Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I only haul a dirt bike in my truck and like a level look so loading is not an issue.

I'm not getting bigger tires and don't want to raise the front any higher.

Can I take out the spring blocks out and mill them down? Are they steel or aluminum? Can I get shorter U bolts?

Thanks in advance.

 

 

Posted

Removing the block completely should net a 1 to 1.25in rear drop. That is, if they didn't change the block height from the previous body style and ones before that.

 

I removed mine on my 2016 without issue, the u-bolts had good threads still and I didn't need any extra washers to make it work. I believe they are cast aluminum because they weight almost nothing.

Posted

Yes, what@camGTP said. Don't mill a rear block, those are to cheap to put any work into. If the blocks are 2" instead of 1.25”, just buy a ORU zero rate and that will net 1" of lift. So remove the factory block and replace with the zero rate and you "should" be level.

You shouldn't need new u bolts but I can't confirm that, I would need to measure the threads on my trail boss to see if there are enough to make up for the loss of the block.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using Tapatalk

Posted
9 hours ago, CamGTP said:

Removing the block completely should net a 1 to 1.25in rear drop. That is, if they didn't change the block height from the previous body style and ones before that.

 

I removed mine on my 2016 without issue, the u-bolts had good threads still and I didn't need any extra washers to make it work. I believe they are cast aluminum because they weight almost nothing.

The Trail Boss blocks are 2", I measured mine.

Posted
11 hours ago, JR09country said:

Yes, what@camGTP said. Don't mill a rear block, those are to cheap to put any work into. If the blocks are 2" instead of 1.25”, just buy a ORU zero rate and that will net 1" of lift. So remove the factory block and replace with the zero rate and you "should" be level.

You shouldn't need new u bolts but I can't confirm that, I would need to measure the threads on my trail boss to see if there are enough to make up for the loss of the block.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using Tapatalk
 

Hey JR09 What is an ORU zero rate and where do I get one? Looks like I'll need shorted U bolts as there is not much thread left.

Thanks 

Posted

I mean this was no disrespect but WHY!!!!???  

 

Why not just get an RST or LT if you didn't want the rear TB height. 

 

Good Luck , not trying to be a Di**  :) 

  • Like 1
Posted
58 minutes ago, saber said:

Hey JR09 What is an ORU zero rate and where do I get one? Looks like I'll need shorted U bolts as there is not much thread left.

Thanks 

He’s mistaken. Not ORU. ORD Zero rate. 

 

It’s a 1” block that bolts to the spring pack and thus reduces block related axle wrap. 

 

https://www.offroaddesign.com/catalog/Zero Rates.htm

Posted
53 minutes ago, f8l vnm said:

I mean this was no disrespect but WHY!!!!???  

 

Why not just get an RST or LT if you didn't want the rear TB height. 

 

Good Luck , not trying to be a Di**  :) 

I am going to go out on a limb and say because it looks cooler and the off road image and black wheels are all the rage...

Tyler

  • Haha 1
Posted
He’s mistaken. Not ORU. ORD Zero rate. 

 

It’s a 1” block that bolts to the spring pack and thus reduces block related axle wrap. 

 

https://www.offroaddesign.com/catalog/Zero Rates.htm

That's one. They probably have the shorter ubolts too, do we know if the 14bolt semi float has the same axle tube size as the axles on the T1?

 

I've thought about doing the same thing instead of raising the front even more. I would do the zero rate and then try the u bolt flip and see if that would work, should give the truck a level stance. The ass high look is terrible looking but I get why they do it.

 

https://www.offroaddesign.com/catalog/Zero%20Rates.htm

 

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using Tapatalk

 

 

 

Posted

It seems to me that the DC Trail Boss's have too much rake.  I think it would look good leveled by lowering the back a little. 

Posted
1 hour ago, JR09country said:

That's one. They probably have the shorter ubolts too, do we know if the 14bolt semi float has the same axle tube size as the axles on the T1?

U bolts wouldn’t be hard to get at any good parts store. 

 

Axle tubes...unsure of. I don’t know why they felt the need to change the 14SF into the 12SF but they obviously did. However a lot of the internal components are still the same. I wouldn’t hazard a guess until I put a tape measure to it. 

Posted

Follow this. Post pics if you do it. I am back and forth on leveling my truck. I think this may be the way to do it. No undue strain on the cv joints or rough ride from lifting the front to high. 

Posted
9 hours ago, saber said:

Hey JR09 What is an ORU zero rate and where do I get one? Looks like I'll need shorted U bolts as there is not much thread left.

Thanks 

All you need to do is get spacers (bigger nuts) that make up the difference, use them as washers.  

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, saber said:

What do you guys think about lowering the rear with these shackles?

https://wulfsuspensions.com/collections/chevrolet-gmc/products/2004-2014-ford-f150-rear-shackle-leveling-lift-kit

 

image.png.7651d81f0acb940ddcdcc3706d1b94cd.png

 

I installed those on my truck they worked fine. If you can take out the lifting block I would do that first though. My truck did not have a spacer. I'm assuming just the trail boss models do because the front is lifted.

20190322_184742.jpg

Edited by Billet Bowtie

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
    • It has happened to me a few times. I carry a jumpstart-tire inflator with me.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...