Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello

 

I added a OEM wireless charging pad to RST Silverado.

Here is what I needed...

-Harness 84482759 ($56, this harness also gives me option to add heated rear seat later)

-Charger Module 13521065 (did not need to program) ($50)

-Duct 23391625 ($10)

-Trim Panel 84505586 ($45)

-Mat 84555398 ($9)

-Bracket for module 84075152 ($10)

 

Everything works nice charger icon lights up on radio when I place phone on it.

 

Thanks

 

 

 

Screenshot_20200711-224732_Photos.jpg

  • Like 4
Posted
38 minutes ago, Rally6.2RST said:

Hello

 

I added a OEM wireless charging pad to RST Silverado.

Here is what I needed...

 

-Harness 84482759 ($56, this harness also gives me option to add heated rear seat later)

-Charger Module 13521065 (did not need to program) ($50)

-Duct 23391625 ($10)

-Trim Panel 84505586 ($45)

-Mat 84555398 ($9)

-Bracket for module 84075152 ($10)

 

Everything works nice charger icon lights up on radio when I place phone on it.

 

Thanks

 

 

 

Screenshot_20200711-224732_Photos.jpg

How difficult was the install?  Could you provide some info on how you installed it?thanks. 

Posted

Nice addition man, I will add this to my list of retrofits.  Rear view mirror camera, and digital dash are already on the list haba

Posted

So I am extremely interested in doing this add on.  However, when I looked up the wire harness #84482759 on GM Parts Store it states it doesn't fit my 2019 Trail Boss LT.  Could this simply be because wireless charging was not an available option on my truck?

Posted
37 minutes ago, rwickens said:

So I am extremely interested in doing this add on.  However, when I looked up the wire harness #84482759 on GM Parts Store it states it doesn't fit my 2019 Trail Boss LT.  Could this simply be because wireless charging was not an available option on my truck?

This was not an option on my RST either. I do have a IOS radio.  Could try 84514829. It is cheaper because of no heated rear seat.  I bought my with rear seat wires in case i wanted to add later.

Posted
1 hour ago, Brian Jones said:

Nice upgrade. If you have the heated rear seats would the harness already be there?

 

Thanks. I dont think so. part site has harness with heated and wo wireless charger.

Posted
On 7/11/2020 at 11:36 PM, ScX31 said:

How difficult was the install?  Could you provide some info on how you installed it?thanks. 

 

It takes about 30min-1hr.  I removed side panels from console removed front cup holders.  then there are 2 7mm that bolt to console to dash.  remove big bolts toward front on console on both sides.  there is a second mount in rear that holds conslle to floor if you remove 10mm bolts inside console lid beneath mat that comes loose.  Remove rear cup holder. There are some t15 in there remove rear panel off console.  Unhook wires and console should come out without removing seats.  rerun new harness and plug up. thanks

Posted

I'm curious why someone would go to this much effort and expense instead of just charging by plugging the phone into a USB port which you need to do anyway to use Apple CarPlay?  I truly realize some will do it just because it's cool and they want to regardless of what I consider to be a very expensive mod FOR WHAT YOU GET.

 

I'm not trolling but am truly curious as it just seems unnecessary but I must be missing something.  I'm hoping someone will educate me.

  • Like 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, rikhek said:

I'm curious why someone would go to this much effort and expense instead of just charging by plugging the phone into a USB port which you need to do anyway to use Apple CarPlay?  I truly realize some will do it just because it's cool and they want to regardless of what I consider to be a very expensive mod FOR WHAT YOU GET.

 

I'm not trolling but am truly curious as it just seems unnecessary but I must be missing something.  I'm hoping someone will educate me.

Yes, not for everyone.  I did it because I got some money and I was curious what all can be added.  It is for sure alot of money for what it is. I plan on retrofitting wireless carplay/andriod auto.  I also added 360 surround view with invisible trailer to my truck.  Thanks.

Posted
4 minutes ago, Rally6.2RST said:

Yes, not for everyone.  I did it because I got some money and I was curious what all can be added.  It is for sure alot of money for what it is. I plan on retrofitting wireless carplay/andriod auto.  I also added 360 surround view with invisible trailer to my truck.  Thanks.

Got it.  Thanks for the response.

Posted
4 hours ago, Rally6.2RST said:

Yes, not for everyone.  I did it because I got some money and I was curious what all can be added.  It is for sure alot of money for what it is. I plan on retrofitting wireless carplay/andriod auto.  I also added 360 surround view with invisible trailer to my truck.  Thanks.

What are you doing for wireless carplay? 

 

Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, Rally6.2RST said:

Yes, not for everyone.  I did it because I got some money and I was curious what all can be added.  It is for sure alot of money for what it is. I plan on retrofitting wireless carplay/andriod auto.  I also added 360 surround view with invisible trailer to my truck.  Thanks.

I tried converting my Silverado LTZ to wireless CarPlay. It’s not going to work well. I tried multiple different modules, they’re all laggy and end up with features missing (such as steering wheel controls). At the end of the day, the CarPlay software on the head unit is not designed for wireless CarPlay, so unless Chevy/GMC pushes an update that can support it, it’s never going to work correctly

Edited by Alex Kemple
Spelling
Posted
I'm curious why someone would go to this much effort and expense instead of just charging by plugging the phone into a USB port which you need to do anyway to use Apple CarPlay?  I truly realize some will do it just because it's cool and they want to regardless of what I consider to be a very expensive mod FOR WHAT YOU GET.
 
I'm not trolling but am truly curious as it just seems unnecessary but I must be missing something.  I'm hoping someone will educate me.
You have a solid point that I wasn't considering. The only reply I could think of is how my wife could put her phone down and charge while mine is plugged in.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...