Jump to content

Radio Reception Issues


ace ventura

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

Got my truck back today. Spent afternoon at dealer with service manager. We compared the FM reception of Sierra/ Silverado to other GM radios, There was a significant difference in the reception, Other GM radios were able to pick up stations clearly while the sierra/ Silverado had signal lose and static. All trucks with 8" screens performed the same Bose/non Bose/ Nav/ non Nav. I have made a video demonstrating the difference in reception which the service manager is going to send to GM. There will not be a quick fix to this concern but at least GM has been made aware of the problem and supporting evidence has been submitted. It is important that if you also have this concern that you report it to your dealer or GM. I have be impressed with the feedback and interest that the people I have talked with at GM concerning this.

Posted

Thanks for the heads up, I go in for my first months service on the 6th of Feb. Ill definitely be letting them know about this.

Posted

I have a feeling that unless this issue can be fixed for cheap on the RF antenna path side, GM is not going to deal with the expense of changing radio control heads out to fix this issue.

Posted

I agree that GM will not change out all the radio control units but I believe they will try to improve the FM reception in units produced in the future. In talking with service manager if improvements are made in the unit then GM will authorize upgrade of the units for owners who have expressed concerns.

Posted

I'd like to see that in writing from GM to everyone out there with problems and those of us waiting on our truck orders.

Posted

That sure would show some commitment. I don't imagine it will happen.

Posted

Tried to cut and paste comment from Kristen a. from gm customer care and can't seem to get it on this post. This message is for her or anyone else from gm that cares to comment.

 

 

You can help us all out by letting us know what gm knows about this issue and what they plan to do about it.

Posted

andre9,

 

I don't imagine it will happen either unless enough people finally get sick and tired of just laying down and just accept whatever is thrown at us by any manufacturer. As for me I'm done, I work hard for my money and I will get what I pay for. This poor FM reception is well documented for months along with many issues with the 2014's. As for me I contacted my dealer and GM and when my truck comes in I will not be taking it if it has any issues posted on this site.

 

GM technicians, engineers and Quality Control should have picked these issues up during testing, I work for one of the largest manufacturing company's in the world. No way this would fly with my company, heads would roll and vendors would be held accountable. These vehicles weren't designed, engineered and tested overnight, it took years. In the 30 years I've worked for my company I've seen them throw away millions of dollars in product. They have insurance for losses like this and go after the vendors who also have insurance for these type of problems as well. On top of that they claim a loss at the end of their fiscal year.

 

So in the end GM or any manufacturer for that matter does not lose anything. The only one who loses are the loyal customer no matter what the product. I see so many people owning the 2014's giving up and saying they will trade it in in a year or two. That is a lot of money to lose and in a year or two no one will want to buy a 2014 because by then the public will know these trucks are plagued with problems which will surely hurt trade in values or even try selling it privately.

 

Just my opinion...

Posted

I know it is a pain as is the software recall issue. But defect problems can be much more serious.

 

Please check out the FIRST and pinned thread in the 900 model section for the 07-13s on really bad oil consumption (last five-six pages sums up where it is at today) and the level of repair to fix it. Such problems affects resale value. The FM problem will be fixed and no affect on resale.

Posted

I just bought my first GMC truck last Thursday and I am having the same issue. Local radio stations that are in HD that I've had no problem clearly picking up in other vehicles are barely achieved in this new truck. I thought it was just a GMC thing. Didn't realized it was a purposeful attempt to encourage paid services. Not cool GM.

Posted

Not sure if it as widespread as some think, I will be dropping the xm as soon as runs out so have been using fm a lot, mine woorks as well if not better than all the others I have had in the past, I am 45 miles from my favorite fm station at home and with some radios reception suffers rapidly when I get further away, this truck picks it up well past 60 miles and the hd radio stays past 50 miles easily.

Posted

I suggest everyone contact their dealer and phone GM or this will not get addressed. I wasn't only speaking to the FM reception problem but to all the reported problems on this site and from friends of mine that are having major issues. Bad vibration at speeds over 55 MPH, Trucks not starting due to stuck flapper in exhaust, warped dashes, heated and cooled seat issues, trucks shutting off, no power, running on 2 cylinders, the 120 volt outlet that won't even charge a laptop, it goes on and on.

 

Some of these guys are really suffering with major problems. Some are being addressed but I have yet to see a fix for the vibration issue. I'm not just knocking GM but every manufacturer. I have always owned GM vehicles and have had over 22 in my life, never seen a vehicle with this many problems.

 

Please forgive me for venting but the more I read about the 2014's the more upset I get. I ordered a $54,000.00 truck and see guys on here having to add lights under the dash so you can see the floor when you open the door at night....that should be there from the factory. The remote starts are junk but I can buy an aftermarket one installed for less then $200.00 and it will start it from over 600 feet away. Factory ones get you 100 feet if your lucky. It's time the American consumer demands to get what they pay for!

 

Again, sorry for venting, this is just my opinion

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • But Grumpy I did show several subdivisions that had homes starting in the 170K range. If you bought a Townhouse or Condo you could go cheaper. Same with a car 3000 dollars in the 70s translates to around 20K today. There are several models at that price. You actually get more for the money. In the 70s I drove a 3000$ car bought a 28K home and made 4.50 per hour. Thank goodness for overtime. Today I could buy a 170K house drive a 20K car and make 25 dollars an hour operating the same machine today. The difference the house, car, machine would be better and have AC. And I wouldn’t be taxed on overtime. And statistically your wife works too. Easing the burden. I thought we agreed to disagree. I brought receipts earlier, showing examples. I think you’re more stubborn than me. I was done with this debate. 
    • I’m definitely interested to hear the end result here. 
    • My 2025 Silverado 1500 had to receive a brand-new engine (long block) under warranty last month at only around 16,500 miles. Before the replacement, the truck repeatedly displayed "Engine Oil Level Low" warnings, even though the Oil Life Monitor still showed around 50% remaining after about 6,000 miles since my last oil change. After seeing the warning several times, I checked the dipstick with the engine cold, and the oil level was completely normal. The next day, the message escalated to "Add Engine Oil." At first, I assumed it was just a faulty oil level sensor, so I brought the truck to the dealership. After inspecting the engine, they found internal cylinder wall scoring and ultimately replaced the entire long block under warranty. Before this happened, I was planning to install a 4-inch lift and suspension upgrade on my truck. After needing a new engine at just 16,500 miles, I honestly don't see the point anymore. I also contacted GM to ask whether my vehicle qualified for a buyback, but I was informed that it does not at this time. Anyway, this experience has left me with serious concerns about the long-term reliability of this engine. I sincerely hope NHTSA expands the current investigation or recall to include 2025 model and performs a thorough inspection of affected vehicles. My biggest concern is that these engines may fail shortly after the powertrain warranty expires. If GM truly stands behind this engine, then at the very least, please consider extending the powertrain warranty to 10 years for affected owners. That would go a long way toward restoring customer confidence.
    • Without exception but then I'm the odd duck, right? I know what goes into that test, how it is calculated and thus how to beat it. But EPA values are often not beaten by the general public and the government has in past years adjusted the means and methods to come to those values to more closely approximate "Joe Average".    The only real trick to beating that EPA average is don't drive like "Joe Average".    It's the same method you used to profit from "Economic Migration" and in doing so beat the 'stats'. But you, like me, are not "Joe Average".     The thing you don't seem to grasp is this "Purchasing Power Index" isn't forward looking. It doesn't predict what it going to be but looks backward and states what it was. They are not telling us what the THINK, they are telling us what they MEASURED. Example:    Wife says "I'm going to lose 40 pounds by Christmas". May she does, maybe she doesn't but the doctors office who weighed her when she made that statement and again at Christmas only REPORTS what the RESULT was. You and I can banter about what was possible and what aunt Tilly did till the cows come home but the result is the result. Arguing otherwise is.....irrational. That's all I'm saying. This isn't about:      What you are calling a 'Statistic' is a RESULT not a CALCUATION and as a result the RULE. Like gravity as a rule, it can not be broken. 
    • Just wanted to say thank you for posting this. Years later, your thread is still helping Silverado owners.   I bought my 2025 Silverado 1500 in January 2025, and I've had what feels like the exact same rattle since day one. After reading your findings, I believe my truck has the same issue with the cable carrier contacting the rear sliding window. To be honest, I had pretty much given up on pursuing the issue. It wasn't until I recently drove another brand's pickup that I realized just how quiet their cabin was—and how noisy mine has been all along. On my truck, the rattle happens on almost any paved road, gets even worse on rougher pavement, and I can even hear it during braking and acceleration.   I actually referenced your thread when submitting my case to GM, hoping they'll recognize this as a recurring issue instead of treating it as an isolated incident. The reason I reached out to GM first is because my dealership told me they would need to keep the truck for at least two days just to diagnose the problem. I was concerned that even after two days, they still might not be able to identify the source of the rattle before giving the truck back to me. I had also asked a few dealerships about this issue during previous service visits, but none of them seemed to know what was causing it or had a solution. That's why I decided to contact GM directly first, hoping they might already have an official repair procedure or guidance for this issue.   I also hope GM eventually comes up with an official fix for this problem. I have a feeling there are many Silverado owners experiencing the same rattle, but most either choose to live with it or simply don't know what the cause is.   Really appreciate you taking the time to document your diagnosis. Your post is still making a difference years later.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...