Jump to content

Custom Tuner/getting a custom tune

spenpet
 Share

Recommended Posts

Grumpy Bear Senior Enthusiast

Grumpy Bear

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, spenpet said:

thank you!  this makes perfect sense... and if i strip this down to an over simplified manner, it sounds like i can get slightly better gas mileage (or at least not worse) with some sort of better performance...without sacrificing reliability...this helps for sure!

Your welcome. I think you see it for what it is. Eyes wide open then. Have fun and check in and let us know how it goes. 

  • Like 1
KARNUT Senior Enthusiast

KARNUT

Posted
Posted

Back in the day we would add a shift kit to the transmission to increase performance and lengthen life. One of the reasons they don’t do that at the factory is most people would complain about the bump out of the transmission. We would advance the distributor (timing) to increase performance. We didn’t have to worry about top end or shift points and V-4-8 didn’t have that. Basic hand held tuners do that, they add a little feel and drivability to your ride. There’re pretty harmless. Custom tuning is where you can fine trouble, research is recommended. I found it worth it to me, I’m not in the habit of repeating mistakes. I been around long enough to use banks, gear venders, Vortec, Whipple, MSD, etc. In the 100-150K miles I generally drive my rides non of those mods or tweaks has lead to failures, just fun.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
  • 4 weeks later...
TyGriff13 Enthusiast

TyGriff13

Posted
Posted

I can't speak directly to tuning the newer Ecotec engines, however I will say that in my 2008 Silverado with the 5.3 Vortec I had a Bully Dog tune on it and it was fun, it certainly unleashed a little more torque and made it more fun to drive. With that being said I currently own a 2014 Camaro 2SS with the 6.2L LS3, modified pretty heavily, headers, exhaust, throttle body, cam, etc. and on this wonderful GM vehicle that was untouched until around 5k miles ago I very recently had tuned to make the most out of the mods. It was worth every dollar of the $1200 I spent to have it professionally tuned on the Dyno and with people who knew what they were doing, some would call them professionals. I will soon be throwing a tune on my 5.3 Ecotec for sure, my last GMC had the 6.2 and had more than enough power so I didn't even bother with it. Let me know what you go with and what you think about it, all in all though I say TUNE AWAY! 

 

Happy driving! 

  • 2 weeks later...
kevinfranklin Enthusiast

kevinfranklin

Posted
Posted
On 12/8/2017 at 10:44 AM, southern_sierra said:

I went with the Hypertech  Max Energy 2.0 mainly to turn off afm. I also set the throttle response to tow mode a 25% increase. I have had no more clucking or kicks in the ass or searching for gears in the trans. Fuel mileage my be down about 1/2 mile per gal.  I hated the afm form day one and got tired of driving in manual mode all the time. I'm happy with the performance of the engine and trans now.

I'm a rather conservative driver, and want/expect my vehicles to last for >150k miles.  This is my first truck (2017 5.3 4x4), but am surprised and worried about that same transmission "searching" and clunks that make me thing I'm wearing down what SHOULD be a smooth tranny.   It's basically the same in the 3 Sierra's I drove before buying, and in 2 more after.  I guess I was hoping it would work or "learn" it's way out, or I'd figure out how to avoid it, but it just concerns me every time I drive around town (1st --> 2nd --> 3rd and then back down are the real culprits). 

So......if ANY kind of a tune makes the tranny work SMOOTHER, then I'm all in, cost be damned.  I want a comfortable, smooth ride that at least gives me the impression it's going to last a long time.

 

Any other "conservative" drivers out there have this same positive experience southern_sierra has had post-tune??? 

  • Like 2
spenpet Enthusiast

spenpet

Posted
  • Author
Posted
17 hours ago, kevinfranklin said:

I'm a rather conservative driver, and want/expect my vehicles to last for >150k miles.  This is my first truck (2017 5.3 4x4), but am surprised and worried about that same transmission "searching" and clunks that make me thing I'm wearing down what SHOULD be a smooth tranny.   It's basically the same in the 3 Sierra's I drove before buying, and in 2 more after.  I guess I was hoping it would work or "learn" it's way out, or I'd figure out how to avoid it, but it just concerns me every time I drive around town (1st --> 2nd --> 3rd and then back down are the real culprits). 

So......if ANY kind of a tune makes the tranny work SMOOTHER, then I'm all in, cost be damned.  I want a comfortable, smooth ride that at least gives me the impression it's going to last a long time.

 

Any other "conservative" drivers out there have this same positive experience southern_sierra has had post-tune??? 

i'm a conservative driver also...here is my experience and some others with the 8 speed trans...

 

 

  • Like 1
kevinfranklin Enthusiast

kevinfranklin

Posted
Posted

Thanks Spenpet!  That thread's issue seems VERY similar and related for sure, even if most (if not all) of those reprograms were for the 8sp and I (and others) have the 6sp tranny. 

I'll prob chime in on that thread since the subject line is more appropriate than this one...

 

  • Like 1
spenpet Enthusiast

spenpet

Posted
  • Author
Posted
12 minutes ago, kevinfranklin said:

Thanks Spenpet!  That thread's issue seems VERY similar and related for sure, even if most (if not all) of those reprograms were for the 8sp and I (and others) have the 6sp tranny. 

I'll prob chime in on that thread since the subject line is more appropriate than this one...

 

sorry I don't have a better answer, i can only speculate that you might have a similar experience if the dealer reprograms...

  • 2 years later...
Aric New Member

Aric

Posted
Posted

If you do any modification whatsoever to your vehicle bigger tires gear change cold air intake Mufflers it's a must to get a tune otherwise your vehicle will not run properly and the speedo will be off. I run a trinity Diablo sport 1000 and it changed the whole way the truck acted I would never go back to stock.

CamGTP Senior Enthusiast

CamGTP

Posted
Posted
22 minutes ago, Aric said:

If you do any modification whatsoever to your vehicle bigger tires gear change cold air intake Mufflers it's a must to get a tune otherwise your vehicle will not run properly and the speedo will be off. I run a trinity Diablo sport 1000 and it changed the whole way the truck acted I would never go back to stock.

An intake and muffler change don't require tuning. Been custom tuning vehicles for nearly 10 years with HP Tuners just for reference.

 

Larger tires is a good idea and a gear change is a must for tuning.

  • Like 1
MichiganCCab Enthusiast

MichiganCCab

Posted
Posted

I just got a refurbished Diablo intune i3 on e-bay, for about $160 less than new. Loaded the 87 octane tune (you can keep stock tune and change other parameters like AFM etc), turned off DOD/AFM, increased throttle sensitivity 10%, firm shift trans tune. It did what I wanted it to do. I have absolutely HATED the AFM since day 1. I've been driving in M5 for over a year to avoid switching to 4 cylinder mode. I have my 6 speed trans back! I'm still considering a custom tune from DiabLew for driveability improvements. I too, do not want a race truck, just something that I enjoy driving. I'm getting close.

roadkill5.3 Enthusiast

roadkill5.3

Posted
Posted

very happy with my tune from blackbear. 

truck runs and drives like it should. holds gears longer, no lugging around corners, stop light to stop light shifting 4 gears etc. it drives like a truck should. 

i run it on 93 all the time, regardless of the tune, it has 11:1 compression, and i didnt want any ****** on timing even with the stock tune. 

the tcm tune is spectacular in everyway. 

you dont need to hot rod around or have to hot rod around to have a tune. a tune can give you more power yea. but the drivability is what is really noticed. 

a tune is worth it in every way.

 

when i had mine tuned, i told them what i wanted, a good all around 93 tune and their popular and reliable tcm tune. i didnt say i wanted to burn tire, race, etc.  i dont drive like that. but i can tell you, it does burn tire way better and get up and go 10x better.  

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • Chuck FB
      Software Update

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • Chuck FB
      Software Update

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • nfisherman
      Software Update

      By nfisherman · Posted

      Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...