Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

After 4 days in the shop the service writer told me they road force balanced again with a new machine they got from hunter. This must be the new machine they previously told me they had to purchase to remain in spec with GM requirements. Anyhow, he told me the Hunter guy used my truck for training and they re balanced all 4 tires. He told me my truck was all fixed. I made it 4 miles down the highway before it started vibrating again. I should be hearing from GM corporate today, I also sent them my video. We shall see what they say.

 

So what happened? The go fund me is shut down, did they threaten you?

Posted

So what happened? The go fund me is shut down, did they threaten you?

No threats (although I was assuming one was coming). I just decided the project deserves a little more planning. I don’t think GoFundMe was the best route. I want to do it right and I didn’t want to start it off half cocked. I would hate to raise money then find out I had problems with the ATF and couldn’t deliver what I promised. Again, if the project moves forward I just want to be sure I am 100% legit and can deliver what I promise.

Posted

Actually, Tires and every other part will change their characteristics as you drive there are different stresses, temperatures pressures etc on every single part which will change the characteristics even minimally but still a change. Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that tires are or aren't the issue, I don't know what is and I don't believe tires have anything to do with it. I'm just talking from an engineering stand point.

 

 

Someone would have to go back and look for it, but I believe I did an analysis of what a few oz of additional weight on the outer edge of a rotor/ axle flange in rotation would correlate to. If I recall correctly, based on whoever it was that posted the weight of material was taken off of theirs after having them turned on a lathe, it became the equivalent of having a 15lb weight spinning on the outter edge.

15lb...don't think so.

 

It was Softail. Reported removing 18gm of material from the OD of the axle flange. That's 0.6 oz at that diameter. That would be an equivalent mass of about 1/4oz at the rim OD, where wheel weights are typically added to correct out of balance. 1/4oz is not a lot. If I recall correctly, when I was younger I worked at a service station and we sold tires and the smallest weight was 1/4oz. Certainly modern vehicles are more sensitive and balance tolerances are likely tighter now, but still, a 1/4oz is not much and a far cry from 15lb.

Posted (edited)

Slanderous would imply that I am making false claims. I am not making any false claims or defamatory statements. I am simply stating facts and raising awareness for a problem that people are experiencing which seems to be largely ignored. It is really no different than fling a better business bureau claim, this is just a different approach.

Or, slander mean to injure by speaking ill of. There are a couple meanings or definitions of this term and all are subject to interpretation. Meaning i want to start a campain against this company by speaking ill of them. Then if you would like we can break down the definition of ill next, i am sure there are a few. My favorite is as follows, Ill:a : not meeting an accepted standard ill manners

b archaic : notably unskillful or inefficient

 

 

But i do understand where you are coming from on the issue.

Edited by evlwhtman
Posted

Or, [/size]slander mean to injure by speaking ill of. There are a couple meanings or definitions of this term and all are subject to interpretation. Meaning i want to start a campain against this company by speaking ill of them. Then if you would like we can break down the definition of ill next, i am sure there are a few. My favorite is as follows, Ill:[/size]a[/size] [/size]:[/size] not meeting an accepted standard [/size]ill manners[/size]

b archaic : notably unskillful or inefficient[/size]

Well then by that definition this entire forum would be slanderous. I would also make the argument that if GM is telling folks that this vibration is “within spec” then I would merely be reporting factual information confirmed by GM. If the perception of that statement by the general public were negative, they couldn’t hold me responsible for that. I have not lied about anything in my YouTube Series nor do I intend to. Please let me know if you disagree with any of my editing or production and I will issue a retraction if necessary. This is not a campaign as I am not pushing for one specific outcome. If they fixed the vibration I would report that and my series. There are a bunch of outcomes to this story, if they decide to take legal action to silence me I would like to think that would send a terrible message to future customers about how they handle customer relationsions.

 

Again let me know if you think I’m being unfair in any of my videos:

 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Well then by that definition this entire forum would be slanderous. I would also make the argument that if GM is telling folks that this vibration is “within spec” then I would merely be reporting factual information confirmed by GM. If the perception of that statement by the general public were negative, they couldn’t hold me responsible for that. I have not lied about anything in my YouTube Series nor do I intend to. Please let me know if you disagree with any of my editing or production and I will issue a retraction if necessary. This is not a campaign as I am not pushing for one specific outcome. If they fixed the vibration I would report that and my series. There are a bunch of outcomes to this story, if they decide to take legal action to silence me I would like to think that would send a terrible message to future customers about how they handle customer relationsions.

 

Again let me know if you think I’m being unfair in any of my videos:

 

As I just previously stated, I understand where you are coming from a lot of us do I think you might have misconstrued what I am saying to you. I do not disagree with anything you have said, I am just saying to take it to a bigger scale that is all so please do not get offensive in thinking I am rebutting your point when I am agreeing with you just thinking on a bigger scale that is all.....And honestly they do not give a care about any one of us whatsoever. Is there anyone in this 756 page forum that has been silenced?

 

Now back to the forum......

Edited by evlwhtman
Posted

As I just previously stated, I understand where you are coming from a lot of us do I think you might have misconstrued what I am saying to you. I do not disagree with anything you have said, I am just saying to take it to a bigger scale that is all so please do not get offensive in thinking I am rebutting your point when I am agreeing with you just thinking on a bigger scale that is all.....And honestly they do not give a care about any one of us whatsoever. Is there anyone in this 756 page forum that has been silenced?

 

Now back to the forum......

Definitely. I wasn’t trying to be defensive or combative but I think I was. Sorry. Just a bit high strung and passionate about this whole situation. And now back to the forum...

Posted (edited)

 

That is what I was thinking as well but I did check them and they are legit. I'm just going to keep filming and finding more cheap Hecho en Mexico parts out of spec and keep having them replace this junk until I get a buyback or lemon law. Like I said, as soon as I showed the dealership the video, they jumped on it. The service manager told me that the video for him was perfect, they have been having a really hard time having GM pay for the poorly manufactured parts so the more evidence you bring the better.

 

That really sucks man. Once i can find a set of aftermarket axles in stock I will order them and install them. Like stated before it will be my last "fix" I do and if it doesn't work then I might put the truck all back to stock and do the dealer tango. I think there are just a variance of different vibrations we are all experiencing. I know most everyone has a 1 piece aluminum driveshaft and its rare for others to have a 2 piece steel shaft like me. Crew cab 6.5' bed 2wd. Its a long driveshaft so that tells me If I'm experiencing the same talked about vibration as others with a single piece shaft then that should eliminate the problem. I am pretty much ready to give up. I absolutely love my truck and this is the only issue. I emailed AAM who supply the rear axles for GM and I am still waiting to hear back. I know I won't get a response, but its worth a try.

 

Regarding the axles, there was a lot of discussion on axles many months ago, when it was first discovered that the axle flanges were not running true. We discussed in great detail the radial runout of the Outside Diameter (OD) of the axle flange itself, and bottom line, from a weight-balance perspective it would be a small amount of unbalance. And, that surface is not part of the fitment for the wheel, so no effect there.

 

The bigger effect would seem to be the "face runout" of the axle flange. Or the wobble side-to-side that some videos showed. With the wheel mounted, this magnifies to quite a bit of side-to-side wobble at the tread which would certainly be felt in the vehicle, especially when the two wheels on the same axle "get in sync" with each other. (When they are out of sync, they would literally cancel each out quite nicely!) no amount of road force balancing the tires off the vehicle could ever correct this. I suspect that what is happening is the in-sync/out-of-sync effect is playing tricks on everyone, thinking some other corrective action had a positive effect until they go back in sync and magically "the vibration returns".

 

Back to the radial runout...the one thing that was never checked accurately was the bolt circle runout. Difficult to measure without a special jig or fixture. Would be interesting to see the result of that.

 

 

Also I do not think the vibration is from the axle flange, however I believe the axle flange is causing the tires to wear out creating "flat" spots which then lead to vibration. The added weight to the center of the wheel isn't enough to cause such a vibration. When most people here go to the dealer they get a road force balance and the problem is sometimes solved but comes back in 100 miles or so. Over time an out of round flange will cause the tire to become unbalanced again.

 

I did my best with some videos with the wheel bolt pattern runout and it seems true to me. At best i could do is hold the camera to the bedside of the truck and line up the outer edge of the bolts with a mark on the ground. I will try to post up my video of that. I didn't post it originally because it looked fine.

 

Edited by rhino68
Posted (edited)

Regarding the axles, there was a lot of discussion on axles many months ago, when it was first discovered that the axle flanges were not running true. We discussed in great detail the radial runout of the Outside Diameter (OD) of the axle flange itself, and bottom line, from a weight-balance perspective it would be a small amount of unbalance. And, that surface is not part of the fitment for the wheel, so no effect there.

 

The bigger effect would seem to be the "face runout" of the axle flange. Or the wobble side-to-side that some videos showed. With the wheel mounted, this magnifies to quite a bit of side-to-side wobble at the tread which would certainly be felt in the vehicle, especially when the two wheels on the same axle "get in sync" with each other. (When they are out of sync, they would literally cancel each out quite nicely!) no amount of road force balancing the tires off the vehicle could ever correct this. I suspect that what is happening is the in-sync/out-of-sync effect is playing tricks on everyone, thinking some other corrective action had a positive effect until they go back in sync and magically "the vibration returns".

 

Back to the radial runout...the one thing that was never checked accurately was the bolt circle runout. Difficult to measure without a special jig or fixture. Would be interesting to see the result of that.

Set up a dial indicator and spin the wheel studs around until each one hits the indicator and take the reading, that should give a pretty close idea if they are off center.

Edited by Silverado 6.2
Posted

Set up a dial indicator and spin the wheel studs around until each one hits the indicator and take the reading, that should give a pretty close idea if they are off center.

its easier to check this with the rim and tire on since they are hub centric, the hub pilot dictates the centering of the rim not the wheel studs. Check the run out on the the edge of the rim. If it is moving up and down or left and right mark the high spot with some tape take the rim and tire off rotate it 180 degrees. If the wobble is still happening at the tape mark its wheel, if the wobble is now 180 degrees from the tape its the hub and likely the pilot is off center if its moving radially (up and down) or the hub face is warped or bent if you got lateral run out (side to side).

Posted

its easier to check this with the rim and tire on since they are hub centric, the hub pilot dictates the centering of the rim not the wheel studs. Check the run out on the the edge of the rim. If it is moving up and down or left and right mark the high spot with some tape take the rim and tire off rotate it 180 degrees. If the wobble is still happening at the tape mark its wheel, if the wobble is now 180 degrees from the tape its the hub and likely the pilot is off center if its moving radially (up and down) or the hub face is warped or bent if you got lateral run out (side to side).

True, the factory wheels are hub centric, so that hub OD can be checked with a finger dial. I checked mine and they are within a thou runout. BUT, I bought a set of aftermarket wheels for winter and the hub bore is larger, thus making them stud-centric! In my case, the aftermarket wheels seem to run a bit smoother, although could be the super-soft winter rubber doing that.

 

Ive commented on this before, but in my opinion, GM's design isn't the best. They use typical conical nuts into conical holes that are usually used for a stud-centric design, but then use the hub-centric design as well. So, those diameters all have to be machined perfectly concentric, or they will "fight" each other. Is that a problem? Can't say for sure. I suspect it would induce some stresses into the wheel and the hub. Is that an issue? Well, I would say no, if there was no problems with the vehicle. Except.....hmmmm. Nah, these vehicles are perfect!

Posted

True, the factory wheels are hub centric, so that hub OD can be checked with a finger dial. I checked mine and they are within a thou runout. BUT, I bought a set of aftermarket wheels for winter and the hub bore is larger, thus making them stud-centric! In my case, the aftermarket wheels seem to run a bit smoother, although could be the super-soft winter rubber doing that.

 

Ive commented on this before, but in my opinion, GM's design isn't the best. They use typical conical nuts into conical holes that are usually used for a stud-centric design, but then use the hub-centric design as well. So, those diameters all have to be machined perfectly concentric, or they will "fight" each other. Is that a problem? Can't say for sure. I suspect it would induce some stresses into the wheel and the hub. Is that an issue? Well, I would say no, if there was no problems with the vehicle. Except.....hmmmm. Nah, these vehicles are perfect!

Oh yeah, Everything is perfect to half a thousandths. You can get hub centric rings for aftermarket wheels basically a plastic or aluminum insert to match the outer diameter of the hub pilot 78.1 mm for these trucks if I remember correctly the outer OD of the ring has to match whatever the wheel manufactures hub bore spec is, I think the fuels I'm running are 108 mm. Can't say there is much of a difference with or without them though.

Posted

So at this point i have:

 

1 - Rebuilt an entirely new deiveshaft with spicer joints

 

2 - Replaced wheels and tires, went back to stock rims with new tires with 5 alignments and balances

 

3 - Had the poorly manufactured rear axles replaced

 

4 - Shimmed the rear end 2 - 4 degrees both ways

 

5 - Replaced front hubs and bearings

 

6 - Replaced front CV axel shafts (4x4)

 

7 - Shimmed the front differential then back to stock

 

8 - Installed Fox Coilovers, Rears and upper control arms then back to stock

 

9 - Re-torqued rear axle U-bolts

 

10 - Installed lowering shackles then back to stock

 

Plus a handful of other wishful thinking ideas that have come across the internet and with everything replaced and done I have had little to no resolution. If anything it has seem to move the vibrations to where they feel more forward in the truck. As of right now it feels like my steering is failing and sloppy but is still relative to the driveline based on being exacerbated under heavy torque load and freeway speeds. I would like to know if anyone has explored options outside of what I have don't so I can eliminate wasting more time and money. I still feel that it is something in the transmission or front differential.

  • Like 1
Posted

^^ Sounds like you have re-engineered 70% of your truck. The 14 WT i just bought does it too, I will be attaching a gopro along the driveline to see if i can detect where the oscillation begins. I was thinking driveshaft but obviously that did not remedy your issue. I will borrow the heavier wheels/tires from my non-vibrating 15 too to see if that changes anything. I cant believe the previous owner put up with it for 100,000km. I am usually under 65mph but over 65, it feels like I am going to shake a wheel off when I pass someone.

Posted

So at this point i have:

 

1 - Rebuilt an entirely new deiveshaft with spicer joints

 

2 - Replaced wheels and tires, went back to stock rims with new tires with 5 alignments and balances

 

3 - Had the poorly manufactured rear axles replaced

 

4 - Shimmed the rear end 2 - 4 degrees both ways

 

5 - Replaced front hubs and bearings

 

6 - Replaced front CV axel shafts (4x4)

 

7 - Shimmed the front differential then back to stock

 

8 - Installed Fox Coilovers, Rears and upper control arms then back to stock

 

9 - Re-torqued rear axle U-bolts

 

10 - Installed lowering shackles then back to stock

 

Plus a handful of other wishful thinking ideas that have come across the internet and with everything replaced and done I have had little to no resolution. If anything it has seem to move the vibrations to where they feel more forward in the truck. As of right now it feels like my steering is failing and sloppy but is still relative to the driveline based on being exacerbated under heavy torque load and freeway speeds. I would like to know if anyone has explored options outside of what I have don't so I can eliminate wasting more time and money. I still feel that it is something in the transmission or front differential.

WOW, I have seen guys do half of what you have done, never seen that much work done before. After several years now I think this generation is a lost cause. GM is taking a huge hit on all their trucks including SUVs

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I had a new engine installed with under 5,000 miles. It shut off coming around a residential street corner and wouldn't restart. Dealer indicated it seized. New one has been fine since with 10,000 miles on the replaced engine. Annoying but I was given a loaner for the 5 weeks it was down. I won't go with the 6.2l gasser so it's 3.0l again. I love the economy and it tows my enclosed car trailer just fine. 
    • Coming back from towing a car to my daughter in Nashville truck started making a screaming noise from underneath.  Pulled over placed in park and sure enough whining noise from underneath.  Dropped at the dealer fearing new tranny or another front pump/cover replacement.  Service writer said it sounded like the tranny too...  Well $300, new idler and a belt all is good.  Pop the hood and give a listen. lol  Now I'm telling dealers I'm no longer interested in a new truck.
    • HD uses the 6.6 gas.   Oil consumption while heavy working is considered normal.  1 quart per 100 gallons of fuel is the normal rate above 8600lbs GVWR.  If more than that, it is considered excessive.   They will have to perform an oil consumption test using the guidelines in TSB 03-06-01-023J.     Information on Engine Oil Consumption Guidelines All engines require oil to lubricate and protect the load bearing and internal moving parts from wear including cylinder walls, pistons, and piston rings. When a piston moves down its cylinder, a thin film of oil is left on the cylinder wall. During the combustion process, part of this oil layer is consumed. As a result, varying rates of oil consumption are accepted as normal in all engines. Oil Consumption Oil usage has a direct relationship with the amount of fuel used. The harder an engine works, the more fuel and oil it will use. Therefore, oil usage as a factor of fuel usage is a more accurate indicator of acceptable oil consumption levels than vehicle mileage for vehicles at or above 8600 GVW. The accepted rate of oil consumption for gasoline engines in vehicles at or above 8600 GVW is 1 liter (1 qt) within 400 liters (100 gallons) of fuel used. This rate only applies to vehicles under warranty, maintained in accordance with the appropriate maintenance schedule, driven at legal speeds and within design intent of the vehicle. Many factors can affect an owner's concern with oil consumption. Driving habits and vehicle maintenance vary from owner to owner. Thoroughly evaluate each case before deciding whether the vehicle in question has abnormal engine oil consumption. Gasket and External Leaks Inspect the oil pans, engine covers, and the engine oil cooler for leakage. Inspect for oil leakage into the engine coolant. Improper Reading of the Oil Level Indicator (Dipstick) The vehicle must be parked on a level surface to obtain accurate oil level readings. Verify that the dipstick tube is fully seated in the block. When checking the oil level, make sure the dipstick is wiped clean before taking an oil level reading and fully depress the dipstick until the shoulder bottoms out on the dipstick tube. The dipstick should be the proper part number for the engine/vehicle that is being checked. Not Waiting Long Enough After Running Engine to Check Oil Level The vehicle should be allowed to sit for at least 15 minutes, after the engine has been shut off, before taking an oil level reading to assure the oil has had enough time to drain back into the crankcase. In order to ensure accurate results, the temperature of the oil should be close to the same temperature as the last time the oil level was checked. Improper Oil Fill After an Oil Change Following an oil change, verify that the proper amount and type of oil was put in the engine and that the oil level on the dipstick is not above the full mark or below the add marks. Refer to the Owner's Manual or Service Manual for information on recommended oil quantity, viscosity, and quality. High Speed or High RPM Driving Continuous driving at high speeds/high RPMs may increase oil consumption. Because this may not always be an everyday occurrence, it is hard to determine exactly how much the oil economy will be affected. Towing or Heavy Usage Towing a trailer or hauling additional weight will increase oil consumption. Large frontal area trailers will further increase the work required from the engine, especially at highway speeds, and thus increases the rate of oil consumption. PTO Operation Operation of a PTO will increase fuel and oil usage, as the PTO driven accessory uses engine power to operate. Crankcase Ventilation System Verify that the positive crankcase ventilation (PCV) system is operating properly. Blockages, restrictions, or damage to the PCV system can result in increased oil use. Oil Dilution from Condensation On vehicles that are usually driven short distances, less than 8 km (5 mi), especially in colder weather, condensation generated from cold engine operation may not get hot enough to evaporate out of the oil. When this occurs, the dipstick may indicate that the oil level is over-full. Subsequent driving on a trip of sufficient length to enable normal engine operating temperature for 30 minutes or more, in order to vaporize excess moisture, may give the customer the impression of excessive oil consumption. Engine Temperature If an engine is run at overheated temperatures (see Owner's Manual or Service Manual) for more than brief periods, oil will oxidize at a faster than normal rate. In addition, gaskets may distort, piston rings may stick, and excessive wear may result. Verify that all cooling system components are in proper working order. Engine Wear Piston scuffing, excessive piston-to-wall clearance, tapered or out of round cylinders, worn, damaged or improperly installed valve guides, seals and piston rings will all cause an increase in oil consumption. Measurement of Oil Consumption Engines require a period of time to BREAK IN so that moving parts are properly seated. Therefore, oil economy should not be tested until the vehicle has accumulated at least 6400 km (4000 mi). An exception would be allowed only if an engine is reported to be using more than 0.946 liter (1 qt) in 1600 km (1000 mi).   Verify that the engine has no external leaks. Repair as necessary. Verify that the engine is at normal operating temperature (see Owner's Manual or Service Manual). Park the vehicle on a level surface. Wait at least 15 minutes, after the engine is shut off, before checking the oil level to make sure that most of the oil has had time to drain back into the crankcase. Check the oil level and record the vehicle mileage, date, and exact oil level on the form included in this bulletin. Next ensure the oil level is at, but not above, the full mark on the dipstick. add oil if necessary. Also ensure the proper viscosity and quality oil are being used as recommended in the Owner Manual Ask the customer once they have consumed 100 gallons of fuel schedule an appointment and return to the dealer for inspection. If the final evaluation shows that the engine uses more than 0.946 liter (1 qt) in 379 liters (100 gallons) of fuel used, follow the published symptom diagnostics as described in the appropriate Service Manual. If the oil consumption test shows that the engine uses less than 0.946 liter (1 qt) in 379 liters (100 gallons) of fuel used, explain to the customer that their engine meets the guidelines for oil consumption.  
    • I have a 2024 Chevy Silverado 2500 with the 6.2 liter engine, Vin: 2GC4YME79R1273849, with 27,437 miles. Recently we took a trip from Candor, NY to Townsend, TN pulling our fifth wheel, when I got close to the Townsend, TN area The truck gave me a message of low oil. I checked the dip stick and found it was 2 quarts low. Today, August 27, 2026, I had the oil changed and the technician Found the truck was very low on oil.  Is there a Recall for this? What is my recourse for this issue? Do I call the dealer where I bought it or any chevy dealer?   Robert Strickland 292 Owego Road Candor, NY 13743 352-502-6588 [email protected]
    • We understand the importance of understanding how your Sierra performs, @SoCal Angler. Our team would like to gather the proper details to assist you with your inquiry about your truck's automatic braking. When you have a moment, please visit: https://s.chevy.com/support-request and fill out the request form with pertinent details. This will ensure your request is routed correctly so we may take a further look. We will keep an eye out for your outreach.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...