Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Of course there is going to be more people with vibration problems on this forum. Do you really think that the people without the problem would sign up for a forum to read about other peoples problems ? I stumbled across this forum when I had a vibration, that was cleared up with tires.

 

1. So from your post it is your belief that people only come on this forum because they have an issue with their truck? News flash, many of the members have been coming to this forum for years, and have been loyal GM customers for years.

 

 

I'm sure many owners come to this forum. However, I'm willing to bet that the only people following this thread have either experienced the shaking problem or heard about it. I started following this thread because my 2015 Silverado LT shook like crazy the second I got near 50mph. My problem was solved with tires and my dealer was great. It seems to me that most of the vehicles mentioned here had the problem solved by changing their tires out. I feel bad for those that weren't so lucky but I truly believe they are a very small minority. I love my truck and so do three of my friends who have 2014's of their own.

What are you accomplishing by taking my post out of context. Did you even read the posts by myself and BD431 before responding. BD431 said "do you really think that people without the problem would sign up for a forum". The key word here is "FORUM".

Edit: And if he's trying to say that members without the vibration, won't come here and read what members with the vibrations are posting then that's BS, because they seem to keep posting quotes that down play the issues others are having.

And I also know that members without the vibration come here because they are waiting to purchase a new truck and want to make sure GM has a solution for the issue before purchasing. Some members come here just to stay current on the issue.

Thinking that only members with the vibration come to this thread is ridiculous.

Edited by 14LTZZ71
Posted (edited)

deniers will continue to be deniers no matter the truth.

 

they have a vested interest in telling themselves this isn't true because they cant accept that GM no longer stands for quality and they don't stand behind what they sell anymore.

 

it goes against years and years of unquestioned brand loyalty and in the past it was well deserved but no more and THAT is the problem these deniers have, they cannot admit even to themselves that GM is selling lemons and telling customers to go pound sand over it.

 

its like the husband in denial about the wife sleeping around even after you show them the pictures, they just cant accept the truth

 

if this were just a few trucks having issues like the deniers want to believe so desperately, then GM would instantly replace them without question and write off the tiny loss of a few trucks so the very fact that they refuse to do this says its a HUGE widespread issue and they know would go bankrupt if they took back all of these lemons so that's where we are, left with no choice but getting lawyers to sue them.

Edited by keakar
Posted

I hate my truck so much my son just bought one after riding in mine a few times. The salesman he got it from, the same one I bought mine from drives one too. Im not making it up, he happens to be my ex son in law. How stupid is that or maybe denier who be a better word. I realize people may have problems, my experience is that I haven't run into one in person yet. Rest assured if I have a problem I will post it and get rid of it.

Posted

deniers will continue to be deniers no matter the truth.

 

they have a vested interest in telling themselves this isn't true because they cant accept that GM no longer stands for quality and they don't stand behind what they sell anymore.

 

it goes against years and years of unquestioned brand loyalty and in the past it was well deserved but no more and THAT is the problem these deniers have, they cannot admit even to themselves that GM is selling lemons and telling customers to go pound sand over it.

 

its like the husband in denial about the wife sleeping around even after you show them the pictures, they just cant accept the truth

 

if this were just a few trucks having issues like the deniers want to believe so desperately, then GM would instantly replace them without question and write off the tiny loss of a few trucks so the very fact that they refuse to do this says its a HUGE widespread issue and they know would go bankrupt if they took back all of these lemons so that's where we are, left with no choice but getting lawyers to sue them.

 

YA !!!!!! BREAK OUT THE PITCHFORKS !!!!!

Posted

 

YA !!!!!! BREAK OUT THE PITCHFORKS !!!!!

That would be redundant. GM is already using pitchforks when assembling these trucks.

Posted

If this wasn't a very large and widespread issue, why did the service writer at the dealership where I was taking my lemon 14 GM say "we have a ton of problem trucks out there...in fact not a single one on the lot doesn't have the vibration problem"?

 

If it were just a tiny amount of trucks ....why do all the used lots for dealerships have a bunch of 14 GM for sale? Geesh the Ford dealer I go to now has 3 sitting out front. I've never seen so many people get out of their brand new truck for another brand...coincidence??

 

If it's so easily fixed with tires why did two GM engineers swap my tires, rims, drive shaft, shocks and still not fix the shakes mine had causing my to dump it??

 

If those 14's are so great why are the lots full of them? So full GM stalled releasing the 15's for two months! ....and now GM is offering people 0% and $9000 off if they go buy a 14 GM truck?

 

If the 14's are so great...why did Consumer Reports drop the 14 GM truck from their Recommended vehicle list, listing quality and reliability problems?

 

WAY too many people are in complete denial. GM turned a corner. They used to care about their customers and they build a quality product. Now they could give a &$%# less about customers, and they build the cheapest, piece if garbage on 4 wheels. I owned on for 8 miserable months and everything about it was cheap and flimsy....quality has taken a back seat as far as GM is concerned. Those 14's will not last on the road...mark my words. They're built to fall apart...and mine was falling apart in probably 10 different ways with only 11000 miles on it.

Posted (edited)

It's not about being in denial. And yes, you're points are well taken and noted and with truth. Sure, some '14's have problems and probably more than normal or should be and I don't deny that but I still think the number of trucks that don't vibrate much out weight the ones that do. And the 'early '15's are having the same issues because of the carry over crappy parts and tires from '14. Poor parts? for the most part yes. Poor quality control? For the most part yes. Poor service depts.? Some, but not all. Even though my truck is fine, I know there are lots that aren't. But the percentage of trucks that couldn't be fixed with tires, balancing, ring/pinions etc. is small compared to the fixed trucks and vibration free trucks. That's all I'm saying.

Edited by mafd2
  • Like 1
Posted

I joined this forum while researching e85 for these trucks since it was the first flexfuel vehicle I've owned. Not because of any problems with my truck. I have a slight vibration above 70 mph which is more noticeable when going uphill on one stretch of freeway I frequent. It doesn't bother me that much and I never gave it much thought until I stumbled upon this thread and then it became more apparent to me that it could be a legitimate issue that I sometimes noticed. I have not asked my dealership to look at it. I've been following this thread to stay informed of others experiences and to know if GM possibly comes up with a fix for others. I really enjoyed my truck and so far I think its a great vehicle. I've also been following another thread on this forum about what people love about their 14/15 trucks. Its a nice read. But I dont totally disagree or discredit anyone on here who has issues and feel the truck is subpar. I'm sure there are some true lemons out there.

Posted

What are you accomplishing by taking my post out of context. Did you even read the posts by myself and BD431 before responding. BD431 said "do you really think that people without the problem would sign up for a forum". The key word here is "FORUM".

Edit: And if he's trying to say that members without the vibration, won't come here and read what members with the vibrations are posting then that's BS, because they seem to keep posting quotes that down play the issues others are having.

And I also know that members without the vibration come here because they are waiting to purchase a new truck and want to make sure GM has a solution for the issue before purchasing. Some members come here just to stay current on the issue.

Thinking that only members with the vibration come to this thread is ridiculous.

You should check a dictionary before you quote me and call me ridiculous. And you should go back and read my post before you call me a denier. You keep using the word forum. This is one thread in a forum that includes threads with people complaining about AND praising their trucks. Of course I read your posts. You are claiming a 50% vibration rate because of some vote started in a THREAD about vibrating trucks. Of course the vote will be skewed because most of the people posting on this THREAD, not all of as you claim I said, are having vibration issues. Myself included. That's why I started reading this THREAD in the first place. My problem happened to be easy to fix and my dealer happened to be great. I was lucky and stated that I felt bad for those not as lucky. I never denied anything.
Posted

GM bought it back.

 

Im finally rid of that 2014 Silverado vibrating POS.

 

GM, you can stick that POS where the sun dont shine.

Posted

You should check a dictionary before you quote me and call me ridiculous. And you should go back and read my post before you call me a denier. You keep using the word forum. This is one thread in a forum that includes threads with people complaining about AND praising their trucks. Of course I read your posts. You are claiming a 50% vibration rate because of some vote started in a THREAD about vibrating trucks. Of course the vote will be skewed because most of the people posting on this THREAD, not all of as you claim I said, are having vibration issues. Myself included. That's why I started reading this THREAD in the first place. My problem happened to be easy to fix and my dealer happened to be great. I was lucky and stated that I felt bad for those not as lucky. I never denied anything.

Easy now, don't get so stressed out pal. You should take your own advise and read my post again. When did I say you denied anything or that you were a DENIER, if thats even a word. I believe you have me mistaken with another member as far as the denier part goes. If your issue is fixed with tires and balance then take your own advise and stop posting on this thread. And yes, duh, I know the difference between a thread and a forum. The other guy kept saying forum when he meant thread.

I have removed the remainder of my post due to content not recommended for children.

Posted

Easy now, don't get so stressed out pal. You should take your own advise and read my post again. When did I say you denied anything or that you were a DENIER, if thats even a word. I believe you have me mistaken with another member as far as the denier part goes. If your issue is fixed with tires and balance then take your own advise and stop posting on this thread. And yes, duh, I know the difference between a thread and a forum. The other guy kept saying forum when he meant thread.

I have removed the remainder of my post due to content not recommended for children.

I posted my opinion and you chose to call it ridiculous. I reacted. I posted here hoping that the fact that tires cured my vibration problem would help those looking for a fix for their problem. I never advised anyone to stop posting here. Not sure where you got that from. The word 'denier' was used by keakar in his comment that was a direct response to the post where you called my opinion ridiculous. If anything is ridiculous it's the thought that more than 50% of the 2014/15 Silverado/Sierra trucks are vibrating so badly that the lemon law needs to be used and this hasn't made the news yet. I didn't say that only people with vibration issues are following this thread but it is my opinion that most of the people following this thread have either heard about the vibration issue or have experienced it firsthand like I did. I never denied that people are having issues. I feel badly for those that were unable to cure their problem with changing out tires but it's my opinion that those trucks are a very small percentage of the trucks out there. I also believe that the number of dealers not helping their customers cure this problem is very small. Again. My opinion. I don't really care if you agree with my thoughts or not but don't think I'm just going to sit back and be called ridiculous without reacting. That would be ridiculous. :thumbs:

Posted (edited)

if you look at the shake/vibration poll it's at 50% with those owners who have voted.

I posted my opinion and you chose to call it ridiculous. I reacted. I posted here hoping that the fact that tires cured my vibration problem would help those looking for a fix for their problem. I never advised anyone to stop posting here. Not sure where you got that from. The word 'denier' was used by keakar in his comment that was a direct response to the post where you called my opinion ridiculous. If anything is ridiculous it's the thought that more than 50% of the 2014/15 Silverado/Sierra trucks are vibrating so badly that the lemon law needs to be used and this hasn't made the news yet. I didn't say that only people with vibration issues are following this thread but it is my opinion that most of the people following this thread have either heard about the vibration issue or have experienced it firsthand like I did. I never denied that people are having issues. I feel badly for those that were unable to cure their problem with changing out tires but it's my opinion that those trucks are a very small percentage of the trucks out there. I also believe that the number of dealers not helping their customers cure this problem is very small. Again. My opinion. I don't really care if you agree with my thoughts or not but don't think I'm just going to sit back and be called ridiculous without reacting. That would be ridiculous. :thumbs:

You really got to start reading posts before attempting to reply to them. I never said 50% of the 2014/15 GM trucks vibrate. I said its at 50% with those who have voted. You guys are twisting my wording and putting a spin on what I said. Get with the program, please.

Also, if Keakar said you were a denier then you need to take that up with him not me.

Edited by 14LTZZ71
Posted

e2e71583feec1e805ca3b3866ee9bdd3.jpg

 

Stop the arguing with each other. You have been warned (again)

 

 

Ryan

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • probably won't get a response from that user, as they haven't returned to the site since making that one post.  users don't (at least I don't, and I haven't seen any setting which would notify me via say, email) get any notification other than going to this site, and checking if they got a response on their thread...
    • Thanks - I wasn't quite caffeinated this morning. 2:1 makes sense, turning the crankshaft 360 degrees will turn the cam 180 degrees, and had I done that, the cam's dot would be at 6 and the crank's at 12 again.   I went ahead and took the sprocket off anyway, aligned everything dot-to-dot including the balance shaft just for s&g. I'm glad I did because I discovered no Loctite on the timing sprocket bolts. Maybe it's not required, but at only 20 ft-lb torque spec, those bolts aren't in there very tight. Cleaned and reassembled with some thread locker and torqued.   A general observation: Less is more with RTV. If a little doesn't stop a leak, a LOT probably won't, either. RTV is thinly veiled revenge, in a tube...      
    • The timing marks are ok, that is #1, you can turn it over until they line up and it won't change anything, the crankshaft turns twice for every camshaft revolution, I have always set up SB Chevs as your pic shows using a straight edge
    • Someone's been here before.... There is a receipt for a 3-piece timing set, purchased earlier this year.   Is this picture something, or, nothing?   I have the timing cover off and my crank is perfectly TDC and the keyed gear's locating mark is dead on 12 o'clock.   The cam gear locating mark is also at 12 o'clock. Now, I'm not an expert, but all the install guides say the two locating marks should meet and be perfectly aligned when installing a timing set. The mark on the crank should be dead on 12:00 and the cam gear's mark should be dead on 6:00, and both marks should be perfectly vertically aligned.   I believe the timing gear is keyed or has a dowel that ensures it can only be installed on the cam in one position, so I have to believe the cam is out of phase somehow. At the very least, with a triangular bolt pattern, it can only be installed in one of 3 different positions.   Before I pulled the front cover, the truck was running alright, no service engine soon lights except an occasional P0172 / rich condition. Timing -16 timing at idle (should be +16), and total -35% fuel trim, two conditions I haven't been able to figure out.   In related news, my injector tested pretty well, wasn't leaking, but I had it rebuilt anyway, and it's on it's way back to me.         Along with this discovery, the good and bad:   Good: The oil pan seal appears undamaged.   Bad: -The timing cover has been reused, and the positioning dowels have been broken. That could explain some of the leaking. -Some kind of white paste or grease was used to try to seal the oil pan seal and timing cover (since wiped off..). -Then, someone globbed silicone all over the front of the cover and also buried the ckp sensor in it. But, they didn't put any inside the cover or use RTV to try to seal the oil pan seal with the timing cover (good).
    • The guy that owns K&P filters last I checked in with him has over 300,000 miles on his Dodge base Hemi using his own 35 micron absolute stainless mesh filter from its first oil change.    The GM study I've posted a dozen times shows the relationship in engine life based in multiples of base units, not miles or years. That is the base unit is the number of miles the motor ran using the reference filter efficiency.    The above two paragraphs dismantle anecdotal arguments IF one changes oil often enough to prevent particle formation and the motor is in otherwise good shape. That is not full of silica (no air filter) or suffering a metallurgical issue that is not part of the lubrication discussion. Poor heat treat in example.   Data from UOA's I've reviewed from more than a few engines can show remarkably broad variations in oil cleanliness using the exact same filter over the course of an engines life.     Lastly there is the common sense of it. Wear debris WILL circulate the engine BEFORE it ever sees a filter in route to that filter and WILL harm the pump which NEVER sees filtered oil.    Alpha question then becomes, given the facts, how long do you believe is a reasonable service life from a vehicle you are certain you will not pass down? That is the junk yard will be it's resting place when you're done with it? (the moral issue most don't care about).    Omega question is then how diligent are you prepared to be in general mechanical, air & oil maintenance? Preventing particulates and keeping them sufficiently dilute; preventing the precursors from generation, amalgamation and precipitation.    If I get a good look at the engine bay of a vehicle I have a fair idea of the owners commitment to the inside of the power train. That 30 micron WIX is still more efficient than a sieve.                 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...