Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

 

I was just reading some on the Ford forums today, sounds similar to the GM issues.

 

And here's some RAM 8 speed woes.

 

http://www.ramforumz.com/showthread.php?t=196654

 

http://www.ramforumz.com/showthread.php?t=190906

 

No matter the brand, there will always be risks with quality/lemons.

You're right.....but toyota tundra is best in resale for a reason. I buy american....but toyota is proven in power train ...... at least it's built in Texas!

 

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk

Posted (edited)

You're right.....but toyota tundra is best in resale for a reason. I buy american....but toyota is proven in power train ...... at least it's built in Texas!

 

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk

 

I would consider Toyota if they actually put more effort into the Tundra. To me it's the same Truck since 06/07. The new restyle was just that, no real drive-train changes (I know this could contribute to reliability while keeping the interior up to date). The 5.7 they have in it is a pig on fuel and not the best power in the pack. I categorize resale the same as other "niches" in trucks: Sierras and Silverados claim lowest cost of ownership and V8 fuel econ, Toyota also claims reliability, Ram/Ford battle on CLASS fuel mileage and towing. I picked whatever stands out to me the most, which was V8 capability.

 

For the next gen it could definitely be a contender if they switched to DI or updated the fuel delivery someway somehow, or put a comparable diesel to the new Titan in it. Wait for MikeNH to comment on toyotas... :ughdance:

Edited by Jordan18
Posted

Not Toyotas claim on resale....but consumer reports and other editorials

At this point I wanted something I knew would last..yes power train is the same....but it's proven....everyone else's is new and I didn't want to go thru the same crap on a brand new design...mechanically.

As far as the design.....to each his own

 

The new truck has Suttle differences....but they are recognizable...and I like the squared off look and new interior is first class.

 

I knew it was a hog when I bought it

...

But I'd rather spend money on gas going where I want to go vs going to the shop.

 

Thanks for your comment. If no 15s would hv been on record having same vibration issues I probably would hv gone back with Chevy. ..but issue still present in some trucks

 

 

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

Had mine in Saturday for my first Free oil change and tire rotation... Had them look into my 70-75 MPH Vibration and agreed it has one... They rebalanced all 4 tires and say the LF needed 1 1/2 OZ... Is that alot? She made it out to be but I have no idea... They also tell me that it is better but may still have a vibe and for me to test it... I didn't get a chance to talk to them directly or test it with them because I got there after service dept hours... I haven't had a chance to test it yet but will today after work... I don't have a worm fuzzy about it especially after reading this Thread...

 

Stay Tuned.

 

 

Yes, that's definitely a lot and you will feel vibration from a wheel/tire that is so much out. Imbalance of up to 0.5 oz per wheel is the limit of tolerance on a light truck like yours. On a passenger car with firm sport suspension, imbalance of only up to .25 oz per wheel can be tolerated without annoying vibration.

 

 

Thanks pm26 for the information... I feel a little more optimistic about the vibe being better after that rebalance beings is was out that much... I actually was on auto pilot, as usual, leaving work being only 6 miles from work and forgot to jump on the highway to test her out...

I finally got a chance to test it out after the re-balance and rotation and I am Happy to report that it is much, much better... It was so bad that it may still have some vibe but it feels like nothing to me now... I am headed on a couple hundred mile trip in a week and should get a better idea of where I am at... I will keep an eye on it and keep you all posted...

 

Keep the Faith

Posted

The vibration and shake problem sounds the same as what I experience in my 2015 Yukon with the 5.3 v-8.

I have addressed the issue with dealers from FL to my home state of MI. The service manager at a Chev dealer in FL described my exact problem before I had a chance to describe ti to him. This has been confirmed by service managers and write up personnel at several dealers.

 

The bottom line is it is related to changes in exhaust tome caused by AFM AFM and has been in existence in some GM car lines since the 2007 model year and is covered in Service Bulletin 06-06-05-001F. It is very noticeable at lower speeds when in 4 cylinder mode. and mostly disappears in 8 cylinder mode.

 

I personally have a problem with the fact that this has not been remedied since the 2007 model and with the ending sentence of the paragraph titled "Changes in Exhaust Tone'"that states "THIS IS A NORMAL CONDITION FOR AFM EQUIPPED VEHICLES AND NO REPAIRS SHOULD BE ATTEMPTED."

 

I have driven and ridden in other Yukons equipped the same as mine and there is no such vibration.

 

I forgot to mention that my conversation with several representatives at GM Customer Service were to no avail other than being told my complaint was noted, assigned a complaint number and placed in a "case closed" file. How's that for customer service!!

 

 

Posted (edited)

With stories like this, the likelyhood of GM ever addressing the vibration issues

will never happen :nonod:

 

 

 

kind of like repaying the remaining $10billion in taxpayer funded bailout....

Edited by 97SierraSLT
Posted

The vibration and shake problem sounds the same as what I experience in my 2015 Yukon with the 5.3 v-8.

I have addressed the issue with dealers from FL to my home state of MI. The service manager at a Chev dealer in FL described my exact problem before I had a chance to describe ti to him. This has been confirmed by service managers and write up personnel at several dealers.

 

The bottom line is it is related to changes in exhaust tome caused by AFM AFM and has been in existence in some GM car lines since the 2007 model year and is covered in Service Bulletin 06-06-05-001F. It is very noticeable at lower speeds when in 4 cylinder mode. and mostly disappears in 8 cylinder mode.

 

I personally have a problem with the fact that this has not been remedied since the 2007 model and with the ending sentence of the paragraph titled "Changes in Exhaust Tone'"that states "THIS IS A NORMAL CONDITION FOR AFM EQUIPPED VEHICLES AND NO REPAIRS SHOULD BE ATTEMPTED."

 

I have driven and ridden in other Yukons equipped the same as mine and there is no such vibration.

 

I forgot to mention that my conversation with several representatives at GM Customer Service were to no avail other than being told my complaint was noted, assigned a complaint number and placed in a "case closed" file. How's that for customer service!!

 

While there may be some "resonating" sound in the new body styles as related to AFM.. thats not what the vibrations are coming from.. I had an 08 Sierra z71 with the 5.3 with AFM.. and that thing rode and drove perfect. .. and it had 207k miles on it when I sold it...

Posted

I believe it was mentioned before, but putting the transmission in M5 mode disables AFM.

Posted

Now that it's getting hotter here, 70-80, I've noticed the vibrations are all but gone. I'm willing to bet they come back this fall

Posted

That has been mentioned before as well, guess these trucks shiver when they get cold!

  • Like 1
Posted

Now that it's getting hotter here, 70-80, I've noticed the vibrations are all but gone. I'm willing to bet they come back this fall

Well, could be. If the whole issue is vibration causing a resonant response of the entire frame/body/interior system, then changing the stiffness of something in that system will affect the natural frequency and/or damping. In the case of rubber suspension and cab mounts, both stiffness and damping would be reduced when the rubber gets hot. This would have a big effect on the total system response. Same for tires - hot rubber is softer!

 

You know, I pointed out on the SUV forum that GM has advertised that they have gone to new style "shear type" body mounts. The rubber is secured laterally to reduce horizontal body movement, in an attempt to give these full size trucks a more firm, "sports car" -like ride. I still wonder how much of and effect it is having on all the vibration (and noise for the SUV's) issues we are seeing.

 

Anyone else seeing different characteristics in the hot weather?

Posted

Most of my vibes tend to resonate from what feels like the rear of the truck. In a search for a possible solution/bandaid for the problem I found these. In a brief search I see most guys using them are putting them on 3/4 tons and up to help with the ride. But after watching the video and looking at the possible vibration dampening these could offer I am thinking about trying them out.

 

Anyone have any experience with these?

 

http://www.sulastic.com/sa-04?make=GMC&model=SIERRA%201500&year=2014&motor=&viewmode=list

 

 

 

 

 

Posted

There are a lot of trucks out there that have no vibrations. This is not a design issue, per se', but more likely a quality control issue.

Posted

There are a lot of trucks out there that have no vibrations. This is not a design issue, per se', but more likely a quality control issue.

 

My 2015 Sierra CC has no noticeable vibration. It has almost 2000 miles on it. There was speculation a while back on this thread if the running boards might be involved, some kind of aerodynamic fluttering at high speed. I can say, since I bought the truck without running boards, and having has them installed 3 weeks later (they were ordered to be installed when I purchased the vehicle, but they did not have them in stock initially), that there was no difference after, no noticeable vibration either way.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Maybe, but it seems he is the only one that has backed up data to prove what he is stating. I think he is doing this more because he enjoys it and wants to get the information out to us. He's got the knowledge and access to the proper equipment and having the funds doesn't hurt.  I would love to do what he is doing and would do it if and when I hit the Powerball.  I'm not a Tribologist by any means but love to learn what I can.   I would bet there would be doubting people out there if a completely independent lab with high quality work and highly respected in the automotive industry, put out information like this.  The world can't be pleased, one just has to take the information that they are given, do more of their own research to find actual lab data to back up what they are trying to figure/find out.  Most don't bother, they just want to believe what they first see.     I don't have the minimax but my 6.2 in my 2019 Silverado with 64k miles shows excellent UOA results with 0w-20 and for my own purposes 5w-20.  Since not much of a change using 5w. I liked the data sheet information on the SS 5w-20 and figured I would give it a try.  Still the same viscosity at 100℃.   In the end we all just do what makes us happy, life is too short to get upset over trivial social media.   On a side note, I do feel GM has dropped the ball and just cares about the bottom dollar and not quality anymore.  "Like a Rock" has been long gone.  Seems "Built Ford Tough" has as well.
    • Better than stock but that's like putting lipstick on a pig
    • Hello, my 3 month old Sierra Elevation wont recognize a trailer with electric brakes? All the lights work correctly, but no power to the brakes?   This is the factory installed brake controller. If you manually push the knob, the display shows the power % but does not light up like my 2022 silverado.   I have an appointment with the dealer, but was checking to see if anyone else has seen this issue.    Thanks, 
    • Been using SS 0w-20 from new, but wanted to change to the 5w-20 because I liked the data on the data sheet, to me it seems like a little better product. But as you can see, not much difference. This is also with running a mix of 10 gallons E85 to a tank topped with 93. It isn't a flex fuel vehicle so any higher I get a CEL for running lean on both banks. Yes my mileage takes a hit. Instead of 20 mpg I normally get on trips I get 17mpg. This is also using EaO17 filter.  What is amazing is I have the AMSOIL cone filter on it since I have the GM Performance intake installed and that air filter has 44k miles on it.  I just take it out and shop vac it off once a year.  I use the upholstery tool on my shop vac.  Works well.   
    • So, lot's of googling and reading, and a trial fit found, that indeed they hit the newer fatter caliper. I did some re-testing today, and found just 3/16" worth of washers was enough for the wheel to spin freely. I added 2 more on each, and again it spun freely. Tested lock to lock with the 4 washers, about 5/16" not quite the 3/8" Im considering, but pretty close. No issues. I've been looking at the BORA .375" spacers and using extended lugnuts to get back lost thread due to the spacer. All the ET lugs I've seen are all .33" reach inside the wheel lug holes. For those that don't like spacers or think they're unsafe, I think it depends on what type of spacers you're using and making sure you get good quality hubcentric ones, and if you're using bolt on ones, regular mainenance, checking the spacer lugs. Not wanting or needing that much spread. Looking for the minimum that will let me run these rims and tires.  it does look to stick out a little, but I really want put these on. and use the stock all-terrains in the winter. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...