Jump to content

2015 Chevrolet Colorado and GMC Canyon Sales Halted


Recommended Posts

Posted

2015_Colorado_Canyon07.jpg

By Zane Merva
Executive Editor, GM-Trucks.com
10/3/2014

 

Sales of the new 2015 Chevrolet Colorado and GMC Canyon have been halted. Automotive News reports that Chevy and GMC dealers received notice yesterday (Thursday, Oct 2nd) of a pending issue that may effect the airbags.

 

Deliveries for the just launched midsize pickup started under two weeks ago. We just had our first drive of the Colorado and Canyon last week.

 

General Motors has notified the National Traffic and Safety Administration that driver's side airbags are wired incorrectly and may not function as designed. The issue is reported to be fixable with a software update.

 

So far 49 of the pickups have been delivered. Owners will be given a free loaner until the software update is available "in a few days."

 

Source: Automotive News

2015_Colorado_Canyon07.jpg

2015_Colorado_Canyon07.jpg

2015_Colorado_Canyon07.jpg

Posted

Come on GM, this is getting ridiculous. Make sure it works before you decide to sell it, and get some quality control at the plants. It's just getting embarrassing for you and for fans/ owners of the brands you sell. :banghead:

Posted

Real sad to read this. Seems GM can't pull off a smooth launch.

Posted

Why are they having so many problems with airbags, airbag connectors, airbag software, etc?

Posted

I have a couple of "friends" with Ford trucks. I always hear about the recalls and problems

with GM. They not only send me info, I can also expect a text. I just heard about the latest

issues with airbags. They are better than OnStar.

Posted

They really need to stop sourcing out over 50% of the part content to non American company's in the name of picking the lowest bid. Pretty pathetic when a Toyota is actually more American under the body panels and hood then a Chevy! The cheapness is showing drastically too with the shear amount of part failures and software glitches they have been having these last few years!

Posted

Beta testing is for losers.

 

Just ask Apple. After that last IOS update. It disabled everyone's phone ability. :banghead: You'd think somewhere along the lines they'd test SOMETHING.

 

Seriously tho, GM's name is mud right now in the news. If I wasn't such a GM apologizer/fanboy I'd totally feel they weren't a good brand. I know better though. (for better or worse. :lol:)

Posted

Come on GM, this is getting ridiculous. Make sure it works before you decide to sell it, and get some quality control at the plants. It's just getting embarrassing for you and for fans/ owners of the brands you sell. :banghead:

 

The plants aren't at fault. All the plants do is assemble everything. The problem is all of the outsourcing with all of the different companies. That's why you see recalls with all brands. I do agree with the quality control though. But, because of all of the outsourcing, quality control could be with the companies, not GM or their assembly plants.

Posted

"airbags are wired incorrectly"

 

"fixable with a software update."

 

so fixing hardware with software is a thing?

Posted

"airbags are wired incorrectly"

 

"fixable with a software update."

 

so fixing hardware with software is a thing?

Maybe the computer can allow the signal to be swapped over instead of a two pin swap.
Posted

I don't remmeber getting a warranty from GM suppliers or vendors with the exception being tires, therefore 100% of the blame for GM problems fall on GM and GM alone. I haven't seen any of the vendors or suppliers advertising their products "as seen on the 20?? whatever."

For some reason the "norm" for GM has been converted to pushing out the product and worrying about fixing it later or very low engineering and quality control procedures.

Posted

I don't remmeber getting a warranty from GM suppliers or vendors with the exception being tires, therefore 100% of the blame for GM problems fall on GM and GM alone. I haven't seen any of the vendors or suppliers advertising their products "as seen on the 20?? whatever."

For some reason the "norm" for GM has been converted to pushing out the product and worrying about fixing it later or very low engineering and quality control procedures.

 

 

Suppliers never advertise like you describe but honestly outside of the body, power train and computer controllers, GM and every other brand don't make much of the vehicle these days.

 

That said, GM is supposed to have quality checks in place to prevent bad parts from being used and that has failed horribly on the past few launches.

Posted

Suppliers never advertise like you describe but honestly outside of the body, power train and computer controllers, GM and every other brand don't make much of the vehicle these days.

 

That said, GM is supposed to have quality checks in place to prevent bad parts from being used and that has failed horribly on the past few launches.

I agree and that's exactly my point. GM Suppliers and Vendors never advertise or provide a warranty, so they should never be blamed, as far as the consumer is concerned anyway.

Posted

I have no way to know for sure but I am willing to bet that the vendor absolutely has a warranty it gives to GM/whoever. The Japanese airbag company (Takarta or something like that) that is responsible for like a million defective units is likely on the hook for that. Sarah works for a supplier so maybe she can chime in.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I know; crap pictures.   Anyway, as a finale of sorts to this thread, I had replaced both differential covers and since they had the capability of adding temperature probes, I did that. These are MaxTow analog/digital gauges with stepper motors. They'll flutter around like crazy for a moment and start at a nominal 100 degrees Fahrenheit.   I drove a 30-mile loop to the grocery store, averaging 70 MPH (as much as 80 to see if there was a quick spike in temperature. The air temperature is 102 (ambient ?). but the first pic is 7 miles into the trip. The second is getting back into the truck after leaving the store; differential temperatures dropped about three to four degrees in 15 minutes. The third pic in on the road to my house, about a mile away.   In that run, I saw a high of 150F on the rear differential, and 121F on the front. I'm sure a longer drive or towing will see higher than that, and when that happens, I can update the observations. 
    • You don't want to become predictable now, do you? 😏
    • Fully warm, coolant temp >194, closed loop.   Run time can be anywhere from just reached operating temperature to having driven 30+ miles.   The O2 chart (which is a feature I just discovered after reading) for the bad idle seems to be "most" of the time. For the little time I've been watching it (scanning and driving! watchout!) I can't seem to isolate any cause or condition yet.   It definitely idles rougher sometimes than others and so far what I've seen is the rougher idles are always rich. But not enough to set a CEL.   In other news I replaced the starter solenoid. Everything on this truck is such a PITA. Starter "snout" is mangled up with the torque converter inspection cover which is tangled up with hard cooling lines and the driveshaft. But I got 'er done without too much swearing...I just go into everything now knowing it's going to be a frustrating mess.   The starter solenoid replacement kicks off the next round of work: AC, injector rebuild, cat, exhaust. I'm just going to do it all. But first:   I don't know what my fuel pressures are. I can't definitively say the issue is the injector without first verifying fuel pressures and any leakdown. I "rented" a test kit ($199.99 at O'Really's ...intentional misspelling). They don't "rent" tools anymore, they charge you for the tool and then you return it when you're done. No joke. It is listed as a rental on the receipt but the guy told me there's no difference between renting and buying  now, you just return it when you're done and they refund the credit card. Mmmkay, whatever.   I will rule out fuel pressure issues (too much), and any leaking (that's how I'll know the problem is inside the intake). I think someone said the return line could be plugged or not flowing and that could cause high fuel pressure (and too much fuel being pushed through injectors). I'll cross that bridge if I get high readings.   As of now I'm ready to tear off the intake cover, extract the injector, and have it sent off to be rebuilt just so I can rule that out.
    • What are the conditions of this rich idle? Warm or cold engine? Run time? Does every idle look like this or only sometimes?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...