Jump to content

Factory "Rancho" Tenneco Shocks Love 'Em or Hate 'Em/Upgraded  

109 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

Posted

Ranchos are garbage and if anyone is looking to upgrade to a better shock then start with Bilsteins. Bilsteins are a good quality entry level performance shock. I immediately switched out those knockoff Ranchos and went with Bilsteins and now running the awesome CST Coilovers and rear piggy back resi’s.

cda8fe0eab7f08ea016e85e04f906be2.jpg

29c1fd955524736e0c8b935640f4fc83.jpg


Sent from above

  • Like 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, TXGREEK said:

Ranchos are garbage and if anyone is looking to upgrade to a better shock then start with Bilsteins. Bilsteins are a good quality entry level performance shock. I immediately switched out those knockoff Ranchos and went with Bilsteins and now running the awesome CST Coilovers and rear piggy back resi’s.

Sweet Setup TX ! :thumbs:

  • Like 1
Posted

My biggest issue with the factory Rancho shocks is the rebound. I feel like the compression stroke is okay for a factory 4x4 suspension but the rebound seams to have no control whatsoever. A good shock should control the compression and rebound stroke. I haven't replaced them yet but hopefully soon.

Posted
My biggest issue with the factory Rancho shocks is the rebound. I feel like the compression stroke is okay for a factory 4x4 suspension but the rebound seams to have no control whatsoever. A good shock should control the compression and rebound stroke. I haven't replaced them yet but hopefully soon.


Exactly the reason why they’re being replaced. In some years back, the new Chevys were outfitted with Bilstein shocks, front and rear. Never having issues unless you wanted to lift. Bilstein will be your best economical choice. If you’re in the market to do a level then I’d hold off and get a pair of CST, King or Fox leveling coilovers. Can’t beat coilovers when it comes to ride quality.


Sent from above
Posted

Different question than the pole, so forgive me OP: why does everyone keep saying Tenneco Rancho instead of just Rancho? I know Tenneco is the parent company to Rancho, but why the use of both? Is the OEM Rancho a different product than what can be purchased under the Rancho name retail?

Posted
40 minutes ago, mcdavis said:

Different question than the pole, so forgive me OP: why does everyone keep saying Tenneco Rancho instead of just Rancho? I know Tenneco is the parent company to Rancho, but why the use of both? Is the OEM Rancho a different product than what can be purchased under the Rancho name retail?

No it is the same. Just a few people on here I think either work for Bilstein, have a vendetta against Rancho or just have to have the latest "it" item such as bilstein's or BFG tires. The Rancho's are legit Rancho's and aren't bad by any means (took me around the white rim trail, over the alpine loop and various other places and did well). For 95% of the people on here the Rancho's do well and are more than they need, ditto with the factory tires. It is the same reason people call Ram's Fiat's or GM government motors, just trying to be cute and sway others to their personal view on something regardless if it is right or wrong.

 

Don't read more in to it than it is. Good question though!

 

Tyler

  • Like 1
Posted
4 hours ago, jjt said:

My biggest issue with the factory Rancho shocks is the rebound. I feel like the compression stroke is okay for a factory 4x4 suspension but the rebound seams to have no control whatsoever. A good shock should control the compression and rebound stroke. I haven't replaced them yet but hopefully soon.

Please vote :thumbs:

Posted
No it is the same. Just a few people on here I think either work for Bilstein, have a vendetta against Rancho or just have to have the latest "it" item such as bilstein's or BFG tires. The Rancho's are legit Rancho's and aren't bad by any means (took me around the white rim trail, over the alpine loop and various other places and did well). For 95% of the people on here the Rancho's do well and are more than they need, ditto with the factory tires. It is the same reason people call Ram's Fiat's or GM government motors, just trying to be cute and sway others to their personal view on something regardless if it is right or wrong.
 
Don't read more in to it than it is. Good question though!
 
Tyler


That is absolutely ridiculous! Everyone knows stock shocks are garbage compared to aftermarket and for you to claim a few people on here must work for Bilstein or another is ridiculous. There are those of us that enjoy having the finer things in life and don’t like to settle especially if you’ve actually physically rode in a vehicle with aftermarket suspension. These forums are about expressing personal experiences and no one should be ridiculed by some penny pincher with an obvious inferiority complex!

My ranchos went out at 3 months after purchasing a new truck which was to be expected and does that mean I work for Bilstein or CST because I love the ride compared to that garbage and like to inform anyone interested in a far superior shock. Research it and you’ll probably think the article is getting a kick back lol
Posted
No it is the same. Just a few people on here I think either work for Bilstein, have a vendetta against Rancho or just have to have the latest "it" item such as bilstein's or BFG tires. The Rancho's are legit Rancho's and aren't bad by any means (took me around the white rim trail, over the alpine loop and various other places and did well). For 95% of the people on here the Rancho's do well and are more than they need, ditto with the factory tires. It is the same reason people call Ram's Fiat's or GM government motors, just trying to be cute and sway others to their personal view on something regardless if it is right or wrong.
 
Don't read more in to it than it is. Good question though!
 
Tyler

The last Z71 I owned was awhile ago. I put KOs on like always. This truck I kept the longest 180K. Traded in with the original shocks. I used my trucks off road as well as pavement. Never an issue with factory equipment. It's amusing that the people who swear GM is the best, want to say they use inferior parts.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
  • Like 1
Posted

The last Z71 I owned was awhile ago. I put KOs on like always. This truck I kept the longest 180K. Traded in with the original shocks. I used my trucks off road as well as pavement. Never an issue with factory equipment. It's amusing that the people who swear GM is the best, want to say they use inferior parts.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk


This is a GM site for GM lovers not Korean Made disposable garbage


Sent from above
Posted


This is a GM site for GM lovers not Korean Made disposable garbage


Sent from above


Exhibit A for cognitive fragility right here folks.
Posted


Exhibit A for cognitive fragility right here folks.

The usual reaction unless 1000 percent agreement.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 1
Posted
On 9/4/2018 at 9:42 PM, Sierra Dan said:

Dump the Factory Ranchos.

Install Bilstein, Pro-Comp, Eibach, Fox, Even Rancho MT7000s

All of these are roughly the same price and serve the same purpose.

What they will not do is underperform like the factory Tenneco Ranchos.

Tenneco makes the Pro Comps as well. 

Posted

I do have a question relative to this topic.  My 17 Sierra All Terrain already has a 2" level on the front.  It sounds like based on that, I would not need the 5100's.  Is that correct and does the 4600's not have the different settings.  Please educate me.

 

Thanks,

 

4W

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • 87 down as low as $5.14 here... winning!
    • Progress... sort of.   Intake is disassembled, spider is out, fuel lines removed. Used a torch on the stripped screw with the lower intake off, much easier when I've got the intake sitting on my workbench, I made it talk. Walked right out with a pair of vice grips once it was nice and toasty hot.   New parts are piling up on my service cart waiting to be installed. Distributor, temperature sensor, new gaskets, fuel line kit, themostat, water neck.   My new pickle is I don't want to spend $600 on a replacement spider. I'm not sure IT is bad. I'm probably splitting hairs. Or it's $300 to send mine away and another 3 weeks of the truck just sitting. I have half a mind to assemble everything with the old spider to see if I can get away with just replacing the fuel pressure regulator to be safe. The obvious issue was the gushing high pressure fuel line which will be replaced. Getting to the spider really isn't that hard, and now I know what I'm doing , swapping it would be a breeze should it absolutely need one. Stupid, or smart?   The part that gives me pause is replacing the distributor. Well, it's already out. And I didn't mark it, whoopsie! Engine was at TDC when I removed it, I know that, so upon correct reinstall the metal tip on the rotor should point to the TDC mark on the distributor because that's where it was pointing on the old distributor. Worst case I'm a tooth off and have to re-stab it.   But then, what? I assume the truck will start. It doesn't appear the timing can be set. Here's the problem: These distributors can't be rotated but a degree or two, by design. What I read is Cam ****** needs to be -2 to +2 degrees, ideally at 0 (and checked/set above 1000 rpm). There should be enough wiggle to get that properly set, but checking the reported value is another potential issue. My Actron 9185 scanner says it supports enhanced GM PIDs and Cam ****** is one of them but it's unclear that I'll be able to correctly see it over OBD 1.5. I can see why people end up junking these things with life left in them. They're an absolute nightmare with tweener-year diagnostics/electronics and unobtanium parts.   Fingers crossed it starts and idles nicely. There can be hope, right? I'ma buy a lottery ticket the same day just in case.   Next steps..DO IT. I have not installed an intake before so I've been reading and watching a lot. Some say NO RTV except on china walls, some say DO RTV on water ports but not fuel/air intake. 1/4 or 3/8 bead on China walls? I think my strategy will be, obviously, RTV china walls with overlap on the gasket corners. Chapstick-style RTV the water ports. Leave intake ports dry. The only set of intake gaskets I could find locally are Edelbrock performance gaskets (uh...for an asthmatic 190hp V6? LOL) so we'll see how they do.   #NoToolLeftBehind. It took an hour, but my recovery mission for my deep 10mm socket was successful. It had rolled down the bellhousing and wedged itself between what I think are the fuel lines? I couldn't see it at all, but with a junk antenna I had laying around, I blindly went poking/sweeping for it, heard it clink, raised the truck, and caught a sliver glimpse of chrome with a flashlight way up there in Narnia. I had pushed it farther along the lines holding it captive, but within access of severely improvised tools, poking and cursing at it to finally knock it free to where I could get a fingertip on it to bring it home.    Not much to see.      
    • Thats crazy considering im right next door (Indiana)
    • For a limited time, retail and commercial accounts receive an AMSOIL Vinyl Tool Tray with their order of $500 or more when they use code TRAY726 at checkout. The promotion runs through July 21, 2026.   Order at https://syntheticadvantage.com   Want to use AMSOIL in your business or sell at your store, apply here.  https://www.amsoil.com/business-opportunities/?zo=521390  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...