Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I’m a little jealous I just rolled over 50k!! It had 21k on it when I got it March of 2017 but it is my daily driver

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

c1c29a74289d7474bc5bfd55194039ba.jpg

  • 1 month later...
Posted

Been driving a lot more highway lately but avg mpg only went up to a whopping 12.3 (dealership says they can't check anything unless a code comes up but I still think something is out of whack based on what some of you get in the same truck with similar driving habits). Gas  prices also went up again so that 1 mpg gain didn't save me a thing!  :lol:

 

IMG_2180.thumb.JPG.980e2f3192ddbd7190dcb3383d5e4d5c.JPG

Posted
Been driving a lot more highway lately but avg mpg only went up to a whopping 12.3 (dealership says they can't check anything unless a code comes up but I still think something is out of whack based on what some of you get in the same truck with similar driving habits). Gas  prices also went up again so that 1 mpg gain didn't save me a thing!  [emoji38]
 
IMG_2180.thumb.JPG.980e2f3192ddbd7190dcb3383d5e4d5c.JPG
You have the 5.3? And how much is the gas around you?

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N920A using Tapatalk

Posted
Just now, SirenRed16 said:

You have the 5.3? And how much is the gas around you?

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N920A using Tapatalk
 

Yes 5.3 and I paid $4.03 for 91 octane.

Posted
Yes 5.3 and I paid $4.03 for 91 octane.
Are you tuned to run 91? I read somewhere unless you're tuned to run 91 it's a waste to pump anything over 87.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N920A using Tapatalk

Posted
1 minute ago, SirenRed16 said:

Are you tuned to run 91? I read somewhere unless you're tuned to run 91 it's a waste to pump anything over 87.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N920A using Tapatalk
 

No tune and I heard something similar to that as well but the truck idled really rough on 87 as well as 89 but smoothed out and got more responsive on 91. 

Posted
No tune and I heard something similar to that as well but the truck idled really rough on 87 as well as 89 but smoothed out and got more responsive on 91. 
I'm still wondering why you only get 12.3. I get around 18 or so but is like to drive fast lol

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N920A using Tapatalk

Posted
2 minutes ago, SirenRed16 said:

I'm still wondering why you only get 12.3. I get around 18 or so but is like to drive fast lol

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N920A using Tapatalk
 

Yeah I am wondering the same thing and find it hard to believe the dealership can't check anything without a code popping up. 

Posted (edited)

I think @Nasty gets almost 16 with mostly highway (edit: mostly city) and I believe @qwank said he gets better than that (both 5.3 regular cabs)

Edited by Marv88
Posted
I think [mention=162984]Nasty[/mention] gets almost 16 with mostly highway and I believe [mention=133504]qwank[/mention] said he gets better than that (both 5.3 regular cabs)
I'm a 5.3 regular cab also

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N920A using Tapatalk

Posted
2 minutes ago, Marv88 said:

I think @Nasty gets almost 16 with mostly highway (edit: mostly city) and I believe @qwank said he gets better than that (both 5.3 regular cabs)

Yup, I actually checked yesterday and my lifetime average is 18.1.

5.3 with 3.42s

Posted
1 minute ago, SirenRed16 said:

I'm a 5.3 regular cab also

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N920A using Tapatalk
 

Yeah all you guys are getting better mileage than I do!

Posted
1 minute ago, qwank said:

Yup, I actually checked yesterday and my lifetime average is 18.1.

5.3 with 3.42s

Do you think my 3:08's with oversized 22's (I went up to 305/45) would make that much difference?

Posted
1 minute ago, Marv88 said:

Do you think my 3:08's with oversized 22's (I went up to 305/45) would make that much difference?

I would think it would be be around 18 still with the higher rear gearing. 

Posted

I have a heavy foot and 29" tires.  So i mess around a lot. But i get about16-17 city at 25-27 freeway keep in mind i dont have afm anymore

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Maybe, but it seems he is the only one that has backed up data to prove what he is stating. I think he is doing this more because he enjoys it and wants to get the information out to us. He's got the knowledge and access to the proper equipment and having the funds doesn't hurt.  I would love to do what he is doing and would do it if and when I hit the Powerball.  I'm not a Tribologist by any means but love to learn what I can.   I would bet there would be doubting people out there if a completely independent lab with high quality work and highly respected in the automotive industry, put out information like this.  The world can't be pleased, one just has to take the information that they are given, do more of their own research to find actual lab data to back up what they are trying to figure/find out.  Most don't bother, they just want to believe what they first see.     I don't have the minimax but my 6.2 in my 2019 Silverado with 64k miles shows excellent UOA results with 0w-20 and for my own purposes 5w-20.  Since not much of a change using 5w. I liked the data sheet information on the SS 5w-20 and figured I would give it a try.  Still the same viscosity at 100℃.   In the end we all just do what makes us happy, life is too short to get upset over trivial social media.   On a side note, I do feel GM has dropped the ball and just cares about the bottom dollar and not quality anymore.  "Like a Rock" has been long gone.  Seems "Built Ford Tough" has as well.
    • Better than stock but that's like putting lipstick on a pig
    • Hello, my 3 month old Sierra Elevation wont recognize a trailer with electric brakes? All the lights work correctly, but no power to the brakes?   This is the factory installed brake controller. If you manually push the knob, the display shows the power % but does not light up like my 2022 silverado.   I have an appointment with the dealer, but was checking to see if anyone else has seen this issue.    Thanks, 
    • Been using SS 0w-20 from new, but wanted to change to the 5w-20 because I liked the data on the data sheet, to me it seems like a little better product. But as you can see, not much difference. This is also with running a mix of 10 gallons E85 to a tank topped with 93. It isn't a flex fuel vehicle so any higher I get a CEL for running lean on both banks. Yes my mileage takes a hit. Instead of 20 mpg I normally get on trips I get 17mpg. This is also using EaO17 filter.  What is amazing is I have the AMSOIL cone filter on it since I have the GM Performance intake installed and that air filter has 44k miles on it.  I just take it out and shop vac it off once a year.  I use the upholstery tool on my shop vac.  Works well.   
    • So, lot's of googling and reading, and a trial fit found, that indeed they hit the newer fatter caliper. I did some re-testing today, and found just 3/16" worth of washers was enough for the wheel to spin freely. I added 2 more on each, and again it spun freely. Tested lock to lock with the 4 washers, about 5/16" not quite the 3/8" Im considering, but pretty close. No issues. I've been looking at the BORA .375" spacers and using extended lugnuts to get back lost thread due to the spacer. All the ET lugs I've seen are all .33" reach inside the wheel lug holes. For those that don't like spacers or think they're unsafe, I think it depends on what type of spacers you're using and making sure you get good quality hubcentric ones, and if you're using bolt on ones, regular mainenance, checking the spacer lugs. Not wanting or needing that much spread. Looking for the minimum that will let me run these rims and tires.  it does look to stick out a little, but I really want put these on. and use the stock all-terrains in the winter. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...