Jump to content

Shake or Vibration Issues

Silver space ship
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 12.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

csckickass
csckickass

Well folks, I did it. After all the failed attempts at the Chevy dealer I traded it in for a 2015 Ram 1500 Larame. I have to agree with the other folks on here that have done the same thing, it was th

mafd2
mafd2

Apparently you and the other customer reps don't care. If you or GM would care y'all would put more effort in the matter. Just coming on the forum and stating the same repetitive posts and being a 3

DALaws
DALaws

Well I have some good news and bad news about my truck vibrations. Good news is that my truck has a significantly less vibration at speed. The bad news is my truck has significantly less vibration. Fo

Posted Images

zmnypit Enthusiast

zmnypit

Posted
Posted (edited)

Heres a video of my truck trying a couple things. As you can see the the passenger side minus a flat spot isnt bad. The drivers side however is terrible. Not only is it out of round the hub face appears warped also. I will have it apart for the rest of the day and part or tomorrow if you guys want to see any other angles etc.

 

 

Edited by zmnypit
  • Like 5
Rolling Thunder Enthusiast

Rolling Thunder

Posted
Posted

Heres a video of my truck trying a couple things. As you can see the the passenger side minus a flat spot isnt bad. The drivers side however is terrible. Not only is it out of round the hub face appears warped also. I will have it apart for the rest of the day and part or tomorrow if you guys want to see any other angles etc.

 

 

 

Is your dial indicator incremented in .001 in? How far out is driver's side it total each way? Can quite make out your TIR (Total Indicator Runout) I agree driver's side O.D. needs to be trimmed and the lateral runout isn't good at all making your wheel and tire wobble. Geezus..!..............

  • Like 1
zmnypit Enthusiast

zmnypit

Posted
Posted (edited)

 

Is your dial indicator incremented in .001 in? How far out is driver's side it total each way? Can quite make out your TIR (Total Indicator Runout) I agree driver's side O.D. needs to be trimmed and the lateral runout isn't good at all making your wheel and tire wobble. Geezus..!..............

Yeah .001. Drivers side its around .05-.06 on the outside. .04 on the lateral. If you go full screen you can make it out. I'm waiting on my buddy to reply if he can turn then down or not on his lathe.

Edited by zmnypit
abominable z71 Enthusiast

abominable z71

Posted
Posted

Yeah .001. Drivers side its around .05-.06 on the outside. .04 on the lateral. If you go full screen you can make it out. I'm waiting on my buddy to reply if he can turn then down or not on his lathe.

Do you have vibration issues, if so, at what speeds?

Pinnacle Enthusiast

Pinnacle

Posted
Posted

Heres a video of my truck trying a couple things. As you can see the the passenger side minus a flat spot isnt bad. The drivers side however is terrible. Not only is it out of round the hub face appears warped also. I will have it apart for the rest of the day and part or tomorrow if you guys want to see any other angles etc.

 

 

 

 

Thats un****ingbelievable, I seen them out of round but thats extreme.

Rolling Thunder Enthusiast

Rolling Thunder

Posted
Posted

Yeah .001. Drivers side its around .05-.06 on the outside. .04 on the lateral. If you go full screen you can make it out. I'm waiting on my buddy to reply if he can turn then down or not on his lathe.

 

The lateral is more of an issues because it looks like the studs would have to be removed and removing the metal may become a thickness issue like brake rotors. I don't know what the acceptable tolerances are for the flange thickness.

 

.040 out for the lateral over say a 7" flange would throw that out three times than that on a 20" wheel (~.125 or 1/8"). So a 20" wheel and tires would wobble about 1/8" of an inch. I'm not a motion engineer but I imagine that would certainly cause vibration @ ~ 70MPH. No?

  • Like 1
Jesse Davidson Enthusiast

Jesse Davidson

Posted
Posted

Heres a video of my truck trying a couple things. As you can see the the passenger side minus a flat spot isnt bad. The drivers side however is terrible. Not only is it out of round the hub face appears warped also. I will have it apart for the rest of the day and part or tomorrow if you guys want to see any other angles etc.

 

 

Holy SH!T thats bad. Is it just me, or does the black portion of the hub seem as though it isn't rotating centered? I blocked out the outside edge to try to minimize the illusion

  • Like 1
Wrench589 Enthusiast

Wrench589

Posted
Posted (edited)

Heres a video of my truck trying a couple things. As you can see the the passenger side minus a flat spot isnt bad. The drivers side however is terrible. Not only is it out of round the hub face appears warped also. I will have it apart for the rest of the day and part or tomorrow if you guys want to see any other angles etc.

 

0

Very interesting! The 40 thou face runout (lateral, as you refer to it) is extremely problematic. If that translates to the tire OD, as you point out, will be even more movement. No question that will be felt inside the cab!

 

Now, the flange OD runout may not be as problematic, although there is absolutely no excuse for such sloppy quality. Softail reported he removed a total of 18 grams of material to true up one of his axles. That's 0.6 oz. based on the ratio of radius' between the flange and the wheels, that is equivalent to about 1/4 oz on the rim diameter. 1/4 oz is about the minimum correction weights that can be used, at least in the old days when I was balancing tires. Also, all that weight won't be in one spot. Account for distribution, some will end up somewhat cancelling each other so can estimate the net unbalance to be about 2/3 that amount.

 

Of course, as vehicles get lighter and stiffer, they need everything to be machined truer and be better balanced. Anyway, it would be real easy to see how much vibration 1/4 oz causes - simply stop by your local parts store, buy a 1/4 of stick-on wheel weight and try it out. If it's significant, should immediately be felt. Regardless, though, I would want my flanges to run a lot truer that 50 thou!!

 

Now, the hub OD and studs are another issue. In Softails video, can clearly see the hub OD has very little runout. This is confirmed by Softail who said he checked everything and only the flange OD was bad. Which is interesting that his flanges has no face runout.... Anyway, he also confirmed that the studs where running true as well. This is incredibly critical, as the factory wheels are both hub centric and lug centric.

 

Did you happen to measure your hub OD runout with a dial? Would be interesting to know. I checked the front ones on mine when I swapped the winter set on and got about 1 thou TIR. Didn't check the rear, though. Sure going to now.

 

All I can say is that GM has to be the worst automobile company in a long time. Machining simple parts like these axles is not rocket science these days, and there is absolutely no excuse for this. Pure incompetence. And GM can blame their out-source supplier but I don't buy that BS. They are responsible to make sure the parts they install in the vehicle are right. Period. Excuses are what I get from my 6 year old. Not what I will accept from a multi billion dollar corporation.

 

And tomorrow, all the execs at GM will go to work and write themselves some more bonus cheques for doing such a great job...... While you tear apart your new truck to fix their crap. Hmmm. Disappointing to say the least.

Edited by Wrench589
  • Like 2
polarys425 Enthusiast

polarys425

Posted
Posted

Heres a video of my truck trying a couple things. As you can see the the passenger side minus a flat spot isnt bad. The drivers side however is terrible. Not only is it out of round the hub face appears warped also. I will have it apart for the rest of the day and part or tomorrow if you guys want to see any other angles etc.

 

 

 

I see one potential issue with your methodology. On the passenger side the hub is rubbing the indicator tip in a downward motion going away from the tip, which is best. On the driver side, the hub is upward toward the indicator tip, meaning the irregularities in the hub are smacking the tip and causing bounce in the indicator.

 

I would actually put the indicator straight up and down rather than angled, and rotate the axles by hand to get an accurate TIR. Same for the face runout, although your setup on that is much less affected.

  • Like 1
zmnypit Enthusiast

zmnypit

Posted
Posted

Do you have vibration issues, if so, at what speeds?

I do. 40-45mph and 70-77mph are the more noticeable speeds.

 

Great video, thanks for taking the time to do that.

You're welcome!

 

 

The lateral is more of an issues because it looks like the studs would have to be removed and removing the metal may become a thickness issue like brake rotors. I don't know what the acceptable tolerances are for the flange thickness.

 

.040 out for the lateral over say a 7" flange would throw that out three times than that on a 20" wheel (~.125 or 1/8"). So a 20" wheel and tires would wobble about 1/8" of an inch. I'm not a motion engineer but I imagine that would certainly cause vibration @ ~ 70MPH. No?

 

I thought about that. More than likely instead of having them turned down I will just replace them with the yukon axles or aftermarket. I have vibration from 40-45mph and 70-77mph.

 

 

I see one potential issue with your methodology. On the passenger side the hub is rubbing the indicator tip in a downward motion going away from the tip, which is best. On the driver side, the hub is upward toward the indicator tip, meaning the irregularities in the hub are smacking the tip and causing bounce in the indicator.

 

I would actually put the indicator straight up and down rather than angled, and rotate the axles by hand to get an accurate TIR. Same for the face runout, although your setup on that is much less affected.

I couldn't get it to grab straight up and down. I was able to hold it in place but it was pretty much the same result. I can re-do it if need be spinning the axles by hand?? Once I seen ithe pass side wasn't that bad other than the flat spot I wasn't really concerned about getting the indicator straight up.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • KARNUT
      Missing thrust bearing? And oil selection

      By KARNUT · Posted

      I agree with this assessment. As you know I’m testing longevity with vehicles for the first time. I have a few vehicles I passed to kids and grandkids. We’re all past 100K miles some approaching 170K. I’m the only one doing 5k oil changes. The rest whatever the minder says. I’m the only one doing frequent transmission service. My odyssey the trip vehicle at 200K will be finished as a trip vehicle. I recently changed to high mileage oil, Valvoline. I can’t get past the fact that all manufacturers want to claim long service life. I just don’t make sense that they would go with low weight oil for mileage. While sacrificing longevity.
    • Atlas
      Missing thrust bearing? And oil selection

      By Atlas · Posted

      There's absolutely a mountain of profit in catering to the "I do my own research" crowd, people who are certain they know better. And I don't mean there isn't data to support that 0w40 produces less wear product than 0w20 in an engine like the 3.0 Duramax, that only feeds them the assurance they need. Again, my whole thing with oil selection is, sure, 0w40 or 0w30 produces less wear product. Are we talking the difference between the engine lasting only 100k versus 200k? Or are we talking more like, if the engine will already go 350k on a good 0w20 regimen recommended by the OE, is using 0w40 going to get us to 355k, assuming we can even get the rest of the truck to last that long, meanwhile sacrificing the first 5y, 100k in powertrain warranty. The answer isn't easy, there are tradeoffs.   I willfully use 0w20 Dexos D for this reason, knowing that a 0w40 will produce slightly less wear. I don't believe the delta in wear product is meaningful over the lifetime of the engine, and I place much more importance on driving style and overall feeding and care of the engine as a whole. It's the mentality that someone can abstain from alcohol their whole life which is an amazing boost to health by itself, theoretically. But if they're sedentary, that lifestyle choice will most likely kill them young despite their other, concerted efforts. Maybe someone doesn't drink AND they are the perfect picture of health and activity AND they use 0w40 AND they treat their engine perfectly. If living until 130 years is the goal, sure, do that. But it's going to be a really old truck falling apart around a good engine for that last 30 years, without a doubt.   I watched Demonworks' other video on the 100k+ 3.0 Duramax that had dealer 0w20 changes on what appears to be OLM-prescribed intervals (8-10k).   The QR codes are still present and readable on the main bearings. That's how little wear it has.   That's not proof that anyone else should stick to 0w20, but it's confirmation, for me, that 0w20 is perfectly acceptable to use in these engines.
    • Z45
      Castrol Edge VS Amsoil OE

      By Z45 · Posted

      1Based on independent testing of OE 0W-20 in the Peugeot TU3M Wear Test as required by the dexos1 Gen 2 specification.
    • c4racer2
      summer road trips in the 2026 2500HD

      By c4racer2 · Posted

      oh ya that's good to know - I would rather use a gear than the brakes down a long hill.  I would not let cruise control take over on snow or towing a trailer for sure on hills anyway.     The other thing about the CO trip was that was all done above 6K feet for the most part, so that has to use more gas as the motor is down a good amount of power up there.   If I drove my 2016 Camaro with a very similar V8 to this 6.6 it would probably get about 23-24 on the fast run up to NE.  But the premium fuel premium is steep here in CO, so it would still only save about $40 in overall costs for the round-trip.  And you sure can't carry much gear in a convertible camaro!
    • newdude
      Magnetic ride struts

      By newdude · Posted

      Got part #s of what you ordered vs what you got?  

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...