Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
5 hours ago, Snoringbear said:

How/why would AFM cause excessive oil consumption?  Not being argumentative just wanting to learn.

Not really sure why it helps, but I know it works. I'm sure there's a thread on here about it. Fixed my oil burning issues.

Maybe it has something to do with a lack of pressure in the cylinders that are disabled allowing oil to pass through the piston rings?

Read some horror stories of excessive carbon build up in the combustion chamber caused by the AFM.

Posted
17 hours ago, lylknutsak said:

Not really sure why it helps, but I know it works. I'm sure there's a thread on here about it. Fixed my oil burning issues.

Maybe it has something to do with a lack of pressure in the cylinders that are disabled allowing oil to pass through the piston rings?

Read some horror stories of excessive carbon build up in the combustion chamber caused by the AFM.

Put a catch can on it. They burn plenty of oil on blow by, the catch can helps with that and keeps the intake cleaner.

Posted
37 minutes ago, evlwhtman said:

Put a catch can on it. They burn plenty of oil on blow by, the catch can helps with that and keeps the intake cleaner.

And the direct injection keeps fuel from cleaning the tops of the valves :(

Posted
On October 24, 2017 at 9:05 PM, lylknutsak said:

Not really sure why it helps, but I know it works. I'm sure there's a thread on here about it. Fixed my oil burning issues.

Maybe it has something to do with a lack of pressure in the cylinders that are disabled allowing oil to pass through the piston rings?

Read some horror stories of excessive carbon build up in the combustion chamber caused by the AFM.

Took your advise and found this link.  Seems to provide pretty good info.  Apparently GM has acknowledged that there can be a problem with some vehicles. 

https://parts.olathetoyota.com/blog/4920/gmc-chevy-afm-oil-consumption

 

just a side note; my driver prior to my current 2015 Silverado 6.2 was a 2008 Silverado 5.3.  It had AFM and at 140,000 miles when I traded it in engine was still tight, maybe down a half quart at 5,000 mile oil change time, especially if I had been doing some long distance towing.  Btw, my current driver, 2015 Silverdo 6.2 is tight as a drum, zero oil consumption.  Just another input from my search;  appears the recommended 0 / 20 weight oil having lower viscosity than previous recommended weights can cause oil consumption if engine tolerances aren't tight enough. 

 

 

  • Thanks 2
Posted

I found the above link too and have not disabled AFM yet, however I burn 1.5 to 2 qrts every 3,000 or so miles, depends how i drive it. And to bring this back to the topic, I too have the shakes, very noticeable around 76-80mph for me, and with speed limit 70 around me, I'm either the slowest (under 74mph)  or fastest guy (above 82mph) out there so we dont get sick in the car by vibrating. 

  • Like 1
Posted
5 hours ago, EFLine said:

I found the above link too and have not disabled AFM yet, however I burn 1.5 to 2 qrts every 3,000 or so miles, depends how i drive it. And to bring this back to the topic, I too have the shakes, very noticeable around 76-80mph for me, and with speed limit 70 around me, I'm either the slowest (under 74mph)  or fastest guy (above 82mph) out there so we dont get sick in the car by vibrating. 

This bad at 76-80? 

IMG_0511.MOV

Posted
18 hours ago, Dmf10e said:

This bad at 76-80? 

IMG_0511.MOV

So its just a thought and I only say this out of curiosity. So with you having a bench seat in the middle, I wonder if that "shows" more effect of the shake then say mine with the captains chairs in front because my cup holders/arm rests are also not on a pivot and cant rattle to the extreme that yours can? I only say this because I have had about 10 loaner trucks from GM, some shake and i see the effects in the arm rest more so on the bench seats than i do on mine, HOWEVER, it feels the same in the chair in both cars but the effects are not shown as extreme on mine. 

 

if you youtube "Chevy Shake" it appears that most of the videos are of people with the bench seat, just my observation. 

 

Ha, I am no engineer so maybe that has absolutely nothing to do with it. 

  • Like 1
Posted
5 hours ago, EFLine said:

So its just a thought and I only say this out of curiosity. So with you having a bench seat in the middle, I wonder if that "shows" more effect of the shake then say mine with the captains chairs in front because my cup holders/arm rests are also not on a pivot and cant rattle to the extreme that yours can? I only say this because I have had about 10 loaner trucks from GM, some shake and i see the effects in the arm rest more so on the bench seats than i do on mine, HOWEVER, it feels the same in the chair in both cars but the effects are not shown as extreme on mine. 

 

if you youtube "Chevy Shake" it appears that most of the videos are of people with the bench seat, just my observation. 

 

Ha, I am no engineer so maybe that has absolutely nothing to do with it. 

Yeah I thought about that. Just seems hit or miss on here. Some people don't have the issues, and/or shake, other have it. When I first bought the truck and maybe up to about 5k miles I didn't notice it. But now its very noticeable. And its not just the center, you can feel the vibration all over. I can hear the zippers on my bag rattle in the backseat too. It's just these $45k trucks shouldn't have these "normal" issues.

Posted
On ‎10‎/‎18‎/‎2017 at 6:31 AM, JK29 said:

Hey Buckem,

 

Mine has the RPM "flutter" as well every time the truck shudders. It swings about 150-200 RPM each shutter. My truck is 100% stock. It also goes away on deceleration.

Took truck back in for vibration and they listened to me this time.  Test drove again and felt vibration. Doing a tranny flush and possibly replacing torque converter per GM recommendation.  Also got shim kit installed for drive seat movement, tranny TCM update, airbag/seatbelt recall taken care of and front end alignment.

  • Like 2
Posted
On 10/27/2017 at 5:10 PM, Dmf10e said:

Yeah I thought about that. Just seems hit or miss on here. Some people don't have the issues, and/or shake, other have it. When I first bought the truck and maybe up to about 5k miles I didn't notice it. But now its very noticeable. And its not just the center, you can feel the vibration all over. I can hear the zippers on my bag rattle in the backseat too. It's just these $45k trucks shouldn't have these "normal" issues.

Thats what I have too, and it drives me nuts. all the zippers from my gym bag, laptop bag, any tools in the back, sounds like a drunk 2 year old concert. not to mention if i do not have a passenger, the seat belt metal tab constantly rattles against the side pillar. Thought about putting 3m velcro (soft side) there so prohibit any additional rattles. 

Posted
On 10/17/2017 at 9:43 AM, Patriot78 said:

Sorry should be specified, it's a 6 speed, I have a range afm  module so I can try and see if that makes a difference but I'm pretty sure when I was using it before it made no difference 

I have a 6 speed and it still happens when I have my afm disabler in. Shifting is a little better too. Its a toss up for me for which i rather have an issue with over the other. haha. I'd like both to be fixed since its a $45k truck. Not normal!!

Posted (edited)

Been following this thread as I've had a shaker of a Denali for over a year.  Replaced most of the tires to RFB them which made it better, but then on first tire rotation, problem came back.  It spent all last week at the dealership.  GM ended up swapping out the Goodyear Eagles that came on it with some Bridgestones and the problem seems better on first drive.  Fingers crossed it stays that way, but I gotta wonder if the different tire is a different durometer or something and just masking another problem.

Edited by UWSkier
Posted (edited)

has anyone replaced their Torque converter themselves? I am out of warranty and thinking of replacing the TC as well as the axles from Yukon and Bilstien 5100 shocks. 

 

If you did replace your TC, what one did you use and did it end up helping? I have lots of other issues with RPM surges that im hoping this could eliminate a few issues

 

 

Edited by EFLine

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I’ve own several successful businesses. I’ve bought homes and lived in different states. I’d witness several generations buy homes and survive in different economic circumstances. You get awful sippy when people have different experiences than you do. You live a life. I’ve lived a life. It seems our experience has been different. You can point out generalized statistics. Some people learn how to thrive when the odds are against them. Living in different states does make a difference in a persons quality of life and economic outcomes and opportunities. That’s a fact Jack. It’s my truth, my life. Hard work and long hours the right environment made my families life easier. And yes moving to a different state increased the odds of that happening. Stats are generalized. People who thrive don’t make excuses. They beat the odds. Others get mad and point to those statistics. I guess that’s you. My post pointed out how you helped people beat the odds. Somehow your panties got in a wad. Go figure. 
    • Good question, I don't remember for sure but I believe it was the HD. I will check and get back to you.
    • Point of the post sir was that while both wages and cost are rising EVERYWHERE; the cost is rising faster EVERYWHERE than the ability to buy EVERYWHERE. We're not going down the location rabbit hole. I'm aware of what economic migration is. I've lived in four states including Texas.   It's what "Purchasing Power" means.   I'm not telling you what I think. I'm telling what the government, your government, data shows.   It wasn't an argument. It wasn't a suggestion. It was a statement of FACT. You are absolutely entitled to your own opinion. Your not entitled to your own facts. If you and I were, they wouldn't be facts.    fact /făkt/   noun Knowledge or information based on real occurrences. "an account based on fact; a blur of fact and fancy." Something demonstrated to exist or known to have existed. "Genetic engineering is now a fact. That Chaucer was a real person is an undisputed fact." A real occurrence; an event. "had to prove the facts of the case." The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, 5th Edition • More at Wordnik   If you'd like to disagree call your Senator or Representative and let him know his departments are in error. But you and I? We are not doing this. 
    • Probably a one and done post, but do you have a CEL on the dash? Was having issues with my transmission, fortunately only a week, and it turned out to be the transmission harness. Valve body was in good shape, so new harness with all the sensors attached, new fluid, and filter. Seems to have worked so far?
    • Two interesting tidbits of information which are NOT related were just released.   One, regarding the possible thrust bearing issues / engine failures with the 3.0. Demonworks just did a segment in which they believe they may have found "a" or "the" cause of thrust bearing failures: A missing thrust bearing. If the engine doesn't have all its thrust bearings from the factory, the missing bearing can cause extra play which ends up destroying a nearby thrust bearing which then sends metal through the engine.       Of other importance, Lake Speed Jr released some interest information regarding oil weight selection for the 3.0. Comparisons of:   AcDelco 0w20 Dexos D Mobil 1 ESP x2 0w20 Dexos D Mobil 1 ESP x2 0w30 Mobil 1 ESP x4 0w40. Mobil Delvac 5w40   Spoiler alert: The Mobils are PAO Ester -base and the ACDelco is a Group III base. Mobil shows lower wear in their tests for similar weights. Additive packages between 20-30-40 weight ESP's appear to be the same, but only 0w20 is Dexos D licensed. Wear is even more reduced with 30 and 40 weight ESP although all perform very well and resist shear and provide very similar viscosities within temperature operating ranges in the 3.0.   There are even more surprises, so just go watch it.    
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...