Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

It's not the dealerships fault....

I agree with this to a point, but it is there responsibility to fix the issue. If a dealer touches a customer's truck to rectify an issue, they are acknowledging a problem. They can't then come back and say the truck is operating as designed after they can't solve the issue? At that point the manufacturer has to acknowledge he built a lemon. So not the dealers fault, but still hold them accountable to fix it. I treat my dealer nice, but he's also the one that sold you that lemon.

  • Like 1
Posted

They are not denying there is an issue. Makes the whole situation even more pathetic at a corporate level.

Posted (edited)

Makes the whole situation even more pathetic at a corporate level.

Just like the GM customer service on this site, the issue is not being addressed by anyone with any horsepower. Issues don't rise to the senior executive level, or else junior executives will be out of a job. Junior, inexperienced executives don't yet have the big picture to work out issues or they don't have the 'nads to bring them up. A lot of times senior executives are out of the know, they just look at $ signs.

Edited by The Zip
  • Like 3
Posted

Why have these "reps" suddenly come back? Do they know something none of us do? Their presence really pisses me off more than anything since they are so useless to getting any resolution for our issues

 

My guess is the article, growing word on the street of the issues, and trying to do some damage control on this 600 page thread. Until I see some action towards solving issues, this is all just lip service to me.

  • Like 1
Posted

 

My guess is the article, growing word on the street of the issues, and trying to do some damage control on this 600 page thread. Until I see some action towards solving issues, this is all just lip service to me.

Sure does seem like the issue has been searched enough.

 

59efc35e31517d71c7a52315503e31dc.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

PM'd the CS rep with a question and so far I've gotten nowhere. My questions don't need a VIN, just an honest answer.

Edited by severado
  • Like 2
Posted

I found a website that collects the aggregate data of complaints and it says that Vibration/ Shaking is the #1 complaint about the 2015 Silverado. lol shocker right

Posted

Sure does seem like the issue has been searched enough.

 

59efc35e31517d71c7a52315503e31dc.jpg

I just did that search, and had to print it to bring to arbitration lol

  • Like 1
Posted

I found a website that collects the aggregate data of complaints and it says that Vibration/ Shaking is the #1 complaint about the 2015 Silverado. lol shocker right

What is the site?

Posted

So I took a closer look at the site, and found that its only based on complaints submitted to them. Vibration is still the #1 complaint though.

here is the link

 

according to the site, there is also 12 active recalls and 90 TSB's out for the Shakerado

 

What is the site?

Posted

Got my truck back yesterday after a week at the dealer. They swapped out my stock 18s with a set of 17s and 20s from the lot with different brand tires. Ass. Service manager drove it each time and confirmed vibration didn't improve with either set. Transmission/driveline guy swears it's in the tires... Sooo GM is sending me 4 brand new tires from a different brand, not SRAs, and the ASM says well take it from there. Says we'll get it worked out, he's just going through the GM routine. Can't say anything bad about the dealer. They're doing their job and just dealing with the GM circus while keeping me updated. I'm just glad they haven't fed me the "it's normal" game the first dealer I went to tried to play.

  • Like 1
Posted

I've got a very interesting story to share. Fellow I've worked with for 23 years was telling me about his wife's Escalade. Don't know the exact year but its previous generation to the current platform. He chaged one of the front axles - it's a 4x4. He had to disconnect the sway bar from the suspension arm and the bolt was so rusted it broke. He got the axle replacement done and didn't had the replacement bolt for the sway bar so took it for a test drive with the sway bar disconnected on that side. The result was shocking.... At about 60 mph, he said the steering wheel shake and shimming was so severe he thought the steering wheel was going to come off! He thought for sure there was a vibration being caused by the new axle. So he verified everything about the new axle and his install (should note he was a mechanic at a GM garage for a decade before moving into our industry, so he is fully qualified to do this kind of work).

 

After finding nothing wrong with the axle or its install, he replaced the broken bolt in the sway bar, re-attached it, and took it for a drive. Remarkably, the shake/shimmy/vibration was all but completely gone! He was stunned. Since when does the sway bar control wheel hop/suspension vibration, or whatever was going on?? Never heard of this.

 

Now, I said "all but gone" because he did say there was a tiny amount of vibration left that was about the same as before from "likely some tire unbalance" as he put it. So, it's almost like the normal amount of slight tire unbalance or road force irregularity is well absorbed/damped/controlled on that generation of GM - until the sway bar was disconnected. Then all hell broke loose! Makes me wonder if there is a similar phenomenon going on with the new trucks, but the base design is not getting the phenomenon under control. Hmmmmm.

 

And hear is the irony....his company truck is a new 2014 GMC Sierra double cab, short box 4x4 and according to him, the truck is perfectly smooth down the highway. And he is very fussy, so I can't see him missing the problems everyone else is experiencing. So for whatever reason, his 2014 is under control.

Posted

I've got a very interesting story to share. Fellow I've worked with for 23 years was telling me about his wife's Escalade. Don't know the exact year but its previous generation to the current platform. He chaged one of the front axles - it's a 4x4. He had to disconnect the sway bar from the suspension arm and the bolt was so rusted it broke. He got the axle replacement done and didn't had the replacement bolt for the sway bar so took it for a test drive with the sway bar disconnected on that side. The result was shocking.... At about 60 mph, he said the steering wheel shake and shimming was so severe he thought the steering wheel was going to come off! He thought for sure there was a vibration being caused by the new axle. So he verified everything about the new axle and his install (should note he was a mechanic at a GM garage for a decade before moving into our industry, so he is fully qualified to do this kind of work).

 

After finding nothing wrong with the axle or its install, he replaced the broken bolt in the sway bar, re-attached it, and took it for a drive. Remarkably, the shake/shimmy/vibration was all but completely gone! He was stunned. Since when does the sway bar control wheel hop/suspension vibration, or whatever was going on?? Never heard of this.

 

Now, I said "all but gone" because he did say there was a tiny amount of vibration left that was about the same as before from "likely some tire unbalance" as he put it. So, it's almost like the normal amount of slight tire unbalance or road force irregularity is well absorbed/damped/controlled on that generation of GM - until the sway bar was disconnected. Then all hell broke loose! Makes me wonder if there is a similar phenomenon going on with the new trucks, but the base design is not getting the phenomenon under control. Hmmmmm.

 

And hear is the irony....his company truck is a new 2014 GMC Sierra double cab, short box 4x4 and according to him, the truck is perfectly smooth down the highway. And he is very fussy, so I can't see him missing the problems everyone else is experiencing. So for whatever reason, his 2014 is under control.

hmmmm

Posted

So my vibrations come and go with temperature changes and bends in the road when traveling at 70 and above. I've noticed that the upper control arm bushings are pretty cracked. Had a 94 corvette that had same type of vibrations and bad bushings. Gonna bring this up next time I go in for another recall. Curious if any of you guys are seeing this? Oh yeah only 20000 miles on the clock.

post-129871-146446723343_thumb.jpg

 

Sent from my VS990 using Tapatalk

post-129871-146446723343_thumb.jpg

post-129871-146446723343_thumb.jpg

post-129871-146446723343_thumb.jpg

Posted

So my vibrations come and go with temperature changes and bends in the road when traveling at 70 and above. I've noticed that the upper control arm bushings are pretty cracked. Had a 94 corvette that had same type of vibrations and bad bushings. Gonna bring this up next time I go in for another recall. Curious if any of you guys are seeing this? Oh yeah only 20000 miles on the clock.

attachicon.gif0528161511a.jpg

 

Sent from my VS990 using Tapatalk

do you mean corroded? I'm not seeing cracks, or am I just missing it?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...