Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

You could have a square "hub" and would not do anything....as long as the Lugs are placed in appropriate positions off center anything past that is just material for strength. It could look like shark teeth too and would not effect anything............keep trying!

 

You could have a square "hub" and would not do anything....as long as the Lugs are placed in appropriate positions off center anything past that is just material for strength. It could look like shark teeth too and would not effect anything............keep trying!

That's incorrect The rotating mass of the hub would create an imbalance in this situation because the additional material on one side of the hub moves the center of gravity away from the center of the hub. It is true any shape even square can be balanced but only if the center of gravity is located on the axis of rotation.

Posted

I drive that section of new pavement 2 or 3 times a month and it does it every time . First time driving after repave wife and I both thought we were having a severe and sudden carrier bearing failure in the rear end. For some strange reason it makes them Bridgestone A/T tires sing and slight vibration in floorboard. We even drove it in her new Camry no tire singing but a very subtle vibration or more like a quiver felt in that too but nothing like truck.

Posted

That's incorrect The rotating mass of the hub would create an imbalance in this situation because the additional material on one side of the hub moves the center of gravity away from the center of the hub. It is true any shape even square can be balanced but only if the center of gravity is located on the axis of rotation.

You get the jest of it! I am not talking 3LBS mass here vs other side? Were talking insignificant differences. I would bet both of us would be shocked at how off/different they could be from one side to the other...........

Posted

You get the jest of it! I am not talking 3LBS mass here vs other side? Were talking insignificant differences. I would bet both of us would be shocked at how off/different they could be from one side to the other...........

We are talking about parts turned in a CNC lathe, They shouldn't be off to the point you can see it with the naked eye. Regardless of the machining tolerance, the amount of mass is only a small part of the equation, rotational speed, natural frequency, and damping ratio all have to be accounted for to determine if a small unbalanced mass will cause an issue. Where the issue arises is when the natural frequency and the input frequency equal one another. This is resonance and the vibration amplitude is very large regardless of the mass value being 3 lbs or 3 grams.

Posted

 

 

so you switched from 2wd to 4wd while driving and that fixed it from vibrating ??

all I can tell you is, it was vibrating pretty bad on the turnpike...while I was off the turnpike, traveling between a few stores, I put it in and out of 4wd a few times at around 40 mph...when I headed back up the highway at 65 to 70 mph, the vibration wasn't there...

i'm ruling out tires, because I traveled at least 300 miles after the dealer service, and it was fine...

the reason that I thought about putting it in and out of 4wd was, that 1 of the recalls was for reprogramming something with the 4wd...

 

and like I said...never an ounce of vibration in almost 25,000 miles...

Posted

We are talking about parts turned in a CNC lathe, They shouldn't be off to the point you can see it with the naked eye. Regardless of the machining tolerance, the amount of mass is only a small part of the equation, rotational speed, natural frequency, and damping ratio all have to be accounted for to determine if a small unbalanced mass will cause an issue. Where the issue arises is when the natural frequency and the input frequency equal one another. This is resonance and the vibration amplitude is very large regardless of the mass value being 3 lbs or 3 grams.

Agreed, you should not be able to see it with naked eye. About the only thing I going in my life is I am not associated with this thread/vibes etc. The only thing I can say is, "when I first bought the truck and brought it home the kids and I were jumping up in down in the bed" I thought to myself this is the stiffest truck bed I have ever jumped in and it's 2wd no Z71 blah,blah plain old 1500 suspension. It would seem to me this truck is ridiculously FRAME STIFF and a goofy ass instantaneous v4-v8 switching engine that is NOT isolated 1 bit from the transient frequency of 75 mph driving. I mean it all sounds great on paper but there is much going on with this truck/engine/drivetrain etc.

 

Just like my wifes Nissan it's brakes were ****ed upon delivery and the second off the lot been complaining......Only response is they make noise sir yes, many of the brakes do, but no injuries or accidents occurred and Nissan is not going to replace parts on your vehicle just to replace parts? The next GM iteration of AFM is Dynamic Skip Fire and hopefully the RANDOM firing patterns i.e. one here, one there, two this side 3 that side of combustion firing patterns and not just a BANK of Cylinders all at one time? Who, knows if this beast rolls smooth it's a damn nice truck and I feel for the fellas dealing with this nonsense!

Posted

Not that this is the fix, more an FYI...

 

I can change the amount of vibration in my truck switching from 22's with street tires to 17's with Nitto G2 tires.

 

The same roads that vibrate the truck on 22's are like a freshly paved road with 17's

  • Like 1
Posted

i tried 3 different sizes of tires and two sets of rims and it only change the speed of when the vibration starts but the vibration is still the same between 95 and 100 klms. it is like i was driving off and on rumble strips

Posted

Just finished a 4000mi trip, ny to Alabama to Florida back to NY

This is the smoothest most enjoyable vehicle I've driven

Granted I installed 4 Michelin's (Defenders) 275/20's when I took delivery. Because I know the good years are junk.

Average 22mpg running 70mph++

Posted (edited)

http://gm.oemdtc.com/5197/shakevibration-in-steering-wheel-floor-seat-at-highway-speeds-on-smooth-roads-1998-2005-buick-cadillac-oldsmobile-pontiac

 

http://www.revbase.com/BBBMotor/TSb/DownloadPdf?id=195111

 

I think GM needs to fire their NVH department and start over. Apparently they have a tough time building anything that doesn't shake.

Edited by abominable z71
  • Like 2
Posted

One of these vibration cases just went before the New Hampshire State arbitration board and it was denied due to the defect not being present at the time of testing. Additionally customers are being reminded that the new vehicle warranty states that slight noise vibration or other normal characteristics of a vehicle are not covered under the new vehicle warranty.

That is their way of saying if you own it you can keep it

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

So I've done some redneck testing. And it appears that my drive line has a bend or something. What do you think?https://vimeo.com/194200154

 

Sent from my Pixel XL using Tapatalk

 

Looks suspect no doubt? janky is what I would call it

Posted

One of these vibration cases just went before the New Hampshire State arbitration board and it was denied due to the defect not being present at the time of testing. Additionally customers are being reminded that the new vehicle warranty states that slight noise vibration or other normal characteristics of a vehicle are not covered under the new vehicle warranty.

That is their way of saying if you own it you can keep it

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Here's the 2017 Chevy Cover your A$$ Vibration Warranty

 

Repairs Covered The warranty covers repairs to correct any vehicle defect, not slight noise, vibrations, or other normal characteristics of the vehicle due to materials or workmanship occurring during the warranty period. Needed repairs will be performed using new, remanufactured, or refurbished parts.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • The timing marks are ok, that is #1, you can turn it over until they line up and it won't change anything, the crankshaft turns twice for every camshaft revolution, I have always set up SB Chevs as your pic shows using a straight edge
    • Someone's been here before.... There is a receipt for a 3-piece timing set, purchased earlier this year.   Is this picture something, or, nothing?   I have the timing cover off and my crank is perfectly TDC and the keyed gear's locating mark is dead on 12 o'clock.   The cam gear locating mark is also at 12 o'clock. Now, I'm not an expert, but all the install guides say the two locating marks should meet and be perfectly aligned when installing a timing set. The mark on the crank should be dead on 12:00 and the cam gear's mark should be dead on 6:00, and both marks should be perfectly vertically aligned.   I believe the timing gear is keyed or has a dowel that ensures it can only be installed on the cam in one position, so I have to believe the cam is out of phase somehow. At the very least, with a triangular bolt pattern, it can only be installed in one of 3 different positions.   Before I pulled the front cover, the truck was running alright, no service engine soon lights except an occasional P0172 / rich condition. Timing -16 timing at idle (should be +16), and total -35% fuel trim, two conditions I haven't been able to figure out.   In related news, my injector tested pretty well, wasn't leaking, but I had it rebuilt anyway, and it's on it's way back to me.         Along with this discovery, the good and bad:   Good: The oil pan seal appears undamaged.   Bad: -The timing cover has been reused, and the positioning dowels have been broken. That could explain some of the leaking. -Some kind of white paste or grease was used to try to seal the oil pan seal and timing cover (since wiped off..). -Then, someone globbed silicone all over the front of the cover and also buried the ckp sensor in it. But, they didn't put any inside the cover or use RTV to try to seal the oil pan seal with the timing cover (good).
    • The guy that owns K&P filters last I checked in with him has over 300,000 miles on his Dodge base Hemi using his own 35 micron absolute stainless mesh filter from its first oil change.    The GM study I've posted a dozen times shows the relationship in engine life based in multiples of base units, not miles or years. That is the base unit is the number of miles the motor ran using the reference filter efficiency.    The above two paragraphs dismantle anecdotal arguments IF one changes oil often enough to prevent particle formation and the motor is in otherwise good shape. That is not full of silica (no air filter) or suffering a metallurgical issue that is not part of the lubrication discussion. Poor heat treat in example.   Data from UOA's I've reviewed from more than a few engines can show remarkably broad variations in oil cleanliness using the exact same filter over the course of an engines life.     Lastly there is the common sense of it. Wear debris WILL circulate the engine BEFORE it ever sees a filter in route to that filter and WILL harm the pump which NEVER sees filtered oil.    Alpha question then becomes, given the facts, how long do you believe is a reasonable service life from a vehicle you are certain you will not pass down? That is the junk yard will be it's resting place when you're done with it? (the moral issue most don't care about).    Omega question is then how diligent are you prepared to be in general mechanical, air & oil maintenance? Preventing particulates and keeping them sufficiently dilute; preventing the precursors from generation, amalgamation and precipitation.    If I get a good look at the engine bay of a vehicle I have a fair idea of the owners commitment to the inside of the power train. That 30 micron WIX is still more efficient than a sieve.                 
    • It also depends on what criteria someone is using for “best” when talking filters.  Are we going off best efficiency?   Best quality/QC?  Etc. because the two may not mutually exclusive.  
    • They’re not the same wiz as 10-15 years ago.  QC has fallen pretty hard.  The XP line was never good though in the first place.    https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/wix-filter-rusted-through.386492/post-6991372   https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/i-ve-used-my-last-wix-filter.27299/   https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/looking-for-a-better-replacement-for-wix-51258.403977/   https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/convince-me-in-using-the-purolator-boss.401537/post-7420147   the forums are littered with posts and examples of not great wix filters the last couple years 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...