447-0-30529300-1477419726_thumb.jpg

post-162447-0-85648400-1477419726_thumb.jpg

post-162447-0-44593000-1477419721_thumb.jpg

post-162447-0-60081500-1477419722_thumb.jpg

post-162447-0-83079300-1477419723_thumb.jpg

post-162447-0-08678700-1477419725_thumb.jpg

post-162447-0-68551600-1477419725_thumb.jpg

post-162447-0-30529300-1477419726_thumb.jpg

post-162447-0-85648400-1477419726_thumb.jpg

  • Like 2
Posted

I hate the way it's marketed and sold; but you cannot go wrong running AMSOIL products in your truck.

? Hows it marketed and sold? I've always heard and seen the brand but never used it.

Posted

? Hows it marketed and sold? I've always heard and seen the brand but never used it.

 

 

You get distributors/marketers on these forums that push/push/push the product and then essentially "belittle" those that voice an alternative product that is essentially equally as good.

  • Like 1
Posted

 

 

You get distributors/marketers on these forums that push/push/push the product and then essentially "belittle" those that voice an alternative product that is essentially equally as good.

 

That's not occurring on this forum. The Amsoil vendor that posts here speaks well of other products when appropriate. So don't lump everyone into the same boat

  • Like 4
Posted

Ok, I'm going to ask this in a serious sense...just how much protection is one losing to an (whatever the GM) 85w versus the mileage loss in a (synthetic) 90w? Seems like the difference in mileage would be really hard see under normal conditions?

 

I guess it's a moot point when cars share the differential and transmission and use ATF.

 

Sent from my SM-T350 using Tapatalk

Posted

Ok, I'm going to ask this in a serious sense...just how much protection is one losing to an (whatever the GM) 85w versus the mileage loss in a (synthetic) 90w? Seems like the difference in mileage would be really hard see under normal conditions?

 

I guess it's a moot point when cars share the differential and transmission and use ATF.

 

Sent from my SM-T350 using Tapatalk

I bet it's like 1-2 tenths kinda like switching to 10W-30 or something hushes things up a tad and loosing a few tenths? When it comes time for mine I like the previous posters idea on going 90W and follow suit!

Posted

Finished the fluid change last night. Found quite a bit of metallic flake in the magnetic catches. Nothing to be concerned about, but the fluid was pretty dirty. Didn't really notice the flakes in the oil, but possible that as it was draining (and subsequently passing over the magnet) the flakes were caught. See pictures. Painted it for rust prevention.

Nice bro! Thanks for taking care of the hardest working that nobody cares about little brother in the world!

Posted (edited)

I did my diff around 42k when I did the PML cover. Dealer did it at 15k when the RR axle seal blew out. That factory fill is for the birds. even with only 27k it was getting pretty dirty. I didn't go for the 85W MPG crap. Way to expensive. I bought a 5gallon bucket of this stuff and it showed up at my door 3 days later. Much cheaper per quart vs even retail M1, or the gold AC Delco stuff. The main thing is get a quality 75-90 Full Synthetic GL-5 rated gear oil. IF you have the G80 Locker, the friction modifier found in even M1 or other retail bottles is not recommended by EATON. I called and talked directly to their tech guy. He was very clear, no friction modifiers. I was not able to find 75/90 Syn Gl-5 on the shelf locally, and I was doing 4 diffs. 2 on my silverado and 2 on my '89 K5. Worked out perfect. And this stuff is "FE" Fuel Efficient. So it's thin 75/90. The 75/85 is for GM to get .1 more MPG on the CAFE. Toyota uses some thin gear oil also... I use my truck as a truck in industrial construction. .1mpg does not matter, getting 250k does. If I cared about the MPG impact between 75/85 and 75/90 then my E load KO2's are really a no no.

 

Here you go... G80 happy:

http://www.phillips66lubricants.com/documents/conoco/industrial_oils/FOB%20Triton%20Syngear%20FE%20TDSw%20828151.pdf

Edited by FL335i
  • Like 1
Posted

I did my diff around 42k when I did the PML cover. Dealer did it at 15k when the RR axle seal blew out. That factory fill is for the birds. even with only 27k it was getting pretty dirty. I didn't go for the 85W MPG crap. Way to expensive. I bought a 5gallon bucket of this stuff and it showed up at my door 3 days later. Much cheaper per quart vs even retail M1, or the gold AC Delco stuff. The main thing is get a quality 75-90 Full Synthetic GL-5 rated gear oil. IF you have the G80 Locker, the friction modifier found in even M1 or other retail bottles is not recommended by EATON. I called and talked directly to their tech guy. He was very clear, no friction modifiers. I was not able to find 75/90 Syn Gl-5 on the shelf locally, and I was doing 4 diffs. 2 on my silverado and 2 on my '89 K5. Worked out perfect. And this stuff is "FE" Fuel Efficient. So it's thin 75/90. The 75/85 is for GM to get .1 more MPG on the CAFE. Toyota uses some thin gear oil also... I use my truck as a truck in industrial construction. .1mpg does not matter, getting 250k does. If I cared about the MPG impact between 75/85 and 75/90 then my E load KO2's are really a no no.

 

Here you go... G80 happy:

http://www.phillips66lubricants.com/documents/conoco/industrial_oils/FOB%20Triton%20Syngear%20FE%20TDSw%20828151.pdf

Thanks Great info! I am getting this crap for my truck ASAP....I never even thought about the G80 Locker/Eaton requirements! I love the part how this Gear oil can go 500,000 for intervals? Comedy folks!

Posted

Thanks Great info! I am getting this crap for my truck ASAP....I never even thought about the G80 Locker/Eaton requirements! I love the part how this Gear oil can go 500,000 for intervals? Comedy folks!

Depends on the differential...a lot of OTR trucks have a 500k change interval.

 

Sent from my SM-T350 using Tapatalk

Posted

mookdoc6 - the 500k interval is for the semi's running on the highway, very common for that application. Not our applications!! That Triton gear oil is marketed toward semi's, hence the 5 gal pails, not being sold at Autozone in quart bottles. The semi's do not have LSD's so their oils do not have friction modifiers normally. Again, for our G80 rear axle, and even front axle being it's open diff, we want a 75w-90 GL-5 FULL SYN gear oil with NO FRICTION MODIFIER. GM put a 75-85syn rear oil in there to get another .1mpg but in the front diff they used cheap 80-90 conventional gear oil. I'm running the 75-90 Triton FE in both front and rear diffs on my silverado and K5 Jimmy.

Posted

AMSOIL makes a similar 75W-90 gear lube available in quarts.

 

FGR.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Look at the OE and API approvals on the Triton FE compare to the Amsoil. Just saying. Price of my 5gal bucket to my door step was $172.00. Came out to $8.60/Qt. I needed a 5 gal bucket for my 2 trucks anyway. I run 0-20 PP from Walmart b/c it's a good oil with the proper API and Dexos approval. I used to run M1 0-40 in my BMW's from walmart for the same reason.... meets specs and is priced right.

Edited by FL335i
Posted (edited)

Look at the OE and API approvals on the Triton FE compare to the Amsoil. Just saying. Price of my 5gal bucket to my door step was $172.00. Came out to $8.60/Qt. I needed a 5 gal bucket for my 2 trucks anyway. I run 0-20 PP from Walmart b/c it's a good oil with the proper API and Dexos approval. I used to run M1 0-40 in my BMW's from walmart for the same reason.... meets specs and is priced right.

https://www.redlineoil.com/product.aspx?product=58304

 

 

^^^^... I'm looking for something more readily available in quart size; would this be ok to use; does it meet the requirements for the g80???

 

Also could I use this in the front diff.

Thanks.

Edited by 15_silverado

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Did have to make 1 modification because of the WeatherTech rear mud flaps and that was needing 3 longer screws than what came with the install package. 😄
    • Picked up the liners yesterday. Installed passenger side WITHOUT any modifications. All mounting holes lined up perfectly. Rain is interfering today with drivers side. Very Happy! Will add pics when finished
    • As a matter of amusement I’ll leave this conversation with this. Do you beat the government average fuel estimate? Statistics are a guide to me. Not a rule. Someone once said I have to have the last word. If true and possible may be. I’ll blame that on working in a family business.
    • That is a fair point, and I agree that trying to log “everything in the truck” would be the wrong direction.   There are a lot of modules and a lot of traffic. If the product became a full-truck datalogger, the amount of data would get huge very quickly, and most owners would never use it.   I think the first useful version would need to be narrow: - powertrain-side event evidence - selected high-value parameters - communication / voltage / reset events - pre/post event window - short report first, raw log only as backup   One distinction I should make is between active OBD/PID polling and passive bus capture. If you are polling PIDs through OBD, then yes: the more parameters you request, the lower the effective sample rate becomes, and you are adding diagnostic traffic to a vehicle that is already busy running itself. With passive CAN capture, the recorder is not asking all the modules for data. It is listening to traffic that is already on the bus. So it does not consume vehicle bus bandwidth in the same way that a scan tool polling hundreds of PIDs would. But your point still applies in a different way.   Even if passive capture does not add bus traffic, the recorder still has limits: - processing rate - storage rate - timestamp accuracy - decoder workload - event filtering - report size - user attention span   So the answer cannot be “log everything and let the user figure it out.” The product would need to store enough raw evidence to be useful, but only decode, graph, and present the important parts around the event.   A practical report should probably show: - what triggered the capture - how much pre/post data was preserved - which selected parameters changed - how those values compared to baseline - whether the same pattern happened before - whether any voltage, reset, bus-off, lost-message, or communication fault occurred - selected graphs around the event - raw data only as supporting evidence   So I agree with you. More data is not automatically better. The real product is the reduction from raw data into a useful event report.
    • That makes sense, and I agree with most of that.   I think the product would need both: 1. a default powertrain template, so it is useful out of the box; 2. user-selected priority parameters, so the owner or shop can choose what they want to see first.   Different users are going to care about different things. One owner may care about oil pressure and voltage. Another may care about misfire trend, AFM/DFM behavior, or U-codes. A shop may want communication events and repeatability first. Your baseline point is probably the most important one. Raw data is not very useful unless the report can show what normal looked like for that vehicle under similar conditions.   The way I would think about it is: - start with a basic known-good baseline - learn normal behavior for that specific vehicle over time - allow the event to be overlaid against baseline - show whether the event was a one-time spike or a repeatable pattern - provide a simple severity level, but with clear limits on what that severity means   For example, early severity could be something like: - Info: event captured, no obvious abnormal pattern - Watch: value moved outside baseline, but not repeated - Warning: repeatable abnormal pattern under similar conditions - Critical: communication loss, voltage drop, bus-off, reset, or severe repeated event   I would not want the first version to say “replace this part.” That would be overclaiming unless there is repair-confirmed data behind it. It would be more honest to say “this pattern deserves inspection.”   On the OBD port question, I think OBD absolutely has a role. OBD is probably the right place for: - DTCs - freeze frame - VIN - calibration information - normal scan-tool parameters - Mode 6 / enhanced diagnostic data if available The reason I am still looking at an ECM-side recorder is that the failure may happen before anyone connects a scan tool. If the owner plugs in a scanner after the event, the pre-event evidence may already be gone unless the ECU happened to save it. So I do not see this as “OBD versus ECM-side.” I see it more like: - ECM-side recorder: always armed, rolling buffer, event evidence - OBD/DLC companion: DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration, normal scan data - phone/cloud: status, notes, upload, report generation, notifications   I agree that phone connection and push notifications would be useful. I just would not want the phone or cloud connection to be required for capture. The recorder should save the event locally even if the phone is not connected. The phone should help with event marking, download, notes, upload, alerts, and report viewing.   For a default GM V8 event report, would this list make sense? - RPM - calculated load / MAP - throttle position - vehicle speed - gear / torque converter state if available - coolant temperature - oil pressure - oil temperature if available - battery voltage - commanded AFM/DFM state if available - actual AFM/DFM state if available - misfire counters / roughness by cylinder if available - fuel trims - relevant U-codes / communication events - bus-off / lost periodic message / module reset / voltage drop events Which of those would you remove, and what would you add?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...