Jump to content

Z71 Rancho shock replacement options?


Recommended Posts

Posted
11 minutes ago, HeySkippyDog said:

The misinformation is what bothers me. People come here for advice and then people like that come out of the woodwork and mislead them.

The belief yesterday was that a 2" lift by 5100 snap ring or 2" puck spacer would reduce their suspension travel to the effect of 2" deep potholes having a disastrous effect.

It's just NOT true. I had 2" of spacer up front to level my '14 and had no problems whatsoever with potholes or leaving pavement for dirt roads.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-J727A using Tapatalk
 

Liar. 

  • Replies 111
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

You guys are both good guys, please stop with the bickering. Lessons learned and moving on.


Sent from above

Posted



[quote
 
I found out that the Bilstein 5100 actually has a shade over 4" of stroke. Factory shocks are 3-1/8" or so. 


If the Billy's travel is 0.875" longer & the total suspension travel at the wheel is about double that of the shock (I think from previous posts), if you have the 5100 on the highest setting will you have slightly less available travel before topping out than standard?

Sent from my Moto Z2 Play using Tapatalk

Posted

Yes, I did notice that your still running your stock UCA’s. I am too. Your running stock height aren’t you cause I know 2.5’s leveling would require new UCA’s?

 

 

Sent from above

 

Posted
Yes, I did notice that your still running your stock UCA’s. I am too. Your running stock height aren’t you cause I know 2.5’s leveling would require new UCA’s?
 
 
Sent from above
 
Who was that aimed at?

Sent from my Moto Z2 Play using Tapatalk

Posted
Who was that aimed at?

 

Sent from my Moto Z2 Play using Tapatalk

 

Ooops, sorry, that’s for Mr. Grumpy

 

 

Sent from above

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Question @diyer2 on this line if you please. Are you saying the shudder is the system turning on and off at the frequency of the shudder? Guess I'm asking if you are saying you have seen it do this with the bi-direction scan tool in graph mode? If so have you been able to discern the 'trigger'. Something is telling to cycle rapidly.    My truck just started doing this recently. 197K on the clock. My response has been M5 anything under 55 mph. I treat it like a lugging stick shift. Gear down and let it spin a bit. Engauge M5, then tow mode and then M6 lets the trans stay in 5th but the AFM is active. Smooth like Skippy.    My thought was that as a machine ages the friction gets lower and as the system is load based, the lower friction would allow it to turn on at ever lower rpm until it reaches the lugging point. And yes I am ignorant of any minimum rpm requirement for the system. If you know that would be useful information.    As you know I run a Scan-Gauge II which allows me to watch the On/Off of the signal to the VLOM. While in the shudder mode I'm not seeing is cycle at that frequency or at all for that matter outside the triggers @newdude posted a few years back. Now is it possible that the refresh rate isn't fast enough to catch it? Maybe. It is why I asked my first question about graphing and trigging parameter.     As we have observed from members here the failure point is all over the map miles wise as you note yourself in your opening post. That by itself begs a few questions like fellows that comment on these lifters failing even after the system has been disabled. Long after. 😬   https://www.enginelabs.com/news/tech-tips-replacing-ls-active-fuel-management-lifters-with-melling/   The Gen5 lifters operate the same as the LS versions. In fact they are the same lifter.    https://www.enginelabs.com/tech-stories/sorting-out-gen-v-lt-lifter-failure-with-a-simple-valvetrain-fix/        
    • UPDATE 2: Steering wheel control backlights and control of the cluster can supposedly be achieved by adding a wire to pin 20 of the cluster and tapping it to pin 2 of the main clock spring harness. I'm going to give it a shot - will update  
    • GM Global A pickups 2019-2022 can do OTA programming for the radio.  GM VIP (GM Global B) can do OTAs for almost every module on board.  So a 2022.5 and newer pickup can do OTAs for recalls like the 2.7 fuel flow recall.  EVs get OTAs that improve one pedal driving, radio issues, HVAC issues, updated battery management software, etc.     So age of the vehicle/what GM electrical platform its on will alter what amount of updates can be pushed on OTAs.  
    • Thank You.   So far my new ride is making me look like a genius for going with the 3.0L, as my first fuel refill occurred over three weeks from when I took delivery.  This engine combination is very amazing.  So far no issues and had not done a regen yet.
    • I am curious as to how much fluid you put back in the transmission ( assuming you had replaced the filter to compare to my findings ) and then went through the process of warming up the trans before pulling the check plug to drain out the excess and if you measured how much came back out.    I just found it surprising that some claimed a certain amount less fluid being put in and then draining some back out. The attitude of the truck as per if the surface is level and how the trucks stance is would make quite a difference since the check plug is right at the front of the transmission. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...