Jump to content

Tailgate cables different lengths

Bbowen826

By Bbowen826
in Troubleshooting & Recalls

Recommended Posts

SF Silverado Enthusiast

SF Silverado

Posted
Posted

Just checked mine and the passenger side has a slight slack to it but as soon as I put a little pressure on my tailgate it tightened right up.

  • Replies 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply
ssv1761982 Enthusiast

ssv1761982

Posted
Posted

I wasted two hours taking mine back to the dealer to get the cables replaced. The new cables are worse and have the big MADE IN CHINA tags. They also stick out between the tailgate and tail lights.

 

I wish I would have searched here first.

 

Did anybody notice the tail gate does not go down flush with the bed?

Jon A Senior Enthusiast

Jon A

Posted
Posted

It's not just the cables, if you swap the cables side to side, if it was loose on the left side and tight on the right it may still be loose on the left and tight on the right. This indicates the mounting points are to blame even more than the cable length.

 

The design of this tailgate makes for very short cables. Very short cables mean any tiny variation in length/mounting point distance will cause this condition much more noticably than prior designs. Build variation vehicle to vehicle simply isn't going to allow both cables to fit the same on every vehicle.

 

If you want the problem fixed, take a few minutes with a die grinder and lengthen the slots on the "short" cable very slightly. It only takes a tiny bit to even them out. You can have the dealer replace cables until the end of time and it won't likely ever fix the problem.

 

Also, as noted above, the tailgate doesn't sit parallel with the bed, even once you've evened out the cables. I really wish they made the cables slightly longer but they don't. Hopefully they'll change that soon. Anyway, I took a little material off both of mine to lower the tailgate as it interfered with my Cargo Glide. People will need to individually evaluate how much material they'd need to take off on their individual truck and decide for themselves, but as I said just a little bit of material removed can make a noticeable improvement.

GMC-AT Senior Enthusiast

GMC-AT

Posted
Posted

good insight... but in the end there is no way I'm taking a die grinder to my new 45K truck....for anything.

M1Tanker Enthusiast

M1Tanker

Posted
Posted

It is not the cables.

 

The dealer took mine off and checked that they are the same length...then proceeded to put them on the wrong sides from what they were labelled. When they do this, the cables stick out the sides of the gate when closed.

 

I took another look at mine this weekend and all of the mounting points seem to measure out the same, but when you step back a good 50 feet and look at the tailgate when closed, it appears that the bottom left of the tailgate is a little bit lower than the right, thus creating the slack. The funny thing is, the top of the tailgate appears to be level to the naked eye...go figure.

 

Anyhow, mine has quite a bit of slack, enough that you cannot tighten it up with weight.

hicountry Enthusiast

hicountry

Posted
Posted

This is deja vu, guys. Read my link in the post # 11 on this page. These posts go back to 2004 when this problem surfaced. About 4 million GM trucks were recalled for this problem back then. Apparently GM did not take any steps to prevent reoccurrence.

 

BTW, this is a safety issue as the single cable holding the weight of the tailgate plus the load can fail under heavy load such as moving an ATV over the tailgate, then the load is transferred to the slack cable, which is then shock loaded and can fail. This can have ugly consequences and result in damage to the tailgate, personal injury, or worse. Do not ignore this issue. There is no excuse for this.

 

I remember a recall for these cables on a 2000 Siverado I had, but I don't remember it being for uneven lengths, as I recall then it was just that the cables were deteriorating and subject to breaking under any kind of load. Seems to me the originals were made in Mexico, I remember the "Made in China" tag on the new ones.

Jon A Senior Enthusiast

Jon A

Posted
Posted

good insight... but in the end there is no way I'm taking a die grinder to my new 45K truck....for anything.

 

I do understand that sentiment. However, many times in life if you want something "done right" your only option is to ____________. It become a question of, "do you want the problem fixed or not?"

 

And of course the cables are only about a $35 part.

Silverado-Hareek Senior Enthusiast

Silverado-Hareek

Posted
Posted

Noticed yesterday when I made a trash run to the dump that I have a ton of slack in the cable on my driver side. When I stood on the tailgate, it tightened a little but still had tiny bit of slack meaning the cable on the passenger side is carrying all of the load on the tailgate.

j-ten-ner Senior Enthusiast

j-ten-ner

Posted
Posted

I've had the same problem on my F350 work truck.

Depending on the load and whether the truck was sitting on a level surface the cables were tight or sluggish on either side.

 

There is no reason to fabricate two different lengths of those cables. I mean we live in the 21 century...

But even the stiffest frame or truck bed will twist just a little.

And that's enough to make one of the cables appear lose.

Remember a worn out drive belt. It seems like the new one has to be at least 1" shorter to fit.

In reality it is only 1/4 or 1/2 of an inch to sit tight again.

 

so long

j-ten-ner

  • 2 weeks later...
M1Tanker Enthusiast

M1Tanker

Posted
Posted

Soo...no fix in sight then?

 

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

M1Tanker Enthusiast

M1Tanker

Posted
Posted

I just noticed there is indeed a bulletin on this today. It indicates it is normal for only one side to be tensioned with no load on the gate due to normal build variance. It did indicate they should both have tension with a load on the gate. Sounds like the OP had one a bit further out than what is normal.

 

Can you please post or pm me the bulletin number. Mine do not both have tension with a load on the gate.

1kwik72 Enthusiast

1kwik72

Posted
Posted

 

Can you please post or pm me the bulletin number. Mine do not both have tension with a load on the gate.

#PIT3227J: Tailgate Cable Slack - (Jan 28, 2014)
Subject: Tailgate Cable Slack

 

999999995.gif Models: 2002 - 2013 Cadillac Escalade EXT 2002 - 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche 1998 - 2000 Chevrolet C/K Classic 2004 - 2012 Chevrolet Colorado 1999 - 2007 Chevrolet Silverado Classic 2007 - 2015 Chevrolet Silverado 1998 - 2004 Chevrolet S10 1999 - 2007 GMC Sierra Classic 1998 - 2000 GMC C/K Classic 2007 - 2015 GMC Sierra 1998 - 2004 GMC Sonoma 2004 - 2012 GMC Canyon

This PI was superseded to update model years. Please discard PIT3227H.

The following diagnosis might be helpful if the vehicle exhibits the symptom(s) described in this PI.

Condition/Concern

Some customers may comment that with the tailgate down, one of the tailgate cables may have slack in it.

Recommendation/Instructions

No repair attempts should be made - as this is normal due to build variation. In most cases, when weight is put on the tailgate the slack comes out of the cable

 

 

Don't shoot the messenger LOL

 

Craig

M1Tanker Enthusiast

M1Tanker

Posted
Posted

Thanks fella...good start for me.

 

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

Spurshot Senior Enthusiast

Spurshot

Posted
Posted

good insight... but in the end there is no way I'm taking a die grinder to my new 45K truck....for anything.

 

He's talking about removing the cable from the truck and lengthening the slot on the Chinexico cable end. I had to do this with both cables on my 2008 to allow my tailgate to drop far enough to allow the bed drawers I have for my guns, to open. A tiny amount goes a long way.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Ryanwehr14
      2018 Sierra 1500 Transfer Case Leak

      By Ryanwehr14 · Posted

      A while back, my truck (2018 GMC Sierra 1500 5.3) went in for an o2 sensor and routine service. The tech identified that my rear output seal on my transfer case was leaking, and recommended I have them replace it. At the time I didn't think anything of it, and had them do the repair. Less than a month later, I noticed that the recently repaired seal was leaking again. I called the shop that did the repair and they warrantied the repair and replaced the same seal again. A few months later, I noticed that once again the same seal leak had come back. It wasn't a great time to bring it in and I ended up just living with it for 6 months or so, noticing small (smaller than a baseball) size oil stains below the truck when it would sit for a while, as well as oil spray on the frame (to the point where it actually took the underbody coating off in that one spot). Finally got around to brining it in again, but this time I took it to a dealership service center since I am in a different part of the state for school. They identified the same output seal leaks and recommended they replace them. They also said there was no scoring on the inside of the transfer case, so it didn't need to be replaced. They chalked up the original repair failures to non oem seals and a job that wasn't done correctly. Now they called and said the seals are holding after driving/sitting for a while, but they found a very small leak in the middle, that they recommended they seal with some kind of silicone/jb weld (not sure what they are using). I haven't picked up the truck yet, but I have been reluctant about this whole repair process because I feel like they are just fixing the same thing that keeps coming back, and I am concerned there could be another root cause for the seal failing. Has anybody else experienced anything like this, or have any ideas on other things that could be the root cause?
    • Fishbones
      2012 Sierra 1500 AC issues

      By Fishbones · Posted

      I just started having AC issues with my 2012 Sierra. The symptom is blowing warm air on all vents.  Here is what I have checked so far. Compressor clutch appears to be engaging and cycling  I checked all fuses and relay, no issues. The only thing I have notices is the short line that comes from the firewall is very cold / frosted. This line is approximately 12 inches long. The coldness stops when it hits the first line connector. As far as AC compressor - At first start the clutch engages, runs continually, Short AC line frosts up. After idling for several minutes the AC line thaws out some but is still cool and the compressor clutch starts cycling on and off every 5 seconds.  Any suggestions on what to look at next would be appreciated.  
    • Grumpy Bear
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Unless you are using a bypass filer system with a Beta of 1000 at 2 micron the commercial filters we have access to, even the very best of them, are poor at the 5 to 10 micron range the typical UOA test can 'see'. Point is there are some truly awful filters being sold A 45 micron Beta 75 filter is what Dyson used to call a screen door on a submarine. That leaves wear metals disconnected from filtration unless particulates are larger than the test can 'see' and yet captured by the filter...which is its job. If that is true then you have a major issue screaming at you.    The graph isn't mine. It belongs to GM and their study on this area. I looked up those studies and provided those SAE tech paper addresses multiple times. Machinery Lubrication displayed it and confirmed it. So if you have doubts about the study you'll have to take it up with GM Engineering. Just like you would have to take up a difference in opinion about the meaning a word with Webster or the length of on inch with the National Institute of Standards and Technology.      Most manuals have two schedules. "Normal Service" and "Severe Service". On it's face it tells you that oil in severe service is more highly stressed and doesn't "Last as Long". The item to bore in on is LAST...what does that mean?    It's the same question one asks about how long to toast bread. What are the inputs? Bread type? Wattage of the toaster? Distance from the elements? What is your preferred level of done?    So lets paint this with a broader brush. Oil is made up of the base and the additive package. The first is altered by heat and oxygen and later is sacrificial with a finite life subject to inputs toward that end. Resistance and supply.    It is the reason an OEM's OCI's are determined by 1.) the specifications of the recommended lubricant and 2.) risk management toward the bottom line. Those lubricants are also subject to cost effectiveness for the OEM.    There is a tendency for most people to believe that the OEM recommended oil rest on the top shelf and that anything other is lesser than. Truth is there are more oils on higher shelves than those on the lower shelf below the OEM's. They make that choice on COST TO THE OEM. Testing is incidental to the margin.    GM makes MONEY, the car/truck is a TOOL to leverage MONEY. Insert whatever car brand you like. Until you forking over a million plus COST not quality is the driver. Thus it is by DESIGN the recommended OCI's and oils fall well short of 'best practice protections'. Proof isn't hard to find. GM Ecotec I-4 2400 breather system and cold start PCM tuning has killed more motors and resulted in more litigation for those that used the 'recommended' practice than GM could bear. What was their response? SHORTEN THE OCI. TWICE.    I don't know how long to leave oil in an I don't know how the oil will respond to MY circumstances and because I don't and can't blanket statement or anecdotal evidence my way out of it.....I TEST and FIND the right OCI for the oil I CHOOSE. There is no shortcut but there is blind allegiance. I don't blindly trust anything.    People hear the word 'detergent' and believe that in the context of oil it means the same thing as laundry soap... Only in the most rudimentary way. It's the first additive to give up on you and they are putting less and less with each new API standard. Solvency can be used but it cost. Some unique undisclosed chemistries can be used. Valvoline R & P in example. OEM's haven't an interest in anything they see as limiting market participation. Whatever.         
    • KARNUT
      OCI, not when but why?

      By KARNUT · Posted

      For some unexplained reason my father wanted a salvage yard. As we were getting the family business off the ground one brother ran the salvage yard. We gathered there when rained out working on pipelines in the eighties to pull parts. Perfectly good running vehicles would come to us simply because they wouldn’t pass emissions inspection. We were able to swap parts and sell some of them. I got a clean old nova with a bad engine. I pulled a perfectly good small block out a Camaro. A father and son project with a rebuilt engine. The son couldn’t get the engine running right. The problem was the spark plugs weren’t gapped. The 90s vehicles probably widened the gap of shade tree do it yourself engine repair. My do it yourself hot rod repair stopped at the 70s. After that my trusted mechanic kept them in running shape. 
    • Atlas
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By Atlas · Posted

      I have an old dental chair in my shop. Something I got for free and apparently it has more than scrap value? People collect them although mine isn't restored or anything. It's visually interesting (1930's Ritter) which is why I like it. And it IS decently comfortable if you kick back.   When a good buddy of mine saw it he said, let me guess, Atlas. It's a conversation piece? As in, you ask the questions, they do the talking?   Where do you hide the jar of teeth?   I would never.   

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...