Jump to content

Z71 Rancho shock replacement options?

VictorLin0725

Recommended Posts

Sierra Dan Senior Enthusiast

Sierra Dan

Posted
Posted

These look great. Up to 2" of lift much like the Bilsteins.

More expensive than a set of 5100's though.

 

See the source image
 

  • Replies 111
  • Created
  • Last Reply
TXGREEK Senior Enthusiast

TXGREEK

Posted
Posted
So if you already have a leveling kit, which i do at 2.5" does it give you another 2"? I definetly dont want to go above that due to the angles. I've read anything above 3" and the CVs are put under a lot of stress.


It’s anything from 2.5” and higher that puts stress, not from 3”. You do not puck it and then add additional leveling struts. Instead, lift it.


Sent from above
TXGREEK Senior Enthusiast

TXGREEK

Posted
Posted
How do they feel? I kind of want a middle of the road "stock" feeling. 

 

Bilstein 5100’s are a great option adding a bit over 1 1/2” up front. They do not ride softer, they’re more of a entry level performance enhancement shock that helps better steering response, less body roll, more of a sport truck feel but not softer. IMHO, Fox 2.0 Coil Overs, pricier but well worth it and just being Coil overs (giving 2” height) helps smoothen ride while still keeping

a comfortable ride quality

 

Sent from above

 

Sierra Dan Senior Enthusiast

Sierra Dan

Posted
Posted

We drive trucks. There is no such thing as a "soft" suspension. RAM is the closest truck to that, but RAM is still a truck.

Bilstein 5100 or 4600 will absorb harsh hits, ie railroad tracks, pot holes, dips/curbs and handle off road terrain far better than the factory Tenneco Ranchos.

These Falcon shocks look great. However, I do not know of a single member that has reviewed them.

They are about $1200 for the set and are only sold as a kit of 4.

TXGREEK Senior Enthusiast

TXGREEK

Posted
Posted
We drive trucks. There is no such thing as a "soft" suspension. RAM is the closest truck to that, but RAM is still a truck.
Bilstein 5100 or 4600 will absorb harsh hits, ie railroad tracks, pot holes, dips/curbs and handle off road terrain far better than the factory Tenneco Ranchos.
These Falcon shocks look great. However, I do not know of a single member that has reviewed them.
They are about $1200 for the set and are only sold as a kit of 4.


So, you gonna try them out?


Sent from above
Darmichar Enthusiast

Darmichar

Posted
Posted
11 hours ago, VictorLin0725 said:

Sent him a PM. Wierd guy, not sure why you would want to downgrade your truck with cheesy decals. As for the Bilsteins, how is the reliability? I'm always concerned with anything "adjustable". Been looking at the Fox setups too, a bit more pricey but slightly better? Not sure what to get yet, just need a nice setup for mostly highway driving because the Ranchos annoyed the hell out of me on a long commute. Would I even be better off getting a stock suspension from GM?

 

Thanks

I put 60,000 trouble free miles on a set of 5100's on my 2014.  Also, not sure what you mean by 'stock suspension' but the non-Rancho OEM shocks on my 2014 were garbage, too.  By 32,000 miles I had blown a front and rear shock on my truck.

Sierra Dan Senior Enthusiast

Sierra Dan

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, TXGREEK said:

 


So, you gonna try them out?


Sent from above

 

Would love to but right now my 5100's only have about 8k miles on them.

Maybe when my kids decide to give up competitive sports LOL 

TXGREEK Senior Enthusiast

TXGREEK

Posted
Posted
Would love to but right now my 5100's only have about 8k miles on them.
Maybe when my kids decide to give up competitive sports LOL 

That’s never going to happen, you’re in for the big haul lol


Sent from above
Sierra Dan Senior Enthusiast

Sierra Dan

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, Darmichar said:

I put 60,000 trouble free miles on a set of 5100's on my 2014.  Also, not sure what you mean by 'stock suspension' but the non-Rancho OEM shocks on my 2014 were garbage, too.  By 32,000 miles I had blown a front and rear shock on my truck.

They are all made by Tenneco. 

Although branded as a USA company or Made in the USA, the quality is like that from China!

Sierra Dan Senior Enthusiast

Sierra Dan

Posted
Posted
Just now, TXGREEK said:


That’s never going to happen, you’re in for the big haul lol


Sent from above

Great TX,  squash my dreams will ya! LOL

At this point my kids are my life. I do enjoy helping coach their baseball and basketball teams. 

Keeps me young :thumbs:

 

TXGREEK Senior Enthusiast

TXGREEK

Posted
Posted
Great TX,  squash my dreams will ya! LOL
At this point my kids are my life. I do enjoy helping coach their baseball and basketball teams. 
Keeps me young :thumbs:
 


Great dad, Great Future! God Bless!


Sent from above
amxguy1970 Senior Enthusiast

amxguy1970

Posted
Posted
16 hours ago, O_J_Simpson said:

Cinder Blocks would ride better than Ranchos. 5100's change the whole truck for the better.

Funny, my stock rancho's ride pretty well, even better in some instances than the few people I know with the bilstein's that are leveled. Granted that they pre-load the spring when lifting with bilstein's so it rides rougher in some instances; it does better in others though as well. Either way they are a very long way from riding like "cinder blocks"...

 

Sounds like your best bet OP is the bilstein's, just be known when lifting with the bilstein's it will increase the spring rate and be rougher in some ways while better in others. Still a great choice and when my stock rancho's are shot (they aren't at 58k) I will probably go this route as well.

 

Tyler

L86 All Terrain Senior Enthusiast

L86 All Terrain

Posted
Posted

I dunno, everyone hates on the Ranchos but as an owner who has both Z71 rancho and 4x4 standard, you would have a very hard time making me say the standard is better. The Ranchos are nothing special but they offer a more "solid" ride and better handling. I find the standard suspension is too floaty and springy for me. Z71 corners better on pavement, handles weight and offroad better, the only thing the standard does better is initial bump stiffness and lots of that is because most Z71's are on 20" wheels are paper thin car tires. You can rail a corner like a Camaro in my Z71, but the 4x4 feels like you are driving a 1977 Cadillac where body roll is better measured in feet than inches. Personal preference I guess. 

 

With that said, Bilstiens will offer an improvement, but they would only be worth it if your Ranchos are toast. The benefits/performance do not justify replacing a new GM Rancho shock imo. You should look to a set of coilovers if you want lift and performance. Fox, King, Dirt Logic, Halo Lifts etc. If you are going to spend $500 on oem-style shocks and the labour to install them, you would happier in the end to spend $1000 and go to a low-to-mid grade coilover.  

Sierra Dan Senior Enthusiast

Sierra Dan

Posted
Posted

Many Ranchos are toast by the 36K-40K mile mark.

Mine were rusted so bad there was little evidence of any white paint left. Maybe they are painted or sealed better now. Or some of you do not live in the salt belt.

Really embarrassing if you ask me. I started out to replace them for something that looked better or new, not even thinking they were bad internally.

When I took one of the rears off and compressed it by hand, it immediately sank about 1-2" easily, and felt like pressing on the spring of a Pogo Stick.

So mine were shot. The fronts were slightly better but same feel when pressing down by hand.

This explained why my head bobbled from side to side every time I pulled out of the driveway.

Or how the back end kicked out from left to right crossing railroad intersections at anything above a snail's pace.

Both of these traits were eliminated with the 5100s.

 

 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • 81mmcat
      Higher oil pressure after DFM shut off

      By 81mmcat · Posted

      Can anyone explain why the oil pressure runs higher after the DFM is shut off?  just installed the Pulsar Lt.
    • fm2176
      New to Me 2010 SLE (Quirks, Issues)

      By fm2176 · Posted

      Thanks!  I figured as such; GM and other manufacturers have used standard parts and harnesses across trim levels and such for decades.  I pulled the blank accessory cover off of my commuter van (a 2016 or so Chevy 15-passenger) years ago and found the plug for a USB outlet.  It wasn't connected to anything, though (I tried swapping in an outlet from another van).  I was a GM Tech years ago (late-90s) and was pretty familiar with my 2006.  I might be wrong, but I view newer vehicles (pretty much anything made in the past 20 years) as being a lot more plug and play.  Meaning, more unused wires and plugs unless you have the Mack Daddy of vehicles.    
    • Coastie05
      It's Been a Long Time...

      By Coastie05 · Posted

      Welcome back!
    • davester
      New to Me 2010 SLE (Quirks, Issues)

      By davester · Posted

      not all plugs will be used.  gm uses more generic harnesses that support most/all options, and if your truck doesn't have a specfiic option, the plug won't be used (commonly will have a dummy insert in the plug , or it'll be taped up, but some may just be left as is).  But it's sldo possible some p.o. has installed the wrong/cheaper parts that aren't correct for your vehicle...
    • fm2176
      New to Me 2010 SLE (Quirks, Issues)

      By fm2176 · Posted

      First off, I'm not trying to just get easy advice/fixes for the issues I've noticed so far.  I'll be combing through the site via searches and such, and if past experiences are any indication, should find what I need.  For the sake of conversation, though, I figured I'd post the handful of things I've noticed in the 12 hours since buying my 2010 SLE CCSB.     Indicator lights: Airbag and TPMS.  The tire pressures aren't reading for any of the wheels, so I'm pretty certain the sensors were either removed, are damaged, or are otherwise inoperable.  I used to mount and balance tires 25 years ago but am pretty much ignorant when it comes to TPMS.  My 2006 didn't have the sensors and this might be the fourth vehicle I've owned that does.     Radio: Rear speakers aren't working.  I removed the driver's side rear door panel and checked the speaker and wiring.  I also removed the sill and b-pillar covers to check the wiring.  A few minutes of Google Fu showed that this is potentially a head unit issue.    Switches: Power mirrors don't turn left/right.  I ordered replacement driver's door switches that should arrive tomorrow.  The windows and locks work but it was only about $20 for all of them.  The driver's side rear window switch lets the window down but won't put it back up.  I think the passenger rear doesn't work at all.  In the coming days/weeks, I'll break out my multimeter to check all of that.   Unknown wiring harness: There's a box attached to the front driver's side of the engine compartment, right where the second battery shelf is located.  There are three plugs, one of which looks like it fits a standard headlight-style bulb (9007 or similar).  It doesn't look like it's plugged into anything.  I'll do some digging and if I don't see anything elsewhere on the site, post some pictures here.   Unknown plugs on brake booster: There are at least two female plugs on the brake booster that aren't being used.  I think it might be a replacement/aftermarket, so maybe those are used for a different application, as there don't seem to be any unplugged harnesses and no indicator lights are on.   Little squeaks when turning: Sounds almost like a bushing around the bed of the truck.  I'll have to pay close attention as I get more familiar with the truck.   Clunk on acceleration: possibly the infamous drivetrain clunk.  My 2006 had it and I'm just not familiar enough with this truck yet to fully grasp what it is.   Anyway, my apologies for the vague and all over the place post.  This truck is new to me, and it's been four years since I drove my 2006.  With 200k miles, I know I'll need to learn this truck quickly to avoid having any major issues, despite being confident it's got much more life to it.  My 2006 had nearly 320k on it when I parked it (nearly 300k of which I put on the truck), and it was still drivable then, though I suspected the head gasket might have blown.  I'd hoped to have that truck back by now, but it's gone forever, as I detailed in my reintroduction thread.  

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...