Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I purchased a set of BF's and they handle much better, but it didn't cure my 43-48mph vibe.

I have programmed afm off, balanced tires, replaced tires, checked the backlash on the ring gear(in spec), and nothing has fixed it. It's not bad, and I have chosen to live with it for now, or until a cure is found or acknowledged.

I'm not gonna let the dealer throw parts at what is obviously a variable issue between trucks, and the service dept have no idea what to do other than what a bulletin tells them to....trained monkeys for the most part. So few mechanics left these days.

I adjusted the air pressure in the tires today and noticed an improvement in my vibration. I notice something in the wheel now but its nothing I want to bring the truck back to the dealer for. They will probably say theres nothing wrong with it. At the point its at now ill live with it

Posted

I adjusted the air pressure in the tires today and noticed an improvement in my vibration. I notice something in the wheel now but its nothing I want to bring the truck back to the dealer for. They will probably say theres nothing wrong with it. At the point its at now ill live with it

That is what they hope for!!!!!!!!!

Posted

After the dealer having my truck for almost 2 weeks they replaced 3 tires (2 tires when i bought the truck) and the vibration was gone... for an hour.. its back again. Interesting enough, on my service documentation it said they road forced the tires and it was 6lbs of road force, came back after "letting the bead set" and the same tire tested at 12 lbs?? WTF happened?

Posted (edited)

I took delivery of my factory order Sierra 1500 Denali right before Christmas and noticed a slight vibration at highway speeds. My truck has the stock 20in wheels with the (less than stellar) Goodyear LS2s. Took it into the dealer this morning, and they force balanced the tires. Now, here is the kicker. They've had several complaints about this, and so they use a force limit setting on the Hunter9700 that makes it more sensitive to problems to prevent repeat complaints. I think they said it was a value of 15lbs instead of the default of 30lbs? I do remember them saying GM doesn't want them to use a value that low, but they still do it to make customers happy. At any rate, using that value, they were able to find one tire was out of round that the default value would have let slide. They replaced the tire, and now vibration is gone.

 

So if you've had your tires force balanced and still have vibrations, check to see what value they used. If its the default like GM wants, see if they will change it to be more sensitive to tire or wheel dimension problems. Hopefully this info helps someone else in time and money.

As I said several times before, road force variation and proper balancing are two different things. You can have a perfectly round tire with zero road force variation, and if the guy doing the balancing balances it wrong for whatever reason, you will still have vibration. Not all dealerships invest in a set of Haweka lug adapters, which enable better balancing and more meaningful road force measurement. In fact, Hunter recommends that such adapters be used for road force measurement. However, they make them optional, and they are pricey, so some dealerships do not buy them. Doing road force measurement involves a pneumatic roller pressing against the wheel with force of about 700 lbs to simulate on the road tire loading. This kind of force applied on a wheel mounted on balancer with only a centering cone through the center hole is not optimal configuration and if the technician does not tighten the screw properly, can result in wheel damage. Hasty mounting using a centering cone on the outside can result in improperly mounted wheel and phony road force readings and incorrect wheel balance.

 

Many here seem to be convinced that if their wheels show low road force variation numbers, this guarantees a well balanced tire. No, it does not. Hunter 9700 machine first measures the road force variation (if that option is selected) , and then imbalance in the tire. The second step is crucial to proper wheel balance. And remember, the larger the wheel diameter, the more difficult it is to balance the wheel correctly if mounted on the machine only with a centering cone and pressure cup. And if the machine is not calibrated properly all bets are off.

Edited by pm26
  • Like 3
Posted (edited)

sorry wrong topic

Edited by jy2014gmc
Posted

I should point out that...when I had my 14 GM I was convinced it was tires, but didn't want to invest in new ones "just in case" it didn't fix things. My new F150 has the same tires (GY SRA) and they actually ride pretty nice. I took the family on a nice drive yesterday, 208 miles mostly highway and the truck rode great...very comfortable. And, it was in the teens all day and I averaged 19.4 mpg the whole trip. Love my F150 with it's 5.0!

Posted

I should point out that...when I had my 14 GM I was convinced it was tires, but didn't want to invest in new ones "just in case" it didn't fix things. My new F150 has the same tires (GY SRA) and they actually ride pretty nice. I took the family on a nice drive yesterday, 208 miles mostly highway and the truck rode great...very comfortable. And, it was in the teens all day and I averaged 19.4 mpg the whole trip. Love my F150 with it's 5.0!

Yo cuz ... Nobody on this site gives a crap about your PoS F150 and how great you think it is. Your posting on the wrong site.

  • Like 4
Posted (edited)

Yo cuz ... Nobody on this site gives a crap about your PoS F150 and how great you think it is. Your posting on the wrong site.

and your posting in the wrong thread, this isn't the "buy chevy for life no matter what" fanboy section.

 

he posted about having the same tires that we have on our trucks and they rode great on his ford and like it or not GM has forced most of us to look at other brands as the only solution to get a good riding truck

 

the only post that doesn't belong here is yours

Edited by keakar
  • Like 2
Posted

and your posting in the wrong thread, this isn't the "buy chevy for life no matter what" fanboy section.

 

he posted about having the same tires that we have on our trucks and they road great on his ford and like it or not GM has forced most of us to look at other brands as the only solution to get a good riding truck

 

the only post that doesn't belong here is yours

Yeah okay ... That's not how I am reading it ...

  • Like 2
Posted

Mine rides great with Firestone destination AT, manufactures can get different quality good year tire and i believe Gm went with the shit quality ones.

Posted

Can remember when this forum was for sharing GM product info. Sad to read how it has deteriorated. DON'T FEED THE TROLLS. From now on I'll whisper.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Can remember when this forum was for sharing GM product info. Sad to read how it has deteriorated. DON'T FEED THE TROLLS. From now on I'll whisper.

trolling is exactly what mudbutt did with his post so im glad you said that.

 

MJFlores and Silverado 6.2 posted the exact same way yet there where no posts by anyone telling Silverado 6.2 he shouldn't be posting that.

 

the only thing bringing this thread down is posts like mudmutt made and the people who support such rude posts.

 

but I do agree there are the ford fanboys around that just post BS and their comments are not needed here

Edited by keakar
  • Like 1
Posted

I should point out that...when I had my 14 GM I was convinced it was tires, but didn't want to invest in new ones "just in case" it didn't fix things. My new F150 has the same tires (GY SRA) and they actually ride pretty nice. I took the family on a nice drive yesterday, 208 miles mostly highway and the truck rode great...very comfortable. And, it was in the teens all day and I averaged 19.4 mpg the whole trip. Love my F150 with it's 5.0!

 

I'm glad you're happy with your Ford. A co worker has a 2014 5.0 in burnt orange that looks really nice. But it's apples and oranges what you're saying here. There's no guarantee the Goodyear SR-A tires Ford has are the same quality GM has been putting on their trucks. Even if they were, the F150 has softer suspension than the Silverado so you could very well have the same crappy tires but you just can't feel it as your suspension is dampening it.

  • Like 2
Posted

trolling is exactly what mudbutt did with his post so im glad you said that.

 

MJFlores and Silverado 6.2 posted the exact same way yet there where no posts by anyone telling Silverado 6.2 he shouldn't be posting that.

 

the only thing bringing this thread down is posts like mudmutt made and the people who support such rude posts.

 

but I do agree there are the ford fanboys around that just post BS and their comments are not needed here

 

Yeah, I may have been rude but just to make a point to this guy... Listen, I just traded a 2012 Dodge RAM Hemi Bighorn for my 2014 Silverado. I had a lot of issues with the Ram and even went through the Lemon Law process with it. I am real happy with the Chevy but you don't see me posting on the Dodge RAM Gen 4 site and telling everyone how great Chevy is and how I made the best decision getting rid of the truck when everyone on that site is driving a RAM. I just call it as I see it and you guys are the trolls here ...

  • Like 1
Posted

 

I'm glad you're happy with your Ford. A co worker has a 2014 5.0 in burnt orange that looks really nice. But it's apples and oranges what you're saying here. There's no guarantee the Goodyear SR-A tires Ford has are the same quality GM has been putting on their trucks. Even if they were, the F150 has softer suspension than the Silverado so you could very well have the same crappy tires but you just can't feel it as your suspension is dampening it.

excellent point

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Maybe, but it seems he is the only one that has backed up data to prove what he is stating. I think he is doing this more because he enjoys it and wants to get the information out to us. He's got the knowledge and access to the proper equipment and having the funds doesn't hurt.  I would love to do what he is doing and would do it if and when I hit the Powerball.  I'm not a Tribologist by any means but love to learn what I can.   I would bet there would be doubting people out there if a completely independent lab with high quality work and highly respected in the automotive industry, put out information like this.  The world can't be pleased, one just has to take the information that they are given, do more of their own research to find actual lab data to back up what they are trying to figure/find out.  Most don't bother, they just want to believe what they first see.     I don't have the minimax but my 6.2 in my 2019 Silverado with 64k miles shows excellent UOA results with 0w-20 and for my own purposes 5w-20.  Since not much of a change using 5w. I liked the data sheet information on the SS 5w-20 and figured I would give it a try.  Still the same viscosity at 100℃.   In the end we all just do what makes us happy, life is too short to get upset over trivial social media.   On a side note, I do feel GM has dropped the ball and just cares about the bottom dollar and not quality anymore.  "Like a Rock" has been long gone.  Seems "Built Ford Tough" has as well.
    • Better than stock but that's like putting lipstick on a pig
    • Hello, my 3 month old Sierra Elevation wont recognize a trailer with electric brakes? All the lights work correctly, but no power to the brakes?   This is the factory installed brake controller. If you manually push the knob, the display shows the power % but does not light up like my 2022 silverado.   I have an appointment with the dealer, but was checking to see if anyone else has seen this issue.    Thanks, 
    • Been using SS 0w-20 from new, but wanted to change to the 5w-20 because I liked the data on the data sheet, to me it seems like a little better product. But as you can see, not much difference. This is also with running a mix of 10 gallons E85 to a tank topped with 93. It isn't a flex fuel vehicle so any higher I get a CEL for running lean on both banks. Yes my mileage takes a hit. Instead of 20 mpg I normally get on trips I get 17mpg. This is also using EaO17 filter.  What is amazing is I have the AMSOIL cone filter on it since I have the GM Performance intake installed and that air filter has 44k miles on it.  I just take it out and shop vac it off once a year.  I use the upholstery tool on my shop vac.  Works well.   
    • So, lot's of googling and reading, and a trial fit found, that indeed they hit the newer fatter caliper. I did some re-testing today, and found just 3/16" worth of washers was enough for the wheel to spin freely. I added 2 more on each, and again it spun freely. Tested lock to lock with the 4 washers, about 5/16" not quite the 3/8" Im considering, but pretty close. No issues. I've been looking at the BORA .375" spacers and using extended lugnuts to get back lost thread due to the spacer. All the ET lugs I've seen are all .33" reach inside the wheel lug holes. For those that don't like spacers or think they're unsafe, I think it depends on what type of spacers you're using and making sure you get good quality hubcentric ones, and if you're using bolt on ones, regular mainenance, checking the spacer lugs. Not wanting or needing that much spread. Looking for the minimum that will let me run these rims and tires.  it does look to stick out a little, but I really want put these on. and use the stock all-terrains in the winter. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...