Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
20 hours ago, 2016ChevyShaker said:

First time poster, long time follower of this topic!  I first got my 2016 Chevy Silverado in July 2016 and I didn’t really notice it until around 8000 miles. I now have 17,000 miles on it, have had my truck to the dealer about six times, and they give me the same runaround bullshit! They did a pico scope test, roadforce, and tell me it’s within GM specs. I tried the Hellwig Springs, no go on that either. I did see where someone changed out the rear end for a Yukon rear but I’m not going through all that hassle. 

 

heres mine: <sorry for portrait video.....its easier when driving>

 

 

When they did the pico scope test did they only attach it to the rear seat? They did the same thing to me but if you read through the TSB it also states they need to attach it to the steering column as well.

 

Also you don't have to go with Yukon. I just disassembles the rear assembly and filmed my axles spinning out of round and in and out. When you show the video to the service department they will fix it no questions asked. I have found that if you can give your dealership substantial evidence that its a manufactured error they will fix it because its easy for them to get their money from GM. GM from my understanding is not willing to correct any of these vibration issues and from a business point of view, I highly doubt a dealership will want to front the money to fix said issue with no reimbursement.

Posted (edited)
On 4/5/2018 at 2:53 PM, 2016ChevyShaker said:

First time poster, long time follower of this topic!  I first got my 2016 Chevy Silverado in July 2016 and I didn’t really notice it until around 8000 miles. I now have 17,000 miles on it, have had my truck to the dealer about six times, and they give me the same runaround bullshit! They did a pico scope test, roadforce, and tell me it’s within GM specs. I tried the Hellwig Springs, no go on that either. I did see where someone changed out the rear end for a Yukon rear but I’m not going through all that hassle. 

 

heres mine: <sorry for portrait video.....its easier when driving>

 

The fold down cup holders on the seat back is not a good example of a vibration test. It is not a solid structure. Hold a pole out and notice how the end your holding is relatively still and how the other end is moving much more. The movement you see starts at the base and is amplified over the distance. The seat back reaching out just amplifies a much smaller movement. Movement from a shaky seat back to begin with. Dissecting the vid. The bottle movement is inconsistent when travelling the same speed. It sounds like the different movements correspond to road imperfections. You can hear the tires going over different surfaces. Just a bad example. By the looks of how little the movement is in the cup holder of this vid compared to other seat back cup holder vids, I will tell you there are people with much worse shakes that might spill that water if the cap were opened. Mine was worse than that till I intervened and there is even worse than I had. Consider yourself somewhat lucky it isn't worse and since GM has no definitive fix you may as well look at the Silver lining here.

 

Edited by Rambodog
  • Like 1
Posted

Not trying to do GM any favours here, but check this out before hopping the fence. Furd has their issues, and ability to "not reproduce the problem" or that all systems are "normal, or within spec", just like GM dealers. The grass isn't always greener on the other side ;) 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
Not trying to do GM any favours here, but check this out before hopping the fence. Furd has their issues, and ability to "not reproduce the problem" or that all systems are "normal, or within spec", just like GM dealers. The grass isn't always greener on the other side ;) 
 
Wow! That's nuts!


Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk

Posted

It’s my guess that GM is now completely focused on the upcoming 2019 models and is no longer interested in the problems with current generation trucks and suv’s.  I drive a 2015 Silverado and other than having the ac condenser failure which was covered by warranty has been pretty much trouble free.  Personally, I’m also interested in the 2019 Silverado or Sierra 1500, especially magnetic ride.  Also, the platform is new and some harmonic buffers are designed in.  So, seems to me GM is aware of ride problems and has taken steps to address them.  And, haven’t seen any numbers yet but have seen hints that horsepower and torque has been bumped up on both the 5.3 and 6.2.  Anyway, we shall see...

Posted

Anyone have the part # to the yukon axles? The ones I ordered are 1" longer than the ones I removed and i've tried searching this thread with no luck. 

Posted (edited)

No shake on my 2016 except when I drive on a section of freeway that is grooved concrete and yes it occurs between 70-80mph.

BUT this only appeared after I changed the stock 20" wheel/Goodyear tire combo for the current 18" Pro-Comp/Falken setup on the truck. It's that concrete grooved surface that runs with the flow of traffic. It's really the only time I experience the vibes. Again, the truck did not have this when running the stock wheel/tire setup, so I can't really blame the truck, but I'm going to play with air pressures a bit on these E-rateds and see what happens. I'm even considering finding stock 18" wheels to rule out the Pro-Comps and the 0-offset.

Edited by FHLH
Posted

Thanks to everyone for posting so much information on the "GM shimmy".  My wife's 2016 Yukon Denali has it and this has helped.  My 2017 Sierra 1500 Denali has a different problem, however, and I wasn't able to find anything in this thread about it.  When under power and at speed, if you're at 1200-1800 RPM and accelerate, the truck violently shutters.  I would've bet money that it was the torque converter based on the feel.  I've taken the truck in and sat the tech in my truck to duplicate.  The repairs so far have been 1- new engine mounts, 2- one of the cylinders threw a misfire code so they found there was a broken valve spring (wtf?), 3- flush of the tranny system (GM requirement), 4- replace of the torque converter.  I was pretty sure the new torque converter would've fixed the problem, but guess what... it's still there!  At 14K miles, I'm super disappointed.  I believe it may be the fuel management system or something switching from a 4 cylinder mode to 8.  I am at a loss and so is my dealer.  Thanks in advance if you have any guidance here, but after 25 years of being a die hard GM fan, this has me doubting.  

Posted
Thanks to everyone for posting so much information on the "GM shimmy".  My wife's 2016 Yukon Denali has it and this has helped.  My 2017 Sierra 1500 Denali has a different problem, however, and I wasn't able to find anything in this thread about it.  When under power and at speed, if you're at 1200-1800 RPM and accelerate, the truck violently shutters.  I would've bet money that it was the torque converter based on the feel.  I've taken the truck in and sat the tech in my truck to duplicate.  The repairs so far have been 1- new engine mounts, 2- one of the cylinders threw a misfire code so they found there was a broken valve spring (wtf?), 3- flush of the tranny system (GM requirement), 4- replace of the torque converter.  I was pretty sure the new torque converter would've fixed the problem, but guess what... it's still there!  At 14K miles, I'm super disappointed.  I believe it may be the fuel management system or something switching from a 4 cylinder mode to 8.  I am at a loss and so is my dealer.  Thanks in advance if you have any guidance here, but after 25 years of being a die hard GM fan, this has me doubting.  
Have you tried putting the transmission in manual mode? Put it in manual and only go to 5 th gear this will keep it out of AFM.

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk

Posted
On 4/17/2018 at 3:41 PM, BO TIE 1 said:

Have you tried putting the transmission in manual mode? Put it in manual and only go to 5 th gear this will keep it out of AFM.

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk
 

Yes, I can do that to make it not happen, but what is the permanent fix?  It's got the clunky 8 speed tranny.  I'm not sure I know how the AFM is engaged on these trucks.  

Posted (edited)
15 minutes ago, wmadden said:

Yes, I can do that to make it not happen, but what is the permanent fix?  It's got the clunky 8 speed tranny.  I'm not sure I know how the AFM is engaged on these trucks.  

Yeah sorry I thought you had the 6 speed. Not sure on the 8 speed. Probably check your manual.

If you think its the fuel management (AFM) that`s where I would start.

Edited by BO TIE 1
Posted
On 8/5/2013 at 10:40 PM, Stex said:

 

Dang Good question. I think they would be the same but??? One could call around. I got mine from 4 wheel parts. Could not find the '14. would need to call.

 

http://www.4wheelparts.com/Lift-Kits-Suspensions-Shocks/Shock-Absorbers.aspx?t_c=1&t_s=90&t_pt=3306&Manufacturer_PQ=Bilstein&kw=bilstein%205100

 

Toll-Free: 800-257-5629

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I am guessing that engines of that design back then had a better ability to be abused and survive longer than a new design engine with the long timing chain and the overhead cams and phasers etc. But I would never guess that an engine could go that far and not fail spectacularly or at least die a slow death. 
    • In the 80's 90's I'd run Honda's 7,500 miles between changes using Red Line HP 5W20 and do it for hundreds of thousands of miles with issues. Back in the day it was an SAE 20 with the HTHS of a SAE 30 and SN add load. It was also very polar. Oxidation VOA was over 120. Besides those motors were SPFI and lean burn tech. I could have likely run it longer but never did.    We had a Toyota bought new I ran on Pennzoil's latest and greatest synthetic of the day with "Penthane". A made up word for a very low dose of PAO. Tried 7,500 mile OCI's in that Group III/VI chemistry and the rings tapped out at 90K. Rocker box wasn't as bad as the one Punch put up but it wasn't good either. Also a SPFI motor.    I'm around 3,750 across the board on these GDI monsters and the oil it tapped out by then usually on TBN/TAN crossover and color. Red Line HP Euro.    The AMSOIL SS brochures tell you to follow the OEM values for the service class but that it can be run up to 25K if monitored. I can't imagine what motor could go that distance and not tap out. I've never owned one.    Yes, I know. Lot's of people do. I'm just not going to be one of them. 
    • I knew a guy in the early 80's that bought a new Monte Carlo and ran it a 100,000 miles without ever changing the filter or the oil. Just kept adding. It looked like that inside.     
    • Good evening. I was lucky enough to get passed down to me a 2007 GMC LBZ that was my great uncle's. While the underside and rockers are more or less gone I feel like with time I can restore it to working order since it only has 110,000 miles and he put nearly every option he could get without getting the new body style since he did not trust DEF. So far I have done everything I can think of but when I put the key into the ignition nothing happens. I put 2 brand new batteries in it. Cleaned the terminals. Check all the fuses and relays and they all pass with my multimeter. I know I'm missing something that I just cant think of. The only odd thing is the OBD2 port works which makes me think its not the mega fuse. Any advice would be greatly appreciated. 
    • Looks nice. I still have my 2000, 1500. Bought a 2025, 1500 for retirement. Feels solid. These trucks have a bad rap on the internet. My brother has a `24 1500, 5.3 with 52,000 miles. No problems at all. Mine hasn`t either but mine`s only at 12,700 miles. Have seen some of these things with 100,000 miles with no problems.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...