Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I do think since you purchased it acknowledging the vibration they may not be willing to work with you. They technically gave you things in return for accepting the shake. You could always try but in your case you purchased the truck with the knowledge of it have the vibrations. Give it a shot!

Lemon law still applies in FL

Posted (edited)

This is the Oklahoma lemon law. Very vague.

http://www.ok.gov/omvc/documents/Lemon%20Law%20Guide.pdf

 

BBB is the only course of action in Oklahoma besides a lawsuit.

that is normal and its like that in almost every state.

 

I also had to go through the BBB lemon law and GM at first and waste 2 months until they told me they wouldn't do anything and at that point I met the requirement to try BBB first.

 

then I got a lawyer and filed lemon law in civil court which took another 6 months but I won and cashed my full refund check this week.

 

you say "besides a lawsuit" like its a bad thing, but the lawyer is paid by GM or doesn't get paid at all in a lemon lawsuit in civil court so how can you look at it as a negative beyond being a process that takes another 6-8 months to end?

 

you could still lose if you win in that you may only get a partial refund based on reduced vehicle value because of the poor operating condition devalues its resale value, so there is no guarranty in the outcome and often they just devalue the vehicle a few thousand dollars and that's all you get and you are still stuck with the vehicle. if this happens it pretty much offsets most off the loss of trading in in on another vehicle, so if all you get is a partial refund you just trade it in after that so its still a win and gets you out without being hurt badly.

Edited by keakar
Posted

Wow good to know that GM is just buying back and selling the same problematic vehicle to another person instead of giving it to a group of engineers to test and discover the actual problem. Its great that you got a deal and an extra year of warranty because all the vibration is going to cause more issues down the road. In my opinion if the vibration bothers you then you shouldn't have bought it.

agree 1000%

 

you bought a lemon knowing it was a lemon so go buy an "im stupid" tee shirt to wear and stop complaining about a defect you knew full well about before you even bought it and signed a waiver saying you accept it with this unfixable defect.

Posted

So i've been fighting with Gm since October. They have basically told me to go pound sand. None of the dealers in town will help me and the BBB is a waste of time. I found an attorney to take my case but I need an ase certified mechanic to confirm the vibration before he will go to court even though it states a vibration in my numerous work orders. No mechanics in town will help me because no one wants to deal with going to court.

 

At this point i'm about to just trade it in and cut my losses. Anyone have any new info recalls or just anything that will help me get my truck fixed????????????

 

I read about the body mounts and i'm waiting to hear back from more people in this thread before I do it.

you will lose an average of $10,000 off the purchase price on a trade-in, if you are ok with that then do it.

 

if not go get a certified mechanic and pay him $100 for an hour to test drive it and confirm the problem. if you don't know one, ask your attorney who to bring it to, his choice in mechanic might be the best choice anyway since they know what each others paperwork needs and language are.

Posted (edited)

I will say this one last time to everyone with vibration issues, because I got my full refund cash buy back through civil court lawsuit after BBB and GM rep wasted my time for 2 months stalling the process before saying "well the service ticket says its not vibrating".

 

MAKE A VIDEO WITH WATER BOTTLES TO CLEARLY SHOW HOW BAD THE VIBRATIONS ARE, AND POST IT ON YOUTUBE.

 

DOING THIS IS THE MAIN REASON I WON MY CASE, BECAUSE THEY CAN LIE ALL THEY WANT TO, BUY THEY CANT LIE AWAY A VIDEO SHOWING HOW BAD IT VIBRATES SO THEY CANT GO INTO COURT AND MAKE A JURY THINK YOU ARE JUST IMAGINING IT.

Edited by keakar
  • Like 1
Posted

I need some help. They rf balanced, replaced 2 rears, and corrected a positive caster issue.

Felt good for a few days.

 

Rear still better but now vibration in front again. It feels like a flat spot and seeming to get worse. As well, the left front is cupping more. these fronts were rotated from the rear a month ago and looked identical on the outside shoulder, now the left front looks cupped worse. The rears they replaced also had one cupped worse from the left front.

What could cause?

I need some help. They rf balanced, replaced 2 rears, and corrected a positive caster issue.

Felt good for a few days.

 

Rear still better but now vibration in front again. It feels like a flat spot and seeming to get worse. As well, the left front is cupping more. these fronts were rotated from the rear a month ago and looked identical on the outside shoulder, now the left front looks cupped worse. The rears they replaced also had one cupped worse from the left front.

What could cause?

I need some help. They rf balanced, replaced 2 rears, and corrected a positive caster issue.

Felt good for a few days.

 

Rear still better but now vibration in front again. It feels like a flat spot and seeming to get worse. As well, the left front is cupping more. these fronts were rotated from the rear a month ago and looked identical on the outside shoulder, now the left front looks cupped worse. The rears they replaced also had one cupped worse from the left front.

What could cause?

I need some help. They rf balanced, replaced 2 rears, and corrected a positive caster issue.

Felt good for a few days.

 

Rear still better but now vibration in front again. It feels like a flat spot and seeming to get worse. As well, the left front is cupping more. these fronts were rotated from the rear a month ago and looked identical on the outside shoulder, now the left front looks cupped worse. The rears they replaced also had one cupped worse from the left front.

What could cause?

Posted

Had mine in Saturday for my first Free oil change and tire rotation... Had them look into my 70-75 MPH Vibration and agreed it has one... They rebalanced all 4 tires and say the LF needed 1 1/2 OZ... Is that alot? She made it out to be but I have no idea... They also tell me that it is better but may still have a vibe and for me to test it... I didn't get a chance to talk to them directly or test it with them because I got there after service dept hours... I haven't had a chance to test it yet but will today after work... I don't have a worm fuzzy about it especially after reading this Thread...

 

Stay Tuned.

Posted

Hello everyone,

 

I posted this in the Colorado section but have been reading this thread and feel like it is probably the better place to post. I have a 2015 Colorado that was built 2 months ago and i have owned it for a month and am having the same shakes and vibrations that everyone else seems to be having with the Silverado. Obviously making me super confident in Chevrolet's build quality. My shakes start around 75 but really become noticeable around 80 and up. The passenger seat shakes like a massage chair. I have taken chevy techs for a ride and they agreed there was a shake but then they keep the truck for a week saying they performed tests and couldn't find a shake and just balance the tires. I have since recorded multiple videos with my GoPro attached to the seat that will be hitting Youtube and EVERY other social media if they still try and play it off as No shake or Normal.

 

I read the first 30 pages of the thread and then realized I really don't want to go through all 300+ pages. Has anyone figured out any common fix? I know i have read 1 or 2 people that found something that worked for them such as tires but doesn't seem like its fixed a majority of trucks.

 

I have yet another appointment with my local dealer so I am keeping my fingers crossed they can fix it and i will be showing them this thread

 

Thanks for any help.

 

Link to my Colorado Forum Thread.. http://www.gm-trucks.com/forums/topic/174291-2015-coloradocanyon-shakes-vibrates/

Posted (edited)

Had mine in Saturday for my first Free oil change and tire rotation... Had them look into my 70-75 MPH Vibration and agreed it has one... They rebalanced all 4 tires and say the LF needed 1 1/2 OZ... Is that alot? She made it out to be but I have no idea... They also tell me that it is better but may still have a vibe and for me to test it... I didn't get a chance to talk to them directly or test it with them because I got there after service dept hours... I haven't had a chance to test it yet but will today after work... I don't have a worm fuzzy about it especially after reading this Thread...

 

Stay Tuned.

Yes, that's definitely a lot and you will feel vibration from a wheel/tire that is so much out. Imbalance of up to 0.5 oz per wheel is the limit of tolerance on a light truck like yours. On a passenger car with firm sport suspension, imbalance of only up to .25 oz per wheel can be tolerated without annoying vibration.

Edited by pm26
Posted

Yes, that's definitely a lot and you will feel vibration from a wheel/tire that is so much out. Imbalance of up to 0.5 oz per wheel is the limit of tolerance on a light truck like yours. On a passenger car with firm sport suspension, imbalance of only up to .25 oz per wheel can be tolerated without annoying vibration.

Thanks pm26 for the information... I feel a little more optimistic about the vibe being better after that rebalance beings is was out that much... I actually was on auto pilot, as usual, leaving work being only 6 miles from work and forgot to jump on the highway to test her out...

Posted (edited)

Hello everyone,

 

I posted this in the Colorado section but have been reading this thread and feel like it is probably the better place to post. I have a 2015 Colorado that was built 2 months ago and i have owned it for a month and am having the same shakes and vibrations that everyone else seems to be having with the Silverado. Obviously making me super confident in Chevrolet's build quality. My shakes start around 75 but really become noticeable around 80 and up. The passenger seat shakes like a massage chair. I have taken chevy techs for a ride and they agreed there was a shake but then they keep the truck for a week saying they performed tests and couldn't find a shake and just balance the tires. I have since recorded multiple videos with my GoPro attached to the seat that will be hitting Youtube and EVERY other social media if they still try and play it off as No shake or Normal.

 

I read the first 30 pages of the thread and then realized I really don't want to go through all 300+ pages. Has anyone figured out any common fix? I know i have read 1 or 2 people that found something that worked for them such as tires but doesn't seem like its fixed a majority of trucks.

 

I have yet another appointment with my local dealer so I am keeping my fingers crossed they can fix it and i will be showing them this thread

 

Thanks for any help.

 

Link to my Colorado Forum Thread.. http://www.gm-trucks.com/forums/topic/174291-2015-coloradocanyon-shakes-vibrates/

the only fix is a lemon lawsuit and in most cases that involves a civil court lawsuit after the BB lemon procedure fails to help.

 

that said, about one out of 100 of these lemons can be made to reduce the vibrations enough to fool the owner into thinking its fixed and no longer there (because they want it to be fixed so badly) but it never goes away. "if" it can be reduced enough, most people are happy with the vehicles after. most times balancing the tires just puts them in "sequence" so the vibrations offset each other until you put enough miles that they get out of sequence again and the vibrations come back.

 

it is a defective vehicle design, plain and simple, along with a host of other bad parts that can make it more pronounce or not so much depending on each individual vehicle. GM is even reselling the buy back vehicles as-is telling people they vibratre so they can unload them. they would not do this if there was "any" way to really fix them.

 

I had "hoped" the Colorado was immune to this defect but I suspected it might have it too, seeing as how its just a smaller exact copy of the big truck and they obviously copied the same defective design close enough to copy the defect as well

Edited by keakar
Posted

As a prospective buyer, this vibration issue is scary....primarily because GM hasn't been able to fix all of them which tells me either they don't totally understand the root problem(s) or it is incurable in some cases. If it happens under warranty, at least you have some options but not all of the vibrators have started vibrating right out of the chute. So for people like me that hold them a long time, I'm scared it might start vibrating after the warranty expires and that would be a big problem because (a) the real complete and permanent fix is still unknown and (b) the cost to fix it is also therefore unknown.

 

I recognize many of them don't vibrate but I've read cases where it only started vibrating after several thousand miles (some as late as 30,000 miles?) so I'm concerned that it could start at any time and leave you with something that can't be fixed. For a buyer of a $40K-$50K vehicle, that's scary.

 

BT

Posted

Ok so I talked to my attorney again and he asked me to try one more dealership about 30 min away. Dropped it off yesterday and they called me a couple hours later saying it was the smoothest truck they have driven up to this point and asked me to come back and take them on a drive to point out what I was talking about.

 

 

I took the service advisor on a test drive this morning and took the truck to 80 and the whole thing started shaking and he immediately said I feel it.

Also tried saying that since its at highway speeds they might have to document it and wait for it to get worse but he would talk to his boss and let me know.

 

Also I have a clunk when you let off the gas to coast (so you can hear the whine when off throttle) and then give it gas again there is a clunk. He tells me this is normal with 4x4 trucks. Is this true?

 

 

Also does anyone has a list of all the recalls out so I can print it out and hand it to him and ask that they all be done? Thanks for everyone's help btw.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...