Jump to content

GM Customer Service Build Sheet GVW ?


Recommended Posts

Posted

I recently asked for and received my truck's build sheet from GM Customer Service.

 

The Gross Vehicle Weight shown on the first page is listed as 3,178 - no Kilograms or Pounds after this figure.

 

Now 3,178 in Kilograms works out to a little over 7,000 Pounds so I thought I had the answer.

 

I contacted GM Customer service asking for details on the GVW number of 3,178 - Here is the reply:

 

" To answer your questions, the Gross Vehicle Weight will be in pounds. So 3,178 lbs will be approximately 1,441 kilograms. "

 

I think the Jeep CJ7 with hardtop I used to own had a GVW higher than 3,178 lbs! The window sticker for my '14 shows GVW of 7,000 LBS.

 

C'mon GM Customer Service. I know this a very small error but if they can't get this right no wonder we have so many recalls.

Posted

I'm pretty sure they are wrong - if anything, the 3,178 is KGs - the GVWR is the anticipated gross weight of the truck with all passengers and fully loaded bed, which would be closer to the 7,200 lb figure -

 

from gmc site:

 

Gross vehicle weight rating, or GVWR, might sound like a term only professional truck drivers are aware of. In reality, it’s an important figure every driver of a GMC pickup truck, SUV and crossover needs to keep in mind in order to remain safe while carrying cargo or passengers alike.

 

Easily found on a label placed inside the driver’s door jamb, the GVWR figure is the maximum weight a GMC truck or SUV is engineered to safely carry. While this figure does not include the total weight of any trailer being towed, it does include the passengers, personal effects, and cargo carried, along with the weight (or the gross vehicle weight) of the truck itself and the tongue weight of the trailer.

 

http://www.gmc.com/gmc-life/how-to/understanding-gross-vehicle-weight-rating.html

Posted

Well if you think about it, they're wrong. The truck itself without anything would be more than 4.000 lbs easy, probably over 5,000. A Mustang or Camaro weighs more than 3,200 lbs I believe so it's no way a truck even empty without fluids weighs that low.

 

Also if you look down the list it does say the rating in lbs.

 

My build sheet at the top says 3,269. Then I look down and the 3 digit code I have is C5Z which says 7.200 lbs GVW.

Posted

OK - I saw the - C5W - GVW RATING -7,000 LBS - about a third of the way down the first page on the right.

 

My point is GM Customer Service should at least know my truck or any '14 full size half ton does not have a GVW of 3,178 lbs / 1,441 kilograms.

Posted

You are not talking with engineers. The CS rep likely has a Knowledge Base and they just refer to that to answer customers questions. Many assume they know everything and anything but in reality they probably could not tell the difference between a Silverado and a Corvette.

Posted

You are not talking with engineers. The CS rep likely has a Knowledge Base and they just refer to that to answer customers questions. Many assume they know everything and anything but in reality they probably could not tell the difference between a Silverado and a Corvette.

 

I think they believe that the cross between a Silverado and a Corvette is the Colorado

Posted

 

You are not talking with engineers. The CS rep likely has a Knowledge Base and they just refer to that to answer customers questions. Many assume they know everything and anything but in reality they probably could not tell the difference between a Silverado and a Corvette.

I think they believe that the cross between a Silverado and a Corvette is the Colorado

 

 

I think if they come out with the El Camino again then that would really screw them up.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • probably won't get a response from that user, as they haven't returned to the site since making that one post.  users don't (at least I don't, and I haven't seen any setting which would notify me via say, email) get any notification other than going to this site, and checking if they got a response on their thread...
    • Thanks - I wasn't quite caffeinated this morning. 2:1 makes sense, turning the crankshaft 360 degrees will turn the cam 180 degrees, and had I done that, the cam's dot would be at 6 and the crank's at 12 again.   I went ahead and took the sprocket off anyway, aligned everything dot-to-dot including the balance shaft just for s&g. I'm glad I did because I discovered no Loctite on the timing sprocket bolts. Maybe it's not required, but at only 20 ft-lb torque spec, those bolts aren't in there very tight. Cleaned and reassembled with some thread locker and torqued.   A general observation: Less is more with RTV. If a little doesn't stop a leak, a LOT probably won't, either. RTV is thinly veiled revenge, in a tube...      
    • The timing marks are ok, that is #1, you can turn it over until they line up and it won't change anything, the crankshaft turns twice for every camshaft revolution, I have always set up SB Chevs as your pic shows using a straight edge
    • Someone's been here before.... There is a receipt for a 3-piece timing set, purchased earlier this year.   Is this picture something, or, nothing?   I have the timing cover off and my crank is perfectly TDC and the keyed gear's locating mark is dead on 12 o'clock.   The cam gear locating mark is also at 12 o'clock. Now, I'm not an expert, but all the install guides say the two locating marks should meet and be perfectly aligned when installing a timing set. The mark on the crank should be dead on 12:00 and the cam gear's mark should be dead on 6:00, and both marks should be perfectly vertically aligned.   I believe the timing gear is keyed or has a dowel that ensures it can only be installed on the cam in one position, so I have to believe the cam is out of phase somehow. At the very least, with a triangular bolt pattern, it can only be installed in one of 3 different positions.   Before I pulled the front cover, the truck was running alright, no service engine soon lights except an occasional P0172 / rich condition. Timing -16 timing at idle (should be +16), and total -35% fuel trim, two conditions I haven't been able to figure out.   In related news, my injector tested pretty well, wasn't leaking, but I had it rebuilt anyway, and it's on it's way back to me.         Along with this discovery, the good and bad:   Good: The oil pan seal appears undamaged.   Bad: -The timing cover has been reused, and the positioning dowels have been broken. That could explain some of the leaking. -Some kind of white paste or grease was used to try to seal the oil pan seal and timing cover (since wiped off..). -Then, someone globbed silicone all over the front of the cover and also buried the ckp sensor in it. But, they didn't put any inside the cover or use RTV to try to seal the oil pan seal with the timing cover (good).
    • The guy that owns K&P filters last I checked in with him has over 300,000 miles on his Dodge base Hemi using his own 35 micron absolute stainless mesh filter from its first oil change.    The GM study I've posted a dozen times shows the relationship in engine life based in multiples of base units, not miles or years. That is the base unit is the number of miles the motor ran using the reference filter efficiency.    The above two paragraphs dismantle anecdotal arguments IF one changes oil often enough to prevent particle formation and the motor is in otherwise good shape. That is not full of silica (no air filter) or suffering a metallurgical issue that is not part of the lubrication discussion. Poor heat treat in example.   Data from UOA's I've reviewed from more than a few engines can show remarkably broad variations in oil cleanliness using the exact same filter over the course of an engines life.     Lastly there is the common sense of it. Wear debris WILL circulate the engine BEFORE it ever sees a filter in route to that filter and WILL harm the pump which NEVER sees filtered oil.    Alpha question then becomes, given the facts, how long do you believe is a reasonable service life from a vehicle you are certain you will not pass down? That is the junk yard will be it's resting place when you're done with it? (the moral issue most don't care about).    Omega question is then how diligent are you prepared to be in general mechanical, air & oil maintenance? Preventing particulates and keeping them sufficiently dilute; preventing the precursors from generation, amalgamation and precipitation.    If I get a good look at the engine bay of a vehicle I have a fair idea of the owners commitment to the inside of the power train. That 30 micron WIX is still more efficient than a sieve.                 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...