Jump to content

Gorehamj

GM's First Self-Driving Car Ends Up In Surprising Place

Recommended Posts

Cruise bolt.png

John Goreham
Contributing Writer, GM-Trucks.com
3-12-2019

The very first self-driving vehicle that GM ever produced has been acquired by the Henry Ford museum.  The vehicle is built upon a pre-production Chevy Bolt battery-electric vehicle. The vehicle was tested in San Fransisco, California starting back in 2016. It was built by Cruise Automation, GM's autonomy company. 

 

GM's President, Mark Reuss, was on hand at the ceremony and https://www.wxyz.com/news/the-henry-ford-acquires-gms-first-self-driving-test-vehiclehad this to say, “Autonomous vehicles will change people’s lives forever, just as the automobile itself did more than a hundred years ago. The Henry Ford is a treasured institution where past and present innovations are documented and displayed, and GM is proud to provide our autonomous test vehicle to serve as an inspiration to the innovators of tomorrow.”

 

Patricia Mooradian, president and CEO, The Henry Ford museum, added, "Self-driving capabilities will fundamentally change our relationship with the automobile. As the home of the historic vehicles that have shaped that relationship today, this acquisition is paramount in how we tell that story in the future.”

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Self driving vehicles don't have to become the norm if we don't let them.  Fight the technology. 

  • Like 3
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
On 3/13/2019 at 3:16 PM, Colossus said:

Self driving vehicles don't have to become the norm if we don't let them.  Fight the technology. 

I think the jury is still out on whether cars are good drivers or not, but there's no question there are plenty of humans that should not be driving.

Edited by Daverado
  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Daverado said:

I think the jury is still out on whether cars are good drivers or not, but there's no question there are plenty of human's that should not be driving.

While I agree (especially down in FL with the 95 year olds driving with high beams on at noon), I enjoy driving myself. Call me crazy, but if I am going somewhere, I just like to be in control of my own transportation. I don't know how much I would enjoy my car fighting me if I tried to change lanes without a blinker, etc...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a friend that works at U of M. They are doing a lot of R and D on self driving cars.  They have them for shuttles in the summer and a lot of other applications in the summer.  The problem they are having is with snow.  The sensors can't tell that snow is snow or another object.  I've heard a lot of cool things about self driving cars. How 20 of them in close quarters, like a traffic jam, react.... 

 

I feel though if we go to self driving cars, and it is the norm, the speed limits could be raised based on the assumption the cars can drive better than a human. 

 

However, I love to drive. I don't see myself having one until maybe I can't drive. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Self driving cars are a joke.

What about in fog or heavy rain?

Not to mention snow the previous poster said. Or glare ice. What's it going to do slow down to 3 mph?

We don't need self driving cars. Dumb with a capital D.

You'll never see me own one.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Never is a long time.

 

I've heard that comment made about many of the technologies that are now widely accepted and used. 

 

But as always, the market will decide.

Edited by redwngr
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There's no way self-driving cars will ever be feasible or practical.  Changing road conditions, different roads, different or unexpected obstacles, other traffic, weather....   There are far too many variables for a self-driving car to have to react to for one to ever be programmed in a safe and practical way.   What's improved by having a bunch of cars buzzing around with no drivers?  If you don't want to drive, mass transportation is obviously the way to get around.  It's cheaper, safer, more practical, less traffic, less polluting...  There is simply no reason to have self-driving cars.  There's no advantage to them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Self driving cars can only be used if all other cars on the road are the same self driving BS. A car can't react to something that's not programed into the computer, and how many times a day do you see things that make you say WTF.  While you slow down and shake your head, the self driving car doesn't even know something wrong is going on. There is millions of things that need to be observed and entered into the driving equation every minute, do you really think we can put that into a cars computer?? Unless all vehicles are autonomous, they will never work. That includes bicycles, motorcycles, everything that is actually on the road way.

Edited by gearheadesw

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Henry Ford Museum/Ford village should be on all car guys bucket list. It spans automotive history from the self propelled buckboard to modern day ALL kinds of makes and models of vehicles. We spent the whole day there and still didn’t see/do it all. Absolutely amazing facility and extremely well laid out. 

 

I also highly recommend the Ford Piquette Ave. plant guided tour. It’s crazy the amount of Ts they produced in such a small factory.

 

 Whether you hate or love Ford there is no denying that Henry is the reason the US automotive industry is what it is today. 

 

My wife thought I was nuts when I said I wanted to go to Detroit as part of our vacation a couple of years ago. She apparently believed all the hype on the “news” about how horrible, ran down, blah blah blah Detroit is. She actually ended up really liking it and even commented one morning at breakfast on how the media so over exaggerated how “bad” Detroit is...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

    • By Mike1985
      Ok..let me try and explain this lol..a few weeks ago my radiator busted and coolant got in the trans..happened backing in driveway so it didnt move at all with water inside.car place fixed radiator..but they had 2 flush the trans twice b4 the fluid looked right..they refuse to fix anything else and now my trans is acting bad...when i first drive in the mornings first gear revs high and the gears off/on need high rpms to change...but when it get to overheated it switches all gears perfect BUT jerks when shifting gears....also takes about 10mins to get trans temp 180..never did that until the coolant got in...2500hd 4x4 6.0 4l80e..any help would be great..thanks
    • By jogutier
      They're in great shape, $100 shipped with the 48 States.
       
      No power fold or puddle lights. Power up down side to side only.


    • By SirManny
      So finally have everything off of my truck and pics of everything. Prices are obo plus shipping. If post not allowed please let me know and I will delete. Thanks.   - RX Speedworks catch can with check valve and clean side separator. Has the OEM connectors for the PCV connections - SOLD   - UPR Catch Can with check valve and OEM connections. Only had for about three weeks. - SOLD   - Superchips F5 GM Flashpaq handheld tuner. Primarily used to turn off AFM and adjust for tire size. Has pre-loaded tunes and able to change parameters such as gear, AFM, speed limiter, etc. Comes with original box and manual - SOLD   - 2014 and up OEM crew cab undersea storage. Prefer not to ship this item but will at buyers expense. But will meet if you are near Augusta, GA-Atlanta, GA-Columbia, SC - SOLD   - Volant CAI intake 5.3L. I removed the filter it came with and upgraded to a RotoFab dry filter. Comes complete with everything you see and OEM connectors. Would make deal with someone if they wanted this and the RX Speedworks catch can as the clean side separator would work with it. - SOLD   - Doug Thorley Tri-Y headers. Will work with 5.3L and the 6.2L ecotec3 engine. However if you have the 6.2L the connection at the fatback needs to be modified. $600.00   - GM OEM Rosen DVD Headrest AV-7950H 8K-GMCHEV-B38-S1. The primary headrest is the DVD unit while the secondary headunit has the USB input and iPOD docking station. Has built in video games and will come with four headphones(two brand new never used), two video game controllers (new just tested), the accessory wires if you wanted to add a video game system or something along those lines. Im at - SOLD on these will not separate. Selling the whole kit.  Thank you for your interest.


    • By USS White lightning
      Kind of curve ball here, but does anyone know if the new style sport bar on the 2016-2018 silverados would fit an older style 2009 Silverado crew cab? I really like the look of the the oem one as opposed to the rough country ones.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    206,604
    Total Topics
    2,209,600
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    175,932
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Kloss004
    Newest Member
    Kloss004
    Joined
  • Who's Online   60 Members, 0 Anonymous, 356 Guests (See full list)

×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.