Jump to content

Do You Wait For The Oil Change Reminder In Your GM?

Gorehamj

Recommended Posts

Hate Work Enthusiast

Hate Work

Posted
Posted

Ahem. Regular oil basically hasn't changed much. Synthetic? Some. Tolerance in engines? Yep. What is your vehicle worth to you compared to the cost of basic maintenance? Are you looking for an excuse to go buy something new? Someone who mostly does short commutes or frequent starts with a dry engine should change their oil much more frequently than someone like me who drives 45 miles one way to work. When will common sense come into play here?

  • Replies 180
  • Created
  • Last Reply
KARNUT Senior Enthusiast

KARNUT

Posted
Posted

Seems to be a lot of people on here with chemical engineering degrees. I’ll stick with the experts, oil and car manufacturers recommendation. See the latest mobile 1 ads on the tube? I have one car that calls oil changes every 10K one at 3700. The last one I’ll change at 5K after the warranty is up.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Grumpy Bear Senior Enthusiast

Grumpy Bear

Posted
Posted

For about 30 years all three majors specified 180 F thermostats and use engine driven fans. The temperature of your motor oil is directly connected to the engines base cooling system. The hotter the motor runs the hotter the oil runs. The hotter the oil runs the thinner it becomes and the faster is thermally oxidizes. Very few OEM offerings utilize any sort of engine oil cooling past passive radiant rejection and now...the engine compartment is all but sealed like a tomb. Thermostats have risen 192, 196 and now 207 F it the flavor of the day. 

 

From the motor oils perspective there have been improvements in even the lowest base stocks that increase resistance to thermal oxidation. If they had not even 2,000 intervals would not be nearly quick enough. Absolute rates of decay however are not as impressive as the marketing hype would lead you to believe.  This 'improvement' does nothing to prevent heat driven viscosity reduction. At the same time that the OEMs are allowing things to heat up; their call outs for viscosity have declined and the future looks even lighter with 12 and 15 weights looming. 

 

What use to be an operational viscosity of 9 to 12 cSt is now under 5 to 9 cSt at 212 F but oil temperatures now 250F and higher as a normal drive is down to under 3 cSt. Lighter than 0W SAE viscosity grading. 

 

Trusting the OEM made me smile a bit. My Priest has lied to me. My Boss lied to me. My wife has lied to me. A Judge has lied to me as has my lawyer. Police have lied both to me and about me. My teachers lied to me. History lies to me. The press lies to me. Marketing makes a living out of lies. Your doctor will lie to you. My parents have lied to me. If fact the only person that has never lied to me is God. Trust in OEM's? :lol:

 

Now having said that; while I do not trust the OEM's I do trust their GREED (the reason most lie) which means I see the factory intervals and viscosity call outs good enough to get your truck/car/motorcycle at least to the end of the warranty. In other words a safe starting point. I also trust that their greed will shave that melon close enough to leave little in reserve thus any thoughtful improvement to error on cautions side to be prudent.    

Nick The Great Senior Enthusiast

Nick The Great

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, KARNUT said:

Seems to be a lot of people on here with chemical engineering degrees. I’ll stick with the experts, oil and car manufacturers recommendation. See the latest mobile 1 ads on the tube? I have one car that calls oil changes every 10K one at 3700. The last one I’ll change at 5K after the warranty is up.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

You mean like my mechanic uncle, who just "knows" anything over 3K is "bad for the engine." 

 

The chemical engineering degree he has and the time he's spent in the GM engineering labs must really add up.  :D

KARNUT Senior Enthusiast

KARNUT

Posted
Posted
For about 30 years all three majors specified 180 F thermostats and use engine driven fans. The temperature of your motor oil is directly connected to the engines base cooling system. The hotter the motor runs the hotter the oil runs. The hotter the oil runs the thinner it becomes and the faster is thermally oxidizes. Very few OEM offerings utilize any sort of engine oil cooling past passive radiant rejection and now...the engine compartment is all but sealed like a tomb. Thermostats have risen 192, 196 and now 207 F it the flavor of the day. 
 
From the motor oils perspective there have been improvements in even the lowest base stocks that increase resistance to thermal oxidation. If they had not even 2,000 intervals would not be nearly quick enough. Absolute rates of decay however are not as impressive as the marketing hype would lead you to believe.  This 'improvement' does nothing to prevent heat driven viscosity reduction. At the same time that the OEMs are allowing things to heat up; their call outs for viscosity have declined and the future looks even lighter with 12 and 15 weights looming. 
 
What use to be an operational viscosity of 9 to 12 cSt is now under 5 to 9 cSt at 212 F but oil temperatures now 250F and higher as a normal drive is down to under 3 cSt. Lighter than 0W SAE viscosity grading. 
 
Trusting the OEM made me smile a bit. My Priest has lied to me. My Boss lied to me. My wife has lied to me. A Judge has lied to me as has my lawyer. Police have lied both to me and about me. My teachers lied to me. History lies to me. The press lies to me. Marketing makes a living out of lies. Your doctor will lie to you. My parents have lied to me. If fact the only person that has never lied to me is God. Trust in OEM's? :lol:
 
Now having said that; while I do not trust the OEM's I do trust their GREED (the reason most lie) which means I see the factory intervals and viscosity call outs good enough to get your truck/car/motorcycle at least to the end of the warranty. In other words a safe starting point. I also trust that their greed will shave that melon close enough to leave little in reserve thus any thoughtful improvement to error on cautions side to be prudent.    

You I tend to believe, just for the reason I’ve read you enough. I’ve been involved with lots of testing when it comes to lubricants. Mainly because we’ve been around long enough to be test mules and our equipment works in extreme conditions. Amsoil, Redline, Mobil 1, seem to live up to their hype. Toyota and Honda seems to buy in to synthetics. I’m old enough not to buy into all the hype completely, but I will to a point. I have work in the extreme all my working years and never lost an engine do to oil failure.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Grumpy Bear Senior Enthusiast

Grumpy Bear

Posted
Posted
13 hours ago, KARNUT said:


You I tend to believe, just for the reason I’ve read you enough. I’ve been involved with lots of testing when it comes to lubricants. Mainly because we’ve been around long enough to be test mules and our equipment works in extreme conditions. Amsoil, Redline, Mobil 1, seem to live up to their hype. Toyota and Honda seems to buy in to synthetics. I’m old enough not to buy into all the hype completely, but I will to a point. I have work in the extreme all my working years and never lost an engine do to oil failure.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Crows love shinny things. :lol:  You might be on to something. Most guys don't keep a truck/car/bike long enough to know much of anything first hand about it. Every car/truck/bike I've ever owned is a rolling lab. Learning winds my watch. I was blessed with a life time of work in oil/gas and chemical. Never really seemed like work. I too have never lost a motor to an oil failure. Fact is I've never lost a motor period. I respect the machine to much to abuse it and loved them enough to race and win my fair share. No that is not a contradiction. 

Cowpie Senior Enthusiast

Cowpie

Posted
Posted

On the commercial side of things, synthetics are where it's at.  Just by using synthetic gear lube in my heavy truck differentials and transmission, the OEM fo those components automatically extends the warranty 50%... from 500,000 miles to 750,000 miles.  No special agreement or paperwork.  Just use synthetics.  So it must make a difference.  And those components, by using synthetic, the OEM recommended drain interval on them is 500,000 miles.  So the OEM will extend the warranty, no questions asked, and that is even with a 500,000 mile drain interval.

 

Standard base oils have indeed come a long way in the last 20 years.  Group II and III mineral base oils are light years ahead of what they were 20 years ago.  And there is also the Natural Gas derived base oils that are bumping up against Group IV PAO base oils in quality and capability.  That makes sense.   Group IV PAO oils are made from ethylene gas, which is primarily sourced from natural gas also.  Either way, the add pack in the motor oil has as much or even more to do with the quality of a motor oil.  1/5th of any motor oil is additive package.  Even the best synthetic  base oil will grenade a motor without any of the beneficial add pack components.

 

 

Loco-diablo Senior Enthusiast

Loco-diablo

Posted
Posted

I get free oil changes for life from my dealership. When it hits 20% remaining I bring it in for free synthetic oil change. 20% seems to be every 6000 miles on it it’s like clockwork


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

SierraHD17 Senior Enthusiast

SierraHD17

Posted
Posted

I wait for the light....... reset it and wait for it again lol.  Expensive oil and matching expensive filters that I follow the severe mileage on.  On the old bomber car it's the same oil and filters but I usually do around the 25000 mile change.  Me saying this seems to drive some people nuts but whatever... this is just what I do.  You do as you see fit.

  • 3 months later...
LexusMate-GMCSierra Enthusiast

LexusMate-GMCSierra

Posted
Posted

On my 2012 I changed oil & filter at 5K miles. I plan on doing the same with my 2018. I agree engines and oil are better today than 40 years ago. But, oil is cheap in my opinion like many others in this thread.

  • 2 months later...
TRC Enthusiast

TRC

Posted
Posted

I watch the Indicator to remind my self to do it, seems with my driving 15% life equals about 5-6k miles.  I added a drain plug to my trans. pan also,

my maintenance schedule is roughly as followed;

     5-6k eng oil+filter and 9 grease fitting in the front end get a few shots, air filter is pullled to make sure no critters found it, and replaced as needed. 

I take a 4 foot pry bar under with me a use it to try and wiggle moving parts(it no ones around to give me a hand) general inspection.

    Every 2 oil changes the trans drain plug comes out and 5qts new ATF go in, all Fill plugs come out to check level and fluid visual condition. tires get rotated (usually the winters get put on or off at this point)

     Every 4 oil changes, i pull every drain plug and the trans pan comes down to to replace the filter, coolant gets tested and power steering reservoir gets suction gunned and refilled.  

This truck has had a steady diet of Schaeffers full synthetic lubes, in the engine, trans, diffs and transfer case and grease joints.

I keep a running list on the plastic cowling covering the radiator with a paint marker. little brake clean and a rag to change the mileages for each task.

I look forward to a Saturday morning  that I get to do the service and check over.

 

 

 

  • 10 months later...
Hobey Enthusiast

Hobey

Posted
Posted
On 3/3/2016 at 7:46 PM, Westy5 said:

I change it myself every 3000 miles. I don't trust the goofs at the dealership. The last truck I owned the Chevy dealer installed a new battery under warranty and dented the fender installing it. Bunch of Idiots. Plus they identify your vehicle by putting a magnetic number on the hood which made me cringe at the site. I try to take care of my vehicles as best I can. Especially after I spent 40,000.00 plus dollars for their product. lDK maybe I'm to fussy, or not?

I wouldn't say you are fussy, just concerned for the care of your truck.  Where we live in Cobourg, Ontario, our Chev Dealer takes great care of our vehicle....we have dealt there for over 15 years now....never any issues, so I hope you find a better dealer !!! P.S....i change our oil every 3 or 4 months due to short trips an vehicles sit for 2 or 3 days ata time....cheap insurance and I m able to assess other items that need maintenance o attention

Grumpy Bear Senior Enthusiast

Grumpy Bear

Posted
Posted

Something I've been thinking about allot recently is oil cleanliness. The internet is full of advice and opinion on OCI's based on many factors that hinge on the oils chemistry. That is viscosity loss or TBN and additive depletion. I've beat that drum to death myself. There is also a great amount of discussion surrounding filtration and almost entirely at it pertains to particle size retention. That is, who has the highest filtration efficiency. How small a particle can that filter capture. You even hear on occasion about retention volume of a filter. How many grams of contamination will it hold before is plugs enough to remain on bypass. And everyone of these concerns is valid but....not comprehensive in the search for the perfect OCI length me thinks. 

 

https://www.blackstone-labs.com/by-pass-oil-filtration/

 

Two things in this link really grabbed my eye. No matter what the box says your filter comes in or who makes it the average particle size passing is 30-40 micron. To me that would mean that the manufactures OCI is based on such filtration and expected contamination levels present under those conditions. 

 

The second was Blackstone believes that an oils life is limited only by it's cleanliness and additive depletion. Just something I'm giving more consideration. 

diyer2 Senior Enthusiast

diyer2

Posted
Posted

Wix specs for my oil filter.

Product Specifications

Part Number:57045

UPC Number:765809570450

Style:Spin-On Lube Filter

Service:Lube

Type:Full Flow

Media:Enhanced Cellulose

Height:4.828 (123)*

Outer Diameter Top:2.939 (75)*

Outer Diameter Bottom:Closed:

Thread Size:22X1.5 MM

By-Pass Valve Setting-PSI:12-15

Anti-Drain Back Valve:Yes

Beta Ratio:2/20=6/20

Burst Pressure-PSI:350

Nominal Micron Rating:21

Oil cleanliness.

This is why I do 3 K OCI.

Why I use of the shelf oil also due to cost.

The cost maybe the same as expensive oil ran for longer OCI's but clean, new oil is what I like.

 

:)

 

 

 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • Atlas
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By Atlas · Posted

      So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Another JR
      Gasser Subforum Has Been Quiet - - So, Regenerative Braking and Using L10

      By Another JR · Posted

      Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • newdude
      Gas fill door

      By newdude · Posted

      Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • newdude
      Gasser Subforum Has Been Quiet - - So, Regenerative Braking and Using L10

      By newdude · Posted

      No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...