Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Fluid film does not play well with the gm frame wax. It will bubble it ,super soften it and break the wax adhesion to metal.

The wax will lose its adhesion with or without FF being applied. Hence why guys that have never even heard of FF have rust on their frames where the wax flaked off. Which came first, the chicken or the egg? I've been brushing FF on for 2+ years, according to you my frame should be nothing but rust at this point.

Edited by HondaHawkGT
Posted

I talked to my dealership about my frame starting to rust away. They told they wouldn't do anything and to contact GM about it getting it fixed under warranty. Who do I talk to at GM about it getting fixed?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

I went thru the same problem with my frame on my 2014 siverado cc sb and the dealer would not do anything so I emailed mary barra she is the top ceo of gm and the truck was taken care of within a weeks time and repaired the right way. [email protected]..

Posted

I went thru the same problem with my frame on my 2014 siverado cc sb and the dealer would not do anything so I emailed mary barra she is the top ceo of gm and the truck was taken care of within a weeks time and repaired the right way. [email protected]..

Please confirm that email address. Two attempts, delivery failure both times.

Thanks!

Posted

I ended up emailing this address: [email protected]. To which I was given a case number and told to take back to the dealership.

 

In the mean time I've been looking at frames of GM trucks in parking lots, at red lights, and at the dealerships. They are the worst in terms of other trucks I have seen. Seen some 14s with frames that looked like my old 2004 Ranger. Can't believe this wax coating is acceptable.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

I went through exactly the same frame problem and the majority were the crew cab built in mexico and it was all do to frame prep before the wax coating was put on at the factory.I tried going thru customer

service which was a waist of time they just pacify you then I just got fet up and went for the top dog

to get some real results and it worked..

Posted

Anyone with a 2016 seeing problems? I have a 2015 that they stripped and coated with new, 6 months later it is still rusty. Looked at some 2016s on the lot, in the rear wheel wells the round cross members are all starting to rust. Trying to get out of my 2015 for transmission problems, but not sure I want a 2016 that is rusting already and probably still has the transmission problems.

Posted

Anyone with a 2016 seeing problems? I have a 2015 that they stripped and coated with new, 6 months later it is still rusty. Looked at some 2016s on the lot, in the rear wheel wells the round cross members are all starting to rust. Trying to get out of my 2015 for transmission problems, but not sure I want a 2016 that is rusting already and probably still has the transmission problems.

And vibrates?

Posted

Mine currently doesn't vibrate. Transmission is absolutely clueless, the pedals seem like they are just suggestions. Looking at the vibration threads, seems like the vibration issue is getting better, just frustrating because there is no for sure fix. At least they are working on vibration issues, the dealer is telling me that there is nothing wrong with my transmission and that it is my opinion that it is broken. Had the transmission try and push me into the back of a truck last week, sounds normal to me.

Posted (edited)

The frame treatment on our trucks is pretty disappointing. I noticed a co workers F150 has a nice shiny black painted frame and that made me kinda mad. Mines rusty and only 8 months old. I've been contemplating getting it looked at by the dealer but geez another f n issue. I'm probably not gonna keep it long enough to worry about it so I dunno...

Edited by oneandzero
Posted

The frame treatment on our trucks is pretty disappointing. I noticed a co workers F150 has a nice shiny black painted frame and that made me kinda mad. Mines rusty and only 8 months old. I've been contemplating getting it looked at by the dealer but geez another f n issue. I'm probably not gonna keep it long enough to worry about it so I dunno...

I was going to take mine in but decided to just fluid film the rusted areas. Figured the dealership would just put the same shitty wax coating on again that will just start to rust in 6 months. The fluid film seems to like convert the rust and leave a film over it. My frame looks pretty good now and I'm happy with it.

 

Also the new Colorados appear to have a painted frame. Not sure why that doesn't carry over to the 1500.

 

+1 on the Fluid Film

Posted (edited)
I had a rubberized coating/bedliner material sprayed in the fall.

post-79641-0-03551000-1447952302_thumb.jpg

post-79641-0-17195500-1447952309_thumb.jpg



I'll share some pictures for what it looks like now after some harsh winter abuse. Honestly there's no other way to deal with the crappy factory wax unless you strip, rust proof/prime and then paint or do something like this.


This was applied OVER the factory wax and so far only small pieces of the rubberized coating have chipped off from debris but wax held intact underneath. It was a cheap process ($250 CAD) for doing the frame and underside of the body and it came with a lifetime warranty. Unfortunately for people outside of Alberta, seems like this is a niche product for a shop in Edmonton and cannot locate a place in the states or other provinces.


The metal parts such as the rear axle and front sway bars and A-arms were not touched, so I sprayed with fluid film and they have no hint of rust.

post-79641-0-03551000-1447952302_thumb.jpg

post-79641-0-17195500-1447952309_thumb.jpg

post-79641-0-03551000-1447952302_thumb.jpg

post-79641-0-17195500-1447952309_thumb.jpg

post-79641-0-03551000-1447952302_thumb.jpg

post-79641-0-17195500-1447952309_thumb.jpg

Edited by Jordan18
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

After 3000 miles my frame had several chunks missing and peeling off. It had a lot of rust. http://m.imgur.com/a/ctmp2

 

 

My dealer followed the TSB and stripped it and retreated it.

http://imgur.com/a/w5MEm

 

6 months later, it looks as bad as before.

http://m.imgur.com/a/nIPEJ

 

 

It's back at the dealer now. They said they would get GM involved and let me know. I'll post an update when I have one.

Edited by Haus_Z71
Posted

Similar issue with my truck - Started over a year ago. I had a Diamond Kote applied at the dealer when I purchased the truck as it came with a 10 year frame warranty - I noticed the Diamond Cote Peeling off down to bare metal - After numerous calls and e-mails to the dealer one of the servie advisors slipped up and mentioned the TSB to me - I then approached the Manager regarding the TSB and he told me they were working on a solution.

 

It took the dealer over a year to "build" an area to complete the work as it required harsh chemicals for peeling the wax coating off the frame. In the meantime he offered a temporary re-spray of the undercoating which I accepted to prevent any further corrosion during the winter salt months. Unfortunately they sprayed this directly over the road dirt and rust that had already accumulated.

 

Originally I was told the process would take 5-7 days as the frame had to be removed from the vehicle. To my surprise when the dealer contacted me to book it in they told me it would only take 2 days. I asked if they were still taking the frame out and they told me no - the TSB just required them to scrape the frame, treat it and re-apply a coating. I was hesitant but allowed them to complete the service.

 

When I went to pick up the truck I was shocked at the "quality" of the repair. They had only applied the diamond kote back over all of the rust and dirt and as far as I could tell did not do any prep work to the frame. What was worse is the entire top of the frame was untouched. not cleaned. not treated and not even covered in the Diamond Kote.

 

These pictures were taken on the dealers lot the day they finished their repair process:

 

sml_gallery_158185_4089_292033.jpg
sml_gallery_158185_4089_41486.jpg
sml_gallery_158185_4089_86279.jpg
sml_gallery_158185_4089_594471.jpg
sml_gallery_158185_4089_152844.jpg
sml_gallery_158185_4089_268510.jpg
sml_gallery_158185_4089_144073.jpg
After I took the photos I went in to speak the manager who said I would need to leave the truck with them so they can take the bed and cab off to complete the repair properly. I then got news from him that they spoke with GM rep who only authorized them to repeat the process again however this time authorized an additional 3 hours to do it properly.
I was furious at this point and told him that there is no way to fix the frame properly without removing it and even then it is a gamble as the rust inside the frame and between the mounted accessories such as body mounts would not be touched and eventually bleed through the new coating...
They are now removing the cab and box to attempt the repair.
As of now I have zero faith this repair will last more than a year and as we have no lemon laws in Canada I am documenting the entire process and will be pursuing legal action when the rust comes through again.
Anyone else have this much trouble dealing with these guys? Or see such a hack job repair?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...