Jump to content

L83 stroker with 4.00" stroked crank


Recommended Posts

Posted

I would expect that the  gen V stuff is different (don't know that you can just drop in a LT crank). and there may not be a readily available crank option that is  not pretty expensive, vs all the other things that can add power. L83 doesn't seem to have the following the older LS or the L86/LT1 do. 

Posted

In my option not worth it better to upgrade the block. But I always found it more interesting to destroke the engine take a 6.2 and a smaller crank then add a bullet proof valve train and a turbo. Spin it over 7k rpm. And try to find a trans to hold the power. Easy 1000hp+ and even down low it would shred gears.
Seen a article on it.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Posted
9 hours ago, 1SLOW1500 said:

In my option not worth it better to upgrade the block. But I always found it more interesting to destroke the engine take a 6.2 and a smaller crank then add a bullet proof valve train and a turbo. Spin it over 7k rpm. And try to find a trans to hold the power. Easy 1000hp+ and even down low it would shred gears.
Seen a article on it.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
 

I'd love to get a 6.2 block but where I'm at they're hard to come by. I found a complete 5.3 with a bad lifter for a steal so I'm making plans to build it strong for boost.

Posted

Depends on how much power is your goal. But 650-700 is in a few stock block trucks. And 850 is stock block record.
Fuel is the limiting factor. Need lt4 and lt4 hpfp. But heads and cam is where the big increase will come from.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Posted
2 hours ago, 1SLOW1500 said:

Depends on how much power is your goal. But 650-700 is in a few stock block trucks. And 850 is stock block record.
Fuel is the limiting factor. Need lt4 and lt4 hpfp. But heads and cam is where the big increase will come from.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
 

Thats what I'm lookin for 650 700. 

Posted
Thats what I'm lookin for 650 700. 
Honestly on a budget build. I would keep stock lower just add arp fasteners, better bearings, rings(for boost), and possibly coating(cheap insurance). Then katech cnc the stock heads and a good cam. With cam you can add fuel lope if you wish. Lt1 injectors are cheaper then lt4. And the hpfp, the pump is money. Add turbo and there you have it. Easy 700rwhp. You are in the danger on the trans. Get good tune, t stat delete and 40k trans cooler and enjoy.
I recommend a better stall as well performance single but ideally multi disc. Tighten up your slip.
Also a drive shaft depending on how you use the truck.
Of a and DOD full delete.
Not needed but great upgrade is trion bearing rockers. With the higher lift and bigger spring it is nice.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Posted
9 hours ago, 1SLOW1500 said:

Honestly on a budget build. I would keep stock lower just add arp fasteners, better bearings, rings(for boost), and possibly coating(cheap insurance). Then katech cnc the stock heads and a good cam. With cam you can add fuel lope if you wish. Lt1 injectors are cheaper then lt4. And the hpfp, the pump is money. Add turbo and there you have it. Easy 700rwhp. You are in the danger on the trans. Get good tune, t stat delete and 40k trans cooler and enjoy.
I recommend a better stall as well performance single but ideally multi disc. Tighten up your slip.
Also a drive shaft depending on how you use the truck.
Of a and DOD full delete.
Not needed but great upgrade is trion bearing rockers. With the higher lift and bigger spring it is nice.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
 

I'm planning on going with a built bottom end and tsp cam. Along with sending my heads out to be ported.

 

I'd love to go turbo but blowers are a lot easier install. still debating on whether to go magnuson or procharger

Posted

Superchargers make less power and have a loss of power as the engine needs to use.morw power to turn the belt. Also MUCH more geat soak. Turbos are easy they just bolt up and you even have boost controllers. Superchargers are linear based on pulley size and speed. Better gas.mile on turbo. And turbo is cheaper as the kit includes the exhaust.
Harder to get 700rwhp on a SC setup. You need bigger supercharger and seriously good flowing heads. On stock displacement 600to 650 is a max effort build. Record I have seen is little under 750 but that is also meth and e85.
Same guy swapped to turbo and went to 850.
But if that is what you want then I would go forged rods and piston. Still don't have to do crank at that power.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Posted
5 hours ago, 1SLOW1500 said:

Superchargers make less power and have a loss of power as the engine needs to use.morw power to turn the belt. Also MUCH more geat soak. Turbos are easy they just bolt up and you even have boost controllers. Superchargers are linear based on pulley size and speed. Better gas.mile on turbo. And turbo is cheaper as the kit includes the exhaust.
Harder to get 700rwhp on a SC setup. You need bigger supercharger and seriously good flowing heads. On stock displacement 600to 650 is a max effort build. Record I have seen is little under 750 but that is also meth and e85.
Same guy swapped to turbo and went to 850.
But if that is what you want then I would go forged rods and piston. Still don't have to do crank at that power.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
 

Biggest reason I thought about going blower was the price of turbo kits seem to be waaay higher than a blower lol. And I already have headers. 

Posted

The whipple is $6000+ the turbo kits are mid 3k to 5k. The turbo being the most expensive but still 800-1500 gets you some of the best turbos on the market not pro mod or cea class turbo but at 700hp you don't need that.
I have had
Small block na 800hp
Small block procharger
Small block nitrous
Ls twin turbo nitrous
Lsx turbo
Lt turbo
By far enjoy the turbo. It is where all racing is going. And on a street engine it is like factory.
Also very quite.
Look around and find a deal or build a system.


Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Posted

I've looked at turbo kits and the cheapest ive found is the on3 kit but reviews are all over the place.

 

Is there a good kit out there thats not going to involve a lot of labour to make things fit?

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • This is a 1/2 ton thing ONLY.  All HDs 2020-2026 have the two speed transfer case, with Autotrac as an option.     1/2 tons 2019-2026, regular 4x4s come with a single speed case (no 4LO!), and trucks with Z71 ordered, or all Trail Boss trucks come with the 2 speed case.  2 speed case is also an option on WT, and is also standard on High Country.  
    • 2013 5.3 still to this day calls for the PF48 filter.  Which as a 15psi bypass pressure.     There is a TSB, 17-NA-157 that talks about the PF-63 and PF-64 filters which have a higher bypass rating of 22psi.    TSB HERE - temp.xml   "Beginning in 2012, the oil pumps began to regulate main gallery feedback instead of pump out pressure. This means that the oil pump now does not begin to regulate until pressure is built up to the main gallery. This change reduces the amount of time it takes to provide oil to the engine bearing and lifters during extreme cold start conditions.  Main gallery feedback oil pump control systems are present on the following engine families which use Spin-on oil filters: Small Gas Engine (SGE), Large Gas Engine (LGE), High Feature (HFV6) Gen2 and Small Block Gen5 gasoline engines. These engines with the main gallery feedback oil pump control systems are factory built with an ACDelco® oil filters"   It also calls out what engines use those filters.  The gen 4 small blocks were not on that list (LMG, LC9, L9H, L92, L94, L20, L96).  Gen 5 small blocks use the higher pressure filter.          That all said...   Your 7045 Napa filter is the PF63 equivalent, with 22psi bypass.  You are already using the higher bypass pressure filter.  You CAN keep using it, you don't technically have to use it though.  
    • Do you know WHY the filter relief setting was increased to 22 psig?    When the new system goes into the second stage the pump volume ramps up considerably. It was found that the 15 psi filter bypass setting put the filter in bypass on a warm engine when the second stage was activated. Raising the filter bypass setting forced the filter to do what it designed to do. Filter. Preventing debris from circulating during high load, high rpm operation.    So next question is how did GM find this out? VLOM/lifter failures and a deep dive by Melling Corp.    Last question. Is it required? Look at it like this; a motor may be equipped with a rev limiter. But it only works if the set point in reached. That 22 psig setting only matters if the pressure differential across the filter media exceeds 15 psig during normal warm operation. Second stage kicks in around 3000-3500 rpm.    I can't answer your question because I don't know you and how you use the truck. But I think there is enough information here to let you decide for yourself. 😉
    • Probably not their first rodeo, so it should go as planned most likely.  Typically the service manager or tech doing the swap will put some seat time to shake it down after they get it all put back together.  We usually put 50-100mi before we hand them back so if something happens, its not after you get it.  A coolant leaks, oil leaks, a ground left off or loose, vibration, etc.     The new engines so far have been good?  There's been a couple that have popped out there again (the replacement engine) but most have been okay.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...