Jump to content

2014+ K2XX - Center Console Swap / Retrofit - Plug and Play Harness!

pgamboa

By pgamboa
in Modifications & Accessories

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

pgamboa
pgamboa

Jump Seat to Full Center Console Retrofit  Plug and Play Harness by PGAMBOA     For those of you looking to swap your Jump Seat to a Full Center Console, I now have a Plug and Play Harness

pgamboa
pgamboa
ChrisTaylor14
ChrisTaylor14

I waited a long time to do this upgrade on my truck because I didn’t want to have to cut and splice the wiring in my truck and wanted everything to work as if the console were factory. So when I saw t

Posted Images

14 Silvy Enthusiast

14 Silvy

Posted
Posted
Does anyone happen to have the PN for this '14 - early '15 jumpseat harness with the 23 pin connector?  Thanks!


I have a 14 console harness with the 23 pin connector I traded trucks and bought a 18 and had to get Phil to build me a harness.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
BrandoJ Enthusiast

BrandoJ

Posted
Posted

Does anyone know where the best place to get the USBs needed for the HMI for the center console? I’ve ordered the 3 cables needed off of Gmpartscenter.net and the cables have been on backorder for almost a month now. If anyone could give me a better website to order off of that would be awesome! Thanks!

Real_Tornadoes Enthusiast

Real_Tornadoes

Posted
Posted
On 4/2/2019 at 4:06 AM, BrandoJ said:

Does anyone know where the best place to get the USBs needed for the HMI for the center console? I’ve ordered the 3 cables needed off of Gmpartscenter.net and the cables have been on backorder for almost a month now. If anyone could give me a better website to order off of that would be awesome! Thanks!

On 3/23/2019 at 12:34 PM, pgamboa said:

Usb cable part # 84022323 is on a National Backorder. There is no ETA in sight and for those online sites that “have it”, most likely, they won’t as they generally all order from the same GM.

An alternative to this Cable and the other usb cables needed for this upgrade, is to get Generic ones from amazon. Trim the ends off until they fit.

Like this.

20f7b4b1287cd08446205dd1789eb563.jpg

3ft CablesOnline USB 2.0 Mini-B... https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00T28JQUG?ref=ppx_pop_mob_ap_share


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

mikeleip New Member

mikeleip

Posted
Posted

Hey you all, need some help. I have everything I need to complete the center console swop from jumpseat except I am having trouble getting the black to brown usb cable. I know it changed to part number 84022323 but every where I try to get it will let me purchase it but I get an email a day or two later stating it’s a discontinued part or it’s backordered from GM. Does anyone know where I can find one or a way to work around it to power everything inside the console? Appreciate any help!

jaybee193 Enthusiast

jaybee193

Posted
Posted

Big thanks to PGamboa for getting my console and everything needed to make it all work.  Couldn’t be more pleased with how it turned out and dealing with Phil.  Top Class fella.  One stop shopping for complete console set-up.  The easiest way to go.  

 

7CCE666A-192F-4EF8-8987-A985EAD4C222.jpeg

Nsfw302 Enthusiast

Nsfw302

Posted
Posted

Does anyone know if the wiring is the same between the variants of center console layouts?

I have a 18 Silverado LT that came with a center console but with only 3 outputs: 2 separate 12v plugs and a dual USB.

I noticed the Denali and LTZ have an additional 120v outlet.

I would like to add the 120v. Is the wiring for the outlet present just left unused thus making things a simple plug and play?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

BlkSS Enthusiast

BlkSS

Posted
Posted (edited)
On 4/9/2019 at 11:36 PM, Nsfw302 said:

Does anyone know if the wiring is the same between the variants of center console layouts?

I have a 18 Silverado LT that came with a center console but with only 3 outputs: 2 separate 12v plugs and a dual USB.

I noticed the Denali and LTZ have an additional 120v outlet.

I would like to add the 120v. Is the wiring for the outlet present just left unused thus making things a simple plug and play?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The wiring for the 110v outlet is part of the dash harness.  You will also need the inverter that is in the dash to get it operational.  The portion of the inverter wiring is wrapped in orange tape and the inverter is located down and to the right of the IC and above the accelerator pedal.  The module can be seen in the pic nearly directly in the middle partially hidden behind the cross bar support.  I believe I saw @pgamboa answer another member regarding this but I don't remember in what thread.

20170527_015316.jpg

Edited by BlkSS
pgamboa Senior Enthusiast

pgamboa

Posted
  • Author
Posted

The 110V outlet can be added like@BlkSS said. You’ll need the inverter and wiring. The wiring consists of about 3-4 wires that need to land in various connectors.

I’ll have a kit for this soon... working on sourcing all the needs.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Nsfw302 Enthusiast

Nsfw302

Posted
Posted
The 110V outlet can be added like[mention=166585]BlkSS[/mention] said. You’ll need the inverter and wiring. The wiring consists of about 3-4 wires that need to land in various connectors.

I’ll have a kit for this soon... working on sourcing all the needs.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Thanks guys. I’ll be waiting for that kit!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
pgamboa Senior Enthusiast

pgamboa

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Hey guys - just wanted to provide a quick update and lead time for new orders.

Currently working on 3/26-3/27 orders today.

Thanks for your patience!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
ahmed521 New Member

ahmed521

Posted
Posted

hey guys , 

just bought a used Center console  and its missing one of the brackets (circled in red)

does anyone buy by any chance have any information  about it , I could not find it online , also did not find a part number for it 

Thanks

 

 

5cb76d0773b17_ScreenShot2019-04-17at5_40_48PM.thumb.jpg.bffc9988ac956600d4a25c0e317a508b.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Jake87
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By Jake87 · Posted

      I hope to high heaven this is wrong. My Chevy farm trucks frame is lasting way longer than a newer Nissan Titan XD I got for a steal, and it only pulls trailers. A decade younger and it's frame is already way rustier than the waxed Chevy I drive across longs and ditches. Also, hasn't Ford been having tones of troubles with rusted frames? 
    • Coastie05
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By Coastie05 · Posted

      Batteries don’t always show signs of a few years ago my vehicle started fine in the morning and took me to work. After work the battery was completely dead and I needed a jump. No, I didn’t leave anything on and the battery was only a couple months old. It was replaced under warranty. 
    • Jake87
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By Jake87 · Posted

      AFM is confirmed in the Corvette engine, so I'm assuming the higher volume trucks will get it as well
    • NDKoze
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By NDKoze · Posted

      If his battery was that bad I would think it would have been showing signs before this that were ignored. Stinks that it happened the way it did in rush hour traffic, but this seems like a pretty fringe scenario. I don't mind it that bad and never turn it off. The only slight annoyance for me is the slight delay between brake to gas, but I have gotten used to it and figure if it can save a little gas why not.
    • bluev8
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By bluev8 · Posted

      That is a good correction. I think “severity” was probably the wrong word for what I meant. What I really mean is closer to event priority, relevance, and actionability — not “this code is severe” or “replace this part.” I agree that a truck can have a lot of trivial or historical communication codes, and if the product starts pushing alerts for every stored or low-value event, people will ignore it very quickly. So the alert logic would need to be filtered. For example, I would not want a random old communication code to generate a push notification by itself. A useful alert would probably need to be based on things like: - new vs historical - active vs stored - repeated vs one-time - duration of the event - whether it happened near the driver-marked symptom - whether it happened together with voltage drop, reset, bus-off, misfire, oil-pressure change, etc. - whether the same pattern repeats under similar conditions So instead of saying “severity,” maybe the product should organize events by affected system and priority. For example: Misfire event: Show misfire counts / roughness first, then fuel trims, RPM/load, DFM/AFM state if available, coolant/oil temp, voltage, and related DTCs. Oil-pressure event: Show oil pressure first, but only in context — RPM, load, oil temperature, coolant temperature, DFM/AFM state if available, voltage, and baseline comparison. Communication event: Show which module/network/message dropped, whether voltage dropped, whether the recorder reset, whether it was active or historical, and whether it repeated. Voltage/reset event: Show battery voltage, crank/wake/sleep state, module reset, communication dropouts, and what came back online first. That also solves the display-order problem you mentioned. The main report should not always show the same fixed list first. It should show the system that appears abnormal first, and then the supporting values for that system. I also agree that the truck already has an oil pressure gauge and MIL. The point would not be to duplicate those. The value would be in showing what else was happening before and after the warning or symptom. For example, if the MIL comes on for a misfire, the truck already told the driver there is a problem. The useful part would be: - which cylinder or bank looked abnormal first - whether it happened after an AFM/DFM transition - whether fuel trims were already moving - whether oil pressure or voltage changed at the same time - whether the same pattern happened previously without a MIL On the OBD port point, I think you may be right for a consumer-facing version. OBD is much easier for the average owner: - easier install - easier removal - inside the cabin - easier phone connection - easier data download - easier to include a pass-through port for another scanner OBD is also the right place for DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration information, Mode 6, and normal scan-tool parameters. The reason I was looking at ECM-side recording is that some events may be gone by the time someone plugs in a scanner, and some powertrain-side network evidence may not be available the same way through the DLC. But I agree that if an OBD-based version can capture enough useful evidence for most owners, that is probably the cleaner consumer product. Maybe the split is: - OBD/DLC version for most consumers - ECM-side version only if it proves it adds evidence that the OBD version cannot get - shop/pro version if deeper powertrain-side event evidence is actually useful So I would not want to force the inline approach if the OBD workflow solves most of the real-world problem. Your last point is probably the key product requirement: the report should be specific to the system showing the abnormality. Not “here are 50 parameters.” More like: “Misfire-related event detected. Here are the misfire/fuel/DFM/context values.” or “Oil-pressure-related event detected. Here is oil pressure compared with RPM/load/temp/baseline.” or “Communication event detected. Here is what dropped, when, and whether voltage/reset happened first.” That is a much better way to think about the report.

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...